Slashdot Mirror


Hell.com Domain Name Up For Sale

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "Internet domain name Hell.com is going up for sale, with bids of over $1 million expected, the Wall Street Journal reports. From the article: 'Sex.com sold for about $12 million earlier this year and Diamond.com changed hands for $7.5 million. The big-money domain-name sales echo an earlier boom, when Business.com fetched $7.5 million in 1999. Today's live auction of 300 names, by Seevast Corp.'s Moniker unit, includes more than a handful it predicts will generate bids of more than $1 million, including Iran.com, Auction.com and Elections.com. Now someone who buys Hell.com "has the opportunity to redefine what hell means, at least on the Internet," says Monte Cahn, Moniker chief executive.'"

16 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Tweekster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have put up a page about the horrors of diamonds and how they are obtained.

    DeBeers would have quickly wrote a MUCH larger check.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    1. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should have put up a page about the horrors of diamonds and how they are obtained

      That store in the mall isn't so bad. Why so angry?

    2. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      So...the people that buy hell.com should buy diamond.com and point it to themselves.

      Then DeBeers would have hell to pay!

      *drum fill*

      Thanks, I'm here all week!

  2. Re:i remember when.... by Marc2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Purchasing a lifetime @hell.com address seems like a poor life choice to me..

    --
    --- What
  3. Re:i remember when.... by jeschust · · Score: 4, Funny

    A lifetime at hell? Psh, I could score that for free.

  4. Of course... by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell as defined on the Internet:
    An all-Flash site.

  5. To the winner by Azathfeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good luck with the domain squatting suit against Lucifer himself.

    I mean, who do you think has all the lawyers?

  6. Re:i remember when.... by 8ball629 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, just get married ;).

  7. Poor life choice? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least they only bought the lifetime version. The eternity subscription is a bitch.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  8. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Barondude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Owning the domain name that matches your search keyword ranks you higher in search engines. That is why domain names still matter

    --
    "That's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage."-Monty Python
  9. Re:so what's thier ip address? by bigattichouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Silly.. hell is a class C with 255 layers:

    6.6.6.0 is the gateway to hell.

    --
    meh
  10. Re:i remember when.... by jahudabudy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hell - where the pints all have holes in the bottom, and the women don't!

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  11. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Interesting

    216.216.216.216 would be a more sensible hellish IP address - 6*6*6 and all that.

    More appropriately, it actually appears to exist - it's owned by a 'New Edge Networks' based in Vancouver, WA, USA. The machine of the beast has an ISP!

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  12. Re:i remember when.... by shaneh0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's not free!

  13. Can't Afford It by ehaggis · · Score: 4, Funny

    I may have to settle for heck.com.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  14. Shocked! Alarmed! I will write an angry letter! by BeeBeard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I innocently went to the sex.com web site mentioned in the article and I was SHOCKED at what I found. I am almost embarrassed to tell you this, but I will because I know that you too will share my outrage: There were...scantily clad women prominently featured EVERYWHERE on the web site! Every time I clicked a link, more images of barely clothed females, cavorting around could be seen on my computer screen!

    You read correctly. Apparently, the Inter Net is being appropriated by these rascals and is being used to transmit filthy images of unclothed women!

    After making this alarming discovery, I spent the next 4 1/2 hours double-checking my findings by clicking the "Black", "Fetish", "Anal", and "Black Anal Fetish" links on the left portion of the computer screen. I found it necessary to do this repeatedly and vigorously until I finally grew tired, and I anticipate needing to continue on with the double-checking tomorrow.

    I estimate that this double-checking process could take upwards of the next 7 months, after which I intend to write an angry letter to the Web Masters of Slash.dot.com and the Wall Street Journal. However, most of my angry missives will be directed to the people behind this horrible, deviant web site, and I will demand that they direct me to other, similar web sites so that I may carry on my investigation.

    Yours in Christ,

    Beebeard