Slashdot Mirror


UK Banks Dump Credentials in Bin Bags

Plutonite writes "BBC news is reporting that several UK banks face 'unlimited fines' for careless handling of sensitive client information. This apparently came after investigators found account details while rummaging through the trash outside the banks involved. In this age of online banking and related security problems, and in light of this scandal, where can we expect to find the greatest threat of ID theft?"

87 comments

  1. my identity was stolen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am the real Anonymous Coward. Any other posts by Anonymous Coward in this topic have been made by an ID thief!!

    1. Re:my identity was stolen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Anonymous Coward!

    2. Re:my identity was stolen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm Anonymous Coward!

    3. Re:my identity was stolen! by todd10k · · Score: 1

      No, I'M SPARTACUS!

    4. Re:my identity was stolen! by GNious · · Score: 1

      No, you all just need lives.... real ones!

  2. Family Guy said it best: by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frank: Gentlemen, I propose we send a message to tobacco companies by fining the El Dorado Cigarette Company infinity billion dollars!
    Congressman: That's the spirit, Frank! But I think a real number might be more effective.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    1. Re:Family Guy said it best: by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't blame the banks for doing this. Paper shredders jam, especially when you try to put angry customers through them.

    2. Re:Family Guy said it best: by rootEToTheIPi · · Score: 1

      Me: That's the spirit, Congressman! But I think a rational number rounded to two decimal places might be more effective.

      --
      When it comes to pastry theft, I take the cake.
    3. Re:Family Guy said it best: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think a complex number may be more vexing.

  3. Laws by Threni · · Score: 0

    There's no law, therefore no incentive to do anything about it.

    1. Re:Laws by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the Data Protection Act is UK law, and makes these fines possible. We have all the protections that USians on /. frequently wish for. From the relevant Act:

      2.1 Regarding the release of personal data to third parties without specific consent (or publication with the same effect), the assumption is that this is not permitted, except where specific exemptions apply. These exemptions now include:

      - where required by law or statutory instrument;

      - where required to prevent or detect crime;

      - where required to assess or collect tax or duty;

      - release to a third party who is sub-contracted to process the data in a way that meets DPA rules.

      2.2 With regard to subject access rights, the data subject is presumed to be entitled to access all personal data held about her/himself that falls under the scope of the new Act, with the following main exemptions (i.e. cases where the controller of the data may decline to release certain data, but must justify doing so):

      - where disclosure unavoidably identifies a third party;

      - where the data was supplied in confidence e.g. references and similar judgements (but please note that examiners' marks and/or comments cannot be assumed to be exempt from disclosure.)

      What else could you want? The Act allows for both civil and criminal penalties, so the banks may well be in for quite the can of whoopass.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    2. Re:Laws by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      What I would love is for people to be able to bring private prosecutions under the Act. Currently the only person who can prosecute is the Information Commissioner IIRC and they seem reluctant to do so. If the average Joe could instigate actions then the banks would have no way of controlling this, save from cleaning their act up and not actually screwing up. Me since I bank with two of the offenders will be making my displeasure with them felt Monday lunchtime, and I won't be taking their offer to discuss in a private room either.

    3. Re:Laws by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      So I take it that the garbage company is not certified under DPA rules? If they were, then release to them would be OK, right?

    4. Re:Laws by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      In principle, the law is simple: you can only use personal information about people if they are a) dead or b) give you permission to do so. You then have a duty of care to make sure the data is not stolen, etc; and you have to say to the Data Protection Registrar that you are holding personal data.

      Actually the law is not that simple really, because of the definition of "personal data", and a whole load of exceptions. Plus theres some other stuff about direct marketing and stuff.

      Wikipedia:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_protection_act
      Full text:
      http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980029.htm

    5. Re:Laws by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suspect you're being a little harsh on Richard Thomas and his team. If you look at the position statements on the ICO's web site, they're generally very reasonable, and the office does take action against organisations that don't respect data protection and freedom of information rules. However, he has stated that to do the job properly, he would need 3x the team he's been given, and unlike most government empire-builders, I'm actually prepared to give him credit for being realistic there.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    6. Re:Laws by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that they are understaffed and overworked but the simple fact is that there are plenty of cases for abuse of personal information where they simply don't care. They essentially said recently that they will just go after the big guys/cases and the little ones will be left by the wayside due to the staffig problems. They've ignored it would seem proven cases of information being sold from both overseas and UK call centres as well which to me is more worrisome than accidentally leaving information in a bag that's due to go to be burnt/buried. They either need to get more staff and start kicking some backside or other people need to do it was well.

    7. Re:Laws by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that they are understaffed and overworked but the simple fact is that there are plenty of cases for abuse of personal information where they simply don't care. They essentially said recently that they will just go after the big guys/cases and the little ones will be left by the wayside due to the staffig problems.

      What would you do in their position? Not going after cases affecting a few people because you only have the resources to pursue cases affecting many people is probably the least of evils, and it's very different to not caring about the cases you can't follow up.

      They do need to get more staff if they're to fulfil their mandate, it's true, but it's not like Thomas can just say "OK, I'm increasing the size of this department by 200%" on his own authority.

      As you say, the other obvious alternative is to allow the public to initiate direct legal action against those breaching the data protection or freedom of information legislation. I'm not sure I agree with going down the regulatory route instead -- any law where a breaker cannot be taken directly to court by a damaged party has questionable value -- but on the other hand, I can see some sensible reasons for it as well. For example, while organisations should be required to meet reasonable data protection obligations, they're also entitled IMHO not to suffer a "DoS attack by court", where an aggrieved party can file repeated claims against them at relatively little cost, just to keep their resources tied up.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:Laws by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The first line of the summary says that they "face 'unlimited fines'" - doesn't that imply to you that there are laws dealing with this in the UK?

    9. Re:Laws by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1
      As you say, the other obvious alternative is to allow the public to initiate direct legal action against those breaching the data protection or freedom of information legislation. I'm not sure I agree with going down the regulatory route instead -- any law where a breaker cannot be taken directly to court by a damaged party has questionable value -- but on the other hand, I can see some sensible reasons for it as well. For example, while organisations should be required to meet reasonable data protection obligations, they're also entitled IMHO not to suffer a "DoS attack by court", where an aggrieved party can file repeated claims against them at relatively little cost, just to keep their resources tied up.
      You have to have a lot of money in the UK to actually get anywhere with a private prosecution. While nominally all prosecutions are under the auspices of the CPS on behalf of the Crown there is nothing to stop anyone launching a private case and it doesn't seem to get abused in other situations.
    10. Re:Laws by siriuskase · · Score: 1
      Actually the Data Protection Act is UK law, and makes these fines possible. We have all the protections that USians on /. frequently wish for. From the relevant Act:


      I don't need to be able to quote law to notice that the only buisinesses in my neighborhood that don't have outdoor trash collection are the banks. Anyone with common sense would avoid a bank that had dumpsters. This isn't a new thing, I'm almst 50, and I've never seen a bank that set its trash outside. Of course, the secure trash truck, I'm not sure where it goes, and I've seen quite a few businesses with so-called "secure dumpsters" out back that were easy to get into for dumpster diving. But, they weren't banks.
      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  4. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has gone ZDNet! I tried to RTFA, but there is a full-motion ad attached to the upper left of the browser window covering the link. Taco, are you going to change the tagline to "News for Marketing Tools. Flash and Felching"?

  5. This is why I keep my cash ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't use banks, I hide all my cash underneath my cat's litter box in my parents basement.
    Nobody steals my identity!
    I wish they would... I'm sooooo lonely down here...

  6. Not uncommon in the US by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many financial institutions' IT departments in the US have no policies for paper shredding. I was always mindful to shred account information, but many of my coworkers were not. No rules were published and I've never heard it brought up as an issue by management.

    You might be wondering why IT staff would have account information on paper. There are a variety of reasons. Periodic statements still go to most customers by paper, and the IT departments are responsible for their automation. A large percentage of people on the business side still like to see reports on paper and often the IT department is responsible for generating them. We are very far from having paperless companies. And in my experience paper disposal policies are largely missing or ignored.

    1. Re:Not uncommon in the US by MaxiumMahem · · Score: 1

      I happen to work for a major national bank in the US and I can tell you we have VERY strict policies concurning shreading of customers confidental account information. Anything that has as much as a customers name or address (much less account information) is either shreaded immideatly or placed in bins which are then kept under lock and key (often in the actual bank vault) untill an appropriate certified and bonded professional comes on sight to dispose of it all in bulk. We (at least in my region) are very strick about this and violation of this policy can lead to immediatl dissmissal. We take traning related to information security at least once a year as well.

  7. it aint ever been safe by eneville · · Score: 4, Informative

    time to store all my money under the mattress now.

    its not really easy to get money out the banks though. they open after i start work, close before i finish, they're difficult during the lunch hour. hell, they only people they're accessible to is bank robbers.

    1. Re:it aint ever been safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have these machines you can use now. They're like bank tellers, only automated. They'd probably catch on if someone came up with a catchy three letter acronym for them. I propose AMT: Automated Machine Teller.

    2. Re:it aint ever been safe by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add that in recent years, they make you enter your own bank transfers into their systems, then happily charge you for the convenience.

      I love banks.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  8. Not in corporate offices by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most corporate Windows machines are behind firewalls. They're not perfect, but they're pretty good. Windows servers are almost always set up behind even more strict firewalls. Ideally servers exposed to the internet are on a different network segment than the internal servers containing even more data.

    The greatest threat to ID theft has always been humans. The vast majority of security breaches are from social engineering.

  9. Bank Data sent from US to UK Unencrypted by hughk · · Score: 1

    Its ok, I saw a whole load of fun data (like copies of client passports, proofs of Name and address) being sent from the US to the UK for processing using that well known data protection technique of a FedEx envelope for a the CDRs. The Information Security people hit the roof when they heard and insisted on proper encryption. The point is that neither the business nor the IT people concerned had the foggiest idea that there was a duty of care involved.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Bank Data sent from US to UK Unencrypted by vidarh · · Score: 1
      I've seen almost as bad stuff.

      One of the largest payment processors in the US routinely sends chargeback info as normal mail in large envelopers prominently stamped with their company name (very obvious it's a credit card processor) and some slogan about their payment processing business.

      Inside the envelope you will not only find the basis for the chargeback and the customer name, but you will also find fun things like copies of their statements with the charged back payments highlighted, etc (instead of blacking out the non-offending ones - I'm so happy to know that my spending habits will provide amusement for bored office workers if I ever charge anything back) and full card details.

      Larger merchants gets at least one envelope a day from this provider, and in many companies there's no way anyone would notice if one of the envelopes wouldn't arrive or would be pilfered by someone in the post room (as many online merchants that sell intangibles know they'll get nowhere disputing the chargebacks in most cases because they don't have enough proof about who used the service).

    2. Re:Bank Data sent from US to UK Unencrypted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your post hits the nail on the head when it says "The information security people hit the roof...". I am currently working at a UK financial institution dealing with live data provided by various third parties. Their governance rules are clear and the infosec team available and helpful, but dispite this, when I took over the role, customer data was being sent unencrypted on CDR from site to site. The point is that the teams involved had never been told what their responsibilities were. It may seem obvious to you and I, but many business people are just not aware. Training and Auditing are the only responses.

      Now I have mandated PGP, which incidentally has a wonderful feature called Self-Decrypting Archives. It's a Windows executable that contains both the encrypted data and the program to decode it. Makes life very easy.

      Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.

    3. Re:Bank Data sent from US to UK Unencrypted by benicillin · · Score: 1

      duty of care, huh? you sound like my torts professor

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    4. Re:Bank Data sent from US to UK Unencrypted by hughk · · Score: 1

      I started off as a nice clean IT person but I've spent far too long on regulatory issues. The "duty of care" may be challengeable in a US bank but the parent is EU based. In any case, there is always reputational risk should there be a compromise.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  10. Greatest threat of information theft.... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    As long as we have stupid people who fail to understand that the information stored on the computer is much more valuable than the computer itself, we'll continue to have people throw away stuff like this, store information on unpatched machines, etc.etc.etc.

    Therefore, don't deal with a company that employs, or outsources to companies who employ stupid people.

    Of course....this is much easier said than done......

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  11. /usr/bin? by dotslashdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should not have dumped the files in /usr/bin, but in /dev/null.

  12. Sounds like airport security by MECC · · Score: 1

    Maybe they got the idea from the airline industry, who in turn might have gotten it from the USA Dept of homerland security.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Sounds like airport security by MrShaggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course.

      If you are digging around in the banks garbage, you must be a terrorist

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Sounds like airport security by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      USA Dept of homerland security

      Homerland? Is that Fox's version of Disneyworld? And why do they get their own federal department? It must be a return favor for Fox News.

    3. Re:Sounds like airport security by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Either that, or a very confused homeless guy.

      "This restaurant sure throws away a lot of paper, and hardly any food!"

  13. Re:The greatest threat of ID theft? Windows by zlogic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh these Microsoft bastards!
    If they never existed people would never throw away printed plain-text passwords, never stick access codes on post-it notes to their monitor, and everyone would be immune to social engineering.

  14. Re:The greatest threat of ID theft? Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the average time before an unprotected Windows box with default safety configuration is rooted after connecting to the Internet? Something like three minutes?

    Just because Windows "boxen" are connected to the Internet, doesn't mean they aren't properly secured by means of a firewall. You seem to be confusing the two. A Windows machine that houses a database will never be connected directly to the Internet when a bank has proper security measures and competent Administrators.

  15. My father's story... by IcebergSlim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    5 or 6 years ago my father came down with cancer, and his wife (now ex) took over the regular task of managing the finances of the household, etc. (This was in Wisconsin.) She also took it upon herself to fraudulently clean out his "Federally Protected" IRA, all of his *non-joint* accounts, filed false tax returns, and then ran up tens of thousands of dollars in debt in his name (hiding the statements and records to keep the game going as long as possible). She even bought a $20,000 diamond ring and a Mercedes for herself -- all while my Father was going through radiation treatment and surgery, etc. Finally, the house of cards came tumbling down, the police were notified, and she admitted everything.

    The result, 5 years later: We found out that the bank had known this fraud was taking place on his accounts (we have one of their internal documents explicitly stating this), yet they covered this up during the discovery process and only gave it to us years later. She's never been arrested nor paid any restitution for what she did, the "Federally Protected" IRA was never reinstated, and a judge in Wisconsin had my father put in jail for refusing to give her his car, which the judge had mistakenly awarded to both of them during the divorce trial. My father sued the bank and has recovered nothing to date.

    Your money is not safe, and no one cares.

    1. Re:My father's story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If what you say is true (I have doubts), you need to find a better lawyer.

    2. Re:My father's story... by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      You and your father need better legal advice. If you can prove this with documentation as you say, and you can prove it was going on during the time he was undergoing treatment, you have a good chance of raking an insane amount of money in from this thing. Remember: you are suing a bank. Your father needs to file against both her(although I understand this is a personal issue) and the people involved inside the bank, and you should not be afraid to spend money on this.

      It is for cases such as these that "infinite fines" are made. I don't know you, but I am absolutely furious.

    3. Re:My father's story... by IcebergSlim · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your comments; in a normal world justice would prevail and he'd at least get his IRA funds restored. Our justice system is insane, though, and banks with deep pockets are very good at frustrating efforts to hold them to account for their actions. Example: during the trial my father and his counsel were barred from any mention whatsoever of the fact that he had had cancer. In the end, their law firm was better than my father's law firm, and having more resources to commit to a case like that makes a huge difference. My father's case, and specifically the fact that his IRA was cleaned out in a case of identity theft, is very unique. He's spoken to other law firms, and most of them are shocked when they hear the story --- they've never heard of such a thing happening. Despite their sympathy, however, litigating a case this complex is very expensive, and considered too risky to take on contingency. So when you've had all your money stolen from you, what are your options? The case is now on appeal with the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, and was dismissed from Federal Court (for jurisdictional reasons, I believe). And the kicker? My father, who has his law degree but never practiced law during his career, is litigating it himself pro se because he can't afford to keep paying attorneys to help him.

      Thanks for your fury. :) I left out many other details that make the case even more ludicrous and infuriating (like the FBI refusing to complete an investigation that would have resulted in her being brought to justice and helped the trial against the bank, because "we've been busy since 9/11", for example), but I didn't think Slashdot was the place to yammer on about the rest of the insanity.

    4. Re:My father's story... by IcebergSlim · · Score: 1


      Please read my response to Plutonite's post below. Or, you're welcome to contact me via my photo website listed below my Slashdot username (http://www.pbase.com/artyler) and I'll happily email you a copies of the complaints, affidavits, etc.

      We're not rubes; it's the system, and if you ever find yourself mired in a legal nightmare like this, you'll discover very quickly why people talk about the difficulties of sueing someone with deeper pockets than you.

    5. Re:My father's story... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, here in the UK, I've had transactions on my credit card blocked temporarily as the activity was out of the ordinary. I had to 'phone the provider and confirm that it was indeed legitimate. I also had my card skimmed when I used it at an ATM in France, and was notified of the fact by my bank when they discovered that the machine had been tampered with.

      You've been screwed, and need to seek (better!) legal advice. However, while it's generally true that large corporations don't particularly care about any individual customer, they're not all as bad as your experience would imply.

  16. Talinkg Points by Jack+Pallance · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1. I know this sounds a little extreme, but maybe the banks are borderline crminial organizations. Thirty-five dollars for a bounced check? Thirty Nine percent interest for a credit card? Some banks are just thieves.

    2. I treat my personal data like it's already on billboards. Obviously the banks don't care about our privacy, so I try to use services where my personal information isn't needed. Using prepaid credit cards instead of a credit line at the bank, or money orders instead of a checking acount may be the way of the future if banks keep giving away our social security numbers.

    The criminals already have all or our personal data. Now we need to act accordingly.

    1. Re:Talinkg Points by benicillin · · Score: 1

      its only a crime if you dont agree to it...

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    2. Re:Talinkg Points by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of prepaid "credit" cards being available in the UK yet. I wish they were, because it would allow me to shop online.

    3. Re:Talinkg Points by Rekolitus · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do know you can get debit cards on the VISA network, right?

      I don't know about prepaid, but that's what my bank gave me, and I've never had a situation where it's been rejected online for being a debit card rather than a credit card.

    4. Re:Talinkg Points by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1
      You do know you can get debit cards on the VISA network, right? I don't know about prepaid, but that's what my bank gave me, and I've never had a situation where it's been rejected online for being a debit card rather than a credit card.
      That's even worse as they can then clean out all your money from your main account. A credit card is preferable as then the credit company is jointly liable with the merchant if it is not delivered and if there is fraud for which you are not liable then the card company in theory stands the entire loss. Prepaid value cards where you load it with a specific amount and you can then only spend that much are available but thier use online is limited to who will take them - the Post Office do a travel card in this vein for example. http://www.postoffice.co.uk/portal/po/jump1?catId= 19300207&mediaId=26800661
    5. Re:Talinkg Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been looking for a prepaid card. The problem so far is these guys like money* want 2 pieces of government ID. So instead of a big bank and visa/mc knowing our personal info, we have to give our info to some payday-loan company and a clerk making $10 an hour. As if I trust them. If I walk in with $1000 to load the card they have a target, my address, my name, my photo, my car...

      Where can we get anonymous prepaid cards?

      As for banks being "borderline criminal"... you bounced a check and they are charging you $35 to assist you in your illegal activities. They'll keep helping you as long as you keep paying the $35.

    6. Re:Talinkg Points by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Debit cards have an unfortunately bad reputation for NOT resturning stolen money. As you already 'paid' the bank, they tend to think anything that happens to it is now fine.

      I once had a total MORON tell me that "No, you don't need to know who we sent this $50 from your account, because we have a signed agreement from you that lets us take money from your account and send it one specific person."

      The fool seemed to to think that if I gave authorization for one transfer, it meant I authorized everyone to take money from my account.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  17. *dons tinfoil hat* by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Conspiracy theory: the government told them to do it in order to increase identity theft, thus hoping that the public will become more accepting of the national identity register, and more willing to carry biometric ID cards.

    -Stephen

    1. Re:*dons tinfoil hat* by isorox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Conspiracy theory: the government told them to do it in order to increase identity theft, thus hoping that the public will become more accepting of the national identity register, and more willing to carry biometric ID cards.

      Which would imply the govenment shows
      1) Joined up thinking
      2) Competence

      That's some whacko theory you've got there

    2. Re:*dons tinfoil hat* by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Now now, the UK Government is competent at some things.

      Those things being failure, recklessness and brazen stupidity.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  18. Guess what. You are still banking by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

    Sorry but the conspiracy goes much deeper than that. Your (USD) cash is a fEDERAL rESERVE nOTE; which is what?.. A private bank. USD only has worth because the fED says so. It's a private bank designed to rob you of your real income.

    So you will have to convert that stash under the litter box to gold if you want to be free from the talons of corrupt banking institutions.

    Believe it.

    1. Re:Guess what. You are still banking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your (USD) cash is a fEDERAL rESERVE nOTE; which is what?.. A private bank. USD only has worth because the fED says so.

      No, the US dollar has worth because everyone in the world thinks it does, except for crackpots. The US dollar is a promise from the world's largest economy with the world's strongest military.

      So you will have to convert that stash under the litter box to gold if you want to be free from the talons of corrupt banking institutions.

      Why is gold valuable? Gold has no innate value, you can't eat it. Gold is only valuable if you can do something with it. While gold has industrial value because it is an noble metal that doesn't corrode, that only accounts for a small fraction of its current value. Gold has value today because people like gold. Why do they like gold? They like gold because they think gold is worth something. Exactly the same as US dollars (or Euros, etc).

      Frankly, you're a kook.

      Believe it.

      I think you need to take your medication.

    2. Re:Guess what. You are still banking by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      Gold is rare. That's why it's valuable.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    3. Re:Guess what. You are still banking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is rare. That's why it's valuable.

      No, gold has value because people want gold. William Shatner's toenail clippings are much rarer than gold, but somehow Shatner's toenail clippings aren't valuable.

      The price of anything is set by supply & demand. There is a lot of demand for gold, so the price is relatively high, even though there are hundreds of thousands of tons of gold. There is no demand for Shatner's toenail clippings, so they aren't valuable.

    4. Re:Guess what. You are still banking by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      That's true. I was trying to point out that gold would become no rarer, and thus no less valuable, if the US economy collapsed. But your point is also important to keep in mind.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    5. Re:Guess what. You are still banking by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

      "The price of anything is set by supply & demand."

      Not really. That's what they teach people in university. A fun theory. Prices (currency) today are set by Central Banks. They are large corrupt private banks. Gold's value will not completely collapse unless you discover how to make it from sea water. Currency's collapse when the central banks decide it's time to kill it. I've been to the Fed in NYC and touched the gold bars. Most of it isn't ours anyway. US holds about 2% of dollar issued backed in gold. China holds about 20%.

      It's a giant scam.

      Believe it.

  19. ... greatest threat of ID theft? People! by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    People that don't care about or don't know how to secure their personal data, institutions run by people with shoddy security practices or that just don't give a damn and all levels of government run by people that seem to refuse to use readily available, inexpensive and reliable security techniques and technology.

  20. Bin Bags by eclectro · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh, they mean trash bags. Those crazy Brits. They should've used Hefty! Hefty! Hefty! instead of wimpy wimpy wimpy.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Bin Bags by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      no what the should have done is mulched the paper first and heat sealed the bags

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  21. Actually, that's not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the real Anonymous Coward!

    All the other Anonymous Cowards are actually just sock puppets of mine.

  22. Re:Talking Points by Pop69 · · Score: 1

    Interesting someone should mention that, there's a site that explains why bank charges in the UK are most likely illegal penalty charges and classed as unfair contract terms

    http://www.bankcharges.info/

    I'm sure UK readers will really enjoy reading the site and sending off those letters to their banks.

  23. Oh the punnage! by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

    If only I had mod points :(

  24. Scandal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds unbelievable!
    How can they handle sensitive customer data like that?

    It is not hard to shred documents, burn them or in other ways securely destroy them.
    It truly is a shame, that they can something this careless with something this important.

    If there is such a thing as banking license or something, I think those bank should get their revoked...

  25. hard to say how they do it by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A former manager of mine used to be the IT director at a bank. There, when they upgraded computers, they went out to the dump and had a 'hard drive party". They removed the hard drives from the computers before tossing them in, disassembled them, and beat the platters throughly with hammers, then frisbee'd them into the hole and watched them be coverd up by the dozer.

    I was under the impression that banks always were anal about destruction of customer records.

    The US Navy has an interesting method also. They have these three level shredders. First level does strips. Second level does squares. Thrid level can best be described as "paper dust", it's the consistency of fine sawdust. Then they flush that out below decks directly into the water. Good luck getting that back.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  26. Which illustrates.... by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    Often the greatest threat and the greatest security hole are not necessisarily in the same place.

  27. Re:The greatest threat of ID theft? Windows by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    Okay, why does this get an Interesting-Rating?

    As if it was Microsoft's fault that managers came up with the idea that passwords were the culprit in our security problems. Sure, some users have quite weak passwords. That's sub-optimal. But when you make them use like 8 digit passwords with letters, special characters and at least one capital letter they will immediately start writing them down. Especially when they have to change it every month.

    Happened in my company. Why? Because there's data from the italian branch of our company on our system. And they require us to have this "security".

    I have to remember a shitload of passwords myself. None of them are exceptionally strong and it's hard enough to remember them. How can people expect users would be able to remember such passwords when they have trouble even comming up with them?

  28. Sounds Like... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an excellent argument for the Paperless Office. Yeah, that's not a perfect solution, but it could sure put an end to dumpster diving.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Sounds Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but it could sure put an end to dumpster diving.

      As could a few well placed bear-traps or dirty syringes...

  29. The British Bankers' Association Explains... by namgge · · Score: 1

    The Chief Executive of the British Bankers' Association was interviewed on the BBC's (RAM) flagship radio news programme this morning. He claimed that the problem was either: (a) it was a very small number of rogue employees, or most likely (b) the customers' fault! The journalist doing the interview was rendered close to speechless by this anwer. The BBA was upholding a long-established UK tradition whereby banks claim that their systems are infallible, and accuse customers who have the cheek to complain (about, e.g. phantom withdrawals) of commiting fraud.

  30. Re:The greatest threat of ID theft? Windows by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    so you are assuming a A+B=C thing

    A: roll 60 on a d100 (no save)
    B: roll 90 on a d100 (no save) hmm grabbing my pda and doing 5 sets

    27 and 50
    72 and 17
    39 and 62
    84 and 29
    51 and 74

    looks like somebody needs some class bonuses or something

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  31. Duh.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    When I worked at the processing center of a bank, there was one big rule: cash slips (internal documents with no personal info on them that only represent money put into or taken out of vaults) can go in trash, everything else in shred box..... Stupid banks.....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  32. Re:Laws and regulators by pbhj · · Score: 1

    >>> ... so the banks may well be in for quite the can of whoopass.

    Or not. Just look at what the water regulators have done to the water companies that allow their pipes to leak so much that they have to impose hosepipe bans and standpipes in some places ... fined them a tiny percentage of their profits.

    A reasonable sum to hurt a bank and make them be careful is going to be about 10% of their profits : 25 million or so for Barclays highstreet banking I gather (http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/artic le346803.ece). You can buy quite a lot of lawyers (and probably politicians, at least in the European Parliament) for that.

    I think management should be held to account for such failures as with corporate manslaughter. I predict however that the regulator will either do nothing but make a suggestion ("naughty banks") or fine them something like £50k (twice the annual paperclip bill!).

    Interestingly HSBC is the 3rd most profitable UK company (source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4303653.stm, one site says they make £1m per hour) yet they don't produce anything! That to me is like paying your richest employee the most even if he does nothing, screwy.

  33. Ownership of Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More to the point, why does the US not take such a serious attitude towards the reckless use of personal data?

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Re:The greatest threat of ID theft? Windows by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    But when you make them use like 8 digit passwords with letters, special characters and at least one capital letter they will immediately start writing them down.

    Requiring special characters, capital letters and such just makes the keyspace smaller and makes it easier to do a brute-force attack on a password. The only somewhat sensible requirement in there is a minimum length.

  36. Profit motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There is no IT equivalent of the Hollywood expression, "You'll never work in this town again!"

    Questionable firms continue to receive medical and insurance industry outsourcing business.
    Decisions based on pure greed; choosing between a $50000 security expenditure or $10000 fine.

    Switch those numbers around, and they'll still factor in whether they get caught and then fined.
    More laws are needed. Then enforce the existing ones with criminal as well as civil penalties.

  37. Banks dump sensitive data by Jezter!*+$nothername · · Score: 1

    I wish the sods would dump some of mine, maybe then I'd stop getting the vast number of unsolicited invitations to take out loans, credit cards and various insurance/assurance deals that I do now. One look at my balances and they'd run for the hills!

    --
    Democracy is being able to elect your own megalomaniac, a dictatorship cuts out the middle man.