The Largest Digital Photo
Photo Shots: 1,145
Computed Data: 84 Gigabyte
Computed Pixels: 13,982,996,480
Color Depth: 16 bit per channel
Cropped Image Size: 8,604,431,000 (w. 96,679 x h. 89,000) pixel
Image Size before the final crop: 10,293,864,000 pixel (w. 103,560 x h. 99,400) pixel
Size on Hard Disk of the 3x16 bit final image: 51,625,586,000 byte
Size of Photographed Scene: 10.80 m x 9.94 m (35.43 ft x 32.61 ft), corresponding to 107.35 m2 (1155.37 ft2).
True Scale Resolution: 227 dpi
Pixel Density: 80 pixel/mm2
Linear Pixel Density: 9 pixel/mm
Hard Disk space dedicated to 16 bit computing: 1.8 Terabyte
Ram: 16 Gigabyte
Processors: 4 x AMD Opteron(TM) 885 Dual Core 64 bit
Shooting on January 30, 2006
Shooting time: 13 hours
Computing time: 3 months
Final Image generated on June 15, 2006
Because of the way the painting was centered, if you start out with the default view and zoom in -- all the way in -- you are treated to a sudden and rather unpleasant close-up of Jesus's crotch. On the cross.
Thanks a lot, Slashdot.
We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
Find one of the largest files on the Internet... Check.
Find a site with a large amount of people browsing it... Check.
Make a post interesting enough that people will look at it... Check.
Watch your victim's bandwidth bills skyrocket... Check
Smell the great smell of burning silicon... In Progress
Linking directly to one of the biggest files around on Slashdot.
Sheesh.
DYWYPI?
the goatse man doesn't learn of this technique....
Monstar L
I think I found a naked lady sunbathing!
Track 45 left.
clickclickclickclickclick
Stop.
Pull back, track right.
clickclickclickclick
Stop.
Give me hard copy right there.
Man, that'd make for a very boring slideshow round someone's house one night:
"OK, this next slide is Jesus' left eye. We're now only two slides away from the bridge of his nose..."
Summation 2
Well, was He risen? I keep hearing yes, but I've always been too shy to check.
I have no idea what you just said, but since you used the term "quantum efficiency".. I have no choice but to believe you :)
"Where are our flying cars predicted 50 years ago? They should have been here 10 years ago already."
That's more of a driver problem than a hardware issue.
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)