Slashdot Mirror


Halo Movie Postponed, Street Fighter Movie On

FofR writes "Given the previous statements concerning the Halo Movie's stalled progress, it should come as no surprise that the movie is now officially on hold." From the article: "At this time Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, along with their partner, Microsoft, have mutually agreed to postpone making a feature film based on the Halo video game universe until we can fulfill the promise we made to millions of Halo fans throughout the world that we would settle for no less than bringing a first class film to the big screen. We are fully supportive of Director Neill Blomkamp's vision of the film. Neill is a tremendously gifted filmmaker and his preliminary work on Halo is truly awe-inspiring. While it will undoubtedly take a little longer for Halo to reach the big screen, we are confident that the final feature film will be well worth the wait." You'll be happy to know even if a Jackson-inspired Halo isn't coming our way, at least we can look forward to another Street Fighter movie.

6 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. release date by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard the Halo movie will be released alongside Duke Nukem Forever: The Movie.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  2. Let's face it by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Speaking as a film fan, let me say that this is for the best. Video game movies generally suck. It's just not a medium that translates well to film. In spite of all the "Master Chief RULZ!!" sentiment among fans, the fact remains that the Master Chief is a faceless entity in the video games (and, likely, would make a terrible film character).

    And, yes, I realize he is "fleshed out" in the novels. But the novels are pulp crap. In the novels, he goes from a 0-dimensional character to a 1-dimensional character. That's not even nearly enough to make an interesting film.

    It would be difficult, if not impossible, to make a film that stayed true to the videogame (to make the fans happy), was commercially successful enough to justify its high budget (to make the studio happy), and had well-developed characters and an interesting plot (to make the critics happy). That's why so many studios have passed on it.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Great! by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'll be happy to know even if a Jackson-inspired Halo isn't coming our way, at least we can look forward to another Street Fighter movie.

    So the sex was postponed, but at least we got the syphilis? Awesome! Thank you, Hollywood!

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  4. Re:Well, I liked the original SF movie by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Raul Julia as M. Bison

    That sad thing is that he would probably provide just as good an acting performance today if he reprized the role.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. Re:Another SF Movie? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I just hope Uwe Boll is available to direct

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. Hobbit? Not for a while. by bigdavex · · Score: 2, Informative
    "What happened to doing the Hobbit?" I wondered. And Wikipedia answered:


    Much speculation has occurred as to whether Jackson might direct a film of The Hobbit, the prequel to The Lord of the Rings. His comments to date seem to indicate that he is interested, if the studios can work out the rights. Late in 2004 it appeared unlikely, as MGM (the studio which holds the rights to The Hobbit) was sold to Sony in the race with Warner Bros. In December of 2004, Jackson said that production on The Hobbit could be as much as four years away,[8] which would place a likely release date in 2010. In September 2006, MGM indicated that they intended to approach Peter Jackson to direct the film in the next few years.[9]

    --
    -Dave