Slashdot Mirror


Prepared for Next Year's Time Change?

wohlford puts forth this query: "Next year, daylight saving time will be extended another four weeks. Slashdot has covered the time change proposal and its estimated impact, already. Since then it has been signed into law. Looking around on the Net I don't see anyone taking this seriously. Will this become the next tech doomsday or just another joke like Y2K?"

26 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. I vote for no-DST and use GMT by Loconut1389 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I hate daylight savings time and see no need for it. Just get up earlier or later as needed. Further, I don't see why we can't just all use GMT. So you get up at 08:00 and I get up at 21:00, big deal.

    1. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by porkThreeWays · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great idea! Hey, while you're at it why don't you get America to use the metric system too.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    2. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by Loconut1389 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd vote for that too- they've been teaching it in schools here for at least 20 years. Maybe not flip the switch overnight, but start putting highway signs in both on every sign (not just a few every hundred miles on major highways)- then people will have a real feel for how fast 100km/h is and how long it takes them to go 40km to work. Once people 'feel' the distances/measurements, it'll be much easier.

    3. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by MeanMF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'd still have to know more or less what time zone other people are in...And I don't think the Japanese, Australians, Californians, etc. would appreciate their normal business hours spanning two days.

    4. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by aduzik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Quick: the current time is 00:30 -- is it morning, midday, or night where I live? If I open my business at 12:00 and close at 22:00, what kind of business do I most likely own: a coffee shop/lunch place, a retail store or a restaurant? If I open at 16:00 and close at 02:00, can you make a sign that (in a non-confusing way) makes it obvious to my customers that, while I open on Monday and stay open continuously until Tuesday, that I'm actually only open for ten hours?

      Now what if I tell you it's 6:30 PM local time? I don't even have to tell you where I live, do I? You would know that it's about dinnertime here, regardless of where "here" is.

      I live in the states, but the time is 00:30 UTC everywhere right now. If I call my grandma in Australia, is she going to say, "ugh! Why did you call me at 00:30?" or is she going to say, "oh, you picked a perfect time to call." (My grandma does, in fact, talk like that, by the way.)

      The point of time zones and "local time" is that it provides *context*. Wednesday is going to turn into Thursday (or already has) in the middle of the night -- for everybody. With UTC, it would be Thursday here in most of the US already. So while it may be a pain to have to adjust for local time in other localities, at least you'll know about what time of day it is there. Unless you happen to live in Greenwich, or maybe one or two time zones in either direction, using UTC would be nothing but a pain in the ass. Do you really think it would make sense for me to leave for work on Sunday "evening" and get home on Monday "morning" -- to say nothing about how lame New Year's Eve parties would be in most of the world. (In Eastern Europe and Asia, you'd enjoy a celebratory cup of joe first thing in the morning. How fun.)

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    5. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hm, I haven't heard of a bar in FL that actually sits on the line, but it is certainly possible to walk from one to another and cross the line in the process. Of course, having lived in the FL panhandle, I can certainly attest to the fact that an extra hour of drinking time is about all there is to look forward to.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    6. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by famebait · · Score: 2, Funny

      Millimeters are also quite popular in some circles. At least if there's nine of them.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    7. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by stanmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but when dealing with strangers you only need to know basic human behaviour. and the UTC differential.

      Most people get up between 0530 and 0800 local. so after 0800 local is a socially acceptable time to call.

      Most people eat lunch between 1030 local and 1330 local so if you call their place of business you are likely to miss them.

      most people go to bed between 2100 and 2359 local, so after 2100 local is an inappropriate time to call a stranger.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    8. Re:I vote for no-DST and use GMT by FacePlant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back home, on a major highway, they switched exits from numbers to mile markers a couple years ago and that's what they did. Old exit numbers were small, new ones were big. It made it easier for people who knew "To get to the park, get off on exit 21."

      The best part of making exit numbers reflect the mile markers that they're near is that
      folks who can do simple math can figure out how far it is to the next exit.

      If I just passed exit 125 and I know the next exit is at 142, I can ask my kid if their
      bladder is going to explode right now, or can they hold it in for another 7 miles. If we
      just passed exit 5, I more than likely have no idea how far it is to exit 6. Better pull
      off to the right and send them behind a tree. No fun.

      You can put distances in km on the road signs as long as you put km markers along
      the road to go with the mile markers. You better make the km markers a different color too, so they don't blend in with the mile markers.

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
  2. Re:fp by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except that it'll get its time as GMT and it still has to make the decision about how much to offset it. A simple rules update for linux and windows should take care of a lot of the problem- but many custom apps will have to be altered or potentially produce incorrect times. I imagine .NET will help some of this in the windows world as it'll just use the underlying routines, which can be updated once by an MS update.

    I imagine it'll be a headache, but things generally wont come to a screeching halt.

  3. Y2K a joke?!?! by NaugaHunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go to hell. A lot of people put a lot of work into resolving a real problem. We'd sure as hell have heard about it if we hadn't.

    One of those damned if you do, damned if you don't things I guess.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    1. Re:Y2K a joke?!?! by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go to hell. A lot of people put a lot of work into resolving a real problem. We'd sure as hell have heard about it if we hadn't.

      I think you meant to phrase that as "A lot of obsolete geeks got to put in a hell of a lot of billable hours as a result of Y2K". Easy mistake, "resolving a problem" to "made a fuckload of cash for babysitting a mainframe". No harm done, eh? ;-)

    2. Re:Y2K a joke?!?! by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Easy mistake, "resolving a problem" to "made a fuckload of cash for babysitting a mainframe".

      Right on dude! I don't even know why they bother babysitting those mainframes running ancient code. Just re-write it all in Ruby. I could have done it in a couple of days. It's not like those mainframes store any really important data, like your bank balance or... Hang on!

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    3. Re:Y2K a joke?!?! by AC5398 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jerk. A whole lot more went into fixing y2k than babysitting a goddamn mainframe.

      But if you'd been someone who did any work for y2k, you'd know that.

  4. Re:Pfft. by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is your solution to 03:14:07 January 19, 2038 UTC?

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  5. Re:Use GMT by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Indiana switched this year.

    Indiana has historically had 2 timezones. Part of it was Eastern, and part of it didn't change. They changed this year to all be on Eastern time. (wrong choice) A lot of our customer read that news and changed the timezone on their servers to Eastern. All of their historical data got screwed up.

    The REAL fix was to apply an OS patch and keep in the same Time-zone they've been in. The OS patch changed that TZ file to understand that previous to a certain date the timezone behaved differently. That's going to need to happend for all the timezone definition files with this new law.

    Unfortunately...that means even if they DID get rid of daylight savings time, the whole history of how it has changed through the ages would need to be contained within those TZ definitions.

    Incidentally, changing the timezone value on a server is actually one of the worst things you can do with for our particular software.

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  6. My vote goes to..... by bernywork · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's only the US, who cares?

    --
    Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
  7. Re:Pfft. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    64-bit computers. :)

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  8. Daylight savings changes isn't a big deal by zsau · · Score: 3, Informative

    Changes to daylight savings time start and end times are hardly a big deal. In Australia it happens all the time. Just this year, daylight savings time was extended by a week in March, and no planes fell out of the sky. About half the computers I used updated and showed the real time, and the other half (including some apparently independent clocks that were set by some remote mechanism) switched back early and were an hour slow. Everyone coped just fine.

    Most people know what hour it is anyway, so it's only important computer systems that matter. And if Microsoft can have a patch for two states and one territory in a relatively small country, then they can have a patch for the vast majority of their home country...

    Absolutely nothing to worry about. Just enjoy the extra daylight in the evening!

    --
    Look out!
  9. Re:Pfft. by Trogre · · Score: 2

    03:14:08 January 19, 2038 UTC, shortly followed by 03:14:09 January 19, 2038 UTC.

    Honestly, there's no good excuse for anyone not using at least 64-bit integers to represent unix time these days, yes even on 32-bit architectures.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  10. Central Stoopid Time... by mkcmkc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want a patch for my operating system that will automatically let me know when Congress does something stupid...

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  11. It affects some radio stations by Announcer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for one of the "dying breed" of Daytime ONLY AM radio stations. Because of the effects of the sun on the ionosphere, Medium Wave (AM Broadcast) signals bounce off of a layer the ionosphere at night, and are absorbed by a different layer which forms during daylight hours. As a result, a number of stations were allowed to operate only during daylight, when the dominating station on that frequency would not be affected.

    Case-in-point, WFIF where I work. WTOP (now WTWP) has operated on 1500Khz for many decades. They are the dominant station on that frequency for the entire Eastern half of the US. (At night, you can hear them from Maine to Florida. Been there, done it.) They are located in Washington, DC. WFIF was licensed to operate on that frequency in 1965, as a daylight-only station. Thus, every day at the FCC-established "legal sunset", we must sign off. We cannot return to the air until the FCC-defined "legal sunrise". (The FCC defines the sunrise/set times for each month, based on an average, so the actual sign-on/off times remain the same through each month.)

    Now we throw the DST/Standard time curveball into this. Because the sun doesn't change, only our clocks do, this affects when we can sign-on and off, and it affects our program schedule.

    Example- under the present system, in October, during DST, we sign-on at 7am and off at 6:30pm. When we change to Standard time on that last Sunday, we get to sign-on at 6am and off at 5:30pm until we hit November. In November, we sign-on at 6:45, and off at 5pm.

    Now throw this new monkey wrench into the works...

    We will no longer have *any* Standard time operation in October, because it won't kick-in until November... so, that means we won't be able to sign-on until 7:45am! (Right now, our latest sign-on is 7:15am in December & January.) That's pretty darned late in the morning to be signing-on! Once Standard time takes effect, we'd be back to where we are, now: 6:45am to 5pm.

    In March of '07, we're going to have another curveball to throw at our audience... we will have been signing-on at 6am for the first few weeks of March. Then the clocks will be changed. Now, we won't be able to sign-on until 7am! Programming that had already re-established itself with our audience will go on yet another hiatus, before returning in April. (The early morning music program already goes away in October & Dec/Jan due to the later sign-on.)

    So, as you can see, there are some radio stations and listeners that are going to be ***VERY*** inconvenienced by this mess.

    We won't even go into the issue of how many computers are out there still running Windows 98SE, which won't be getting any help from Papa Bill to patch it's internal time-shifting routines. I am hoping for a 3'rd party solution... but won't hold my breath. Since we still have a fair number of perfectly functional Win98SE boxes running, we'll just have to disable the automatic time-shift routines, and do it manually.

    --
    Willie...
    1. Re:It affects some radio stations by Tech · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original Win98, as I recall, came with a timezone editor on the original CD although it didn't install by default. I'm not sure whether it was included on the Win98SE CD, but if not the older one would probably still work. The program you're looking for is tzedit.exe and a quick search of the CD should show whether or not it is there.

      Otherwise, Googling "timezone editor" came up with what looked like several alternatives and a link to a Microsoft KB article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317211 which doesn't address this specific problem but does talk about using the timezone editor for another purpose, implicitly stating that there is a timezone editor available for many versions of Windows, and presumable also Win98SE.

      It should be pretty simple to make the appropriate changes. It should be pretty simple for someone to automate the process too. I might even have a go at it myself even though the change doesn't affect me at all (being in the UK).

  12. Re:Pfft. by jZnat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    typedef int64_t time_t;

    Hmm, that should work fine.

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  13. Re:Time for a new alarm clock by JagRoth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most atomic clocks don't have rules for when to switch to DST. They just use the code from the time from NIST, which includes a flag to indicate whether DST is in effect or not. As long as NIST changes when they include the DST flag, Atomic clocks should switch to DST on the correct day.

  14. There is a LAW for that ??? by Tensor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why on earth does the US have a law on when should a bar close. I used to own a bar with some friends and would close it when we saw fit. Usually between 3 and 5 am. The "land of the free" sure seem less "freer" each time i look.