Surprises in Microsoft Vista's EULA
androthi writes "Scott Granneman takes a look at some surprises in Microsoft Vista's EULA that limit what security professionals and others can do with the new operating system. You want to post benchmarking results? Well, Microsoft may now have a say in it. Vista's EULA no longer shows up on Microsoft's software licensing page, but does still exist — also take note of Windows DRM deciding what you can and can not listen to, and Defender deciding and removing what it considers spyware automatically (by default)."
Is not to play
I have the best comment *ever* about this story.
I'll post it as soon as Microsoft oks it.
Have you read my journal today?
If we keep brainstorming great stuff like that, we will be able to do all kinds of awesome stuff, like:
study our own computers' performance.
tell people what we find
share ideas on how to improve them
Before you know it, we'l have "free speech" as I like to call it.
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
It's *Microsoft's* operating system, you're just *renting* it.
In other news, this just means that I have a couple more items on my to-do list for the eventual Vista migration:
- Remove the restrictions on unsigned drivers
- Remove EULA from install ISO
- Remove Defender
- Remove WGA
- Remove WMP
- Remove Windows Firewall
- Remove Windows Antivirus
- Remove Security Center
- Set theme to Windows Classic - screw these happy rounded edges on everything, I want my cursor to BLEED on the sharp corners if I hit them wrong.
Hm, maybe I should just wait until a Vista Pro Lite ISO hits the Torrent networks?Microsoft doesn't want us posting benchmarks proving that Vista is worthless...it might hurt their sales.
Yeah, tell me about it. Soon, MS's EULAs will require a paper contract, with a notary cosine. And with every little thing they get away with, they'll get more obtuse. Of course, I feel like I'm going off on a tangent, here...
Microsoft's locked in monopoly is sined
I think your hypotenuse is flawed. As a corporation, Microsoft can only cosine a monopoly.
but admit that we are dependant on a microsoft OS because of its interoperability with 90% of the programs most computer-savvy people need to survive their day-to-day lives.
Hmmmm, I wouldn't consider you a computer-savvy person if you can't find fully functional if not better Linux replacements for 90% of Microsoft software (except games). Even with games if you are calling yourself "computer savvy" I think you can set up wine or winex or something and get most games to run on Linux. Hmm...I've heard strong cases from people in specific cases (graphics, music editing, some office software), but to say that computer savvy people are dependant on Microsoft OS is a little over the top.
I haven't touched Microsoft software for like 5 years and I guess your comment struck a chord with me, as it implies that I am not "computer savvy", heh.