Slashdot Mirror


UK Woman Charged As Terrorist For Computer Files

Terror Alert Brown writes "Reuters is reporting that a UK woman has been charged as a terrorist because of computer files on her hard drive. According to the article, these files included 'the Al Qaeda Manual, The Terrorists Handbook, The Mujahideen Poisons Handbook, a manual for a Dragunov sniper rifle, and The Firearms and RPG Handbook.' She was picked up in connection with the plot stopped in August to detonate explosives in airplanes flying out of Heathrow airport. Now might be a good time to delete any copies of the Anarchist's Cookbook you once read for amusement and still have floating around on your hard drive."

30 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. She was linked to a group of terrorists... by topham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She was linked to terrorists, and the files are evidence.

    She wasn't arrested and charged BECAUSE of the files.
    there is a difference.

    1. Re:She was linked to a group of terrorists... by zxnos · · Score: 5, Insightful
      read the next paragraph ma man...

      Police said the charges against the woman were connected with the arrest last month of a man caught at Heathrow airport in possession of a night vision scope and a poisons handbook.

      the wouldnt have looked at her without some evidence she was linked to the man who was arrested prior who had similar documents on a hard drive.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    2. Re:She was linked to a group of terrorists... by bunions · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My point is that the charge against her is apparently "possession of forbidden documents." I understand the reason that she's a suspect.

      > they wouldnt have looked at her without ...

      you're getting close to the "don't worry about making everything illegal, the cops will only arrest people they think are criminals" argument.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    3. Re:She was linked to a group of terrorists... by xoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forbidden in the context of terrorism, yes. If I was writing a book about Al Qaeda I could legally possess the Al Qaeda Manual; if I was planning an act of terrorism it wouldn't.

      The relevant section of the Terrorism Act 2000 is here - http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00011--g.htm# 57

      It's not a great law as it basically makes being a bit terroristy a crime rather than something concrete such as possession of a weapon - possess a weapon such as plastic explosive and you've committed an offence (assuming you're not special forces or in mining); planning to do a terrorist spectacular would make the offence worse, but even if the law couldn't prove terrorist intent they'd still have you. Here the law has to prove (should this ever come to court) terrorist intent, otherwise there's no offence.

      But it's better than banning the books outright.

    4. Re:She was linked to a group of terrorists... by Tsagadai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there are 1,600 terrorists in England you are screwed. There were only about 1,000 in fallujah (according to a close friend who was there as a doctor) and the US had 20,000+ troops against them. If there are 1,600 terrorists that's it head for the hills. ...but we all know thats not the case. What there really is, is alot of people "suspected" or witch hunted by the government for some reason. And in all seriousness that is only their official claim of how many they are watching. I'm becoming quite terrified of my government and police forces. I know people who are definately being watched (a hypothetical conversation about terrorism led to 3 raids and a week in prison). Any statistics about homeland security are to be treated with mistrust. You can't fight a war on anything against your own citizens in a democracy. Armies and spies are horrible things to use within your own borders. My point is keep alert the worst is coming and soon.

  2. It's a strange time by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am hoping that there were other lines of evidence against this woman as this is what we need to be very careful about here in the US. The concept of a thought crime is not new and any society that starts prosecuting individuals for books they may possess or for studying things is becoming a a darkness right out of an Orwellian nightmare.

    Hell, as kids we had copies of the Anarchists cookbook and manuals that the US government printed for crafting insurgencies and survival that had all sorts of directions for creating improvised munitions and such. It makes me wonder if we would have been suspects back then. Of course the early 80's were a different time when a couple of 14-15 year olds could carry a rifle out in the Texas countryside to shoot cans without even a second glance. Now, we have bastardized Republicans (Neocons) who are out to create National IDs, document any passage in and out of the country, search our personal information including credit files and library files, and some even propose to index all of the information on personal computers in an effort to screen out "enemy combatants" not to mention revoking Constitutional rights such as Habeus Corpus. It's a strange time.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:It's a strange time by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's illegal to plan crimes.

      Say that to yourself again, really slow this time. What about writing novels, movie scripts, or what about those individuals in police agencies and federal agencies that think about planning crimes to prevent them. What you are saying is that it is illegal to think about carrying a crime out. There should be nothing illegal about that. However, if you go about carrying those plans out, then it becomes a crime. Or at least that is how it should be.

      Say for just the fun of it have some blueprints for making bombs then on the same table have a postcard with the parliment buildings on it.

      If you really believe this, then you are part of the problem.

      The cops don't just go searching random computers hoping they'll stumble on some terrorist then they can arrest them.

      But these are just the sorts of things the US and UK governments have been moving towards. Datamining through any available database available to them to search for incriminating evidence and calculate likelihood indices for incrimination.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:It's a strange time by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Say that to yourself again, really slow this time. What about writing novels, movie scripts, or what about those individuals in police agencies and federal agencies that think about planning crimes to prevent them. What you are saying is that it is illegal to think about carrying a crime out. There should be nothing illegal about that. However, if you go about carrying those plans out, then it becomes a crime. Or at least that is how it should be.


      The key is intent... And it's up to a court to decide that, not police officers.

      --
      Deleted
    3. Re:It's a strange time by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If she had been arrested only for the files on her HDD that would be absurd, but she was connected with a terrorist group which they had foiled; the files on her HDD are practically incidental.

      This is a case of MI5 doing a damn good job, not a big brother issue; infiltrate the terrorist organization, collect information, bring everyone involved in before the plot takes shape.
      The mind boggles at the idea that terrorists, who plan to blow up/irradiate/poison civilians and don't plan to get away with it, shouldn't have any action taken against them until they've committed their crime.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:It's a strange time by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The cops don't just go searching random computers hoping they'll stumble on some terrorist then they can arrest them.

      No, not random computers. Computers of minorities and people whom they don't like.

  3. I'm as guilty as she is... by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm from the UK and heard this story on the radio today

    My HD still has the anarchist cookbook and all sorts of shite in my home directory. Stuff I copied from friends on floppys back when I was a 13yo.
    I am honestly getting worried where CCTV Blairs Britan is taking us.

    No I've nothing to hide. I've nothing to share either.

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  4. RPG handbook by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "the Al Qaeda Manual, The Terrorists Handbook, The Mujahideen Poisons Handbook, a manual for a Dragunov sniper rifle, and The Firearms and RPG Handbook."

    I of course misinterpreted the acronym, but they sure do look like RPG manual titles, don't they? "Dungeons and Dragunovs". Did they read them? They'd feel rather silly I bet if they said "At level five, you can learn Mujahideen Sneaky Poison Attack that does 2d6 damage if you roll..."

    Not to be flippant, but even the summary points out that she was arrested in connection with a bomb plot, and then these documents were found. Presumeably the prosecution's case will rely on drawing that connection, with the manuals as circumstantial evidence. Frankly if that's the best they have the case may fail, but if it's part of a larger collection of evidence (like that which lead to her arrest) then it may not. The justice system has held up fairly well as fair as maintaining standards of burden of proof even in terrorism cases, so barring something like false arrest I'm not feeling any rights violations here.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  5. Slashdot needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a terrorism icon.

  6. Delete? Not quite yet... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now might be a good time to delete any copies of the Anarchist's Cookbook you once read for amusement and still have floating around on your hard drive.

    Don't forget the missing intermediate steps of encrypting it, and then making a backup copy on secure, durable media.

    Someone who has all these files on their hard drives is either a compulsive packrat or might be up to no good... certainly it might raise a few eyebrows. But it shouldn't be illegal to possess these things, and isn't, yet. If possessing certain types of knowledge becomes illegal in and of itself, that's when we'll need the Anarchist's Cookbook the most.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  7. Re:I guess it would be a good time to bring it up by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah. That's why they wanted to use TATP. You would only need to bring a complete mobile chemical laboratory to the plane, mix stuff with chemical fumes and being extemely careful for 2-2.5 hours in the toilet and then if you're lucky you could detonate it. Sounds realistic.

    About dirty bombs: it spreads the radiation! This means the small pieces are not nearly enough to cause even a temporary health problem! -- that's a summary coming from a terrorism expert.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  8. Looks like it was a good thought, dreadful summary by FungiFromYuggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Experts have pointed out that the UK peroxide bombing plot, as discussed, was wildly implausible.

    You are completely correct that both liquid and binary explosives exist. Nitroglycerin has been used as an explosive in the past.

    However, the restrictions on carryon luggage didn't seem to be solving any actual security problem and don't really seem intended to. (If you're really worried about binary explosives, why make them pour the containers into the same bin, in front of what could be hundreds of people?)

  9. Since when is linking a crime? by gillbates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the most terrifying aspect of this whole thing is that she was arrested not because of anything she did, but rather because of her association with others the government doesn't like.

    This isn't justice; it's not even close. It's more like vigilantism with official sanction.

    How long will it be before merely showing an interest in "Terrorist Causes" or "Terrorist Methods" - however defined by the government - is enough to get one arrested? Or has it happened already?

    Democracy in Britain is officially dead.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Since when is linking a crime? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Democracy=This,

      If the people say they want a witch hunt then you have to give the people a witch hunt. If you think democracy is some magic wand where everyone does right then you're wrong. It's an excuse for the masses to hunt the minorities while feeling they have the high ground and "doing the right thing".

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:Since when is linking a crime? by Kuciwalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this insightful? She was "associated with" people who tried to blow up several airplanes. I use quotes because it sounds like they're saying she was a collaborator, or part of the cell. These aren't people "the government doesn't like," these are people who demonstrably tried to kill hundreds of innocent people.

    3. Re:Since when is linking a crime? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the people say they want a witch hunt then you have to give the people a witch hunt. If you think democracy is some magic wand where everyone does right then you're wrong. It's an excuse for the masses to hunt the minorities while feeling they have the high ground and "doing the right thing".

      That is why most "democratic" nations are actually variations on a theme called "Republic". That is the democractic will of the masses is constrained by a set of rules, such as the Bill of Rights, Habeas Corpus, and the like. This prevents (at least in theory) tragic outcomes of the proverbial situation where 2 wolves and a sheep vote democratically on "what's for dinner?".

      And that is precisely why the recent abolishment of Habeas Corpus by the "conservative" fear mongerers is such a devastating (and maybe fatal) blow to the integrity of system of government of the US.

    4. Re:Since when is linking a crime? by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think the most terrifying aspect of this whole thing is that she was arrested not because of anything she did, but rather because of her association with others the government doesn't like.

      You act as if this is a new thing - but its not. She could just as easily been implicated in a group plotting a murder, or a bank heist, or an insurance fraud scheme - and still be picked up questioning and possible charged if she was found in possesion of circumstantial evidence linked to that type of crime. Its pretty much routine.
       
       
      Democracy in Britain is officially dead.

      Nah. Nothing much has changed (at least in this particular case) except it made the media. (If she was implicated in a child pornography ring, and found with lolikon on her PC - I bet you'd be among the first frothing at the mouth to hang her high.)
  10. Re:Is worse for those of us that bought the book. by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Cookbook and plenty of others that won't help you accidentally kill yourself are available quite legally.

    Maybe this will help:
    I can buy lockpicks and lockout tools legally. I can buy manuals to unlock any vehicle, also legally.
    If I'm busted for conspiracy to steal (as opposed to lawfully repo) cars, that stuff becomes evidence along with the rest of the evidence supporting the charges.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  11. Re:One Word in Response by shenanigans · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The write-up is wrong. Now is the time to download ALL the above-mentioned documents, and share them. Let them try to arrest all of us.

  12. Re:One Word in Response by suparjerk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am in full agreement. If reading this article scares you into deleting your text files, then the tyrants running our governments have won, and the citizens have lost.

    Now is the time to download and collect as much information on these subjects as you can. Voice your opinion through your actions. If "We the People" believe, in our so-called democracies, that holding such information shouldn't be a criminal offense, then our governments do not have the right to tell us that it is.

    Unless, of course, you all disagree...

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  13. Re:How was she linked? by mabinogi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Right thinking people" is a phrase that always deeply disturbs me.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  14. Re:One Word in Response by andcal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't think how to explain this succinctly. All the nerds in the world can download all the anarchist cookbooks they want, but that isn't going to stop the government from selectively prosecuting only the people they want, and totally ignoring the rest. It's not even like the general public is going to notice what you have on your hard drive, and move to have whatever law changed so that we aren't techincally criminals anymore.

    --
    --something witty
  15. Re:One Word in Response by JesseL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we were all going to perform out acts of protest and civil disobedience quietly from our basements, you would be right.

    But who does that?

    When you protest you do your best to make sure you are visible. In this case you would do things like distributing fliers and CDs with the forbidden documents. You would let everyone know that you have these things. You would make sure that either the government has to persecute you (and thousands like you) too, or admit their hypocrisy.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  16. Re:HANG THE FILTHY WHORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't be silly. Just because someone claims they are a Muslim doesn't mean they are automatically follow all the rules. You could also say that assuming a woman is a Christian she should would definitely not be filthy or a whore as well. You could also note that Christians are great neighbors because they won't envy anything of yours, commit adultery, or steal.

    Let me give you a hint: the woman is a human being first and foremost. Whether she claims to be a Muslim or Christian (or other religion), she must first reconcile her normal human 'vices.'

    I know it is politically correct nowadays to compensate for negative biases against Muslims by providing positive ones. This counteracts the reality in most Muslim countries where most Muslims are no more virtuous than most Christians are in Christian countries. The negative biases aren't generally true nor are the positive biases. This also applies to Buddhists, Jews, etc.

  17. Re:One Word in Response by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Britain has become the showcase of how to facilitate big brother socialism. They have more cameras per capita than any other country I know of and plan on adding more and to add microphones and loudspeakers to them. Civil rights have been abrogated to the point of non-existence. I didn't know how close to current times the movie V for Vendetta was. This is normal for the UK, after WWII the government completely disarmed the populace and were well on the way to this state until WWII interupted. They did rally and win in the face of crushing odds. I don't think that the modern British citizen is capable of that amount of fortitude anymore. I feel this way mostly because the elimination of their rights has went with mostly a whimper.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  18. Re:One Word in Response by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The write-up is wrong. Now is the time to download ALL the above-mentioned documents, and share them. Let them try to arrest all of us.

    I think it is safe to say you missed the essential elements of what happened, so lets recap what we know from the news:

    The arrested was Samina Malik, 22, an Asian woman who allegedly was working or had worked at Heathrow airport as a shop assistant. (Could she have been an insider at a juicy target for terrorists?) She has been charged with four offences under the Terrorism Act 2000.

    Malik was allegedly associated with Sohail Anjum Qureshi, previously charged as part of the same investigation. How was he nabbed? It is alleged that on 18 October he was plotting to go to Pakistan (well known as home to various terrorist organizations, training camps, and the gateway to Afghanistan)(groups in Pakistan have been tied to a number of attacks planned against the UK) taking with him, among other things:

    -Camping equipment
    -£9,000 cash
    -A night vision scope
    -The Mujahideen Poisons Handbook
    -Two metal batons
    -Combat manuals

    It is alleged that was taking terrorist materials to Islamabad..

    Investigators then followed the trail from Anjum, back to Malik. Allegedly, she had a number of publications on her computer from what look to be a narrow range of interests:

    The al-Qaeda Manual,
    The Terrorists Handbook
    The Mujahideen Poisons Handbook
    How To Win Hand-To-Hand Fighting
    The Firearms and RPG Handbook
    Dragunov sniper rifle manual
    9mm pistol manual
    Anti-tank mine manual

    (Fascinating reading for a 22 year old woman, isn't it? Do you think her goal was to be the life of the party?)

    She was allegedly filling a writing pad full of handwritten notes, which led to one of the charges against her. (Any bets about what those notes were about? Hmmmm... Heathrow... Pakistan... Al Qaeda....)

    No doubt there are other aspects of this that we don't know about. As it is, you have to scour several news reports to get this much.

    Woman charged in terror investigation
    Female terror book suspect in the dock
    Airport worker on terror handbook charges is remanded
    Woman charged under UK terrorism act
    Too many terrorist plots to name, say MI5
    Woman charged under anti-terror laws

    Now, I very much doubt that she is in trouble simply for having those document in and of themselves. What is likely the case is that it is the combination of what she was doing, involving herself with some sort of terrorist cell, AND having those documents. That is trouble in the same sense that having a crowbar in the garage means you have a crowbar in your garage, whereas having a crowbar in your hands at 3:00 AM in back of somebody's house in the next town over means you have a burglar tool, which will make you subject to heavy penalties.

    I doubt that the authorities have much interest in trying to arrest people for simply having those publications. Everything I've seen seems to indicate that their hands are more than full simply trying to cope with the small percentage of people that both have those publications and are trying to use them in attempts to kill large numbers of people. You may also want to keep in mind that the more false signals you generate, the less effective the police will be in tracking down those who are trying to kill you for being, take your pick: an infidel, British

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell