Exclusive Interview With Greg Bear
Joe Dickerson writes, "Aberrant Dreams, an Atlanta-based online magazine, has posted an exclusive interview with science fiction great Greg Bear. The interview covers topics from what it was like being the son-in-law of Poul Anderson, to his newest book (Quantico), to plans for upcoming books. While you're there, check out their other exclusive interviews with the likes of Alastair Reynolds, Stephen Baxter, and Gerald W. Page."
While you're there, check out their other exclusive interviews with the likes of Alastair Reynolds, Stephen Baxter, and Gerald W. Page.
Troy McClure, is that you?
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
"Are you deliberately moving away from science fiction to make more money?" Bear's recent novels (Vitals, Dead Lines, Quantico) have been only marginally science fictional and much more thrillers. Sounds like is new novel about "City at the End of Time" might be returning more to science fiction though.
For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
I actually just finished reading his book "Moving Mars," and it was excellent. I'll definitely check out other books by him in the future. I felt that some of his ideas on (science fictional) theoretical physics (for those who have read the book, I'm talking about Bell Contiuum Theory) reminded me a lot of the faster-than-light travel ideas in the later books of Card's Ender's Game series (Xenocide and Children of the Mind). For those of you who haven't tried his books yet, Robert Sawyer is also an excellent author with a similar style.
(( (CRAYON) )) >
I read Darwin's Radio, and I have to admit I really liked it. I suspected Bear took his "theory" a little too seriously -- and an extremely far fetched theory it is. Darwin's Children rather sealed the deal on that; he's a quack. And the book, well, sucked... A direct sequel going from silly-but-interesting speculative science to metaphysical nonsense and well, a quite uninspired new human race.
It was rather a letdown when his neo human race, that was supposed to be more socially adept, were just as socially retarded as us humans, in fact, even more so. Or maybe it was just off-putting that this writer thought that a socially superior hominid would be even MORE cliquey and xenophobic than us humans.
Yeah, that's what it was. I was interested in seeing how these new humans would deal with the ill treatment by the "normal" people in a superior manner, and was rather appalled that it was simply, in kind. Ie. with prejudice, fear, and menacing.
OTOH, I enjoyed the first book enough that I'm willing to give Bear another chance. Any recommendations?
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
They're Mary Sues! Come on, their eyes change color! And they have magical scent-based mind-control powers! And the grownups just don't understand them!
All Bear would have had to do is give them pink hair and epic flying unicorn mounts. And make them all Dumbledore's daughter.
And you're absolutely right. Radio was kind of interesting; I wanted to see where he was taking the concept. But the sequel didn't do anything SFnal; it was as though Bear was afraid of heaping too many ideas on his audience and decided to play it as a straight thriller, which isn't nearly as interesting. And that weirdness about religious experiences which never went anywhere--what was up with that?
I had read The Forge of God some years earlier, and I'd really enjoyed it. I was pretty damned disappointed in the Darwin books.
Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca