Why the Word 'Planet' Will Never Be Defined
eldavojohn writes "What makes a planet a planet? Slashdot covered the great debate about whether or not Pluto qualified and Space.com now has up an article explaining why we'll never have the term 'planet' defined to a point that everyone can agree on. Divisions in the scientific community currently stand over whether or not it has to be in orbit around a star, the dynamics of the body in question and apparently the country you come from plays a part in it too. Some feel the United States is the dominant deciding factor on the definition but the IAU has not turned to democratizing the definition yet." From the article: "In the broadest terms, a planet could be thought of as anything from an 800-kilometer-wide (500-mile-wide) round rock orbiting a dead star to a colossal gas ball floating alone in space."
Floating mass of sh*t bigger than the moon that isn't on fire, but that is orbiting some floating mass of sh*t that is, in fact, on fire.
Luck favors the prepared, darling.
actually called an "Air Biscut"....never heard it described as a planet before, but, I suppose if it really were that colassal....
A goal is a dream with a deadline
I would define a Planet as: A relative of Captain Planet
'A series of gaming sites ran by counter strike kiddies who think that half life 2 is going to be better than far cry.'. Not sure I quite get that 100%, but you can't argue with the wisdom of the internet.
Don't see what's so hard about that ...
I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
They say that Pluto's
Not quite a planet.
These KBOs
Are goofy, dammit.
Burma Shave.
Anything equal to or greater than the size of Marvin's brain.
Unfortunately, as we do not have the minimum 9 planets required to qualify as a class A solar system, we will have to wait for a trial date with a municipal court first.
Have gnu, will travel.
How about "It is a planet if Galactus would consume it" ?
why hasn't this been moderated up??