Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Unbans Linux World of Warcraft Players

An anonymous reader writes "World of Warcraft players using Cedega (the Linux-based Windows emulator) had their bans lifted after an investigation by Blizzard in cooperation with the Cedega development team revealed that the bans were in fact made in error."

10 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Gotta give 'em credit by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The response was a lot more classy than some companies would have done (*coughSonycough*)

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
    1. Re:Gotta give 'em credit by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...most of their games are evolutionary not revolutionary (although they're fun and have a lot of polish)

      This, in my opinion, is one of the reasons Blizzard enjoys such great success. They may not be very inventive when it comes to new concepts for games, but they will take existing concepts and run the hell out of them. Their games aren't always the best examples of what can be done, but they're always great examples of what should be done.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  2. Well, that's good. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's good to see Blizzard actually take the time to investigate their mistake and make things right.

    I understand based on market share vs. time to develop why Blizzard doesn't have a linux client, but considering that they've got an OSX client I can't imagine the hurdles for porting are that high.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Well, that's good. by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      That they did. Well, no. It was distributed in an early beta over FilePlanet.


      $ for a in *; do sha1sum $a; done;
      c9affeeaff43d565513c1240c37d51efb61c0ff9 WowClient
      dc288d9f7c88c1b0287387c3bb506ef30fd62b1f libSDL-1.3.so.0
      a9178bcd629e3db58d9ca565ee75c0ce85373f70 libexpat.so.0
      3c457e00bdbd4f39b547ff9ac8f67a76c7eb4a1d libfmod-3.72.so
      dd1f45ca3466b2c77e738b54f7b55e858754181e libfreetype.so.6
      56e16ad086c592848d1d53f0b4db2570bb60041e libgcc_s.so.1
      3c137e3f7e29223f6535e8b61fabcfdb2340bca3 libstdc++.so.5
      c8fae34ab919251d0af382f5557ca70ee9c143bf libz.so.1
      a8de29b62f05a71b0fa3761f0441c29081e31cc0 uninstall
      8a5670bbc67b6cb72805afdf28bc0c69fc573a3a uninstall.bin
      cdd47ffc29bc129da0521da5b98a1af23bbb5f4c wow


      I've got the binaries, libraries, and even shell scripts to start it around. No joke.

      They have a functional WoW Linux client. I have no doubt of that.

      They didn't ship it due to legal reasons.

      #!/bin/sh
      #
      # Run World of Warcraft

      # Function to find the real directory a program resides in.
      FindPath()
      {
      fullpath="`echo $1 | grep /`"
      if [ "$fullpath" = "" ]; then
      oIFS="$IFS"
      IFS=:
      for path in $PATH
      do if [ -x "$path/$1" ]; then
      if [ "$path" = "" ]; then
      path="."
      fi
      fullpath="$path/$1"
      break
      fi
      done
      IFS="$oIFS"
      fi
      if [ "$fullpath" = "" ]; then
      fullpath="$1"
      fi
      # Is the awk/ls magic portable?
      if [ -L "$fullpath" ]; then
      fullpath=`ls -l "$fullpath" | awk '{ ORS=" "; i = 11; while ( i fi
      dirname "$fullpath"
      }

      # Unfortunate hack until we figure out why TLS glibc breaks us
      if [ -d /lib/tls ]; then
      LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19
      export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
      fi

      cd "`FindPath \"$0\"`"
      LD_LIBRARY_PATH="`pwd`/lib" exec ./WowClient $*
      Apparently, "Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 20.9)." Not that I'm surprised, after posting a bit of bash script. Even after adding that line, it's still not enough!

      Huh, I'm up to 23.3 and even then that's still not enough. More meaningless text, just to bump it up a tad bit. I should probably drop the punctuation, but hey, oh well. It seems that even 24.5 isn't enough for it... how about 25? Maybe? Please? Okay, more than twenty-five. Time for copy/paste of random text to bump it up. * Please try to keep posts on topic. * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) I understand based on market share vs. time to develop why Blizzard doesn't have a linux client, but considering that they've got an OSX client I can't imagine the hurdles for porting are that high.
  3. Great News by CalSolt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, we can sleep at night knowing that the 15 people who play WoW on Linux can once again have their freedom.

  4. 20 days free? Thats it? by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should give a better comp than just a few free weeks of play. Something like an ingame penguin pet... Ya, that'd be sweet!

  5. One company that (sort of) gets it? by fallen1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to give them credit as well, they heard about the problem, acknowledged there was a problem, teamed up with Cedega and then FIXED the problem (reinstated locked accounts) and then gave them 20 days credit as well.

    Would I be pissed if I played and had an account locked/banned by this? Hell yeah. Would I be somewhat mollified by 20 days of play tacked onto my account and an e-mail apology with an admission of "We screwed up, sorry" to boot? Hell yeah!

    A lot of companies these days don't listen to their "base" and ignore the customer as nothing more than a $ and a number. Blizzard isn't perfect on this account, but they're better than a lot of the major playors out there. Kudos to Blizzard for realizing their cash cow was supported by multiple _people_/players and not just a bunch of $$$ and random numbers called credit cards - and willing to work to fix the problem! Keep up the good work.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  6. Apology AND free play time by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary also failed to mention that the people who were blocked got 20 days free play time - 2 weeks more than the time they were blocked. Basically, compensation for time lost plus some insane interest. They got some flak for this initially, but now, not so long after the incident in question, they admit to being wrong, reimburse those wronged, and told us they worked with the Cedega folks to get this resolved, thus supporting the Linux community. I don't see that they could have handled this much better after the initial screw-up, and with that last bit, they now come off smelling like roses (or at least a lot less like shit) to a majority of the /. community. Well played, Bliz, and bravo.

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  7. Cedega OK... What about wine? by Sylvak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently installed WOW on linux using Wine... It works great. I hope I don't get banned just because I'm using a different emulator. Does anybody know if they can tell the difference? I didn't see any mention of Wine in the article.

    If anybody has a clue on this, please reply.

  8. Blizzard "supports" an unsupported environment ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 5, Informative

    No anti-cheating effort will be 100% error free 100% of the time. I think judgement should be made on how often errors occur and how a company handles reports of errors. The statements before and after indicate a pretty decent handling of the situation. Especially for an unsupported OS. Apparently not all Cedega users were banned, the problem must have been intermittent. This is consistent with what many Cedega users were saying, that they have been playing and everything was fine.

    So, they test in an unsupported environment and promptly investigate problems and address them. IMHO Blizzard is showing Linux some respect, as they did many years ago for Macintosh when most people laughed at it. Hopefully history will repeat itself.

    What they said before the investigation when the report of problem first came in:

    "We have been testing our security software with Cedega. Cedega was used and tested before the security procedures and during the security procedures. From this testing we have yielded no hits, meaning Cedega, by itself, does not incur an account suspension. We have accounts of several Cedega users who have been playing normally during the time that these processes are running. Again, these people are not being suspended simply because of using Cedega or Linux. We are in contact with the people at Cedega and following up with them regarding individual accounts. To answer the OP's question, no it is not against the ToS to use Linux or Cedega. We continue to monitor the situation to prevent cases of false positives and to rectify them if they do occur."

    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topi cId=47009071&sid=1&pageNo=3

    What they said after investigating:

    "Greetings,

    As you know, Blizzard Entertainment traditionally makes a serious commitment to protect the World of Warcraft community from players who gain unfair advantage through hacks and exploits. Last week, our administrators implemented bans on a large number of accounts that were identified acting against the terms and the spirit of the game.

    However, it has since come to our attention that a very small percentage of those accounts should not have been banned. This case of mistaken identity seems to be isolated to users of an unsupported, Linux-based Windows emulator called Cedega.

    Once this pattern was brought to Blizzard's attention, our staff worked directly in conjunction with the Cedega development team in a rigorous and thorough review of the situation. We have since determined that your account was one of those accidentally flagged, and as such we are immediately reinstating your account to fully playable status.

    Blizzard Entertainment deeply regrets the error, as we understand that this brief account closure presented you with an inconvenient and highly frustrating experience. We remain firmly committed to enforcing our regulations and suspensions for those exploiting our game, in the interest of ensuring that our legitimate customers have the best possible play experience. In this case, however, we regretfully caught a handful of innocent customers in the process, and for that we offer you our genuine apology.

    In consideration of our error, we are applying a credit of two weeks play time onto your account, in addition to crediting back the time that your account was locked. This comes to a total of twenty (2O) days credit, which should be visible on your account within the end of the week.

    If you have any other questions or concerns regarding this account, please do not hesitate to let us know. We appreciate your extraordinary patience in this matter and hope you will continue to enjoy your time in World of Warcraft.

    Regards,

    World of Warcraft Support Team
    Blizzard Entertainment"

    http://www.linuxlookup.com/2006/nov/22/blizzard_un bans_linux_world_of_warcraft_players