Slashdot Mirror


High-Tech Shopping In a Window Wonderland

PreacherTom writes "Elaborate holiday window fronts are nothing new to the Miracle Mile of Chicago's Michigan Avenue, home to many of the world's most famous stores. However, retailers are debuting new technology to take things to the next level this year. On Nov. 20, Ralph Lauren installed a 67-in. touch-screen display that allows passersby to purchase any item from the company's RLX line of high-performance ski-wear. They can then retrieve available items from inside the store, or have the clothes shipped from a central warehouse ... skipping the line at the register completely. Ralph Lauren is far from alone: this is just one example of how stores are targeting the tech-savvy consumer."

61 comments

  1. Forget that by tttonyyy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...just have someone playing with their Wii in the shop window, that should get peoples attention.

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:Forget that by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...just have someone playing with their Wii in the shop window, that should get peoples attention.

      You do know stuff like that is prohibited in most countries, especially in "protect-the-children-from-the-adult-body america", right?

    2. Re:Forget that by eieken · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, just put a sheep in front of them!

      --
      Meet new people, and kill them.
    3. Re:Forget that by ady1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the certain implementation of Wii you talk about is legally sellable in US of A

  2. Christmas just wouldn't be the same by darth_MALL · · Score: 0, Interesting

    without the disgraceful overindugence and commercialization!
    Having said that - donate something to help out someone this year.

  3. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. More self checkout lines by Nos. · · Score: 1

    Around here, it seems a lot of people are afraid to use self checkout lines, where you scan and bag the items yourself. So, they all line up at the cashiers, meanwhile, I can get through the self checkout in record time.

    1. Re:More self checkout lines by diersing · · Score: 1
      targeting the tech-savvy consumer.
      They aren't targeting tech-savvy people, they are looking for is someone who isn't afraid to make a purchase whilst standing on one of the busiest streets in the nation - techy-savviness might be seen in capturing the financial elements of the transaction in such a public place.
    2. Re:More self checkout lines by tttonyyy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Around here, it seems a lot of people are afraid to use self checkout lines, where you scan and bag the items yourself. So, they all line up at the cashiers, meanwhile, I can get through the self checkout in record time.
      ...unless something goes wrong, in which case it takes ten times as long. Or if you're buying alcohol (which requires age verification), for example.

      While I don't doubt your premise that some people are afraid to use them, there are circumstances where people might not choose to use them as well. Sounds like risk assessment to me.
      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    3. Re:More self checkout lines by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Around here, it seems a lot of people are afraid to use self checkout lines, where you scan and bag the items yourself. So, they all line up at the cashiers, meanwhile, I can get through the self checkout in record time.

      You're lucky. Around here it seems that most of the people using the self checkout lines are the folks who should be farthest from them.

      They go to the self checkout line which is market very clearly as "20 items or less" with two or three shopping carts piled high with items. Then they start randomly passing things over the scanner with absolutely no attention to where the barcode is located on the item or what piece of information the machine may be asking for. They look around in bewilderment when the machine asks them to remove something from the scale, or to scan something again, or to type in the produce code on a banana or apple.

      Ultimately some employee has to come over and void out the entire transaction and then ring them up again. At that point it is no longer self checkout but rather a cashier checking you out at a self checkout machine. And all the while I'm standing there with a single box of cereal and cash in my hand...a transaction that would take less than a minute if it weren't for the folks in front of me.
      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:More self checkout lines by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Take me for isntance... I go through the regular checkout lane so that the store doesn't see a discontinued need for workers. Yeah, I know how self checkout works, yeah, I think it's reliable, no, I don't think the extra 2-5 minute wait is worth higher unemployment numbers.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    5. Re:More self checkout lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why they don't issue concealed weapons permits in New York... Some people been dodgin' Darwin for far too long.

      Just noticed my captcha: 'evolve'... Oh, the irony!

    6. Re:More self checkout lines by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      Capitalism is about making things more effective. When will people stop complaining about small shops closing up, people being laid off, et cetera? That's the idea!

    7. Re:More self checkout lines by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      What about the engineers and programmers that create and maintain the self-checkout machines? Don't they deserve jobs too?

      Don't buy a horse and buggy just to prevent the people who make horse and buggies keep their jobs.

    8. Re:More self checkout lines by Bwian_of_Nazareth · · Score: 1

      This cannot be more wrong. Capitalism is about assigning value to your utility. Both can and most ofter are non-monetary. It is usually more about time, inconvenience, conscience... money is just the common denominator, the clutch we use to make these things comparable.

    9. Re:More self checkout lines by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      If there aren't enough people who value mom and pop stores to keep them in business, as is obviously the case of the individual store when it closes up, they have been rated superfluous by the society. Their value was not enough, and if you believe in such a system, you should not mourn the loss. Put a product on the market? It will be valued monetarily.

      That said, if a store is boycotted if they start laying people off, then people have proven to value the employees and as such, if the losses to boycott prove larger than the losses to salaries, they should obviously be kept hired.

    10. Re:More self checkout lines by Dantu · · Score: 1

      I don't think the extra 2-5 minute wait is worth higher unemployment numbers.

      Did you even think before you said that? You would rather pay people to do work that you actually don't want done (making you wait), than to have them unemployed and looking for useful work. Clearly you're no laissez-faire capitalist, but even for a socialist there are better options:
      - improved (un)employment insurance and/or welfare programs so that people can get by while looking for useful work
      - Make-work projects - you overpay people, but at least something useful gets done.
      - Government subsidied apprenticeship etc. programs

    11. Re:More self checkout lines by drsquare · · Score: 1
      Or if you're buying alcohol (which requires age verification), for example.


      Age verification is instant and seamless, someone just presses a button or something. I race through these self-checkouts whilst all the lazy retards stand in lines!
    12. Re:More self checkout lines by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Using an outdated system or technology to keep people in jobs is Luddism at its worst. Do you have all your cotton spun by hand to keep the cotton spinners in work?

    13. Re:More self checkout lines by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      >Capitalism is about making things more effective.
      >When will people stop complaining about small shops
      >closing up, people being laid off, et cetera?
      >That's the idea!

      True, at least in part.

      Which is one of the reasons some of us think it's rather a bad idea.

      I share your surprise that so many people complain about the necessary and inevitable result of a system while continuing to support it wholeheartedly at both the polls and the cash register. I just wish they'd stop the later rather than the former.

    14. Re:More self checkout lines by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to meet these people who make the buggy horses of which you speak. Do they do so biologically or mechanically? And why don't they do some unit testing?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:More self checkout lines by rthille · · Score: 1

      Do you move items around in the store too, so the store has to hire another person to put the things back where they belong?

      Personally, I'd rather have the store pay people to be helpful to me looking for stuff and check out myself...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  5. yikes by dinnerkraft · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does entering your credit card info on a 67in. screen is a bad idea?

    --
    Real geeks use acronyms.
    1. Re:yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just you who'd imagine the system would REQUIRE you to enter your credit card number on screen...

    2. Re:yikes by dinnerkraft · · Score: 1

      How else would you pay for it if you have it delivered? Apart from COD, I don't see it. The article didn't even approach the payment issue.

      --
      Real geeks use acronyms.
    3. Re:yikes by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      No, I thought of that as well. If you can choose to have it shipped, presumably you still have to pay for the item and tell them where to ship it.

    4. Re:yikes by dinnerkraft · · Score: 1

      FTA: "They can then retrieve available items from inside the store, or have the clothes shipped from a central warehouse--no long check-out lines necessary. " There has to be some form of payment available right at the screen. The article didn't mention that you could swipe your card or enter the info anywhere. My best guess: you receive a confirmation email with a link for payment purposes.

      --
      Real geeks use acronyms.
    5. Re:yikes by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh, since this is a point of sale purchase, maybe you could use your actual, physical credit card in an actual, physical reader and enter your PIN on an ATM type keypad before going in and nabbing your purchase.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    6. Re:yikes by dinnerkraft · · Score: 1

      That would be the obvious process in order for this thing to work. I'm just pointing out that it's not discussed at all and could very well be a security risk otherwise.

      --
      Real geeks use acronyms.
  6. Enjoy it while it lasts by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In a few weeks, when people start noticing the self-checkouts, they will quickly become one of **THE SLOWEST** lines in the store. This is because

    • You have Joe struggling to find the barcode on the box
    • You have Joe scanning and buying 15 things even though the limit is only 1-5 items
    • You have the stupid machine pausing after every scan saying "Please place the item into the bag" or somesuch
    • You have items recorded with incorrect weights so even when you do put it promptly in the bag the system complains and asks you to wait for a cashier

    All this headache - and do they give you any kind of a discount for doing a cashier's work? No. So the store is saving the cashier salary, and not passing it onto you.

    I gave up on self-checkouts long ago. Maybe in a technology generation or two they will be better (I really like the IBM commercial where the RFID scanner scans all the items instantly and presents the total - hopefully it will zap the tag too).

    But for now they suck ass and are a waste of time. If you have more than two items, or have to wait even behind *ONE MORE* person than the normal checkout line, the normal checkout line will be faster.

    1. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All this headache - and do they give you any kind of a discount for doing a cashier's work? No. So the store is saving the cashier salary, and not passing it onto you.

      That's my main reason for not using them.
      I don't see any great gain for me.

      And in the larger economic picture, it means less people employed, which means less people with money available to spend at MY business.

      It's not small business that's moving to self-serv checkouts, it's the big "the only thing that matters is max_profit" companies that are trying to see how much profit they can squeeze out of everything without causing a mass customer revolt.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    2. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree wholeheartedly. When it comes to shopping technology hasn't sped things up, it's slowed it down. Credit cards and debit cards, while more convenient for the individual and shop, are less convenient for the individual behind since they are much slower than cash.

      That said...perhaps it would be good for old people to get the tech and everyone else to use cash. This being because there's nothing an old person likes to do more at a checkout than have a really good long rummage for the exact change.

    3. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      really like the IBM commercial where the RFID scanner scans all the items instantly and presents the total - hopefully it will zap the tag too

      In a mall near you, sometime in the near future...

      You walk over to the self-checkout counter. As you pass the scanner post, the RFID scanner scans all the items instantly and presents the total. Once you pay, a set of rings shoot from the ground Stargate SG-1 style and surround you and your groceries. You hear "ZZZZT", the packaging on your groceries begins to smell faintly and smoke comes out of your pockets. All RFID tags have been comprehensively nuked, including the ones in your credit card, driver's license and passport.

    4. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Credit cards and debit cards, while more convenient for the individual and shop, are less convenient for the individual behind since they are much slower than cash.

      My experience is different. I can pay with a debit card in something like 5 seconds. With cash, I may be able to hand over some bills in 5 seconds, but no way is the cashier going to be able to give me the appropriate change in that time.
      There's also the 'supply chain' of the cash to consider. If I have to go to an ATM first to retrieve my cash, and then pay with cash at the shop, I've spent more time than if I skip the ATM step altogether.

    5. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Philnet.HFZ · · Score: 1

      Now see, I was watching TV, and came across the idea that there would be an RFID tag in the food and your credit card, and it'd be a small matter of simply walking through a post or whatever, and it'd automagically deduct the money from your credit card account - then it proceeds to zap you with electricity, destroying the RFID tags in the process. Or something. Either that, or the in-store system just makes a note to ignore RFID tags belonging to the food you just purchased and you then walk out, no need to even get out your wallet.

      --
      I don't get why posts are limited to 120 characters. Seems unreasonable to me. I mean, just because I like having a real
    6. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by oakgrove · · Score: 0
      I find that when I use my debit/credit card it's actually much faster than cash. I usually swipe my card and type in the pin number while the checkout person is still scanning my items. By the time the checker is done, all they have to do is hit the submit button and my card is approved in seconds versus taking my cash and counting my change, etc.

      I know you didn't comment specifically about them but I'll just say a couple of sentences about the automated machines. They're actually really fast due to the fact that unbeknownst to most people, you don't even have to touch any of the buttons on the screen; just walk up and start scanning your items and the machine automatically gets the idea and starts with the "place item in the bag" routine. And when you get finished scanning your crap, you don't have to touch "finished" or whatever, just put your card in the reader and the computer automatically goes into pay mode. Very fast in my experience.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    7. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by somersault · · Score: 1

      But won't they need to spend money on security to make sure that nobody is quietly stealing stuff instead of paying for it? In the UK at the couple of self-service checkouts I used, I don't think there was an item limit, and it would have been easy to put stuff through without paying (not that I did of course :/ just always aware how easy it is to take advantage of systems if I really wanted to, especially being a SysAdmin..! but I have morals, and that's why I'm in such a trusted position in the first place..)

      --
      which is totally what she said
  7. Great! by ratta · · Score: 1

    High-Tech Shopping in a WindowS Wonderland!!! uh, nevermind :)

    --
    Wondering why i am doing so strange posts? I am trying to get a "+5,Flamebait" or "-1,Insightful" rating.
  8. Also in clothing itself by PsyQo · · Score: 0

    I happen to work for a global clothing brand and we (and our competitors) are putting more and more gadgets in the clothing itself: iPod control, integrated bluetooth mobile phone control (hands-free), video cameras, you name it. Wearable electronics are imo a very cool technology and here to stay.

    1. Re:Also in clothing itself by BoberFett · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess weak fabrics and cheap construction just weren't forcing us to replace our clothes often enough. Now they're going to make our clothes technologically obsolete every 6 months.

      "I'm sorry sir, your shirt is not compatible with Windows Vista, and we no longer support Windows XP."

    2. Re:Also in clothing itself by nickishappy · · Score: 1

      I know where you're coming from. Only half of my clothes are new enough to support hyperthreading.

      --
      Please don't drink and derive. Alcohol and calculus don't mix.
    3. Re:Also in clothing itself by PsyQo · · Score: 0

      Funny you mention that, because that has happened. But not because of Microsoft :) The last time a lot of wearable electronics were 'absoleted', was when Apple changed their remote control interface on the Nano.

  9. Yeah, sure by Trailwalker · · Score: 1
    ...this is just one example of how stores are targeting the tech-savvy consumer.
    Just one more way to suck in the "un-savvy" impulse buyer.
  10. Windowing System? by DevelopersDevelopers · · Score: 1

    So, come on already, which Windowing System did they use? Was it X? I sure do hope it was X11 and not some piece of crap like Rio...

  11. How long will that 67-inch display last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Chicago after all. I bet someone steals it within a week.

  12. Had this in Palo Alto a year ago. by Animats · · Score: 1

    We had something like that here in Silicon Valley a year ago, at Alan Pinel Realtors in Palo Alto. Big touch screen inside the front window, yet able to detect touches on the outside. You could check their house inventory. This being Palo Alto, the price categories went to "$5,000,000 and up".

    It wasn't obvious how the touch sending worked. Some kind of sensing bar hung above the display, inside the window. The window glass itself seemed totally standard.

    1. Re:Had this in Palo Alto a year ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The white paper on this site describes a number of techniques that could be used.

  13. RE;Had this in Palo Alto a year ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How abou using something like the halographic keyboards to control it they work on normal glass.

  14. Ralph Lauren by cjsnell · · Score: 1

    Ralph Lauren's RLX ski wear is "high performance"? Heh. That's a good one.

    High gaper factor, maybe. :)

  15. But baby, it's cold outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good news everybody!

    Because when I'm doing Christmas shopping in Chicago, in December, I know that the last place I want to be is inside the store...

    bkd

  16. Skiwear? psh by Supreme_101 · · Score: 1

    Im more of a tactile shopper myself, i mean seriously, i *Wouldnt* put my card into a giant tv screen. im not exactly a skinny bloke, so id at least like to try my stuff on first. Its like buying groceries over teh internet - its a great idea until you find that some one stacked your tomatoes and bananas at teh bottom of a bag of soup tins. Delightful isnt it - you never know how it will turn out until it is too late

    1. Re:Skiwear? psh by The+Benefactor · · Score: 1

      You realise that most (if not all) grocery deliverers will happily take back and refund items which aren't up to scratch (or have been battered into mush) when delivered. So if some idiot does what you described then you can easily refuse to accept them and the driver will return them and in a day or so the amount will be refunded to your account.

      --
      To err is human, to arr is pirate.
  17. Saks patenting snowflakes? by 0jjjjjjjjjj0 · · Score: 1
    From the original article ...
    "The snowflakes have paid off in terms of brand identity. We want shoppers to come in and buy, of course. But we also want them to have long-term, warm memories of Saks as a place to visit and shop," Wisgerof says. "Now the snowflake has become a Saks icon. In many ways, we now 'own' the snowflake...and it appears on our holiday shopping bags around the nation."

    I wonder if they're going to patent the snowflake, now it's part of their brand and all ...

    --
    WANRING: This warning is misspelt.
  18. It's the Magnificent Mile in Chicago by slagheap · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Miracle Mile is in L.A.

    --
    First against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:It's the Magnificent Mile in Chicago by oakgrove · · Score: 0

      Miracle Mile is in Coral Gables, FL.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    2. Re:It's the Magnificent Mile in Chicago by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      As that link didn't seem to work out very well, try this one.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  19. Be sure to bring a large blanket. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Ralph Lauren installed a 67-in. touch-screen display that allows passersby to purchase any item

    Nothing like having your CC# and details presented on a 67" display.

    1. Re:Be sure to bring a large blanket. by markimusk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the second comment about this thing showing your credit card info to everyone on a huge display.

      Are you fucking retarded? Do you really think it does this? Do you not suppose somebody might have thought of that when designing it and made a credit card info exchange perhaps a tiny bit more secure?

      Christ this it Slashdot, not Retards R Me ok? Do the world a gigantic favour and eliminate yourself as expediently as possible.

      fucktard.

      no offense.

  20. skipping the line at the register by Orlando · · Score: 1

    They can then retrieve available items from inside the store, or have the clothes shipped from a central warehouse ... skipping the line at the register completely.

    Wow, imagine this extended to the home, allowing shoppers to buy without even leaving the house! Oh, wait...

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
  21. Sounds a bit 1980s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like shopping at Argos in the UK. Flick through a catalogue, type the number into the keypad, insert credit card and go to collection point. Not very glamorous but it works quite well. You've been able to do this for 20+ years over here, welcome to last century USA.