Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Stays Relevant Despite Pulled Content

Gray writes "École Secondaire Mont-Bleu has banned all personal electronic devices and suspended two 13-year-old girls after one uploaded to YouTube a camera phone video of their teacher yelling at the other. After the video was posted on the popular internet video site, the teacher was so embarrassed that he stayed home from work, where he remains on stress leave. The teachers' union is now trying to get all personal electronic devices banned from all schools in Western Quebec." Meanwhile, via the PVRBlog comes word that YouTube has helped raise CBS' ratings by some 7-9%. From that article: "CBS has uploaded more than 300 clips that have a total of 29.2 million views on YouTube, averaging 857,000 views per day, since the service launched on October 18. CBS has three of the top 25 most viewed videos this month (Nov.1-17), including clips from CBS's Tuesday night hit drama 'NCIS,' 'Late Show with David Letterman,' 'The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson' and 'The Early Show.' The CBS Brand Channel is also one of the most subscribed channels of all time with more than 20,000 users subscribing to CBS programming on YouTube since the channel launch last month."

33 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Two different things by NightWulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One is the fact that kids were recording what was going on privately, i.e. these two teachers fighting. Sure one can argue it was done in public, but still. This is a new world, where even the average joe can feel like a famous actor, where any little flub or stupid act they do can be recoreded by 500 people with camera phones, and uploaded to millions of viewers in a few minutes. It used to be you needed to be someone important to be embarassed by millions, now you just need to be in the unfortunate position of being around a cell phone.

    As for CBS, good for them. I would rather have an entire episode of a show, with commercials on youtube in a good resolution then to have to watch it on TV, or be forced to record it via dvr, etc.

    1. Re:Two different things by just_another_sean · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It wasn't two teachers fighting, it was a teacher yelling at a 13 year old kid. The other 13 year old recorded it and put it on youtube. Depending on why exactly he was yelling, and there aren't many good reasons, he probably should be embarassed.

      IMHO yelling at a kid just teaches a kid how to yell.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Two different things by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, that is what the ban makes upsetting. It would be good to ban phones in class because the constant beeping will distort the order, I can completely understand that. But it should not be banned for the reason that stupid behaviour of the teacher could get public. Just for comparison, in Germany there is a website "rate-my-professor", and several college professors have asked via court that their entry is removed there. This is of course rather questionable, if they are underperforming, they should think about it and improve, instead of get a ban on their underperforming becoming public. However, they are so used to their unquestionable authority that they cannot see this. I for one, welcome our new put-everything-on-youtube overlords!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  2. Objective Viewfinders by airos4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And how many times did you ever go home and tell a parent about how a teacher treated you, and get ignored or dismissed with "They wouldn't do that."

    Personally? As much as I'm against the Big Brother society, I'm amused that someone is so scared of how he could be portrayed by an objective viewfinder. And he'll tell us all about how the context isn't there, but there's no good reason why a teacher should be yelling and carrying on to the point where it looks good on video. There's other more effective ways to reach people, and if you can't figure one of them out then there are other career paths.

    --
    I wish there was a choice that said "Factually Wrong -1" when I mod.
    1. Re:Objective Viewfinders by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And how many times did you ever go home and tell a parent about how a teacher treated you, and get ignored or dismissed with "They wouldn't do that."

      And how many times have schools contacted parents or called them to a parent teacher conference to tell of some misbehavior by their child, only to have the parents say "that's not possible, my little angel would never do that and if you try and discipline him/her for it, we'll sue"? Now, if the teacher tried to record the little monsters (even for the teacher's own protection and to have proof of the act), the parents would be completely livid. Lawsuits would be flying and we would all be screaming about "The Man" trying to oppress the students.

      I too am against a Big Brother society, but I think we are already getting there. The problem is that Big Brother is not the government, but rather any knucklehead with some sort of recording device. Personally, I think those kids should be treated the same way a teacher at that school would have been for similarly recording an altercation instigated by a student toward a teacher.

      I absolutely despise teachers' unions. I think that they have done more to damage the quality of education in the industrialized world than any other force. However, it is abundantly clear that this teacher needs the full backing of the union. More than anything, kids today need to learn respect for authority. This doesn't mean that authority is always right or infallible, just that kids should be taught to respect and that there are proper channels in which to handle grievances (i.e., posting to youtube is not the proper channel).

    2. Re:Objective Viewfinders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I think those kids should be treated the same way a teacher at that school would have been for similarly recording an altercation instigated by a student toward a teacher"

      You hold 13 year olds to the same standards as teachers?

    3. Re:Objective Viewfinders by dircha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wake up, buddy. These are public employees. These are the people to who we have committed one of the most fundamental and important roles in our society: teaching the next generation. In many cases these teachers are more important in shaping the future of our society than are parents themselves.

      You better believe we need to hold these people to the highest level of accountability.

      And you know what? Teachers unions should be happy we are doing this. As we weed out the scum and the freeloaders who are negatively impacting our children, we will raise the standards in the teaching profession and hopefully thereby raise the wages of teachers to reflect the fundamental and critical role they play in our society and our future.

    4. Re:Objective Viewfinders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Now, if the teacher tried to record the little monsters (even for the teacher's own protection and to have proof of the act), the parents would be completely livid.

      Many jobs involve putting up with undeserved BS from the public. Often, you are not allowed to engage in a fair fight with bad customers. That's why teaching is a paid profession.

      Kids may need a little of that growing up - it can be a good lesson - but generally they are entitled to a BS-free environment in the classroom.

    5. Re:Objective Viewfinders by E10Reads · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Except that all unions are administrated by the "scum and freeloaders" group. That's what unions are all about, defending the right of not working properly." I am a member of a union, the cinematographers guild. I work as a motion picutre camera assistant. It is not unheard of to work over 24 hours on a shoot (many television shows in New York shoot over 13 hours every day, 5 days a week. By the end of the week people are working 16 hours, halfway into Saturday, and then begin work monday morning at 6 or 7). It is the job of a producer to work a crew-member as hard as they can, for as long as they can, with as little pay/rest/recompense as possible. It is the job of my union to keep me protected from this, and they are fighting a losing battle, as every contract renegotiation we lose more ground to the producers. Most of the people who administer my union are/were working as cinematographers or camera assitants. If you would consider the people who worked in the field and left ( or even stayed working in the field) to continue on to help their brothers and sisters get a fair deal as "scum and [freeloading]", then please rethink your statement. If you are speaking sarcasticly I couldn't pick that up from your statement.

  3. Misleading Summary by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTFA: the incident took place a month ago, when one student provoked the teacher into yelling at her while a classmate secretly taped the confrontation.

    As Admiral Akbar once said: It's a trap. TFA also mentions that the exact same thing happened at another school in Canada.

    We all know how easily video can be creatively edited & pictures can be photoshopped... so short of banning camera phones & (video) cameras, I don't really see how you resolve the issue.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Misleading Summary by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, you can always ask other teachers/students in the given situation what was going on. Heck, someone can always press charges and the justice system would take care of it. It would probably set a precedent either way discouraging the use of these phones.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    2. Re:Misleading Summary by Rudisaurus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      We all know how easily video can be creatively edited & pictures can be photoshopped... so short of banning camera phones & (video) cameras, I don't really see how you resolve the issue.
      How about ... not yelling at students?

      How about behaving with a certain decorum and a degree of self-control?

      How about always behaving as if you are on public display?

      See? No problem!
      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    3. Re:Misleading Summary by wasted · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How about hiring competent professionals who know better than to allow themselves to be baited by belligerent kids?


      The union wouldn't allow that, because it would threaten the job security and promotion opportunities of those teachers who are completely incompetent but good due-paying members of the union.
    4. Re:Misleading Summary by Desert_Scarecrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Yes, and no, they are not allowed to disinvite a student from class. Welcome to the modern American public school system: if you expel a student, expect a lawsuit. Since the cost of going to court is going to ruin your already ridiculously underfunded budget, as a school administrator you will not do ANYTHING that might put you in danger of that. And since most parents are completely unable to raise civil children, very little learning takes place in school. Putting little Johnny's "self-esteem" at the top of the priority list and reinforcing that judgement with lawsuits is the disease of the public school system. Worse, it's a discredit to Johnny, who thinks respect should be automatic. No matter what the hippies tell you, respect is only gotten one way: by earning it.

  4. Finally by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "CBS has uploaded more than 300 clips that have a total of 29.2 million views on YouTube, averaging 857,000 views per day, since the service launched on October 18. CBS has three of the top 25 most viewed videos this month (Nov.1-17), including clips from CBS's Tuesday night hit drama 'NCIS,' 'Late Show with David Letterman,' 'The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson' and 'The Early Show.' The CBS Brand Channel is also one of the most subscribed channels of all time with more than 20,000 users subscribing to CBS programming on YouTube since the channel launch last month."

    Finally! Hopefully, big media will realise that literally giving away content is good for them in the long run. If this catches on like we've been hoping for years now, the DMCA, copyright laws and its like won't need to be changed, they'll just become irrelevant withg the advent of the new paradigm. (sorry for the buzzwords, folks.)
    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  5. Re:Hahaha. by gnasher719 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My suggestion: Install video cameras in all classrooms. The teachers can film everything, edit to their hearts content, and publish the best bits on YouTube. Must be great fun seeing thousands of creepy little morons being shown to be creepy little morons for everyone to see. Like the bloody idiot who wrote the headline for this submission and couldn't even get the spelling of "relevant" right.

  6. Re:I Know It's Off-topic. by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    '' Kids who deliberately provoke a teacher to film the results don't need to be yelled at so much as slapped around a little. And that's why I'd be a terrible teacher. ''

    You would lose your job as a teacher rather quickly. Doesn't mean you would be a bad teacher.

  7. A Good Check by morefiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's ridiculously easy for teachers to abuse their authority. Many often display questionable behaviour in the classroom or elsewhere, the account of which might be met with skepticism when reported to a higher authority, or might simply be flat-out not reported owing to the submissive nature of most students or due to the awkwardness inherent in getting a teacher chastised for an isolated incident.

    With the knowledge that lectures are being, or might possible be, recorded by the students themselves, teachers suddenly become accountable for all their actions--as it should be. Banning such videos from youtube, and electronic devices as whole from schools, is a broad handed tyrannical gesture and an affront to student rights and free speech.

  8. Parents have rights too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think the parent in the article said it best, "...teachers need to be accountable for their actions..."

    It is the same with the police, No one would remember Rodney King if someone had not caught the police beating him on video, and ever since then the police have been trying to make it illegal to film/tape them (calling it obstructing justice, personally I call it ENFORCING justice).

    Teachers (like the police) have a resposibility to the public, and if a fear of being caught on video doing something unethical, illegal, or stupid, keeps them in line then so be it.

  9. chilling effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "How about always behaving as if you are on public display?"

    Not everyone agrees that this would be a good thing.

  10. WTF? by psykocrime · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So, a teacher does something stupid and gets caught on tape... the response of the school district?

    1. Leave (probably paid) for the teacher

    2. disciplinary action for the kids doing the filming

    3. ban of personal electronic devices in classrooms

    Uuuuh, can I be the first to say: WTF!?!!

    Could this situation be *any* more backwards than what it should be? How about an appropriate response like:

    1. Fire / discipline teacher

    2. Public praise for the kids involved

    3. No ban of anything

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    1. Re:WTF? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, a teacher does something stupid and gets caught on tape... the response of the school district?

      1. Leave (probably paid) for the teacher
      2. disciplinary action for the kids doing the filming
      3. ban of personal electronic devices in classrooms

      Uuuuh, can I be the first to say: WTF!?!!


      Can I be the first to say: "This is the exact response to the Abu Grahib pictures incident"?

      Immediate ban of cameras in all army prisons, court martial for the ones caught on film, higher ups run free. Creepy, huh?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  11. Keeping bad teachers in check by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think kids should be allowed to have electronic devices because the threat of being recorded will keep bad teachers in check.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  12. Flamebait? by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When a teacher loses control, there's no excuse.

    Pranks like this get caught and lead to kids being punished, but whenever a teacher loses control, that damages their credibility and that of the school's. In this case, both the teacher and students need to be suspended; and they all need counseling. The kids need to be taught not to play pranks and the teacher needs to learn how to maintain control.

    We need those student cameras in place in case teachers start shit with the students (i.e., beatings, molestation, etc).

    Banning student cameras in this case is like banning cars because someone went on a rampage across a playground.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Flamebait? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The fact is kids arnt punished enough in schools these days.

      But the punishments should be immediate and painful or unpleasant - i.e. cleaning dirty stuff or having to "assume the position" or even being banned from sports and extracurriculars. Not calling the cops and having them deal with it (that just shows teachers as weak) or forcing kids to attend a whine-session with a shrink.

      -b.

    2. Re:Flamebait? by Ozwald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After reviewing the evidence (as linked above) I have the following conclusions:

      - after all these years, some teachers are still loud and annoying
      - after all these years, some students are still assholes and bitches, especially to subs
      - teachers' threats are empty
      - students know that the teachers' threats are empty

      Keep in mind, what I'm suggesting is much more calm. No more punishing up front. Punishing for long term, sure. I'm also suggesting that there are good students out there. And a lot of them. Why does their education have to be affected by a the ones that don't care?

      Keep in mind there's also a mob mentality involved here too. If a small group of the 'cool' kids are obnoxious, the rest will be too. Separating these from the larger group and into smaller more controlled groups may even help them too but I believe it will help the rest enormously.

      Note that I never suggested direct punishment in either of my posts.

      Oz

    3. Re:Flamebait? by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its kinda funny - in 3rd world countries, kids know how to behave in classrooms by the time they hit highschool. Teachers are given both the power and the respect as parents over the kids. Some teachers are a bit violent, and some find better ways of getting accross - but kids learn how to deal with the whole variety of them.

      In Canada / America (I haven't been to a British school) - by the time kids hit highschool, they 'rebel' against society. Clearly there's something wrong when highschool kids don't know where they oughta behave themselves and where they can vent and rebel.

      --
      _Vishal www.squad9.com
  13. Re:Why ban? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why is this misuse?
    A teacher yelling at a student should be put out to the world. Maybe the teacher should rethink his behaviour. Clearly he thinks his behaviour is wrong, or it wouldn't bother him.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Re:Hahaha. by etymxris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know, there seems to be a moral difference between mocking children who have no choice but to be where they are, and mocking adults who chose the profession they are in. Teachers are held to a much higher standard of conduct than students, and for good reason.

  15. Re:I Know It's Off-topic. by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There really are great kids who have been handed poorly-equipped parents by a crueler fate than your own.

    Finding the heart to absorb some of their personal angst whilst moving the class forward in spite of the aggressively self-promotional behaviour is THE key challenge of teaching a PUBLIC school - the principle purpose of which is to address the vicious cycles in society by which the feeble beget the more feeble.

    Its a lofty calling, and both difficult and under-appreciated (to say nothing of misunderstood).

    Here's to those who succeed!

    AIK

  16. Re:New trend by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I was with you right up to that last part.
    And until Adobe stops dragging their feet on Linux (and even BSD) support, fuck Flash, too. Let's face it, the browser plugin situation is a disaster

    Using Linux is your choice. YOURS. You have made the choice to use an OS that has roughly 3% market share. Not only that, but an OS where interoperability between distros is far from assured. Oddly enough, the fact that Adobe supports 95% of the market sounds like more than enough for me. The browser plug-in situation is great! Flash is compatible on more types of computers than 99% of the programs out there. Flash is more cross-browser and cross-platform compatible than many HTML/CSS websites. If you have chosen to use an OS that is not supported by a piece of software that has become a major part of the web, that is your choice. The rest of the world is under no obligation to support a platform just because you happen to use it.
  17. I call BS by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to see evidence that "Very rarely is the teacher at fault, I can easily say based on reports I see via NEA and NJEA newsletters nearly half the time the teacher is punished despite 9/10 times the student provoking the teacher."

    I'll agree that death threats and violence by students upon teachers are on the rise compared to 50 years ago. But that's a direct reverse from 50 years ago when violence by teachers AND parents upon students were the accepted norm. The only difference between yester year and modern times is the direction of the violence.

    I'll also agree that we punish kids too lightly, and that counseling is not always the best solution. But we need to find a middle ground - we certainly cannot go back to the day when kids got the hell beat out of them (remember, folks, violence only begets violence), and we can't have the ultra permissive situation we have today. Kids need to be treated with respect and taught that it goes both ways.

    That having been said, banning student cameras won't stop the abuse that they're sometimes used to record. There's no LEGITIMATE reason to deny students that freedom because of a few abusers... that is, unless you desire them not to be in competition with the Government, which is moving toward monitoring everyone 24/7 (currently even moreso in the UK than the US).

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  18. How many of you have worked with kids? by Slotty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm seeing a lot of posts saying "the teacher shouldn't yell" or some other why don't you just reason with them.

    I do volunteer work with 13-15 yr olds in the Australian (Catholic) High school system. Kids talk, they're disruptive and don't like authority. From what I've experienced in the school system students are far more disrespectful. I was amazed when I heard students swear directly at teachers. How many of you have to put up with that in your working environment?

    Children need to respect the authority of their teachers and be disciplined by them. Parents going on about "suing" are stupid and teaching their children poor skills to deal with life