Slashdot Mirror


Internet Archive Gets DMCA Exemption

Paul Hickman writes "The Internet Archive has successfully lobbied for a DMCA exemption for the Software Archive. The IA keeps out-of-date programs, games and other random craziness for future programmers to savor. At the rapid pace of software development, this makes sure that we can create a history for us to remember and wonder at the programming of early games."

7 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Now all that we need is by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a personal DMCA exemption for every US Citizen.... sigh

  2. Yes, and I, uh, need one also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am a special archivist librarian, um, responsible for the collection of laser-readable media in my home^H^H^H^H *library* and I need a special exemption also so that my friends^H^H^H^H^H^H^H fellow librarians are able to enjoy^H^H^^H^H^H access the material contained therein.

    Sincerely
    Pirate^H^H^H^H^H^H Bob

    1. Re:Yes, and I, uh, need one also... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your torren^H^H^H^H^H^H journal.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  3. Re:Can they ignore takedown orders? by russ1337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I store my MP3 collection there? I wouldn't want to to get lost.

  4. Re:Can they ignore takedown orders? by Elektroschock · · Score: 5, Informative
    In the European Union we currently watch the next stage of madness. They prepared legislation which would turn all intentional infringements of an IP right into a criminal offense. No fair use exemptions yet.

    Article 3 Offences
    Member States shall ensure that all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, and attempting, aiding or abetting and inciting such infringements, are treated as criminal offences.Let's see whether parliament will fix it. I hope that at least the following amendment will be accepted:

    Article 3, paragraph 2 (new)

    Amendment
    Member States shall ensure that the fair and
    reasonable use of a protected work including
    such use by reproduction in copies or audio
    or by any other means, for purposes such as
    criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching
    (including multiple copies for classroom use),
    scholarship, archiving, format conversion or
    research will not be treated as a criminal
    offence.

    Justification:

    Paragraph 1 of Article 3 describes what shall be treated as a criminal offence. New paragraph 2
    affirms desirable fair uses which shall never get punished by criminal sanctions, and are vital for
    a free and open society. Amendment derived from to 17 U. S.C. 107Please write to Member of the Legal Affairs Committee and ask them to support or table the amendment. Lobbying at the right time can prevent a lot of problems which occur when the law will be executed. Then you or your business will get into danger. Please ask MEPs to support the fair use provision!
  5. All 6 exemptions by WaXHeLL · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. Audiovisual works included in the educational library of a college or university's film or media studies department, when circumvention is accomplished for the purpose of making compilations of portions of those works for educational use in the classroom by media studies or film professors. 2. Computer programs and video games distributed in formats that have become obsolete and that require the original media or hardware as a condition of access, when circumvention is accomplished for the purpose of preservation or archival reproduction of published digital works by a library or archive. A format shall be considered obsolete if the machine or system necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format is no longer manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial marketplace. 3. Computer programs protected by dongles that prevent access due to malfunction or Recommendation of the Register of Copyrights November 17, 2006 Page 2 damage and which are obsolete. A dongle shall be considered obsolete if it is no longer manufactured or if a replacement or repair is no longer reasonably available in the commercial marketplace. 4. Literary works distributed in ebook format when all existing ebook editions of the work (including digital text editions made available by authorized entities) contain access controls that prevent the enabling either of the book's read-aloud function or of screen readers that render the text into a specialized format. 5. Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network. 6. Sound recordings, and audiovisual works associated with those sound recordings, distributed in compact disc format and protected by technological protection measures that control access to lawfully purchased works and create or exploit security flaws or vulnerabilities that compromise the security of personal computers, when circumvention is accomplished solely for the purpose of good faith testing, investigating, or correcting such security flaws or vulnerabilities.

    --
    The troll with karma.
  6. Re:Can they ignore takedown orders? by PurpleMonkeyKing · · Score: 5, Informative

    They made the exception for obsolete computer programs/games among others. Their definition of obsolete is:

    A format shall be considered obsolete if the machine or system necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format is no longer manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial marketplace.

    Takedown orders will still hold, if the content is still manufactured. Well, at least they don't have to wait until it reaches public domain!

    The first few pages of the official document (pdf warning) give more details.