Judge To SCO — Quit Whining
chiark writes, "Back in June, the magistrate judge presiding over SCO vs IBM gutted SCO's claims, as discussed on Slashdot. SCO cried 'foul,' appealed to the District Judge, and today that judge has ruled against SCO, succinctly and concisely affirming every point of the original damning judgement. Also included in this ruling is the news that the Novell vs. SCO trial will go first: 'After deciding the pending dispositive motions in this case, and after deciding the dispositive motions in Novell, which should be fully briefed in May 2007, the court will set a trial date for any remaining claims in this action.' It's notable that the judge conducted the review using a more exhaustive standard than required out of an 'abundance of caution,' and still found against SCO." As Groklaw asks and answers: "What does it mean? It means SCO is toast."
I better act fast! This is the time to sell my remaining SCO stock before the tsunami strikes.
This is slashdot. Neutral does not exist with respect to linux, microsoft, and sco. Other topics may vary.
What is this, 2003? I'm looking forward to the latest press release from the the Iraqi information minister.
Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
This is your last chance to take advantage of SCO's special licensing offer of only $699 per computer. Better get those orders in before it's too late!
This guy's the limit!
. . .a more neutral/appropriate headline might make this a more reputable site.
What, and ruin it's reputation? I don't think so.
KFG
Am I the only one who sees this as reminiscent the scene in Star Wars IIIYou are the only one here who thinks Star Wars III is worth remembering at all.
Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
Quit whining... :-)
The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!