Slashdot Mirror


Intel To Include Draft 802.11n In Centrino

filenavigator writes "Intel announced at the Globalcom 2006 Expo that they will be including Draft 802.11n hardware in their Centrino chips. It will be interesting since they said that they will start doing this sometime in the middle of 2007, and the 802.11n standard is not to be finalized until 2008. Additionally Draft 802.11n has been dogged by interoperability problems." From the article: "Although the news caused barely a ripple of reaction in the audience of software and hardware engineers, there are industry analysts who have already warned large buyers of wireless technology to resist the temptation to deploy high-speed IEEE 802.11n devices until the standard is ratified."

7 of 67 comments (clear)

  1. Eh by wiz31337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only major issues I've seen with 802.11n is the decrease in range and the obvious speed differences. If it is backward compatible with 802.11a/b/g then this should be a big issue.

    --
    /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
  2. Time's up - Intel is now the standard by hirschma · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty obvious how this plays out:

    * Intel will become, pretty much overnight, what all of these routers have to interoperate with,
    * Everyone else tweaks their chipsets to work with Intel,
    * Intel's interpretation of the draft standard becomes the standard.

    Yeah, I'm quite sure that the IEEE will do something to rock that boat.

  3. It's both dangerous and misleading to embed N now by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) it's still a draft, and anything can change between now and then (ask Synoptics)
    2) while backwards compatible with G, N requires special antennas (two of the, in diff-mode, so to increase bit-rate); Centrino silicon will be new
    3) even though every fab house is trying to get marketshare in N, there's lots unproven about its future, and which technologies might eclipse it
    4) it thwarts the draft process of the IEEE; but I guess standards will go to those that buy them.

    Many tests have proven incompatibility issues, and the mistakes made. Reserving notebook real estate for a chipset is just a rook move, and nothing more.

    Move along, therefore; nothing but PR prattle to see here.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  4. Re:Why so long to finalize the standard? by GotenXiao · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does everyone always assume that wireless networks are only ever used for internet access? Am I forbidden from running VNC to my desktop from my laptop? Can I not transfer files to my wifi-enabled Archos? Streaming media from my desktop to a TV downstairs?

    --
    Goten Xiao
  5. Apple is shipping pre-n already by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are not advertising it, but Apple's new laptops have pre-n built in already. There is speculation that pre-n will fuel the iTV and its HD capable HDMI port. Don't you love rumors?

  6. Re:Can someone explain this? by InakiZuloaga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It depends on how well are you able to receive. There's a parameter that is named the receiver sensitivity and that's the lowest power that it can receive and still get the correct data. If you have a receiver circuit with sensitivity of let's say -90dbm and that allows you to reach 0.1 miles, if you have another device that has a sensitivity of -93dbm that will allow you to reach 0.15 miles without changing the transmit power. The sensitivity depends on how noise inmune is your receiver to noise and that depends on the radio standard used.

  7. Re:looks like i'll have to buy the white album aga by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why? Is your 54G stuff not working?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.