Slashdot Mirror


German Minister Seeks Jail Time For FPS Players

GamePolitics has the somewhat unbelievable news that German Minister of the Interior Gunther Beckstein is seeking jail time for violent game developers, publishers, and players. MSNBC has further coverage of the issue, which has pro gamers in Germany quite worried. From the article: "The draft law, a reaction to a school shooting that shook German public opinion last month, will come before the upper house of parliament next year. But it is already sending shockwaves through the 2m-strong German online gaming community. 'We have among the most drastic censorship rules for games,' said Frank Sliwka, head of the Deutsche E-Sport Bund, an umbrella federation for German online gaming teams. 'Now we are being labelled as a breeding ground for unstable, dysfunctional and violent youngsters.'"

18 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. It's all the games' fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, everyone knows Germany has had absolutely *no* history of violence before video games appeared on the scene.

    *ducks*

    1. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a proven fact that Adolf Hitler played Wolfenstein 0.0001 on his Volksrechner 0.4 * 10^(-4) MHz.

    2. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Germany didn't start WWI. It began as a war between Austria and Serbia.

      They got involved pretty damn quickly, though.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    3. Re:It's all the games' fault! by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the fastest possible application of Godwin's law is for the origingal post in a thread to invoke the Nazis preemptively. Let's call that a G0 post.

      The fastest possible meta Godwin would be in a child response to a G0 post. Let's call that an M1 post. You can't pull a meta-Godwin in a G0 post without triggering the self-referential (wank) exception.

      Sadly, you post is a respectable but undistinguished M2 (grand child) meta-godwin. But then again this post is an H3 hyper-meta-godwin so I can't say anthing. H2 would the fastest theoretically possible hyper-meta. Of course you can't do an H1 because that triggers the meta-self-referential (wank wank) rule.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:It's all the games' fault! by triffid_98 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Baldrick: I've heard what these Germans will do, Sir. They'll have their wicked way with anything of woman-born.

      Edmund: Well, in that case, Baldrick, you're quite safe. However, the Teutonic reputation for brutality is well-founded: their operas last three or four days; and they have no word for `fluffy'.

    5. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful
      World's fastest invocation of Godwin's Law? :D
              ~~=====> - Godwin's Law

                  0 - You
                _|_
                  |
                / \

      It's not a rule that can be invoked like "Whoever finishes the TP must install the new roll.", it's a law in the sense of "E=MC^2".

      Let me introduce you to Kano's Law.
      • The odds of someone using Godwin's Law to shield an idea from criticism is proportional to how much that idea resebles those of the Nazis.


      LK
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Rycross · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know who else were pedantic dick-wavers? Nazis.

  2. WOW, more of the same by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More clueless people trying to make rules for systems that they have no idea how it works....

    First, Didn't the neo-nazi youths have this title all wrapped up before there were violent games?
    Kidding aside, this is just another stupid knee jerk reaction to social problems that nobody wants to take the blame for.

    When I was a kid, we played with toy guns, king of the hill, kill-the-guy-with-the-ball, and other VIOLENT games...
    It wasn't until they banned 'red rover' that this sort of bad finger pointing started to happen...

    FerChrisSakes - lets blame everyone and everything but the parents and families of violent kids...

    Sheesh

  3. Re:"Logic" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pretty females can have a stimulating effect on sex offenders (known and unknown), so will you ban women from walking in public?

    Or make them wear burkas. Might as well. That's where the EU will be in 10 years time anyway. The lovely streetwalkers of Paris will become a thing of the past. :-(

  4. Not "German Minister of the Interior" by mseeger · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hi,

    he (Beckstein) is not the "German Minister of the Interior" but the one of Bavaria (german: Bayern). Bavaria is the most conservative state in germany, ruled for nearly 60 years by the same party. He has been joined in his attempt by the minister of interior of lower saxony.

    The core of the prolem is the definition of "killer games". Since nearly all major politicians are 60 or older, they have nearly no understanding of the topic. They believe e.g. that Counterstrike is played with a joystick and the goal of the game to be "killing hostages". Usually, hearing them, i'm torn between laughing and crying.

    Regards, Martin

  5. Re:Going a little overboard by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No... But WWII is responsible for all the WWII video games of the last few years. If I see one more WWII video game, I'm going to jump into my Sherman tank and take a tour through town!

  6. An once of prevention by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is worth a pound of cure. We all know that.

    But what is seldom appreciated is how often that a pound of prevention turns out to be worth only an ounce of cure. Or less.

    The reason that the "ounce of prevention" strategy works is that it focuses you on simple, reasonable actions that accurately target the concern and produce few side effects. Like putting a lock on your door to prevent burglary. Now you could sit on your front porch and shoot at everybody who comes near your house that you think "looks shifty". There is no doubt a more vigorous preventive measure than locking your doors and widnows, but it isn't more effective.

    It really doesn't matter whether something is done before or after the fact, so much that the action be chosen to produce the results desired, and not much if anything else.

    And seeing as we've already triggered Godwin's law, I may as well raise the example of the Final Solution as an instance of the pound of prevention phenomonon. If people thought that the Jews where using their control of money to ruin the country, why didn't they simply pass a few banking regulation laws? Then nobody could ruin the country that way, Jew or otherwise. The answer is that the pound of prevention phenomon, like road rage, is driven by highly emotionally charged thinking. The kind that makes you act so stupidly that the only way not to die from embarassment is to do something even stupider.

    If you're so concerned with pathologically violent people, why not simply screen for them at various reasonable points? You provide mental health services at school to disturbed kids and training for teachers on how to recognize and deal with them. You screen people who have violent run-ins with other people before they go onto bigger and badder things. You run a public education campaign so people can recognize when their associates and familiy members need help -- maybe a few people will recognize they need help themselves.

    Will this get rid of all violence by disturbed people? No. But it will do a hell of a lot more than banning video games.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  7. Re:Where do you draw the line by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Funny
    I just got Suzuki Superbikes for PS2. In this game, the riders occasionally kick at each other. Since kicking someone on a motorcycle at race speeds could certainally result in injuries as bad as or worse than a bullet wound, am I playing a violent game?
    Yes, it is a violent game if it allows you to do that. Thus, they would have to change the game so that players do not kick at each other. In fact, at the end of the game, all players will be shown joining the winner for a large group hug to show that there is no animosity.

    What if I try to take out other drivers in GT4?
    Well, then, your car will immediately be stopped by the police and you automatically lose the race. In fact, in order to keep anyone's feelings from being hurt, GT4 will be rewritten so that all races always end in a tie between all drivers.

    Oh, and what if I develop a FPS app in Java? The folks at Sun aided and abetted me. Do they go to jail?
    Yes they do. In fact, the makers of personal computers will be liable if someone uses their personal computer to virtually harm another being--including making them feel bad. Of course, makers of personal computers will then sue all of their component suppliers and so on down the line.
  8. You know what causes the most school shootings... by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is all the media glamor and shock that is the result of school shootings. These kids want to "make a statement". They're so hurt or outcast and they shoot up their school to lash back and to make the world notice, as if to say "It's that bad here." It's essentially an act of terrorism.

    I'm pretty sure Islamic extremist groups didn't become violent from video games, but because they felt a need to lash out. The behavior is, plain and simple, unchecked immaturity combined with a little knowledge.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  9. Re:"Logic" by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And just what does banning trans-fat acids in food have to do with banning good tasting food?

    Such a ban has been in effect in Denmark since 2004, and I'm yet to see any restaurants close over it or any chefs complain that now they can't make their favorite dishes.

    Hell, even McDonalds got on board very quickly. And they've even announced their intentions of extending the restrictions on transfatty acids to all of their European restaurents - all 6,300 of them. Even Kentucky Fried Chicken announced similar goals (they have restaurents in Denmark as well).

    And all that without changing the way food tastes.

    Oh, wait. You were being obtuse, weren't you?

    What next? Going to complain that we don't allow odd things like, say, tar and mercury in your food due to health issues? I mean, people could just steer clear of the foods that contained that kind of stuff, right?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  10. Beckstein NOT germanys Minister of the Interior by euice · · Score: 5, Informative

    He is the Minister of Interior of Bavaria, and Bavaria is just one of 16 states (Bundesland) in germany. That's like calling Arnold Schwarzenegger president of the united states.

    And besides that, he isn't even very popular in germany (at least outside bavaria).

    To give you a picture of his political position: The conservatives (CDU) are the largest party in germany at the moment, althouth they are only supported by about 35% across germany.

    In bavaria, things are a lot different. Bavaria is so conservative, that the more moderate CDU is split into two partys. The party in bavaria is called CSU, so the rest of germany does not link the radical positions of the CSU to the conservatives outside bavaria.

    That works incredible well: the CSU dominates bavaria around 60% for decades, with political statements like the above. And Mr. Beckstein is often the one saying the radical statements.

    Shall I mention that Mr. Beckstein is a huge fan of the Bush administration whereas most germans are not?

  11. Re:"Logic" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    You just have no quick, paid for romance in your heart, sir.

  12. Some clarification by Fefe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The guy is not the German minister of the interior, he is the Bavarian minister of the interior, and he is well known for this stupid publicity stunts. He is always at the forefront of demanding new databases, new surveillance, longer jail time for everything, more police and using the military to do police work. In short: the guy is a nutcase.

    He is doing it to make sure people don't notice all the scandals his administration is involved in, for example they just completely botched a police IT spending bill, wasted millions on new software which does not work. And his law and order state had issues with soccer hooligans.

    In short: the guy is a joke. Don't take him seriously.