Slashdot Mirror


German Minister Seeks Jail Time For FPS Players

GamePolitics has the somewhat unbelievable news that German Minister of the Interior Gunther Beckstein is seeking jail time for violent game developers, publishers, and players. MSNBC has further coverage of the issue, which has pro gamers in Germany quite worried. From the article: "The draft law, a reaction to a school shooting that shook German public opinion last month, will come before the upper house of parliament next year. But it is already sending shockwaves through the 2m-strong German online gaming community. 'We have among the most drastic censorship rules for games,' said Frank Sliwka, head of the Deutsche E-Sport Bund, an umbrella federation for German online gaming teams. 'Now we are being labelled as a breeding ground for unstable, dysfunctional and violent youngsters.'"

54 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. It's all the games' fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, everyone knows Germany has had absolutely *no* history of violence before video games appeared on the scene.

    *ducks*

    1. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Gertlex · · Score: 2, Funny

      After all, everyone knows Germany has had absolutely *no* history of violence before video games appeared on the scene.
       
      *ducks* World's fastest invocation of Godwin's Law? :D
    2. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Referring to the world wars generally isn't Godwinning something, you have to invoke Hitler directly. And I've seen it done in headlines a number of times, this is plodding by comparison.

    3. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a proven fact that Adolf Hitler played Wolfenstein 0.0001 on his Volksrechner 0.4 * 10^(-4) MHz.

    4. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Germany didn't start WWI. It began as a war between Austria and Serbia.

      They got involved pretty damn quickly, though.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    5. Re:It's all the games' fault! by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the fastest possible application of Godwin's law is for the origingal post in a thread to invoke the Nazis preemptively. Let's call that a G0 post.

      The fastest possible meta Godwin would be in a child response to a G0 post. Let's call that an M1 post. You can't pull a meta-Godwin in a G0 post without triggering the self-referential (wank) exception.

      Sadly, you post is a respectable but undistinguished M2 (grand child) meta-godwin. But then again this post is an H3 hyper-meta-godwin so I can't say anthing. H2 would the fastest theoretically possible hyper-meta. Of course you can't do an H1 because that triggers the meta-self-referential (wank wank) rule.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:It's all the games' fault! by triffid_98 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Baldrick: I've heard what these Germans will do, Sir. They'll have their wicked way with anything of woman-born.

      Edmund: Well, in that case, Baldrick, you're quite safe. However, the Teutonic reputation for brutality is well-founded: their operas last three or four days; and they have no word for `fluffy'.

    7. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful
      World's fastest invocation of Godwin's Law? :D
              ~~=====> - Godwin's Law

                  0 - You
                _|_
                  |
                / \

      It's not a rule that can be invoked like "Whoever finishes the TP must install the new roll.", it's a law in the sense of "E=MC^2".

      Let me introduce you to Kano's Law.
      • The odds of someone using Godwin's Law to shield an idea from criticism is proportional to how much that idea resebles those of the Nazis.


      LK
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:It's all the games' fault! by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to mention that he didn't even say anything about the world wars; for all we know he could have been referring to Germanic barbarians fighting with the Roman legions 2000 years ago!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:It's all the games' fault! by dangitman · · Score: 3, Informative

      For example: discussion proceeds (the information is free) until someone invokes Godwin's law (invokes the state secret law) and then you can't talk about whatever it is anymore.

      You don't seem to have any idea of what Godwin's Law is. It does not prevent further discussion, or stop information from being "free." It is simply a statement of probability. This is what Godwin's Law says:

      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.

      It says nothing about such comparisons being valid or invalid. It says nothing about discontinuing the discussion, or winning an argument - as so many people mistakenly argue. It just says that lengthy online discussions are more likely to contain comparisons to Nazis than brief discussions.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    10. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Informative
      The solution after WWII was to break Germany into two countries.



      Crap, man, pick up a history book, please.



      Germany ended up divided because the western Allies didn't like the Soviet plan for making a unified Germany out of the four occupation zones (which would have been "neutral" at best, or more likely ended up a Commie satellite state, like the GDR), and the Soviets of course didn't like any of the plans the western Allies had (which all involved Germany not becoming a satellite state of the Soviet Union).



      There were plans for breaking up Germany, but they were all discarded. The final result wasn't a solution someone came up with, it was the end result of the winners not being able to agree on one solution.

    11. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, even the Jargon File goes on to say:

      "'As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.' There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups..."

      Technically Godwin's Law does no such thing, but the codicil of application of Godwin's Law ending/losing a thread is now so firmly attached to the original that it's pretty pointlessly pedantic to argue against the idea.

      "Godwin's Law" in popular usage therefore indicates both Godwin's Law and the associated tradition of it ending threads.

      You can argue about the "meaning" of words or phrases all you like, but words have no intrinsic meaning - they're just collections of sounds we've arbitrarily drawn a ring around and decided to call "a word". If the majority of people use a word to mean X, the word now means X, irrespective of what it meant before. C.F. "gay/cheerful", "gay/homosexual", "gay/bad".

      "Godwin's Law" now includes the codicil about ending threads. We can now call a halt to pedantic dick-waving competitions the world over. :-D

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    12. Re:It's all the games' fault! by Rycross · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know who else were pedantic dick-wavers? Nazis.

  2. WOW, more of the same by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More clueless people trying to make rules for systems that they have no idea how it works....

    First, Didn't the neo-nazi youths have this title all wrapped up before there were violent games?
    Kidding aside, this is just another stupid knee jerk reaction to social problems that nobody wants to take the blame for.

    When I was a kid, we played with toy guns, king of the hill, kill-the-guy-with-the-ball, and other VIOLENT games...
    It wasn't until they banned 'red rover' that this sort of bad finger pointing started to happen...

    FerChrisSakes - lets blame everyone and everything but the parents and families of violent kids...

    Sheesh

    1. Re:WOW, more of the same by thhamm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FerChrisSakes - lets blame everyone and everything but the parents and families of violent kids...

      true, and beckstein is an idiot. he's got real paranoia and nobody is taking him really seriously here. er. i hope.

    2. Re:WOW, more of the same by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's also important to remember that Beckstein is the Innenminister for Bavaria, not Germany. It's akin to the attorney general of Texas, not the AG of the USA.

      And yes, Beckstein's a git. It's taking him far too long to realise that he is one of the most unpopular politicians in Bavaria, now that Monica ("my daddy used to OWN this state!") Hohlmeier has been run out of town in disgrace.

  3. Reason? by PieSquared · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can you say publicity stunt? Seriously, gaming in Germany is massive, and nearly every video game is violent in some way. Why don't they ban "tag" while they're at it, a game which encourages *actual* attacking of another human being in the game. I'm not familiar with German law, but I get the feeling this guy isn't elected. Why? Because so many germans play games and would be against it. This would probably be political suicide even in America, a country that seems more inclined to take away people's rights. Now, however, whoever the interior minister works for can point to this (probably) failed bill whenever a school shooting comes up, but then point at someone else whenever the bill is criticised. Some day people are going to realize that the people in school shootings got the plan on *how* to go about doing their crime from a video game *at worst.* The idea *to* do it came from themselves, from deep mental issues probably stemming from their parents or not having enough ways of releasing their anger safely (ever try video games for that?). If they hadn't gotten the plan from a game, they'd get it from a movie, or a book, or even (gasp) come up with their own.

    --
    Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    1. Re:Reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The U.S. beat them to the banning of tag
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15316912/

    2. Re:Reason? by mikeasu · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Why don't they ban "tag" while they're at it, a game which encourages *actual* attacking of another human being in the game." We're one step ahead of you... http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-06-26-rec ess-bans_x.htm http://www.washtimes.com/national/20061018-114713- 2243r.htm http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/art icles/2006/10/18/attleboro_elementary_school_bans_ tag/

  4. "Logic" by Daemonstar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "It is absolutely beyond any doubt that such killer games desensitise unstable characters and can have a stimulating effect," Mr Beckstein said on Monday.
    Although true, I don't see how banning a game is going to prevent future violence. You can't apply that "logic" to other areas:

    1) Pretty females can have a stimulating effect on sex offenders (known and unknown), so will you ban women from walking in public?

    2) Good tasting food can have a stimulating effect on people with eating disorders, so will you ban good tasting food?

    How about doing something constructive and helping people recognize problems in their kids, providing free help to families with issues, and promiting good family relationships, instead? :P
    --
    I don't reply to Anonymous posts; if you have something to say to me, identify yourself or I won't reply.
    1. Re:"Logic" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretty females can have a stimulating effect on sex offenders (known and unknown), so will you ban women from walking in public?

      Or make them wear burkas. Might as well. That's where the EU will be in 10 years time anyway. The lovely streetwalkers of Paris will become a thing of the past. :-(

    2. Re:"Logic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is Germany, there aren't any pretty women and the food isn't good. That's why they've evolved such great beer, to drink away their sorrows. ;) I kid, I kid...

    3. Re:"Logic" by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Interesting

      2) Good tasting food can have a stimulating effect on people with eating disorders, so will you ban good tasting food?

      Yeah - luckily, that couldn't possibly happen, since that would be ridiculous.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    4. Re:"Logic" by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2, Funny
      The lovely streetwalkers of Paris will become a thing of the past. :-(

      If you had wanted to drive your point home, you might have picked a consequence that was actually bad.
      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    5. Re:"Logic" by HeavenlyBankAcct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, honestly, I doubt that any industry is looking after my personal well-being. And I do agree with you on the general principle of the issue. However, I can't help the fact that I'd vastly prefer the situation if "looking after my own best interests" was a job left to me and me alone.

    6. Re:"Logic" by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And just what does banning trans-fat acids in food have to do with banning good tasting food?

      Such a ban has been in effect in Denmark since 2004, and I'm yet to see any restaurants close over it or any chefs complain that now they can't make their favorite dishes.

      Hell, even McDonalds got on board very quickly. And they've even announced their intentions of extending the restrictions on transfatty acids to all of their European restaurents - all 6,300 of them. Even Kentucky Fried Chicken announced similar goals (they have restaurents in Denmark as well).

      And all that without changing the way food tastes.

      Oh, wait. You were being obtuse, weren't you?

      What next? Going to complain that we don't allow odd things like, say, tar and mercury in your food due to health issues? I mean, people could just steer clear of the foods that contained that kind of stuff, right?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    7. Re:"Logic" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

      You just have no quick, paid for romance in your heart, sir.

    8. Re:"Logic" by moerty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or make them wear burkas. Might as well. That's where the EU will be in 10 years time anyway. The lovely streetwalkers of Paris will become a thing of the past. :-( that's just an ignorant statement, in order for any religion in europe to ever get to the point where they control people's daily lives they'd have to survive multiple bloodbaths. europe isn't all peace and flowers you know, the past 70 years of peace are an anomaly and there have been longer peaces in europe which have degenerated into bloody darkness, america is as likely as europe to becoming islamist. the real danger is fundamentalism prevalent in mainstream religion, europe has fought many bloody wars to reach a point where religion is almost completely excluded from the body politic, in this sense america is more likely to turn into a christian theocracy than europe.

    9. Re:"Logic" by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Silly, trans fats come about because we decided animal fat was bad for us. So we all decided we should eat fats from plants instead. Problem is, plant fats are mostly liquids at room temperature, and we like our butter to spread. So Crisco invented hydrogenation and instead of being a trace component trans fat became the norm.

      By the way -- they're saying butter is better for you than margarine now.

    10. Re:"Logic" by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Or make them wear burkas. Might as well. That's where the EU will be in 10 years time anyway. The lovely streetwalkers of Paris will become a thing of the past. :-(

      The Veil Controversy

      For Islamists, the imperative to veil women justifies almost any means. Sometimes they try to buy off resistance. Some French Muslim families, for instance, are paid 500 euros (around $600) per quarter by extremist Muslim organizations just to have their daughters wear the hijab. This has also happened in the United States. Indeed, the famous and brave Syrian-American psychiatrist Wafa Sultan recently told the Jerusalem Post that after she moved to the United States in 1991, Saudis offered her $1,500 a month to cover her head and attend a mosque.

      But what Islamists use most is intimidation. A survey conducted in France in May 2003 found that 77 percent of girls wearing the hijab said they did so because of physical threats from Islamist groups. A series in the newspaper Libération in 2003 documented how Muslim women and girls in France who refuse to wear the hijab are insulted, rejected, and often physically threatened by Muslim males. One of the teenage girls interviewed said, "Every day, bearded men come to me and advise me strongly on wearing the veil. It is a war. For now, there are no dead, but there are looks and words that do kill."

      France's Toll of Destruction

      Last night probably another hundred cars were set ablaze - as will be the case tonight, tomorrow night, and the following ones. Before large-scale rioting started on 27 October the police had already registered 30,000 car-becues this year - an average of, indeed, 100 a day. What a boost this must be to the French automobile industry. In the same period there were 3,800 attacks on police officers - a "normal" non-riot average of almost 13 a day.

      The 751 No-Go Zones of France

      They go by the euphemistic term Zones Urbaines Sensibles, or Sensitive Urban Zones, with the even more antiseptic acronym ZUS, and there are 751 of them as of last count. They are convienently listed on one long webpage, complete with street demarcations and map delineations.

      What are they? Those places in France that the French state does not control. They range from two zones in the medieval town of Carcassone to twelve in the heavily Muslim town of Marseilles, with hardly a town in France lacking in its ZUS. The ZUS came into existence in late 1996 and according to a 2004 estimate, nearly 5 million people live in them.

      Comment: A more precise name for these zones would be Dar al-Islam, the place where Muslims rule. (November 14, 2006)

      Nov. 28, 2006 update: For an insight into how bad things are, the police in Lyons demonstrated on Nov. 9, denouncing "violence against the forces of order." Things have reached a pretty sad state when the police have to demonstrate in the streets against the criminals.

      The New French Revolution

      They rule gangland style, combined with the male-dominated traditions of the Arab countries they came from. It's gotten so bad that, today, most of the young women only feel safe if they are covered up, or if they stay at home. Girls who want to look just like other French girls are considered provocative, asking for trouble......

      "I was gang raped by three people I knew, and I couldn't say anything, because in my culture, your family is dishonored if you lose your virginity," says Bellil. "So I kept quiet, and the rapes continued. The next time, I was pulled off a commuter train and no one lifted a finger to help me. ...Everybody turned their head awa

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    11. Re:"Logic" by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It is absolutely beyond any doubt that such killer games desensitise unstable characters and can have a stimulating effect," Mr Beckstein said on Monday.
      Although true, I don't see how banning a game is going to prevent future violence. You can't apply that "logic" to other areas:

      1) Pretty females can have a stimulating effect on sex offenders (known and unknown), so will you ban women from walking in public?

      2) Good tasting food can have a stimulating effect on people with eating disorders, so will you ban good tasting food?

      How about doing something constructive and helping people recognize problems in their kids, providing free help to families with issues, and promiting good family relationships, instead? :P Your counter-logic fails because it ignores "desensitise unstable characters".
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  5. The first reaction by government... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is invariably an over-reaction.

    Surprised? Nope.

  6. Sounds silly but ... by terrymr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The USA did ban playing cards online.

    1. Re:Sounds silly but ... by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Playing cards online is perfectly legal. Gambling, on the other had, is not.

    2. Re:Sounds silly but ... by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2, Funny
      Gambling, on the other had, is not.
      Gambling in games of skill, like poker or backgammon, is indeed illegal. Gambling in games of chance, like the stock market, remains legal however.
  7. What the State Really Wants by jazman_777 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is a throughly docile democratized (herd mentality) society. No one must be able to imagine or visualize "solving problems" by using violence, by himself. No one must be able to imagine that there even is a problem. I love this State! More soma, please!

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  8. Not "German Minister of the Interior" by mseeger · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hi,

    he (Beckstein) is not the "German Minister of the Interior" but the one of Bavaria (german: Bayern). Bavaria is the most conservative state in germany, ruled for nearly 60 years by the same party. He has been joined in his attempt by the minister of interior of lower saxony.

    The core of the prolem is the definition of "killer games". Since nearly all major politicians are 60 or older, they have nearly no understanding of the topic. They believe e.g. that Counterstrike is played with a joystick and the goal of the game to be "killing hostages". Usually, hearing them, i'm torn between laughing and crying.

    Regards, Martin

    1. Re:Not "German Minister of the Interior" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They believe e.g. that Counterstrike is played with a joystick and the goal of the game to be "killing hostages". What difference would it make if that were actually true?

      It's safe to say they have the correct basic idea of what a game is, though on specific games clearly don't know what they are talking about. But it's not an issue of the specific game content or why they are against game x or game y. Even if CS were all about killing hostages, should it be censored? We would of course say "no", but they say "yes".

      That's the issue that needs to be addressed, because their ignorance of specific games still doesn't excuse their calling for them to be banned, whether they actually exist in that form or not.
    2. Re:Not "German Minister of the Interior" by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bavaria is the most conservative state in germany, ruled for nearly 60 years by the same party.

      To you Americans: Think Texas. That's about how Bavaria is compared to Germany.

  9. Re:Going a little overboard by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No... But WWII is responsible for all the WWII video games of the last few years. If I see one more WWII video game, I'm going to jump into my Sherman tank and take a tour through town!

  10. An once of prevention by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is worth a pound of cure. We all know that.

    But what is seldom appreciated is how often that a pound of prevention turns out to be worth only an ounce of cure. Or less.

    The reason that the "ounce of prevention" strategy works is that it focuses you on simple, reasonable actions that accurately target the concern and produce few side effects. Like putting a lock on your door to prevent burglary. Now you could sit on your front porch and shoot at everybody who comes near your house that you think "looks shifty". There is no doubt a more vigorous preventive measure than locking your doors and widnows, but it isn't more effective.

    It really doesn't matter whether something is done before or after the fact, so much that the action be chosen to produce the results desired, and not much if anything else.

    And seeing as we've already triggered Godwin's law, I may as well raise the example of the Final Solution as an instance of the pound of prevention phenomonon. If people thought that the Jews where using their control of money to ruin the country, why didn't they simply pass a few banking regulation laws? Then nobody could ruin the country that way, Jew or otherwise. The answer is that the pound of prevention phenomon, like road rage, is driven by highly emotionally charged thinking. The kind that makes you act so stupidly that the only way not to die from embarassment is to do something even stupider.

    If you're so concerned with pathologically violent people, why not simply screen for them at various reasonable points? You provide mental health services at school to disturbed kids and training for teachers on how to recognize and deal with them. You screen people who have violent run-ins with other people before they go onto bigger and badder things. You run a public education campaign so people can recognize when their associates and familiy members need help -- maybe a few people will recognize they need help themselves.

    Will this get rid of all violence by disturbed people? No. But it will do a hell of a lot more than banning video games.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  11. Re:Where do you draw the line by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Funny
    I just got Suzuki Superbikes for PS2. In this game, the riders occasionally kick at each other. Since kicking someone on a motorcycle at race speeds could certainally result in injuries as bad as or worse than a bullet wound, am I playing a violent game?
    Yes, it is a violent game if it allows you to do that. Thus, they would have to change the game so that players do not kick at each other. In fact, at the end of the game, all players will be shown joining the winner for a large group hug to show that there is no animosity.

    What if I try to take out other drivers in GT4?
    Well, then, your car will immediately be stopped by the police and you automatically lose the race. In fact, in order to keep anyone's feelings from being hurt, GT4 will be rewritten so that all races always end in a tie between all drivers.

    Oh, and what if I develop a FPS app in Java? The folks at Sun aided and abetted me. Do they go to jail?
    Yes they do. In fact, the makers of personal computers will be liable if someone uses their personal computer to virtually harm another being--including making them feel bad. Of course, makers of personal computers will then sue all of their component suppliers and so on down the line.
  12. You know what causes the most school shootings... by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is all the media glamor and shock that is the result of school shootings. These kids want to "make a statement". They're so hurt or outcast and they shoot up their school to lash back and to make the world notice, as if to say "It's that bad here." It's essentially an act of terrorism.

    I'm pretty sure Islamic extremist groups didn't become violent from video games, but because they felt a need to lash out. The behavior is, plain and simple, unchecked immaturity combined with a little knowledge.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  13. Re:you got it all wrong by paeanblack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This guy is elected...By old people.

    More aptly, this guy is elected by people who bother to vote

  14. FPS Doug by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that FPS Doug would be made an international criminal???

    --
    I got nothin'
  15. Beckstein NOT germanys Minister of the Interior by euice · · Score: 5, Informative

    He is the Minister of Interior of Bavaria, and Bavaria is just one of 16 states (Bundesland) in germany. That's like calling Arnold Schwarzenegger president of the united states.

    And besides that, he isn't even very popular in germany (at least outside bavaria).

    To give you a picture of his political position: The conservatives (CDU) are the largest party in germany at the moment, althouth they are only supported by about 35% across germany.

    In bavaria, things are a lot different. Bavaria is so conservative, that the more moderate CDU is split into two partys. The party in bavaria is called CSU, so the rest of germany does not link the radical positions of the CSU to the conservatives outside bavaria.

    That works incredible well: the CSU dominates bavaria around 60% for decades, with political statements like the above. And Mr. Beckstein is often the one saying the radical statements.

    Shall I mention that Mr. Beckstein is a huge fan of the Bush administration whereas most germans are not?

    1. Re:Beckstein NOT germanys Minister of the Interior by euice · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe I should add, that these these statements are not new.

      After the school shoot-out in erfurt 2002 the government introduced an age-rating on video games, although Mr. Beckstein and his political friends demanded the full ban of violent computer games.

      If you want a balanced report on this, read this article

  16. It's true!! by rlp · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been playing a video game all evening. And I still have a desire to violently knock down ten defenseless pins with a large heavy ball. Sometimes even as many as 91. Though I've successfully managed to restrain the urge to destroy video screens with small flying white objects.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:It's true!! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've been playing a video game all evening. And I still have a desire to violently knock down ten defenseless pins with a large heavy ball. Sometimes even as many as 91. Though I've successfully managed to restrain the urge to destroy video screens with small flying white objects.

      Me, I just have this uncontrollable urge to find a bunch of bunnies and start disco dancing...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  17. I'm surprised we don't see one every single day by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And not because kids want notoriety, but do to this simple formula: a kid is bullied and ostracized until he or she decides that life is simply not worth living anymore, and before they go, they might as well take the fucking assholes with them that are responsible for making them feel that way.

  18. Some clarification by Fefe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The guy is not the German minister of the interior, he is the Bavarian minister of the interior, and he is well known for this stupid publicity stunts. He is always at the forefront of demanding new databases, new surveillance, longer jail time for everything, more police and using the military to do police work. In short: the guy is a nutcase.

    He is doing it to make sure people don't notice all the scandals his administration is involved in, for example they just completely botched a police IT spending bill, wasted millions on new software which does not work. And his law and order state had issues with soccer hooligans.

    In short: the guy is a joke. Don't take him seriously.

  19. 30 more years of idiocy by Handlarn · · Score: 2

    Gamers only need to hold out for about 30 more years. By then every politician will have grown up with "violent" gaming themselves, and stupid things like these will be history. Of course, by then, all politicians will have something new to wrongly accuse of turning people into drooling monsters.

  20. Re:you got it all wrong by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not entirely. He's more correct than he probably knew he was. Germany has a terminal population problem; the only think keeping their country afloat long-term is immigration. So it's entirely plauseable that "old" people are a statistically larger percentage of the population than the younger - just as it would be the other way around in a healthy civilization.

    At least one good thing can be said about such things: if the trend isn't reversed, at least their society will experience a short age of guaranteed non-agression before its departure from the face of the earth as a cultural entity.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  21. Re:Why the First Amendment is Important by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Does the phrase "I hate Illinois Nazis" have any meaning for you?

    We have Nazis in the USA too. They have even, on occasion, paraded in the streets (through Black or Jewish neighborhoods, in fact), protected by police from hecklers.

    For the most part, they are laughed at. It doesn't take a legal ban to render them harmless - letting them spout their doctrine on TV seems to make them objects of ridicule in and of itself.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"