Slashdot Mirror


Criminals Target Tech Students With Job Offers

An anonymous reader writes "BBC News is running a story on criminal gangs targeting tech students. Some of these outfits offer to pay for an education in exchange for the student's employment on graduation in criminal hacking activities." From the article: " As the number of criminal gangs looking to move into cyber crime expanded, it got harder to recruit skilled hackers, said Mr Day. This has led criminals to target university students all around the world. 'Some students are being sponsored through their IT degree,' said Mr Day. Once qualified, the graduates go to work for the criminal gangs. As well as the direct route of targeting students, some organised crime gangs were trading on the glamour surrounding the 'hacker' label to help them recruit impressionable youngsters..."

39 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. surprised? by Xolom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's a better job offer than the other offers most kids are going to get, and it appeals to their interests... why are people surprised?

    1. Re:surprised? by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it's a better job offer than the other offers most kids are going to get, and it appeals to their interests... why are people surprised?

      Um... for the same reason people might be surprised if non-crazy students who spend their years in college studying chemistry would look for "sponsorship" from a group that tells them they'll be building suitcase bombs for terrorists? Or an engineering/architecture student that's told they'll get a free ride through college as along as they agree to help break into banks once they graduate? This isn't any different.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:surprised? by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't any different.

      It's significantly different. One is treason, another is abandoning a lucrative private enterprise for crime, and the third is a resort of despiration for those with few prosepcts.

      The morality, ethics, and legal response to each of these is different. You might as well claim that vehicular manslaughter and driving with a cell phone "aren't any different."

    3. Re:surprised? by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny that you mention ethics. I remember a class a few years ago, we tried to determine what set a 'Profession' different from a 'job'. Eventually we settled on something along the lines 'that a professional has a code of ethics'.e.g Doctors, engineers, lawyers (ok, yeah ok i know - stick with me)..

      I dont recall IT professionals having a code of ethics. If BSC/SE graduates swore to uphold a code of ethics, it may weed out a few of the more 'innocent' people that would take up this offer. Of course it may always be to late by the time they graduate too....

      One could always join the military to get their training. It even has a similar rank structure to the Mob.

    4. Re:surprised? by spikedvodka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it may not qaulify as a mandetory code of ethics, I'd encourage you to read the SAGE System Administrator's Code of Ethics
      We as professional System Administrators do hereby commit ourselves to the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct, and agree to be guided by this code of ethics, and encourage every System Administrator to do the same.
      Professionalism

              * I will maintain professional conduct in the workplace and will not allow personal feelings or beliefs to cause me to treat people unfairly or unprofessionally.

      Personal Integrity

              * I will be honest in my professional dealings and forthcoming about my competence and the impact of my mistakes. I will seek assistance from others when required.
              * I will avoid conflicts of interest and biases whenever possible. When my advice is sought, if I have a conflict of interest or bias, I will declare it if appropriate, and recuse myself if necessary.

      Privacy

              * I will access private information on computer systems only when it is necessary in the course of my technical duties. I will maintain and protect the confidentiality of any information to which I may have access, regardless of the method by which I came into knowledge of it.

      Laws and Policies

              * I will educate myself and others on relevant laws, regulations, and policies regarding the performance of my duties.

      Communication

              * I will communicate with management, users, and colleagues about computer matters of mutual interest. I will strive to listen to and understand the needs of all parties.

      System Integrity

              * I will strive to ensure the necessary integrity, reliability, and availability of the systems for which I am responsible.
              * I will design and maintain each system in a manner to support the purpose of the system to the organization.

      Education

              * I will continue to update and enhance my technical knowledge and other work-related skills. I will share my knowledge and experience with others.

      Responsibility to Computing Community

              * I will cooperate with the larger computing community to maintain the integrity of network and computing resources.

      Social Responsibility

              * As an informed professional, I will encourage the writing and adoption of relevant policies and laws consistent with these ethical principles.

      Ethical Responsibility

              * I will strive to build and maintain a safe, healthy, and productive workplace.
              * I will do my best to make decisions consistent with the safety, privacy, and well-being of my community and the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might pose unexamined risks or dangers.
              * I will accept and offer honest criticism of technical work as appropriate and will credit properly the contributions of others.
              * I will lead by example, maintaining a high ethical standard and degree of professionalism in the performance of all my duties. I will support colleagues and co-workers in following this code of ethics.

      Draft of September 12, 2003, approved September 18, 2003, by the SAGE Executive Committee and September 30, 2003, by the Ethics Working Group.

      Co-signed by LOPSA, USENIX, and SAGE 2006.

      USENIX grants permission to reproduce this Code in any format, provided that the wording is not changed in any way, that signatories LOPSA, USENIX, and SAGE are included, and that no other signatory or logo is added without explicit permission from the copyright holders.

      http://www.sage.org/ethics/

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  2. Sweet by presidentbeef · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does this mean that legitimate companies, to keep up, will have to do the same thing?
    Maybe they could even get into bidding wars over potential students/employees! This could only be a good thing...right?

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
    1. Re:Sweet by phatvw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Haven't folks like Peter Norton (Symantec) been doing this for years? Recruiting kids to write worms and viruses so they can sell their shitty "Utilities" and Virus scanning suites to big business? ;)

    2. Re:Sweet by neoform · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not if the companies are employing black hat hackers to take down their competition.. (i worked shortly for such a company, quit out of disgust).

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
  3. interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how do i sign up?

  4. A new medium for an age old problem by Mikachu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't anything new really. I mean I even feel redundant saying this. Where there's commerce, there's crime. Where there's crime, there's organization. Gangs have simply moved on from convincing kids on street corners to steal some stuff into convincing kids in chatrooms to hack into some websites. It was only a matter of time.

  5. This is a good thing by svunt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm currently doing an IT internship for the Gambino family. The pay is good, I get medical & dental, and if anyone mods me down, they'll find out about some of the other perks of working in the industry.

    1. Re:This is a good thing by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
      Eh, getta load of this guy! We pays you good money so you can keep quiet, sit in your little room, and do your computer thing. But what's this? We finds you on this "internet," advertising who you work for! Hey, bambino, leave the singin' to Sinatra, capische?

      Whack 'em.

      --
      IAALS.
    2. Re:This is a good thing by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      I had no idea that Joe Pesci was a Slashdotter, until now.

    3. Re:This is a good thing by idonthack · · Score: 4, Funny
      Whack 'em.
      So, uh... I understand you have an opening now?
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    4. Re:This is a good thing by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new tuition-paying overlords.

    5. Re:This is a good thing by 6Yankee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but youdonthack. Sorry :P

  6. pft! by tloh · · Score: 4, Funny

    No! No! No! Any hacker with even an ounce of skill is more than capable of setting up shop on his own. What you gotta do is offer the guy something he would never EVER get legitimately. What these criminal types REALLY ought to do is come on slashdot here and promise they can arrange regular *private* meetings with our favorite adult performers from the pr0n we all download.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  7. Hack what ? by jfclavette · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what you will, hacking (cracking, don't throw a fit) isn't exactly easy nowadays. Can anyone here honestly tell me that they can get me access to a given business's clients database in the next 48 hours ? Didn't think so. So what are the gangs getting out of this ? Are they getting on a hype bandwagon ?

    1. Re:Hack what ? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can anyone here honestly tell me that they can get me access to a given business's clients database in the next 48 hours ? Didn't think so. So what are the gangs getting out of this ? Are they getting on a hype bandwagon ?

      Getting access to a company's database is so 1990's. These days, you need smart computer science types to design better malware to create botnets so that you can practice good old fashioned extortion against Costa Rican casino web sites. Simple as that.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Hack what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, that has got to be the most clueless comments on the topic that I have ever read. No offense meant, but really, c'mon! Where have you been the last five years? Hacking hasn't only gotten a lot simpler, with all the automated tools that exist nowadays, but also become much more profitable. The increased profits are largely a result of botnets and the ease one can build one with using readily available tools and the huge number of clueless people on a broadband connection (something that also didn't really exist 5-10 years ago). You can spam people cheaper, install popups cheaper, steal their banking information cheaper (more people do internet banking now than a couple of years ago), and so on.

      In short: there's more of everything. More software with more vulnerabilities. More automated tools. More clueless users. More bandwidth in their pipes. More profitable internet companies to blackmail (using DDoS). More companies interested in buying tools and information. Etc.

      If there was ever a time to a criminal on the internet, now is it.

  8. Hoax maybe? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems like a monumentally stupid way to recruit hackers. Let's see, leave a public record of you funding a student (rather than cold cash), then when he graduates, tell him, oops, you want him to break several laws. "Oh really? Well, thanks for the free education. Hey feds, over here!" *gets witness protection* *gets guaranteed income for life* *eliminates obligation to employer*

    In order for this to work, you'd have to credibly threaten or capture a loved one. But if you've got the techie that way, ... er, why do you need to pay for his education again?

    1. Re:Hoax maybe? by Massacrifice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if they start by requiring the would be hacker to "prove" himself (or herself?) worthy by doing something illegal, they can then blackmail him into doing more. I would assume that criminal activities start before the end of the studies. If the studies ever get completed, that is.

      --
      -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
    2. Re:Hoax maybe? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >In order for this to work, you'd have to credibly threaten or capture a loved one.

      The old recipe for recruiting a spy was MICE: Money, Ideology, Compromise, Ego. If organized crime really is troling computer students, they could use at least three of those, and maybe even ideology ("stick it to the greedy corporate exploiters and their fascist tools in government", or something like that).

      The other problem is, what's a CS degree going to do for a blackhat?

      Put them through drama school and psychology if you want to raise a crop of social engineers, use an apprenticeship system if you need vulnerability finders, but CS? There are only a few problems in the criminal world (robust scalable botnet control, untracable communications) that are computer science problems. And there can't be room for many people to work on those.

      The article was way too light on any of the specifics that would have inclined me to trust it.

  9. Not Much of a Surprise. by PixieDust · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Everything internet related means lots of dollar signs. What's intruiging here is how it could also play out amongst large corporations. We all know about the difference between a White Hatter, and a Black Hatter. Now consider a network of say, 20 people, top to bottom. At the top, is some poor twit either finishing up college, or already working for a fairly large business (as this article indicates some targets are). At the bottom (in this case, origin), is Company A, that really wants to see company B go down. High profile, but they're paying a pretty penny. Think about it.

    Wal-Mart. Big huge massive retail company. How much do you think it would be worth to K-Mart, or Target, or various other retailers, for Wal-Mart to just be down for a few days? Easily into tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Sad part is, the person at the top doesn't even have to know what's going on. They just say "Hey write a program that will do this, and propogate. We'll give you a cool 100Gs." Kid says hells yea, takes a few hours, whatever, writes it, and gives it to them, collects.

    Two weeks later, Wal-Mart plant sticks the little nasty into the Wal-Mart mainframe, and it gets disseminated to every single store in the company. The plant is nice and safe (removed by organization, or perhaps just left to fend for themselves, whatever), many of the people involved will never be caught, and the person that wrote it may not even know they were responsible!

    Perhaps I should take off my tin-foil hat, but still, it's a helluva "What-If".

    1. Re:Not Much of a Surprise. by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if an attacker had access to wal*mart's systems, shutting them down for a few days would be a bad way to do it, instead attack trust and dependability.

      screw up certain shipments for holidays, occasionally add an item or three to credit card purchases, add a hundred bucks to random debits.

      then at the end transfer all credit card numbers, debit card numbers, signatures, and PINs to a third party


      halting operations would be bad for walmart, leaking EVERY SINGLE credit card transaction processed by walmart would be much worse long term.

      the attack could be even more effective if the pharmacy/medical records kept could be leaked. people get pissed when their viagra perscription gets posted on the internet

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  10. Re:i really can't believe... by OmniBeing · · Score: 2, Informative

    A close friend of mine and I were offered "work" for a criminal organization years ago when we were fresh out of high school (we developed quite a rep, did some stupid things like send all the account usernames and passwords for the district to the main laser in the library. Nobody knew who did it till a friend ratted us out. That's another story though.)

    The offer was nice, new machines and $10,000 each for a weeks work attacking ADT's system so they could stage a b&e spree.

    Scared the crap out of me, I had friends that ran with those people, one was a runner who shortly there after went missing after he embezzled. I left the city (for other reasons) no idea what happened to Jamie...

    There are other things to consider other than renumeration, like physical safety.

    --
    - The Google Toolbar has a spell checker button AND it works, consider that before hitting submit next time k?
  11. Re:The year for this article is 2006 by xrayspx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Back in The Day, Slashdot listed only the day and date, which if I gave a shit, would be sufficient to narrow it down to the year. However, sometime in the last 2 years I was pleasantly surprised to see they started putting the year as well attached to every post.

    Don't believe me? Read everything to the right of my name on this post.

    Of course, I suppose I could be lying too.

  12. Hookers as Employee Benefits! by LinuxLuver · · Score: 5, Funny

    Criminal gangs should be able to offer some very "creative" fringe benefit packages. You want $200,000 a year? Or maybe $150,000 and a two hookers / week? Tax that!

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
    1. Re:Hookers as Employee Benefits! by NotFamousYet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it is true that what most tech-savvy people expect from an IT job is a good combination of comfort and challenge (see Google's very long list of fringe benefits).

      If you're a student, such an offer is definitely more tempting and self-rewarding than working in a cubicle.

  13. Re:Benefits by Massacrifice · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh yeah, they have a dental plan... Tony, gimme the pliers.

    --
    -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
  14. Re:Not likely... by presidentbeef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I kind of see your point...but doesn't the military already do this? They offer to pay for college, you agree to serve for 6 years or whatever. Does it make a difference if it's a private company?
    I know that some companies will help pay for your education if you agree to continue working for them for a certain amount of time after your education is complete. It's not so different, right? This is just getting them younger.

    Of course, my original comment was more of a joke :)

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  15. Criminal gangs are targeting tech students? by rampant+mac · · Score: 5, Funny

    SCO is hiring? I'm so in there...

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  16. Had to be said by NotFamousYet · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what's their motto?

    DO evil? :P

  17. Re:Not likely... by Marnhinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True, but only to an extent.

    Many companies offer benefits in return for service (as you mention), the difference isn't in really in what the companies offer, it's in what they do.

    If we just looked at offers - then there is not much difference between a lobbyist giving a politician large sums of money and someone donating to charity. Both are giving money away right? But the law looks at more than action - it looks at intent (thankfully). Which means that accepting money from a criminal enterprise is very different than accepting money from a legitimate company.

    --
    There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
  18. Re:The year for this article is 2006 by mincognito · · Score: 3, Informative

    The point is, you can set a date format that includes the year in your Slashdot preferences (in the homepage section).

  19. Re:Getting caught - who does the catching? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The people who get caught by the RIAA are the "low hanging fruit" most of the time. They're either hitting ten year olds or they're hitting the superseeders (or the guys who run the sites). People with IT degrees who pirate would use safer, and harder to trace, methods. Even just using PeerGuardian or pirating via proxy (or stealing wireless) is going to help you a great deal in terms of not getting caught. Additionally, they "stay in the middle" in terms of threat level.

    Same for these hackers. They're semi-safe because they're smarter than the average script-kiddie, and they're not quite as dangerous as the guys who hack the Pentagon or whatever. Law enforcement will feel two pressures: Go after the major crimes and close a lot of cases. They close the easy cases quickly, and catch the high-profile cases for the headlines. These guys probably feel safe since they're neither.

    That said, the reason crime doesn't pay is that a cops only needs to get lucky once, but the criminal needs to be lucky everytime.

  20. Hey, wait, it's McAfee by nbauman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did anybody notice that this BBC story is based entirely on a report, "McAfee Virtual Criminology Report http://www.softmart.com/mcafee/docs/McAfee%20NA%20 Virtual%20Criminology%20Report.pdf and an interview with one of its authors?

    This report -- from 2005 -- doesn't have anything that you couldn't have already read on Slashdot or the newspapers.

    The BBC didn't check McAfee's claims with another source. The McAfee report doesn't say anything about criminals paying tuition for students to study computer science. The McAfee security analyst didn't give any details. The BBC didn't ask him the obvious question, "How do you know?" Did he talk to a student like this? Did he find it in court records? Or did he hear it from another security expert after a few drinks?

    Has McAfee been reliable in the past?

  21. The Wired Article by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Three years ago, Wired had an article written by a guy who does tech support for the Mafia.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  22. Stetson Tailored Tin Foil Hat by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What we *had* here was a failure to communicate.
    That seems to be clearing up, somewhat.

    If you remember just a few, scant years ago, this discussion would be full of:
    * "Your a moran"
    "How about that tin foil hat"
    "You watch too much TV"
    "I guess you are a leet hacker dude :-P"

    and so on.

    Perhaps Kevin (TM) has helped us understand what has been perpetrated on us for years (witting or unwitting social engineering).

    The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0471 237124/ref=ase_mitnicksecuri-20/103-6052457-813506 9?v=glance&s=books

    So the internet does make us smarter, eh?

    For example:
    The Kennedy assassination made the word "conspiracy" a knee jerk, almost unconscientious reaction to discount whatever followed as ludicrous.

    As an exercise let me roll this past you.

    If the Japanese in WWII could have attacked every home in the US by way of their radio set top box (a "brown note" for electronics), to start fires in every home ...

    http://www.schmarder.com/radios/crystal/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_note

    do you think they would have conspired with College (engineering) students to help them?

    Criminals are now MBAs, Engineers and Rocket Scientists.
    Your desktop could be mocking you.

    * [yes, it's misspelled]

    --
    ~hylas