Slashdot Mirror


Second Amendment Questioned

dheera writes "Attorneys in Washington, DC question the scope of the Second Amendment in the first case in nearly 70 years, citing that the right to bear arms only applies to 'a well regulated militia.' 'We interpret the Second Amendment in military terms,' said Todd Kim, the District's solicitor general."

5 of 1,471 comments (clear)

  1. I've allways wondered about this ... by kryten_nl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... do you guys (/girls) have the right to walk around town with a japanese sword hanging on your belt?

    --
    For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  2. well regulated by gorehog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the phrase "A well regulated militia" regulated = equipped.

    The idea was that in the event of tyranny or invasion the people could form up and defend themselves. We are guaranteed the right to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. To pursue life one must be able to defend it. That is why we are guaranteed the right to keep and bear arms.

    By now I would have expected the noise about gun control to die down. It's a losing issue for democrats, and gun ownership may well be the only thing that recently stopped the USA from falling into fascist totalitarianism.

  3. Re:From my cold dead hands by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The resistance in Iraq and Afghanistan has access to automatic weaponry and rocketry. American civilians don't, and many advocates for the Second Amendment don't try to claim that anyone has a right to arms so powerful.

  4. Re:US DOJ is the EXECUTIVE, not JUDICIAL, branch by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mod the parent up, this person gets it. Having studied on the "Founding Fathers" off and on for the last 65+ years, I am absolutely amazed at the miss-interpretation that has been given force of law over the last 100 years, rendering our original Republic an ever more tyranical place to live. Boggles the mind. Only when one recalls Ben's reply about a "Democracy being a very bad form of government, but all the others are so much worse" does it come into a clearer focus. Unforch, the space between is being narrowed inexorably. By lowering democracy toward the "so much worse" category. At some point, the last box (ammo) Ed Howdershelt wrote about in his famous saying about the boxes (soap, ballot, jury, & ammo)to defend liberty, will be opened and used. I believe it was Jefferson who said relative to the tree of liberty needing refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants from time to time, adding "Lord help us if we go 20 years without it". Its been about 40 now since the race riots were a pandemic. Read into that what you will, I'm too old & tired to argue with anyone who hasn't read his history.

    --
    Cheers, Gene

  5. Re:US DOJ says by toxicity69 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From your own link: CITIES OF 500,000 OR MORE POPULATION: (32 cities) Most Dangerous 10: 1 Detroit, MI 2 Baltimore, MD 3 Memphis, TN

    4 Washington, DC

    5 Philadelphia, PA 6 Dallas, TX 7 Nashville, TN 8 Charlotte, NC 9 Columbus, OH 10 Houston, TX