Slashdot Mirror


Independent Benchmarking System for Mice

Heartless Gamer writes "Why benchmark a mouse? From ESReality; "In this environment where performance is king, it's ludicrous to think that mouse performance has never been measured for reviewing the products. Imagine reviewing the latest graphics card in the same way. Without benchmarks, reviewers would have to resort to loading up their favourite game and commenting on how their frag count improved. You would have no way to compare NVIDIA and ATI cards apart from the quality of the packaging. Without benchmarking, graphics card reviews would be almost entirely useless. So why do we put up with mouse reviews that are just as useless?""

14 of 71 comments (clear)

  1. Duh by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, because the most important aspects of a mouse (how it fits your hand, and how it feels) are unquantifiable? I don't care about dpi or whatever, I want to be able to use it all day without getting RSI.

    1. Re:Duh by eebra82 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...Which is why you go to the store to check out which one fits your hand. The people who read the reviews are often gamers and often hardcore gamers who want to know which mouse fits their needs, no matter how small the difference is.

      Although I agree with you that the comfort is the most important aspect of today's mice, it is only ignorant to assume that everyone thinks the same way. After all, when _some_ people buy a car, they want one that looks and feels good but forget about what's under the hood. The same situation can be applied to mice, because not everyone need to know what's under the hood, but some want to.

      Last but not least, what the article suggests is quite correct. A benchmark of a mouse does require proper benchmarking tools and so far, we've only had reviews that measure the looks and the software. I do however disagree with the author of the article, because comparing benchmarks of graphics cards to benchmarks of mice is just wrong. People who buy graphics cards want to know how fast their games will run, while almost no one who's purchasing a mouse wonders if their mice can read info of a surface at 100 miles per hour.

  2. My independent test results: by revlayle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mouse 1: Only runs into walls 30% of the time; thinks poop are like legos; enjoys the "Macarena"

    Mouse 2: Like expensive cheeses; chases own tail; finds Conan O'Brian Funny

    Mouse 3: Got out of the maze; presumed missing; my tuna salad sandwich is missing

    Results: Use rats next time? Republicans?

    1. Re:My independent test results: by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try using Democrats next time. They are cheaper by the dozen. However, they will redesign the maze so they can never find the way in or out and fully expect the cheese to be available all the time.

    2. Re:My independent test results: by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rather than a Republican, who will say that it was their manifest destiny to get to the cheese first, designate cheese as a protected national resource and then kill anybody else that tries to take it.

  3. Why benchmark a mouse? by elzurawka · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good point.

    --
    -EL
  4. Why stop there? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a longtime computer user and builder, I'm shocked - shocked, I say! - that we've never seen a really good benchmarking test for power buttons. I demand a definitive report and comparison on factors like clickiness, springiness, and LED brightness.

    1. Re:Why stop there? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know, that would almost-sorta-kinda-not-really make sense, except that in a computer THE POWER CORD GOES STRAIGHT INTO A TRANSFORMER ANYWAY!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Why stop there? by pipatron · · Score: 2, Funny

      As it does in 99.99% of all audio amplifiers. Hopefully you will never get in contact with the other 0.01%.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  5. Anyone else notice... by wampus · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA: ESReports is an International site, so all Non-English posts will be deleted.

    What the hell? Outside of this country EVERYONE speaks English?

  6. My mouse by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately, I picked up my mouse from the NIHM research facility. It has been horrible. I wake up in the middle of the night and the little bugger is correcting my code, playing with my pda, tweaking my project plans, embezzling from my work. Keeps shopping on line for peanut butter and sunflower seeds.

    Now, if you excuse me. It is my time for exercise on the treadmill according to my pda.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  7. Ambidextrous Mice by gknoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wholeheartedly agree!

    While I'm not left-handed, I swap between right and left hands at work, to help prevent/minimize RSI effects. I go into computer stores, and see all these funky right-handed mice, and sigh.

    I love my Razer, at home.
    At work, I'm very happy with this (wired) Logitech mouse.

  8. There is a benchmark by perkr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is something called ISO 9241-9 - Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. It covers mouse performance, and a metric called throughput (TP). Its validity is a matter of considerable debate. You can read the following technical report from IBM Research for much more information. There is also a recent article in the Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61:6, 2004 by the same author on the same topic.

  9. Remind me again? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forgive me if I seem a bit obtuse. Why would I want to mark my benches with mice?

    The furniture has already been marked, by the landlady's Siamese.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."