Slashdot Mirror


How To Choose Archival CD/DVD Media

An anonymous reader tips us to an article by Patrick McFarland, the well-known Free Software Magazine author, going into great detail on CD/DVD media. McFarland covers the history of these media from CDs through recordable DVDs, explaining the various formats and their strengths and drawbacks. The heart of the article is an essay on the DVD-R vs. DVD+R recording standards, leading to McFarland's recommendation for which media he buys for archival storage. Spoiler: it's Taiyo Yuden DVD+R all the way. From the article: "Unlike pressed CDs/DVDs, 'burnt' CDs/DVDs can eventually 'fade,' due to five things that affect the quality of CD media: sealing method, reflective layer, organic dye makeup, where it was manufactured, and your storage practices (please keep all media out of direct sunlight, in a nice cool dry dark place, in acid-free plastic containers; this will triple the lifetime of any media)."

49 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Unlike pressed CDs/DVDs, 'burnt' CDs/DVDs can eventually 'fade,' due to five things that affect the quality of CD media: sealing method, reflective layer, organic dye makeup, where it was manufactured, and your storage practices (please keep all media out of direct sunlight, in a nice cool dry dark place, in acid-free plastic containers; this will triple the lifetime of any media)."

    How apropos.

    'slashdotters' can eventually fade due to five things that affect the quality of slashdot comments:

    • sealing method - The Sealing, in reality is the ceiling, and refers to the need to ceil() slashdot user's age to hit the double digits.
    • reflective layer - The Reflective layer is the use of low UIDs to represent importance of comments, rather than something actually informative.
    • organic dye makeup - Most comment's make up are so bad, they're DOA, and one can hear the organ playing.
    • where it was manufactured - There are no new comments on slashdot, everything is either culled from its dupe, or copied from the Microsoft Hater's handbook.
    • and your storage practices - Some comments are posted before they are fini

  2. I'm Surprised by aplusjimages · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised to hear that consumer media can last so long. I was under the impression that consumer media would only last at most 20 years. Good to know it is longer.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:I'm Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm surprised to hear that consumer media can last so long. I was under the impression that consumer media would only last at most 20 years. Good to know it is longer.

      All current forms of optical storage share the same problem that will limit their reliable life span. This problem will effect different media design types over different periods of time, but 20 years is a good average before you will start to see bit rot. How ever ALL optical media, regardless of being commercialy pressed or being consumer grade CD/DVD-R, will eventualy suffer bit rot for the exact same reasons. The problem is that the rate of expansion and contraction of the metal substrates that make up the innner layers and the plastics that make up the outter layers are very different. All optical media will suffer bit rot over time because of this, as what eventualy happens is the metal substrate inside the plastic protective layers gets warped and ripples start to form in the surface. This of course starts to alter the smooth/pit reflection encoding of data on the disc and ruins the data.

      Again, different types of optical media design will last longer than others. Yes, commercialy pressed CD/DVDs will last longer than consumer grade CD/DVD-R media on average. How ever none of these formats have the reliability and shelf life of magnetic backup tapes! Espeically newer formats like AIT, SAIT, and LTO (and VXA isn't too bad either, awesome pricing on smaller VXA auto loaders). So if you are looking for reliable long term archiving CD and DVD are NOT what you want to use! You want to use tapes. How ever, you can use CD or DVD if you keep in mind that this format has a shorter shelf life and you plan a migration of that data to a new removable media format say 10 years out from now. You have to do the same thing with tapes too, as eventualy formats become old enough that it gets hard to find tape drives that will read your backups. And yes there is still a limit to the shelf life of backup tapes, as over time the magnetic signals encoded in the tape start to transfer between layers due to the tape layers being tightly wound around each other on the take up spool. How ever, even with that in mind, tapes provide a much longer useful life span for archiving data. And beyond having a longer shelf life tapes have several other advantages. They have much larger capacities than CD/DVD media, so you don't have to sit there rotating tons of discs to restore a large archive. And in many cases newer tape formats have much faster transfer rates than CD/DVD (granted they cannot do random I/O, but burning CD/DVD isn't a random I/O process either). Any one who has serious data to protect shouldn't be using CD/DVD for backup. This is more of a cheap low end consumer approach for those who cannot dish out $1000+ for a good tape drive.

      Those who still have the wool pulled over theirs eyes and still think CD/DVDs are a long term storage platform need only look to those of us who have very old CDs and laser discs for proof to the contrary. I know plenty of people who bought some of the first pressings of CD albums back in the early 80s, and many of their earlier CDs are now suffering bit rot. This is even more prevelant on laser disc, probably because of the much larger surface area being affected. Many laser disc owners are fully aware of the problem of optical media bit rot. In many cases the bit rot gets bad enough that you can visualy see the distortions on the reflective surface.

      Bottom line, if you value your data then use backup tapes! That's what that technology was invented for! CD/DVD-R is more of a short term backup option, best for cheap short term archiving or transporting of data. I use CD/DVD-R for regular backups of the documents on some of my workstations. But when it comes to our servers and our customer's servers it's AIT or LTO tape drives all the way!! Use the right tool for the job!!

  3. He forgot the most important one... by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "(please keep all media out of direct sunlight, in a nice cool dry dark place, in acid-free plastic containers; this will triple the lifetime of any media)." And NEVER ever feed them after midnight. On a more serious note, I used to worry about eventual degradation but it's coming up on 10 years that I've owned a CD-R drive and I have yet to run across a burned CD I cannot read due to this sort of degradation. Maybe at the decade mark, some of my discs will fail me and I'll change my mind but right now I'm not too concerned.

    1. Re:He forgot the most important one... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Used to run an archiving business of sorts (trade stuff in exchange for space) on many towers of CDs. I burned in the mid to late 90s many CDs and have them all archived still. Went back and uploaded them to a terabyte raid I built and without one failure of the CDRs that I archived, not one degraded to not mount and copy. I had a few that had scratches, but that is a different story and not related. Bottomline, buy what works, cheap and don't move them once archived, keep in cool dark place, and you are good to go. Oxidation is a CD-ophile's issue, not much in the reality zone. Heat is an issue, and if you store them on your dashboard, you deserve what results.

    2. Re:He forgot the most important one... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny
      "(please keep all media out of direct sunlight, in a nice cool dry dark place, in acid-free plastic containers; this will triple the lifetime of any media)." And NEVER ever feed them after midnight.
      Do not taunt Happy Fun CD.
    3. Re:He forgot the most important one... by Kenshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do not taunt Happy Fun CD.

      Wanring: Happy Fun CD may install a rootkit on your system if it feels threatened.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:He forgot the most important one... by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got my first burner in mid-1996, so my early discs are over a decade old. I've seen a small but non-zero number of failures among the CD-R burns over time, maybe 10 discs out of over a thousand discs. Haven't seen any from the better quality gold media (Mitsui, Kodak), but a few from CD-R and DVD-R discs made with other formulations. The failures I remember the details of were from Sony (x2, but I used a lot more of these than the others here), 3M, Memorex, and Mitsui Silver (x3). At any time I normally use a 50/50 mix of expensive gold media for important files and whatever's cheap for everything else. Normally the failure is that the disc will still mount but many sectors have unrecoverable errors.

      I've lost multiple discs burned onto completely worthless KHypermedia DVD-R media after less than 3 years--two boxes of media that were free after some promotion, yet I was still ripped off.

  4. Re:Price is all that matters in the short run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Brilliant. Now try reading them on another drive. See ya! /idiot

  5. Bummer by Deagol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I always thought Matsui "Gold" and "Silver" were the top-rated media. At least for CD-Rs (though I thought they were held in high regard for DVD blank media, too). I used to mail-order un-branded blanks them by the spool.

    1. Re:Bummer by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mitsui's gold media has generally been considered the best available for CD-R work, particularly from an archival perspective. The company has reorganized and now goes by the name MAM. If you look through the comments after the article, the author suggests that the currently available MAM media isn't as high of a quality as the older Mitsui discs. I would like to see some citation for that fact, as I wasn't aware the formulation was changed at all from that reorg, but I haven't researched this subject recently enough to be able to dismiss his suggestion outright.

    2. Re:Bummer by Firehed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Modded funny? I know that the moderation system on Slashdot is totally out of whack, but I fail to see any possible opportunity for humor in this post. Any of the In_ mods, certainly, but funny?

      Of course, I expect the requisite *woosh* response to my own post, but at least be kind and explain what I've missed when you do.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  6. Safety in Numbers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cheap but adequate DVD-R media costs $200 for 1000 discs, about 4TB capacity. And a cheap DVD-R changer jukebox costs under $500, about 800GB per load.

    Why not just burn a few copies of the archive to a bunch of DVD sets? The DVDs will get defects, but shuffling the chunks across the discs just a little will probably ensure that the random distribution of specific defects will not hit every copy of a given bit, against the odds a low defect rate will produce.

    How about a pair of those archivers, which fire up every few years just to transfer the aging DVDs to fresh new ones? For another $1000, that's another 5 cycles of DVDs, 800GB per cycle. Another $1000 gets a pair of backup jukeboxes.

    For higher capacities than 800GB, there are pricier pro jukeboxes, but with dual drives for the retranscription cycle (and faster restores). But the architecture is the same. Why try to make the media more reliable, when there's cheaper/easier solutions that just accept unreliable media, and move on?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Safety in Numbers by ericdano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not just get a NAS that has RAID? That would make more sense. When a disc dies, you can replace it, rebuild your array, and everything is fine. PLUS, you could expand your archive over time.

      I think it's absolutely stupid to use a DVD jukebox. Really. Look into a NAS box with RAID.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Safety in Numbers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With the single DVD jukebox, the first 800GB is online at one time, for $450. A 750GB HD costs $350. But the next 800GB in DVD costs only $40 - each 4TB costs $200. And there's no limit to how many $50 TBs you can archive, with a sizeable enough closet. The downside is un/loading the jukebox, 200 at a time. But that's archive, "nearline" storage.

      Plus, you get a DVD reader and writer. For dealing with the DVDs (and CDs) that still distribute lots of content as a transfer medium. And for those without distributed endpoints to where they can archive data, or insufficient network bandwidth to archive all their data across the WAN frequently enough, DVDs are good and cheap offsite archive repositories. Plus you can burn DVDs that will play in every consumer player, which can connect your data to lots of people without data processing HW. HDs are a cul de sac for data, trapped within the infosystem.

      DVD archiving isn't really competition to online HD storage. It's complementary, in different use cases, different user environments. There's considerable overlap in their related extremes, but there's a lot of difference that makes leaves the DVD solution worthwhile for many scenarios.

      BTW, while I'm offering detailed factual analysis of HD vs DVD mass storage, don't throw in your "opinion" that "it's absolutely stupid...". Especially if you're going to offer a disagreement worth considering. Do you want to work together to figure out the real merits in a debate, or do you want to get into an obnoxious pissing contest that few other people will want to wade through? Few people worth teaching will learn anything from such unnecessary conflict. Including ourselves.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Safety in Numbers by ericdano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "With the single DVD jukebox, the first 800GB is online at one time, for $450. A 750GB HD costs $350. But the next 800GB in DVD costs only $40 - each 4TB costs $200. And there's no limit to how many $50 TBs you can archive, with a sizeable enough closet. The downside is un/loading the jukebox, 200 at a time. But that's archive, "nearline" storage."

      But what happens if a DVD gets corrupt? Or scratched? Or, lost?

      "Plus, you get a DVD reader and writer. For dealing with the DVDs (and CDs) that still distribute lots of content as a transfer medium. And for those without distributed endpoints to where they can archive data, or insufficient network bandwidth to archive all their data across the WAN frequently enough, DVDs are good and cheap offsite archive repositories. Plus you can burn DVDs that will play in every consumer player, which can connect your data to lots of people without data processing HW. HDs are a cul de sac for data, trapped within the infosystem."

      Ok. A DVD Reader and writer. Woohoo. For little bits of data, yeah, ok, DVDs are good. But if you are archiving data, say, lots of data, do they work? What about getting data off bad ones? I've tried getting data off a damaged DVD once. It wasn't pretty. At all.

      "DVD archiving isn't really competition to online HD storage. It's complementary, in different use cases, different user environments. There's considerable overlap in their related extremes, but there's a lot of difference that makes leaves the DVD solution worthwhile for many scenarios."

      For some, yeah. I use DVD to archive a lot of projects, but at some point, it seems to make sense to consolidate all the DVDs. I think maybe when we can burn 20 gigs a DVD or more, it would make more sense.

      BTW, while I'm offering detailed factual analysis of HD vs DVD mass storage, don't throw in your "opinion" that "it's absolutely stupid...". Especially if you're going to offer a disagreement worth considering. Do you want to work together to figure out the real merits in a debate, or do you want to get into an obnoxious pissing contest that few other people will want to wade through? Few people worth teaching will learn anything from such unnecessary conflict. Including ourselves."

      Your first "factual analysis" included "Cheap but adequate DVD-R media costs $200 for 1000 discs, about 4TB capacity. And a cheap DVD-R changer jukebox costs under $500, about 800GB per load." which is more expensive than a HD. Then you say it $450? Which is it? I think it's more like $450 (jukebox) + $40 (200 DVDs). Then "How about a pair of those archivers, which fire up every few years just to transfer the aging DVDs to fresh new ones? For another $1000, that's another 5 cycles of DVDs, 800GB per cycle. Another $1000 gets a pair of backup jukeboxes." which, doesn't make sense. If you are just going to "fire then up every few years" why not just use a HD? Or two HDs? Just seems a huge waste of time (burning all the DVDs), and effort (loading/unloading) to get what benefit? To say you have all that neat stuff? How many hours would it take to archive all that stuff? I'm thinking days......week? Two weeks with verification after burn?

      I'd just stick to hard drives, and have intervals where you'd check out the data, and every 2 years or so, consolidate data on a newer bigger drive.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    4. Re:Safety in Numbers by megaditto · · Score: 2, Informative
      So, the 1 Terrabyte array I have now, when I decide I need more room, I can swap out the disks (one at a time, letting it rebuild), and when I'm done, I can have 2 Terrabytes, perhaps more
      [emph. added]

      No, you will not get "more room". You will still have 1 Terrabyte of the same data copied out over more disks, but still only 1 Terrabyte.
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    5. Re:Safety in Numbers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the original grandparent post to which you replied, I started out by saying that the point of the DVD changer is to make several copies of the same data, on different DVD sets. So if a DVD gets scratched, or otherwise ages (as detailed in the story which we're tangentially discussing), there's another copy. More expendable DVDs, instead of tougher ones.

      I'd say that the 4.7TB that $1K will buy, along with the DVD-R burner jukebox, is more than "little bits of data". I already pointed out how to deal with inevitably damaged DVDs.

      A 200 disc book can hold a lot of DVD data. For most people, 4.7TB is more data than they own, including all their movies. Since DVDs can actually hold 17GB when double sided/layered, that's 17TB. If you've got more data than that to store, you can afford $10-20K+ for substantial robotic archival systems.

      Your attempt to argue with my economics is contradictory only because you didn't understand its plain point. The jukebox costs about $400 (as little as $300). 1000 DVDs cost $200, but only 200 will fit into the jukebox at once. So that first 800GB on 200 discs costs $400 + 40, or about $450 - the rounding error for shipping, and actual price of the jukebox, makes $450 a charitable statement, when it will probably be less.

      I'll even parse the next statement you didn't understand. The point is that larger storage than just the first jukebox load quickly becomes much cheaper than HDs. And more incremental, without having to buy an entire 750GB HD to store the next 500GB. Or by spending that money on much more DVDs. Which also bring the the other benefits, including flexibility, that HDs don't offer. And though you don't get it, the point of a pair of jukeboxes is to transfer an entire 200 discs to "fresh" DVDs that haven't aged like the story we're discussing describes. Again, solution to the "expiring DVDs" problem that just uses more DVDs.

      I don't know how long the unspecified DVD jukebox would take to burn a full load. So what? The archive is supposed to last for months, years. If you have more frequent archiving demand, use a different tool.

      The point isn't "more neat stuff", but the right tool for the right job. Since the job we're discssing is "coping with expiring DVDs", there is a way to just use more DVDs, as I've detailed. There are arguments for using HDs instead, but not necessarily in all situations, or even in most. But then, since you're not discussing the same thing as am I, we haven't gotten anywhere in the point of this thread.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Safety in Numbers by profplump · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only until you start making archives. Tape media is easily 50% cheaper on a per-GB basis once you get past the hardware purchase. With hard drives you never get past the hardware purchase.

      If all you want it a copy of the current (or the last few) day's disk state, then another disk makes good sense. If you want to be able to restore last December's tape because someone trashed your 1099-processing software in January and no one noticed until today, tapes are definately cheaper.

  7. I agree... But where can I find some? by madhatter256 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Taiyo Yuden All the way. They are great for copying PSX/PS2 games (seriously) where media quality makes a difference between burning out a laser or playing your back-up game, as well as DVD Movies.

    The only drawback is that you can only order them from the Internet. I do not know of any retail store who actually sells the brand outright nor do I know of any brand (like Sony, Memorex, Fujifilm) who sells rebranded Taiyo Yuden discs.

    Also, the Taiyo brand is more expensive than any other brand.

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
    1. Re:I agree... But where can I find some? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some Verbatim DVD+Rs are manufactured by Taiyo Yuden. Strangely, the ones I used were the cheap-looking colored ones, but I've used several batches of those with excellent results. Speaking of Verbatim, some of their other discs are made by Mitsubishi, and those also very good, although I'm not sure how they'd work for PS2 piracy ;)

  8. Not a concern with MY optical media by loimprevisto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have some movies on laserdisc that're pushing 20 years, and I haven't had a problem with them yet!

    --
    Much Madness is divinest Sense --
    To a discerning Eye --
    Much Sense -- the starkest Madness
  9. You don't get by sa1lnr · · Score: 5, Funny

    direct sunlight in your parents basement. ;)

    1. Re:You don't get by NewWorldDan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, to summarize the article, treat them the same as you would your comic books!

  10. This bears repeating by Daishiman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Repeating again and again and again:

    For backups and archival you need tape backups, stored offsite. If you want something with more capacity and faster recovery, a backup server with rsync and beefy hard drives. Nothing else will do. With the time and effort you'll spend searching and writing DVD media you could have already bought and set up a file server or bought that tape drive.

    Unless you're going to be taking those backups with you and using them in high volume, backing up to DVDs is simply a waste of time and space, and when you get some dreaded CRC errors you'll be crying for not having done otherwise.

    sig: Cosas varias de un sysadmin argentino: http://aosinski.phpnet.us/

    1. Re:This bears repeating by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That realy depends today.

      If you have a large organization and you're backing up terabytes+ daily, then yes with incremental. You can probably afford the $37,000+ for a TB storage solution.
      A good bit of small businesses really don't have more than a couple hundred gigs that need to be backed up and the nightly stuff is probably under a gig unless you're in the media business.

      Tape backup for archival is a horrible solution. You're dependant upon the media and the media player and in the case of Microsoft, the OS as well. BackupExec issues anyone?
      How many of you had that backup you made to tape take forever to retrieve where that happenstance copy you made to another server work just fine?

      Tape backup for `backup` is a fine solution but not for long term storage.
      When marketing companies are finished with projects and they need to be removed from the server, they are archived on CD/DVD media.

      If is probably cheaper to buy about 20 500 Gig Hard Drives and run a backup scheme using that media than to spend $2,000 on a 120Gig DLT tape drive that will take 6 hours to make a backup.

      I'm not really discounting the usefulness of tape backup, I just question if it is relevant today when disk storage is cheaper.

      My .002 cents.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    2. Re:This bears repeating by XSforMe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "For backups and archival you need tape backups,"

      I agree when it comes to backing up, but not necessarily on the archival issue. Whenever you are planning long term archival, your best shot is a nice laser print out on acid free paper. If this is simply not possible then your second best choice will be a media which you suspect you will be able to read in the next 25 years, and in this case my money is on CD/DVD rather than on a particular type of tape.

      Try getting now a days a QIC tape drive which will read a 20 year old tape (QIC-40). You might be able to find a used tape drive in ebay, but I can assure you computer tapes do get eaten up, specially when the tape drive is not under pristine conditions. Sending the tape to an off site recovery center might not always be feasible (either due to the urgency of the request, data sensitivity or simply because there might be no service which can handle your format). Even now, you are better off with 3.5 inch floppies rather than QIC-40 tapes. Further more, don't even get me started on the issue that will be getting the device drivers to work on modern day hardware.

      To cover your rear against data loss on unreliable media such as CDs / DVDs do make a second copy of the volume. Seriously, it takes 5 minutes and almost guarantees you that the data will be available no matter what. Store them separately, and you will be set.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  11. I have CDs good since 1998 by scottsk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I now have some no-name-brand CDs burned in 1998 that are still good. I have never had a good, name-brand CD fail for any reason. The only failure I have ever had was the top layer peeling off some el-cheapo CDs which were stored in plastic sleeves, not jewel cases. One BIG key the article does not mention is to store the disc where the burned surface is not touching anything, such as in a jewel case -- the article should have mentioned that. Do not put in plastic sleeves or cases with slide-in sleeves. Odd that the article is a sales pitch for that T-Y brand -- what about RiData? That's what I use for DVD archival storage. I haven't been using DVD-R long enough to comment on how long they'll last. I have always found the alarmist idea that CDs will spontaneously self-destruct to be sort of over-the-top. CDs seem much more reliable for archiving than any other medium like diskette, hard disk, USB flash, or tape. Flash is more reliable, but has to be refreshed or it will disappear.

    1. Re:I have CDs good since 1998 by slamb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I now have some no-name-brand CDs burned in 1998 that are still good.

      Probably using the original dyes, then? According to the article, they are most likely to fail in 2008:

      The first organic dyes, designed by Taiyo Yuden, were Cyanine-based and, under normal conditions, had a shelf life of around ten years; simply, that was simply unacceptable for archive discs.

      These people are talking about serious long-term archiving, not "it worked for this one guy for eight years".

      I haven't been using DVD-R long enough to comment on how long they'll last.

      No one has successfully used them as long as these people are talking about; they haven't existed that long. The lifespan claims are made from an understanding of chemistry (theory) and accelerated aging techniques (experiment).

  12. my experience: some DVD media dies with no reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One Maxell DVD-R I burned in Sept. 2003 went bad within 3 years, despite every detail of the burning, readback, handling, and storage being in accord with the advice I've seen posted. An email to Maxell support on this issue had the reply: "The media if stored properly will have a life of at least 50 years."

    Possibly relevant, I noticed an internal pattern of small spots visible with a loupe or macro lens (on order of 10 microns in size; much larger than the data pits). You can read more about it here: http://www.bealecorner.com/trv900/DVD/Maxell-DVDR- spots.html

    Maxell America agreed to take back this DVD for analysis. As instructed I sent it to their Fair Lawn, NJ site. It was received Oct. 5 2006 and Maxell acknowledged receipt. They have apparently done nothing with it since, despite several emails to them in the ensuing two months.

  13. Long term storage by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only way to get your stuff to last more than a generation is to chisel out yer 0's and 1's on clay tablets...

  14. I use DVD+/-R over CD-R for archiving. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reason being that DVD+/-R has the recording surface sandwiched between the two layers of plastic. CD-Rs have the recording surface on top, which can flake off unless you handle it very carefully.

    Sure, you can handle the CD-Rs carefully and avoid this problem. But wouldn't you rather use a more reliable medium in the first place?

    --
    AccountKiller
  15. Patrick got his bits wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This method is called 'pits and lands', where pits 'absorb' light (ie, are 'off' bits) and lands 'reflect' light (ie, are 'on' bits). This is incorrect - CDs record data using the transitions between light/dark and not the light/dark itself: see bottom of page http://www.digitalprosound.com/Features/2000/Sept/ RecCD2.htm
    1. Re:Patrick got his bits wrong... by dotgain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, if you're going to be that pedantic, the data still goes through an encoding layer called "Eight to fourteen modulation", which guarantees that a pit / land will be at least x bits and no more than y bits long, so the laser won't lose tracking due to not finding any transisions in a long time.

  16. Re:Price is all that matters in the short run by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, I get non-error-producing (in the burning process, I mean) misburns often enough that I ALWAYS keep the "verify burned data" option checked.

    Takes way, way longer to burn a DVD that way, but it's worth it.

  17. MediaSupply.com by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 2, Informative

    I order Taiyo Yuden DVD+Rs from MediaSupply.com. $25 for a spindle of 50.

  18. Verbatim DatalifePlus 8x MCC 003 by blckbllr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's my two cents:

    Stay away from Taiyo Yuden 16x media. I'm using a BenQ 1620 for all my DVD burning needs, and the PI/PO tests done on T-Y 16x media using DVDInfo Pro have always resulted in low quality burns. I am currently using 8x Verbatim DatalifePlus DVD+R media, and burning them at 4x. The results are truly unbelievable. The media code on the 8x Verbatims is MCC 003. I've heard through the grapevine that T-Y changed their media somehow from their 8x sets to their 16x sets, which has resulted in that the 16x DVD+Rs aren't as good. If you can get your hands on 8x T-Y DVD+Rs, then go for it; otherwise, stick with the Verbatim DatalifePlus series.

    -BB

  19. DVD media quality guide by noky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have found this dvd media quality guide to be extremely informative. Yes, Taiyo Yuden is always ranked at the top (and is what I use), but they are not readily available at local retailers. It really helps to have a detailed comparison of various media instead of just saying "brand X is best".

  20. The secret to spotting Taiyo Yudens by traindirector · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've seen Taiyo Yuden CD-Rs and DVD+/-Rs in a number of retail stores under various brand names. I'm hesitant to publicize my trick, but I suppose the Slashdot community should know. Here's how to spot Taiyo Yudens quickly in the store, without checking each label for "Made in Japan":

    The spindles all have a unique bottom lip. Whereas most plastic spindle coverings are the same diameter from the top of the spindle to the bottom, Taiyo Yuden cases have a "lip" on the bottom of the plastic covering that starts about an inch from the bottom. The bottom of the clear plastic covering sticks out just a bit and then recesses to the diameter of the rest of the spindle. Taiyo Yudens comes in these cases no matter how they are branded, and I have never seen a spindle of discs with this bottom lip that are not Taiyo Yuden. I guess Taiyo Yuden supplies the plastic spindles as well as the branding on top of the disc.

    In any case, I have had better luck with the consistency of Taiyo Yudens than any other brand of DVD+R. I'm not sure what the case is now, since I've only been using Taiyo Yudens for the past few years, but when DVD recording was first becoming affordable, the compatibility of much DVD media with various recorders was so terrible as to be useless (and endlessly frustrating). Taiyo Yuden makes quality discs, and it's always nice to spot them in the store when there's a deal going on.

    1. Re:The secret to spotting Taiyo Yudens by drwtsn32 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure your method is completely accurate. I have a spindle of DVD+R media from TDK with the lip you describe. The media is indeed Taiyo Yuden. I then checked a spindle of CD-R media without the lip. Nope, not Taiyo Yuden. So far your method looks good! But I have another spindle of CD-R media (Maxell) with the same lip as the DVD+R TDK media and Nero shows the disk as being made by Ritek. Damn!

  21. Out of direct sunlight, cool dark place by blantonl · · Score: 3, Funny

    please keep all media out of direct sunlight, in a nice cool dry dark place, in acid-free plastic containers; this will triple the lifetime of any media

    Well, it's good to know that 95% of slashdotters are already following this practice by inherently storing their media close to themselves, next to their computers.

    --
    Lindsay Blanton
    RadioReference.com
  22. The usual vague personal testimony... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh, I'm so tired of these articles. Everyone concentrates on dye fading, because I guess it's easy to measure and quantify. If dye fading were the failure mechanism for these disks, they'd last twenty to two hundred years... according to vendors and researchers.

    Everyone says "I've never had any trouble with brand ABC," but the thing is, ABC varies depending on what you read or who you talk to. Some people insist they've never had any trouble with the cheapest generic products they buy at Staples. Some say any name brand is OK. Some say Verbatim is good. Some say to stay away from Verbatim. The more sophisticated will tell you not to use anything but phtalocy- pthalocy- pffthal- the Mitsui stuff. Others (like this guy) are partial to other dyes. Some say you're a fool to use anything but Mitsui Gold... some say they're an overpriced waste of money.

    It's all authoritative sounding talk, talk, talk and no two experts say the same thing.

    In reality, I don't think anyone understands very well what actually causes these disks to fail in the real world. I've had disks fail in less than two years--maybe only a couple-three in many hundreds, but certainly not zero--and I've never seen any obvious pattern as to which of them fail.

    The thing that really bothers me is that drives and/or their accompanying software drivers never give you any indication of what the signal quality of a particular disk is. If they did, you could detect that a disk was deteriorating before it failed, and make a copy. As it is, they just keep silently keep correcting errors behind your back and you have no warning until there is utter, catastrophic failure.

    1. Re:The usual vague personal testimony... by epine · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Have you ever heard of bait and switch? It's a deeply engrained trait in the human species. Under one set of conditions, such as not having much credibility to begin with, an organization will work very hard to establish the reputation of a product line. Then under another set of conditions--major stakeholders change chairs, new management team recruited, under a short-term cash-out-now incentive structure--all the expensive magic that made the original product good is discarded, and the newly watered down version of the reputable product continues to be marketed with no mention that it was changed at all.

      Do you need that again in a short sentence? Brands suck. The brand is not the product.

      I used to buy a lot of bottled pasta sauce under the Classico brand. No added corn sugar. Tasted like food. The tomatoes tasted like they were delivered to the factory on a flat-bed truck in the kinds of crates they picture on the front of the bottle. Then the situation turned evil. Some new brand manager decided to move the brand upscale. The best flavour of all, the plain onion and garlic, was replaced with a roast garlic that tasted like crap. Prices went up. The tomatoes began to take on the appearance of a puree. Now it is impossible to open a jar without thinking the tomatoes were delivered to the factory in a tanker trunk. The body of the sauce now conveys the impression "ultrasonically homogenized". All the bottles have fancier flavours and labels than ever before, and the price is higher for an inferior product.

      This has nothing to do with experts whatsoever, and every to do with the human necessity of people needed to make themselves look good (e.g. in their role as the marketing director) at the expense of end result.

      Brands exist to convey the message that you're still getting the good stuff long after the good stuff has taking the building with it, and the only left is debasement.

    2. Re:The usual vague personal testimony... by infolation · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can obtain meaningful PIE/PIF/jitter (etc) error information using certain plextor drives which in include error scanning modes (e.g. the 716a) and software such as plextools professional or PXSCAN/PXVIEW.

      Alexander Noe's site also includes error readings from the main brands of DVD+R/-R (including TY) for comparison to your own discs.

  23. People like stores. It's not a guessing game. by traindirector · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not just order them online, and know what you're getting?

    Sometimes you need media immediately. Some people like to pick up media at the store. If you're going to be buying it at the store, why not get the good stuff, especially if it's the same price?

    Additionally, it's not a guessing game once you know what you're looking for. If it comes in the Taiyo Yuden "That's" packaging and says "Made in Japan", it's Taiyo Yuden (unless it's a cheap imitation, which is still identifiable and not very common). People over at the media section of the CD Freaks Forum have discussed this to death for years. I will save you from hours of mostly non-productive reading by telling you that the packaging is unique to Taiyo Yuden, that fakes are not hard to spot and will not normally say "Made in Japan", and that most of the people on the CD Freaks forum, who have entirely too much time on their hands and enjoy obsessively testing CD-Rs and DVD+/-Rs with many official and hacked firmwares for dozens of recorders, agree that Taiyo Yuden is the best.

  24. Taiyo Yuden FAQ by Foresto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Taiyo Yuden FAQ, for those who want guidance in finding these discs.

  25. Re:par2 by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course, if a disk gets a read error in the sector holding the FAT, I'm toast. :-)

    Maybe not. PAR2 files store the filenames as part of the recovery data. As long as the TOC track (innermost track) isn't kaput, you can recover the data even if both the UDF and older 8.3 file tables are blitzed. If the TOC is busted, you'll have to get a professional DVD reader or go to a recovery service.

    (The "how to" is over on the QuickPar forums. Basically, you rip the disk at the sector level to a pair of files. Rename the one with a PAR2 extension, then feed it the 2nd file as source data. QuickPar will find all of the data blocks and reconstitute the original files.)

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  26. Burned verses Pressed by KrisKlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Up to this time, I had thought of my burned CD/DVDs as a "permanent" backup or record. This article has changed my thinking, and while I still like to buy "pressed" music CDs and DVD movies, and even download music from iTunes, I will now think of them as more permanent and acknowledge that MY burned discs will have to be re-burned from time to time. I am using LaCie CD/DVD burner and have had little problems with it and found it to be most reliable. As time goes along, storage space, via ethernet, is getting cheaper and cheaper and will provide more hard-drive space for direct storage of music and movies. I am preparing DVD storage of about 14,000 book titles from the Gutenberg Project and make them available to schools and libraries and compatible to Macs. Query: Should I learn how to make these discs "pressed" instead of burned? I am doing this under the guise of Scriptorium Library(TM) and will pay a 20% royalty to Gutenberg should the project get off the ground. So far, I have enough titles for about four DVD discs (about 4.5 gigabytes each). Cordially, Kris Kleeberg

  27. independence by chucken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only one to be suspicious about the impartiality of this article? Check out the links. Quite a lot go through the weird ass domain name JDOQOCY.COM. Do a whois on this domain and you'll find the registrant is "Commission Junction". Hmm, impartial, NOT.