Slashdot Mirror


Many New Species Found Under Antarctica

gt_mattex writes to tell us The Globe and Mail is reporting that quite a few new species have been found in the ocean beneath the Antarctic ice. From the article: "It is too early to say exactly how many new species were discovered in the Antarctic, many in the Weddell Sea, where ice crushed the ship of Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton in 1915. The scientists saw more strange creatures than familiar ones, says Ron O'Dor, an expert in octopuses and squid from Halifax's Dalhousie University and the chief scientist in charge of producing the first marine life census of the planet by 2010."

11 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. ANCIENTS by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    IT's the ANCIENT outpost

  2. Needs pictures by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article describes some pretty odd creatures.

    I mean, without a picture of that centimeter-in-diameter protozoan, how the hell am I supposed to imagine how it looks like, much less the more important facets of such a discovery... such as how does it taste?

  3. Re:Anyone else worried after reading this? by nog_lorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you worry! We will have those scary new species gone in no time!

  4. Re:Could they be harmful? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Other then that

    Seek also the difference between "then" and "than" ;)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  5. My god -- it's full of geeks by anagama · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the dark ocean beneath the Antarctic ice, researchers have found scores of species they've never seen before, including strange jellyfish and other gelatinous organisms that thrive without light

    My god -- it's full of geeks.
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  6. Re:Could they be harmful? by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everything in Australia is deadly. The spiders are deadly, the snakes are deadly, the crocodiles are deadly, the plants are deadly, the driving in Sydney is definitely deadly, the TV commercials are lethal... I never did find out what happened to those rabbits that escaped from a research facility on a Government-owned island and made it to shore, back in '95. As I recall, they were being used for some research into some lethal pathogen or other. Since there are Australians still alive, I take it that the crisis was brought under control, but that was cutting it a little fine. I guess we can add the Australian Government to things that are lethal, though.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  7. Re:Amazing by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Drain the oceans?!? That's ridiculous -- where would they go??? I guess you could find something that sucks really hard, like Digg, put a straw in it, and plop it on the beach.

    But it would make much more sense to rapidly evaporate all of them, perhaps with a large scale hairdryer task force and/or a few strategically placed nukes.

  8. If it rhymes, it must be true by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the ocean, wriggling by,

    are octopuses, not octopi.

    Attr. to Patricia T. O'Conner, as is the quote, "Octopi is for suckers".

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:If it rhymes, it must be true by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 4, Funny

      octopi is 25.1327412

      --
      Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
  9. Re:Could they be harmful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead of listing all of the deadly things about Australia, it's much easier to list the non-deadly things:

    - some of the sheep

    Thanks Terry Pratchett.

  10. Re:Could they be harmful? by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny
    Naaah. Since they never probably evolve near humans, they couldn't possibility be harmful.
    They could have nasty pointy teeth.
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.