Slashdot Mirror


Many New Species Found Under Antarctica

gt_mattex writes to tell us The Globe and Mail is reporting that quite a few new species have been found in the ocean beneath the Antarctic ice. From the article: "It is too early to say exactly how many new species were discovered in the Antarctic, many in the Weddell Sea, where ice crushed the ship of Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton in 1915. The scientists saw more strange creatures than familiar ones, says Ron O'Dor, an expert in octopuses and squid from Halifax's Dalhousie University and the chief scientist in charge of producing the first marine life census of the planet by 2010."

52 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Let me get in my boat before you start research... by the_tsi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this the initial stage of the Second Impact?

  2. Amazing by Sneakernets · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's been millenia and we still don't know all the life on our planet. I always look forward to articles like this, they really tell us how little we do know.

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Amazing by LiquidMind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      i've been thinking about that too, especially about the life that resides at the bottom of our oceans....
      how interesting (and suicidal, but bear with me) would it be to somehow drain all the oceans of water just to see what's left over...

      --
      This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    2. Re:Amazing by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drain the oceans?!? That's ridiculous -- where would they go??? I guess you could find something that sucks really hard, like Digg, put a straw in it, and plop it on the beach.

      But it would make much more sense to rapidly evaporate all of them, perhaps with a large scale hairdryer task force and/or a few strategically placed nukes.

    3. Re:Amazing by geobeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been millenia and we still don't know all the life on our planet. I always look forward to articles like this, they really tell us how little we do know.

      I just finished a Microbiology intro course where the instructor kept stressing that. You think it's amazing how many macroscopic species we are still discovering; that's nothing compared to the unknown species of bacteria that are right under our noses--and that could be quite literal.

      It seems that life on Earth, as far as the number of species is concerned, consists of bacteria, beetles, and assorted debris.

      (After Asimov: "The Solar System consists of the Sun, Jupiter, and assorted debris."

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  3. Anyone else worried after reading this? by chabotc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "A school of fish the size of Manhattan off the New Jersey coast. About 20 million herring were travelling together."

    That soon we'll find ways to make ocean life go extinct in those parts which so far relativly are protected from our interferance.. With our normal area's of fishing drying up quickly, how long will it take before we go and do our thing there too ... *sigh*

    1. Re:Anyone else worried after reading this? by nog_lorp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you worry! We will have those scary new species gone in no time!

  4. Great... by Durrok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here comes the Second Impact. Glad I'm a couple hundred miles inland and not living in Japan...

    --
    I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
  5. ANCIENTS by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    IT's the ANCIENT outpost

  6. shouldn't it be... by wealthychef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "octopi and squids"? :-)

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:shouldn't it be... by siride · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Either "octopuses" or "octopodes".

    2. Re:shouldn't it be... by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Informative

      The word 'pus' is Greek for foot, and the plural in Greek is 'podes', so it would be octopodes -- except the name of the animal is not 'eight-feet', it's 'eight-foot', so it's one 'eight-foot' or 'octopus' and many 'eight-foots' or 'octopuses'.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:shouldn't it be... by tommten · · Score: 2, Funny

      mmm.. octopie *drools*

      --
      - I choked on the red pill and now I'm stuck in limbo
  7. I get suspicious... by clifgriffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get suspicious whenever a creature purported to have gone extinct X million years ago is discovered alive and well.

    It seems to happen with some regularity.

    It seems to me, if you find a fossil of an animal you believe to be extinct, you will probably test it with the assumption it is of relatively old age.

    I think you probably find what you're looking for.

    Anyway, not trying to start a flame war. But that's probably going to happen anyway. ("YOU IGNORANT BASTARD DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW DATING WORKS!!!")

    1. Re:I get suspicious... by hywel_ap_ieuan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I get suspicious whenever a creature purported to have gone extinct X million years ago is discovered alive and well.It seems to happen with some regularity.It seems to me, if you find a fossil of an animal you believe to be extinct, you will probably test it with the assumption it is of relatively old age.I think you probably find what you're looking for.Anyway, not trying to start a flame war. But that's probably going to happen anyway. ("YOU IGNORANT BASTARD DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW DATING WORKS!!!")
      You've hit on the first objection to your suspicion already - dating isn't based on anything so trivial as believing an organism is extinct. It's based, typically, on knowing the approximate age of the sediment the fossil is found in. That in turn is based on things like radiodating of overlaying igneous rock, index fossils in the same or nearby layers, and similar techniques. Due to stuff like that, the general age of most sediments is pretty well known. Geologists who are familiar with a given area can tell you what era a particular formation dates from. If your fossil came from a well-known formation, you probably know the date of a given fossil plus or minus a few percent as soon as you locate it.
      As to how you know the critter is extinct: You don't, not with 100% certainty. But if it's over a few million years old, it's a pretty good bet. Most species don't last all that long, geologically speaking. And you're probably also rather misled by the popular reporting. The "Jurassic Shrimp" is actually a new species within a genus (Neoglyphea) with only one previously-known member, which genus is part of a family (Glypheidae)that was previously thought to be extinct. As one of the discoverers said, "the group is less completely extinct than was thought."
    2. Re:I get suspicious... by vaughanf · · Score: 2, Funny
      ("YOU IGNORANT BASTARD DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW DATING WORKS!!!")
      What kind of question is that in a place like slashdot? Really...
  8. The Thing by Diagoras · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Somebody in this camp ain't what he appears to be. Right now that may be one or two of us. By spring, it could be all of us."

    --
    I value politeness. If you extend it to me, I'll extend it to you.
  9. Needs pictures by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article describes some pretty odd creatures.

    I mean, without a picture of that centimeter-in-diameter protozoan, how the hell am I supposed to imagine how it looks like, much less the more important facets of such a discovery... such as how does it taste?

  10. Re:Could they be harmful? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Other then that

    Seek also the difference between "then" and "than" ;)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  11. Re:Could they be harmful? by css-hack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure they could be harmful. In fact, where two species evolve seperately, it is less likely that they'll be able to coexist peacefully. Just look at the species that have been introduced to Australia.

    I think the greater danger here, though, is that humans will disturb or destroy the new-found species or their habitats.

  12. Re:Life census of the ocean? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually I already knew how long the study had been taking place. They are attempting to catalog all the life in the oceans when we haven't even cataloged all life in the rain forests, which is a far smaller task. Now when you consider that the surface area (not volume) of the ocean is 75% of the earth, the chances of encountering every creature in the ocean seems ridiculously small, much less the chance that every creature is encountered and properly documented in all of 9 years. The jokes on you.

  13. My god -- it's full of geeks by anagama · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the dark ocean beneath the Antarctic ice, researchers have found scores of species they've never seen before, including strange jellyfish and other gelatinous organisms that thrive without light

    My god -- it's full of geeks.
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  14. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by wellingj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure enough people get the NGE allusion

  15. Elder Things? by bendy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes but have they found any evidence of Elder Things yet? Or at the very least some Shoggoths?

  16. that's a bizarre reaction by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that little nugget of news was reason to find cheer, i think

    a colossal school of herring? off new jersey? isn't that good news?

    why the despondent reaction to that news item? there are certainly tons of news items to find depressing reactions to about ocean life and man's hungry stomach... but that particular nugget of news is reason to cheer, don't you think?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's a bizarre reaction by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like finding a pocket of air in a sinking ship. The good news is far overshadowed by the bad news.

    2. Re:that's a bizarre reaction by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't such great news if the herring are filling an ecological niche left vacant by the destruction of another species, or are present in large numbers because their natural predators have been wiped out.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  17. New...? by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As in just fell out of the tree of evolution?

    ...bah....

    Those critter are most likely checking out the mini-subs and shaking their heads and thinking "Oh, look! A new species!"

  18. what, the yeti lobster didn't do it for you? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    but, anyways, here you go, lotsa pictures

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  19. i'm with you by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    take the common wood louse, that you can find under any rock in any forest

    now, blow it up a thousand fold in size

    there you go, running around the ocean floor

    amazing indeed

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i'm with you by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I knew I'd see some of these. For any slashdotters who want to see a FASCINATING and beautifully produced BBC documentary on this, I recommend episode 2 "The Deep" from their award-winning "The Blue Planet" series. Here's a direct .torrent link.

      BBC The Blue Planet: The Deep .torrent

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:i'm with you by MrOuija_AK · · Score: 2, Interesting
    3. Re:i'm with you by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      My current favorite:

      http://www.amonline.net.au/fishes/about/fieldwork/ norfanz/psychrol2.htm

      The name they gave it is fine, but 'Sploork' seems like a better fit to me.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  20. Re:Could they be harmful? by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everything in Australia is deadly. The spiders are deadly, the snakes are deadly, the crocodiles are deadly, the plants are deadly, the driving in Sydney is definitely deadly, the TV commercials are lethal... I never did find out what happened to those rabbits that escaped from a research facility on a Government-owned island and made it to shore, back in '95. As I recall, they were being used for some research into some lethal pathogen or other. Since there are Australians still alive, I take it that the crisis was brought under control, but that was cutting it a little fine. I guess we can add the Australian Government to things that are lethal, though.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  21. Re:Life census of the ocean? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What point are you trying to make, should they give up because their ultimate goal will never be reached?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  22. Oh, that's easy. by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You label everything as one or more of "sushi", "chowder" or "probably made into soup somewhere". Saves on physiological and genetic analysis, and it's all that Joe Average is likely to care about. (If the average person gave a rat's about conservation or science, we'd be a thousand years more advanced and ten thousand years wiser.)


    Besides, in 15 years or less there won't be enough of a food chain in the oceans to sustain most of the organisms that do still exist and without a gene bank capable of storing that kind of volume of information there's no possibility of either having any usable data OR being able to revive the ecology once conditions have returned to saner levels. Collecting photos is all fine and good, but in not that long a time that is ALL we'll have, unless serious efforts are made to either conserve or genetically catalog.


    (And, frankly, I can't see the US Government even getting past the planning stages in a mere 15 years - assuming it even got that far. As they're the only group with the clout and the money to build a center capable of analyzing and storing a few hundred million DNA/mtDNA databases in that kind of timeframe, most of the information currently in the oceans is beyond any possibility of recovery.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Oh, that's easy. by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, in 15 years or less there won't be enough of a food chain in the oceans to sustain most of the organisms that do still exist and without a gene bank capable of storing that kind of volume of information there's no possibility of either having any usable data OR being able to revive the ecology once conditions have returned to saner levels. Collecting photos is all fine and good, but in not that long a time that is ALL we'll have, unless serious efforts are made to either conserve or genetically catalog.
      1970 called, they want their dire ecological predictions back.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  23. Hey Great! by gp310ad · · Score: 2, Funny

    A new isle at the fish market!

    --
    Do not look into LASER with remaining eye!
  24. Re:Worried? No. by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Informative

    You, for one, must have meant sashimi.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  25. Re:some people really need to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "so stop talking about it and move on, or change your attitude about life in the ocean"

    I can attest to that.

    I used to believe it would be the worst thing in the world. If it was forced upon me, I thought, I would surely die rather than submit to such a harsh and painful existence. How could I eat? How could I breathe? Both would come at significant hardship, all as my skin shrivelled and those few comforts I'd brought from my land-dwelling past rusted away.

    Yes, I was someone who, like many, clung to the land desperately.

    How silly that attitude seems to me now. The atmosphere is clogged with pollutants, the crops doused with carcinogens, the cities governed by rich men who guide the masses' efforts into their own purses.

    This is what changed my attitude about life in the ocean, and that is what, I hope, will help you change yours.

  26. Re:At The Mountains of Madness by bsa3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the parties to the Dresden Agreement of 1931 have sent repeated followup expeditions, but the crawling chaos got them all. And the Russians are deploying shoggoths in attack mode in the Khyber pass... sucks to be in that universe, I gather. (The robot to be slurped is "A Colder War" by Charles Stross. Highly recommended.)

  27. Lake Vostok by Timbotronic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It'll be interesting to see what they find in Lake Vostok, which is a freshwater lake as big as Lake Ontario and has been sealed under Antarctic ice for up to a million years.

    Could be the perfect test for a Cryobot mission to Europa

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  28. Re:Could they be harmful? by Alicat1194 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Naah, Vegemite is like 1080, only toxic to non-natives :)

    --
    You can learn a lot about a person if you just take the time to inject them with sodium pentathol
  29. If it rhymes, it must be true by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the ocean, wriggling by,

    are octopuses, not octopi.

    Attr. to Patricia T. O'Conner, as is the quote, "Octopi is for suckers".

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:If it rhymes, it must be true by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 4, Funny

      octopi is 25.1327412

      --
      Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
  30. Re:Could they be harmful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead of listing all of the deadly things about Australia, it's much easier to list the non-deadly things:

    - some of the sheep

    Thanks Terry Pratchett.

  31. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by PrinceOfStorms · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And for those who don't even get the "NGE" reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neon_Genesis_Evangeli on_glossary#Second_Impact.

    (And yes, I had to look it up myself.)

  32. aussie childhood, oh the memories... by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember growing up in adelaide.

    'don't' walk on the grass without shoes'
    'don't lean on the hedges'
    'don't go near the lizards'
    'don't dig in the garden'

    and in Broadbeach

    'don't play with the jellyfish'
    'don't go in the sea without shoes'

    Not that these rules worked especially well on me, I broke almost all of them on a reguler basis, and so did my friends. It's amazing Aussie kids survive to adulthood.

    I came to england at 7, and was shocked to find kids running from pissy little spiders and bee's....

  33. Re:Could they be harmful? by jimicus · · Score: 2, Funny

    myxomatosis was released back in 1950, and suppressed the rabbit population quite thoroughly for a couple of decades before they started to evolve immunity.

    Steady on. You'll start a flamewar with the creationists.

    What if a bunch of rabbits intelligently designed immunity?

  34. Re:Could they be harmful? by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny
    Naaah. Since they never probably evolve near humans, they couldn't possibility be harmful.
    They could have nasty pointy teeth.
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  35. Re:Life census of the ocean? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    yea, I refer to this as the "cut and run" date. At which point we all know the ocean life wins. I think we need to "stay the course." Not set a date that the ocean life can hide until.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  36. Re:Could they be harmful? by njchick · · Score: 2, Funny

    And don't forget koalas. They a lurking everywhere waiting for human flesh. Even a small koala can rip you apart in a matter of seconds.