Slashdot Mirror


Create Living Cells With an Inkjet Printer

MattSparkes writes to tell us New Scientist has an article on the use of inkjet printing technology in creating biological tissue. From the article "An inkjet device that prints tiny 'bio-ink' patterns has been used to simultaneously grow two different tissues from the stem cells of adult mice. Surgeons could one day use the technology to repair various damaged tissues at the same time, the researchers say."

100 comments

  1. This lends a whole new meaning... by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Funny

    This lends a whole new meaning to the phrase "Getting some ink"

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:This lends a whole new meaning... by zeromorph · · Score: 2, Funny

      and to facial toner.

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  2. But imagine the price of ink by grahamsz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure i could buy a new liver from the Russian mafia for less than the Lexmark ink required to print one.

    1. Re:But imagine the price of ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably get better tech support from the Mafia.

  3. Works great until... by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know they're going to gouge you for refills.

    1. Re:Works great until... by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...or until you find that someone else copyrighted your liver.

    2. Re:Works great until... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet they'll charge you an arm and a leg.

    3. Re:Works great until... by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      And if your surgeon violated the DMCA, you'll wake up in a tub of ice...

  4. Overheard in an Operating Room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    PC Load Letter? What the fuck does that mean?

    1. Re:Overheard in an Operating Room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be PC Load Liver

    2. Re:Overheard in an Operating Room by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mine says "PC LOAD LIVER"

      WTF

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  5. And I thought .... by zappepcs · · Score: 2

    that finding printer drivers for Linux was difficult....

    Where the hell do you find a printer driver for this? I'm pretty sure it won't be from the Intelligent Design Printer company LOLOL

    1. Re:And I thought .... by monoqlith · · Score: 3, Funny

      For Windows Vista systems, the printer relies on the new "Plug and Live" technology.

      Unfortunately, the technology was released prematurely and is still in its "Plug and Die" phase of development.

    2. Re:And I thought .... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it won't be from the Intelligent Design Printer company LOLOL Laughing Out Loud Out Loud?
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  6. Weird Science by freewaybear · · Score: 0

    This would make a good premise for the sequel, eh?

    --
    Registered Linux User #404114 [url=http://www.punkoiska.com][img]http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/4379/posbannercf5.g
  7. Again ... by Iron+Condor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you have something to publish, publish in Nature or Science. If you have nothing to publish, publish in New Scientist...

    --
    We're all born with nothing.
    If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    1. Re:Again ... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      The last line of the article says that this appeared at the annual meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology. I don't know what kind of peer review goes into that, but it's not just science-by-press-release.

    2. Re:Again ... by silentounce · · Score: 1

      This technology isn't knew though. I heard of it a long time ago.
       
      Is this relevant enough for you? There are also several related articles.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
  8. Why is this on /. as if it's new? by vsage3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I saw a highschool-aged kid show one of these off at the Florida State Science Fair several years ago. I had heard about the concept prior as well. While it is an interesting idea, it should not be presented as brand-spanking new.

    1. Re:Why is this on /. as if it's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:Why is this on /. as if it's new? by rykyard · · Score: 1

      the "new" part is differentiatomg and growing 2 tissues with this tech, not the tech. I'm sure the high-school kid wasn't doing that. The printer is just a cheaper (than say http://www.beckmancoulter.com/products/instrument/ automatedsolutions/biomek/biomekfx_inst_dcr.aspBio mek) robot.

  9. w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm gonna make me a new girlfriend using only LaTeX and vim.

    1. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm gonna make me a new girlfriend using only LaTeX and vim.


      Why not skip vim and the printer and stick to your current latex-only girlfriend?
    2. Re:w00t! by truckaxle · · Score: 1

      Maybe instead of "repairing various damaged tissues" you could just uhmmm... enhance various undeveloped tissues you could solve your girlfriend problem.

    3. Re:w00t! by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      you could just uhmmm... enhance various undeveloped tissues you could solve your girlfriend problem.

      That would require fan-fold paper which is hard to come by it seems now.
    4. Re:w00t! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      \sloppy

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably having problems with some tough stains on his latex girlfriend.

      "Vim is the only everyday cleaner that deals with even the toughest dirt."
      http://www.unilever.ca/ourbrands/homecare/vim.asp

  10. Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new inkjet printed overlords!

  11. BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by vivin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now imagine if I have a Beowulf cluster of these... I could instruct them to print out THE PERFECT (NAKED) WOMAN! Bwahahaha!

    People say I should go out and meet women but I think this is so much cooler!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heed what other people say you must. Exist the perfect woman must not.

    2. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by kettch · · Score: 1

      You mean a la Fifth Element? I'll laugh when your perfect woman breaks your neck for groping her.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    3. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's worth the time in traction.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    4. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we didn't have fancy bewolf clusters, we just had to rely on weird science

    5. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I hope your definition of 'perfect' includes 'dumb as a door knob', because if it doesn't, she'll instantly dump your sorry ass and print herself a 'perfect guy'.

    6. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG...there has got to be much more constructive ways to use this technology than by making naked women

      You guys are seriously shallow...no offense

    7. Re:BWAHAHA! Beowulf cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shallow much? There are way more constructive ways to use this technology than using it to make naked women.

      Try using this technology to make, say, prosthetic limbs. Then they'd look more like the real thing and who knows? Maybe in the future they'll develop technology to rejoin the lost limbs so they can really work again.

      Or if they can create organs with this technology, why wouldn't they be able to mke a whole person, or an animal.

      Use your brains guys, it doesn't take a lot of brain power to think up naked women. Be original. Come on.

  12. Looks like someone's been hitting the egg nog... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This adds whole new dimensions to the work-day-after embarrassment of getting drunk at the office Christmas party and making photocopies of your ass.

  13. Printshop for Organs by alienuforia · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd really like to print out my own heart to give to my girlfriend on Valentine's Day. I think it would be bloody sweet.

  14. Overheard at Kinkos by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

    Ok, who used all the ink printing all these black market KIDNEYS?

    1. Re:Overheard at Kinkos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The market kidneys is going to fall with this discovey! Sell your kidneys now that you are on time!!!!

  15. Ooo! I saw this in a movie once! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Come on! Cut to the chase! There's only one question I need answered:

    Can it print me a copy of Milla Jovovich?

  16. Let's save someone some time by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    United States Patent Application 732980759-32754321

    Protein structure for biochemical enforcement of growth factor ink expiry dates

    ABSTRACT

    A protein structure and associated amino acid sequence providing a set of functions for remotely enforcing expiry dates of growth factor ink.

    Inventors: MillionthMonkey

    Serial No.: 053243653216
    Series Code: 10
    Filed: December 11, 2006

    Claims

    1. An architecture for a system comprising: a greedy ink manufacturer, an end user, an ink expiration date, a hardware device capable of spraying growth factor protein containing inks into desired tissue growth patterns, an application program interface to support same.

    2. An architecture as recited in claim 1, wherein a biochemical timer is implemented with adjustable expiry date settings that may be set at time of manufacture, via expression of a sequence of amino acids (see Attachment A) generating a protein that processes an RNA strand at a fixed rate.

    3. An architecture as recited in claim 2, wherein an RNA template molecule of predetermined length is used at time of manufacture to control a timer as recited in claim 2.

    4. An architecture as recited in claim 3, wherein a biochemical clock is employed to trigger denaturation of growth factor proteins as recited in claim 1.

    5. An architecture as recited in claim 4, wherein the application program interface comprises: a first group of services related to discovery of an impending ink expiry event, a second group of services related to displaying numerous dialog boxes to the end user [as outlined in claim 1] asking for money, and a third group of services related to remotely extracting payment from an end user [as outlined in claim 1].

    6. An application program interface as recited in claim 5, wherein the first group of services comprises: first functions that enable ink manufacturer to specify an expiry date [as recited in claim 3] and implement enforcement of the expiry date by having a biochemical timer [as recited in claim 4] trigger denaturation of growth factors used in gene expression inks.

    CONCLUSION

    Although the invention has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed invention.

    And I'm off to the patent office! Later, suckas!

  17. Title is wrong... by dtjohnson · · Score: 5, Informative

    They're not creating cells. They are 'claiming' to have allegedly created tissues by using the inkjet to spray non-differentiated stem cells on to a substrate. Doesn't sound like they're close to selling skin tissue to burn victims yet, though.

    1. Re:Title is wrong... by Malcolm+Chan · · Score: 1
      Absolutely! There is quite a difference between using cells as the "ink", and assembling a cell. We're not even close to being able to do that.

      --

      /MC

  18. Prices by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, but with the prices of ink jet cartridges, who could afford it!!!

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Prices by zaaj · · Score: 1
      Actually, at the company where I work, we sell a development printer and the cartridges come in two parts, the printhead, and an empty fluid container. Researchers or industrial R&D people can fill it with whatever fluid they want to experiment with. These cartridges are comparable in price to commercial inkjet cartridges. Granted, the ones we sell don't have ink in them, but when you consider that some biomedical research chemicals are well over $2,000/liter, and the printer system is in the low 5-digit price range, the cartridges are not that expensive a component of the whole setup.

      And no, the custom software required to run all this doesn't run on Linux.

      Disclaimer: I just work in IT, and the info above is not official, just what I've picked up by helping others at the company with their computers, and being generally interested in what they do.

  19. 5th element by zx-15 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Watch out, here comes Leeloo.

  20. so what if the toner is low? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    does the poor critter come out like that badly beamed crew member in the first star trek movie?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  21. Re:Ooo! I saw this in a movie once! by Datamonstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure, but buy in bulk so you'll have enough left over to grow her some tits.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  22. Re:Ooo! I saw this in a movie once! by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

    Screw that. Just make the tits.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  23. Paper jam... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1


    Tech: When did you noticed the paper jam?

    Customer: Last week.

    Tech: That's too bad. Your printer died over the weekend. You need to call an undertaker since your warrantry doesn't cover disposal of the body.

  24. Re:GOOGLE IS RACIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, all I'm seeing is Kentucky Fried Children.

  25. Progress by quokkapox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Humanity will inevitably learn new technologies to cheaply and exactly replicate patterns of matter, much as we currently are able to flawlessly and freely share patterns of information. The profound economic effects modern computing has wrought on society are about to be repeated in another echo of the Industrial and Agricultural Revolutions.

    First we somehow learned how to share information, person-to-person, with language. Ten thousand years ago we used that to develop agriculture; we learned how to replicate plants. Then we automated that with the help of domesticated farm animals and handmade tools. We systematized all of this, and then figured out how to globally replicate and distribute the instructions for making the tools themselves. Another cycle gets us where we are today, where we can use all of the available knowledge and tools to design the *next* generation of whatever it is we're trying to do with ourselves.

    So where are we going with all this, besides "burning" a batch of Viagra, Ciprofloxacin, LSD, or flu vaccine on your desktop? Maybe we need to keep an open source perspective, so you can at least cook up some aspirin as *FREELY* as you can play an .ogg. You might have to listen to Beethoven while you wait, because Britney, Beck, and Björk are still locked down (although your grandfather might have left you an illicit DVD with the Beatles discography as ancient MP3s).

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Progress by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Humanity will inevitably learn new technologies to cheaply and exactly replicate patterns of matter, much as we currently are able to flawlessly and freely share patterns of information." [My emphasis]

      As someone who has spent the last two decades developing and supporting large software systems may I just say, we are doomed.

      BTW: I do share your sentiments about the importance of the current digital era: "For millions of years mankind lived just like the animals, then something happened which unleashed the power of our imagination. We learned to talk." - Steven Hawking's introduction to Pink Floyd's "Keep Talking".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  26. SPAAAACE MEEEEAT !!!! by David+Gould · · Score: 2, Interesting


    All this talk of organs and body parts... Screw that, I'm hungry -- can they use it to grow muscle tissue? Mmm, printed meat.

    Once the technology gets established enough to be cheap, it sounds like it might actually become more energy-efficient than raising livestock. And it should be ethically acceptable for vegetarians -- wouldn't some of them at least, who aren't too spooked by the "sciencey-ness" of the whole thing, agree that since the meat didn't come from an animal, it's okay to eat?

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    1. Re:SPAAAACE MEEEEAT !!!! by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      And it should be ethically acceptable for vegetarians -- wouldn't some of them at least, who aren't too spooked by the "sciencey-ness" of the whole thing, agree that since the meat didn't come from an animal, it's okay to eat?

      Not as many as you might think.

      It's not as if we're all sitting around looking for a loop-hole so we can go out and eat some "pre-embargo" meat or anything like that. Doing an end run around the ethics thing is gonna run you smack-dab into the gross factor for many of us.

      If someone had some tank-grown, protein slurry which was very chemically similar to animal flesh, I'm not gonna be the first one in line to give it a taste -- and circumstances would need to be pretty dire to make me come around. I don't care if you didn't technically have to kill an actual critter, it's a foodstuff which is a chemistry experiment, and smacks of Soylent Green to me.

      For the same reason that a lot of vegetarians don't want anything to do with GMOs (scary food supply issues with absolutely no broad understanding of what it's doing) -- the 'inkjet steak' idea wants to make me vomit. Not happening.

      I'll stick with my actual vegetarian diet consisting of plant matter, and understanding what nutrients are actually in food -- not to mention the actual cooking of it. The whole Ronco Spray On Meat? I'll take a pass on.

      For a lot of us, we believe that there are ethical issues surrounding meat, as well as recognizing that meat isn't always the healthiest thing to eat (and being afraid of the safety/security of our food supply). I can just imagine what nasty diseases are waiting to infect your non-animal meat-goo and the people eating it -- if Mad Cow happens when we feed sheep to cows, I don't even want to fscking know what nasties are going to be waiting to develop on tank-grown meat. Some big nasty bit of athelete's foot and yeast infection spreading through the protein slurry vats doesn't conjure up an appatizing image for me.

      We're not afraid of science -- we're just not enthused to eat the byproducts of it, since we have no idea of what the long-term issues could possibly be. I personally, would rather eat things which are at least naturally occuring.

      But, hey, when Mickey D's start selling McProtein Patties made from "100% Cellularly-Identical To Beef", you go right ahead and chow down on that sucker. I won't interfere with your right to eat it. ;-)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:SPAAAACE MEEEEAT !!!! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Most vegetables were not edible by man in their natural state; it took thousands of years of genetic engineering to get to their current "natural" state.

      No, the vegetables were selectively bred, that much is true. But, with selective breeding, you can only choose for pre-existing traits.

      Splicing in genes from a spider to a goat to produce silk, that is genetic engineering. Very large difference.

      Basically you just object to science that you find "icky," which is quite retarded. You describe "some big nasty bit of athlete's foot and yeast infection spreading through the protein slurry vats" when it would be a perfectly safe sterile process, compared to the massive petri dish in which vegetables are grown, earth (or the smaller petri dishes in which natural meat is grown, animals).

      Not really. What actual experience do we have in growing such things? Plants growing in the soil, OK, well understood mechanism. We didn't need to invent it, we just fiddled with it and refined it. And, I defy you to identify a perfectly safe, sterile process that does what we're talking about.

      We've never done such a thing, and we don't have any studies on it. How will we know it's perfectly safe until we've been doing it for a very long time? We can't. For the same reason that we discovered that Thalidamyde and DDT had some nasty consequences, we have no idea of how safe this is going to be.

      Blindly believing we'll have magic science which comes in the first generation which solves the problems with this is retarded -- because it assumes it will just work, and there will be no side-effects. That, and no matter how good your safeguards are, something has a very good chance of going wrong -- as in the fungal infection, or a possible unplanned mutation of the food stuff, or discovering that we've managed to make something which is highly toxic.

      Your "natural" foods are the product of science, the only difference is that you've trained your brain to find negatives about the things that ideologically bother you, so your brain concocted a "grossness" for something that's far less gross, dangerous, etc., than things that are aligned with your beliefs.

      Natural, organic foods have more about practices than science in them -- or at least, some of the early science we figured out about how to grow plants. Ideally, they're not using chemicals, they're not based on Mon-freaking-Santo's crap which is supposed to make it resistant to pesticides, and they sure as hell don't have genes from whole different families or lifeform.

      I can wrap my brain around selectively breeding tomatoes to be suited for a climate, or juicier, or taller, or whatever. Because those are traits which are already present in the species. Heck, the resurgance in the heirloom varieties of plants (you know, when a Mennonite Farmer could be doing "cutting edge science" by breeding them) demonstrates that a lot of people are looking for plants in the form they used to take before we bred them into something which stays fresher on the store shelf but has no taste left in it.

      The 'space meat' in the post I was responding to has not been proven to be anything -- specifically, not safe, or not anything but gross, or even possible. It's a hypothetical which people seem to think will come into existence without issues, problems, or delay. It also pre-supposes that -- rather than trying to come up with better agricultural practices, and maybe weening ourselves off domesticated animals as a food-source -- skipping to growing meat in a lab in your perfectly sterile environment is going to be more effective, and a more efficient use of resources.

      I seriously doubt it is more efficient to run machines than, oh, you know, photosynthesis.

      And if that's wrong and you just plain don't like science, well that's even more retarded. Science provided you with vegetables and health

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:SPAAAACE MEEEEAT !!!! by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 0

      I am also a vegetarian, and all I can say is that once it has been tested and proven safe, I would have no ethical objection to eating Squirted Meat. However, since becoming vegetarian, the thought of eating meat (even ethically acquired meat, such as that of an animal that died of natural causes) has become distasteful to me, so I would not eat the meat unless necessary.

      It should be noted though that if in a situation where other food was unavailable, I would have no hesitation to eat ethically acquired meat, whether it be from a laser printer, a cow or a human. In fact, if the infrastructure is in place then I would like to donate my body to be eaten by starving people when I die. See the following link for a very interesting and insightful discussion of the benefits of ethical cannibalism: http://www.uq.edu.au/~pdwgrey/web/can/cannibalism. html

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  27. Fifth Element comes early! by radiogeak · · Score: 1

    Looks like we don't have to wait for the year 1314 to print human tissue! Woot!

    1. Re:Fifth Element comes early! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      1314? - Only on slashdot would I ask: What calenar system are you using?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Fifth Element comes early! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what dictionary are you using?

  28. Living cells? by brit74 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The system isn't actually creating living cells. It's laying existing cells down into a pattern to form tissues. The title, "Create Living Cells With an Inkjet Printer" seems to imply that it's putting together molecules to form cells. (Is it "printing" the nucleotide sequences of DNA and RNA, "printing" mitochondria, "printing" amino acid sequences so that they form working 3-dimensional proteins, placing sugars and hormones inside those cells? Is it laying down a thin cell-wall with species-specific proteins embedded in that wall?) The answer is no, it's not doing any of that. We aren't capable of doing that, and even if we were, it would require a massive database of information that's much larger than the data stored in the human genome.

    1. Re:Living cells? by GeHa · · Score: 1

      Nope. You're right in saying that the title is wrong - no building cells from scratch here - but the article describes printing growth factor (differentiation factor proteins, in fact) on monolayers of stem cells. The idea here is to force the cells to differentiate into different cell types within the same culture dish, which would be required for building complex tissues from stem cells.

      --

      ------
      sigs are a total waste of bandwith, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio is lower than 1:10.

  29. Minority Report by Firehed · · Score: 1

    With a pair of eyeballs acquir^W printed by a strange Japanese man? And little spidery things crawling all over the place?

    What a future. I, for one, welcome our new Animated, Noise-making Cereal Box Overlords!

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  30. Seems like a dupe. by PixieDust · · Score: 1
    Seems an awful lot like This Story from a long time ago.

    They're different, but hardly anything that's a new sensational breakthrough.

  31. My "How long before" by Clueless+Nick · · Score: 1

    Now you can print your own pr0n. Or pony.

    With stories like these, why bother to RTFA?

    --
    Chat with other atheists http://secularchat.org
    1. Re:My "How long before" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an "or"?

  32. Well... by Giloo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I, for one, welcome our new bio-ink printer generated stem cells overlord.

  33. Publication requirement. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    A patent (usually) is not just abstract and claims. Between both parts should come a sufficiently precise description about how to achieve the claims. That's the publication requirement: the patent holder only gets monopoly protection in exchange for describing his invention in such a way that any expert familiar with the state of the art can rebuild the invention using just the patent document alone.


    Absence of the "body" of the patent would imply either of two things:

    • The invention is not sufficiently well described. No publication => not valid
    • It is obvious how to implement it by just reading the claims. Obvious patent => not valid

    Yes, and that's also the reason why software patents should contain the full source code of a reference implementation of the claimed algorithm.


    All that being said, a sufficiently corrupt patent office court would still uphold it.

    1. Re:Publication requirement. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      A patent (usually) is not just abstract and claims. Between both parts should come a sufficiently precise description about how to achieve the claims.
      Oh yes. I have all this stuff in my "Appendix A".
    2. Re:Publication requirement. by OfficeSubmarine · · Score: 1

      All that being said, a sufficiently corrupt patent office court would still uphold it.

      The most important part of your post, sadly. While somewhat open to interpretation, personally, I'd put the US system right into that category. Or at least based on what I've seen large cooperations get away with.

    3. Re:Publication requirement. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Does that appendix use your BRM or is it just a plain old organ you stole from some prostitute in Taiwan?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  34. Ah maaaaan! by macneib · · Score: 1

    I was expecting a howto article...

  35. Printing people? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    That sounds familiar...

  36. More misleading headlines... by DrKC9N · · Score: 1

    Yet another erroneous Slashdot headline. These living cells are not "created," they are grown from existing stem cells. It's not like you put a nonliving substrate "in" the printer and get a spleen "out." The printer simply guides the cells' differentiation patterns.

  37. On Lexmark Printers by revlic · · Score: 1

    Cost of a standard no frills lexmark printer: $19.99 Cost of a new inject cartridge: $29.99 1. Give away free razors 2. Charge, FAR OUT THE ASS for the razors. 3. ??? 4. Profit

  38. The *real* reason for DRM by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    The more paranoid amongst us would speculate that this sort of capability is one of the reasons that companies are scrabbling around so much trying to perfect Treacherous Computing and DRM.

    You can bet your butt that as soon as the first device capable of manufacturing all of the parts involved in its own construction from simple raw materials is produced, a "matterware hacker" is going to feel the urge to make an open-source variant. From there on it's an inevitable progression to the complete breakdown of the consumer society - why purchase products from a big company when you can download the specs and print your own? Make your own energy collectors and raw material processors and your only constraints would be time and knowledge. And the beauty of knowledge is that when people get together and hand it around for free, everyone becomes richer without impoverishing themselves.

    This idea of course, terrifies those who are hooked on the hierarchical structure of power and control that looms over our world today, either because they fear destructive chaos or because they are addicted to the power. But if these technologies are pursued to their logical limits, the only possible end states are universal wealth, universal control, or global extinction. Mankind has proven time and again that if you can conceive of a technology, and it is possible, then it will be achieved. If freedom is to prevail, then the hackers are going to have to be the ones to save us all.

    Ok, maybe DRM is explicable in terms of present content-industry greed. But DRM on "matterware" is a logical extension, and the stakes are far higher than whether you get to listen to the latest RIAA sponsored aural insult or watch the steam rise from the latest Hollywood heap.

  39. Now I can create the Perfect Being. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! So I'll soon be able to create the Perfect Being -- the redhead from The Fifth Element (Milla Jovovich).

    1. Re:Now I can create the Perfect Being. by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      Yes, the "perfect being" is a woman who looks like Raggity Andy.

      Print me out a Lucy Lu bot instead.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  40. This is news ? by davro · · Score: 0

    Sounds very similar and very old

    Thursday, December 02, 2004 05:00 PM http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,118815-page,1/ar ticle.html
    01 February, 2005 7:00 a.m http://www.livescience.com/technology/050201_skin_ printing.html
    Wednesday, 19th January 2005 http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/143/ 143230_tailormade_skin_from_ink_printer.html

    Come on get with it, i have already built my clone army using disposable printers thought it was common knowledge.

  41. More Nu Scientist Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn... these Nu "Scientist" fairy tales and bedtime stories make me sleepy. Wake me up when you have some real science and technology stories.

  42. I can just picture the office assistant now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'It looks like you're trying to assemble a merciless army of clones. Do you want to switch to merciless clone template design mode?'

  43. TITLE: Misleading by jimstapleton · · Score: 2

    it doesn't actually create living cells as implied. It looks more like it makes a growth template for stem cells to use, as well as possibly planting them.

    Still useful mind you. But creating functional cells de-novo? No. That would be extremely nice, and probably the most nobel-worthy discovery in biology since Watson & Crick's nice little discovery (even if it didn't require a printer, just doing it would be quite useful)...

    Sadly, not yet.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  44. Some of us need this tech and ASAP... by EndoCanuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an individual who has a serious bone defect from an accident, this is very exciting news. Honestly, try wandering around thought life with one femur 2 inches shorter than the other. There are many folks out there who could really benefit from this technology. While it's fun to crack wise or debate the morality of the issue when you don't need the help this process could offer, remember that there are a lot of people who have been praying for something like this for a long time. Check out a children's hospital some time and see how many little ones could be helped by this.

  45. This research is OLD by xtal · · Score: 1

    YAWN.

    Call me when someone is using it for something productive. Otherwise, I'm filing tissue printing in the same bin as fuel cells - especially micro fuel cells - the only time you hear about it is when the research money is running low.

    (yeah, I need another cup of coffee.. but still)

    --
    ..don't panic
  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. Pretty Cool..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

    What would be really cool is if they could turn this technology around and build something like the "regeneration" machine in The Fifth Element...

    Instead of Nip/Tuck it would be Cut/Paste

    You would have to be careful if you were to do a face lift, though. If you use a coprighted image, the person would come out with the word VOID printed across their new face... Not that the wouldn't be funny too.....

    Kind of reminiscent of the Futurama episode "I Dated A Robot" where they download celebrities onto blank robots.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  48. Infectious E-mails? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    So now when one receives anthrax through e-mail, it won't necessarily be an MP3 attachment; it could be a PostScript attachment instead.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  49. No kidding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That stuff costs an arm and a leg.

  50. Re:GOOGLE IS RACIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont get any ads at all ps; ur nickname demonstrates stupidity.

  51. Human fax by ccarvalho · · Score: 1

    Finally, i can travel faster fax'ing myself.

    --
    Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate.