Slashdot Mirror
Google Releases Customized IE 7
narramissic writes "Google has released a customized version of Internet Explorer 7 that uses Google as the default search engine and provides users with the Google Toolbar and a Google homepage they can personalize. Perhaps not exactly what Microsoft intended when they released the Internet Explorer Administration Kit, which allows developers to customize IE."
Isn't this what Yahoo already did?
MS pwned by their own system. Nice! FP :D
>Perhaps not exactly what Microsoft intended when they released the Internet Explorer Administration Kit, which allows developers to customize IE.
Bullshit. Perhaps EXACTLY what Microsoft intended to help keep those pesky anti-trust lawsuits away.
What about http://www.google.com/firefox
Did Google ever pick a side in the browser wars?
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
The term "pwned" comes to mind.
That's my first reaction. Second reaction is... shouldn't Google be pushing anything but Internet Explorer to its customers? A certain browser named after a certain bushy animal comes to mind.
Doesn't seem like they really want to take them to court.
From TFA:
ieblog
Does it still check for a ummm "proper" Windows XP?
There certainly has been an admin kit for prior versions, at least for IE6 anyway. Not sure why this hasn't been thought of before.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/ie/rWe'll make great pets
The #1 thing that has kept me liking Google is their lack of using force as a way to get consumers to adopt their products. Microsoft and AOL are very aggressive in promoting their products and try to shape their users' habits to their profit rather than catering to consumer needs to gain profit. Google, on the other hand, just comes out with wild stuff that is just so good that people flock to it. Gmail blew away Hotmail and Yahoo for a little while with the 1-gigabyte of storage space. Google maps with the Flash-based interface was just awesome. Nothing was ever forced on me. I use Google's products only because I want to.
I don't use Microsoft's products because I want to. I use them (on occasion) because I'm forced to by the standards of others (Word documents, argh) that Microsoft has carefully crafted. I don't have to use Google maps or Froogle or anything at work. But if it's the best out there, I use it!
I sincerely hope that this does not change. Preinstalling Google toolbar on computers is a little pushing it, in my opinion.
Yeah I'm sure the Microsoft folks will be devastated if a lot of people download and use their software....
Is everyone here this dumb?? This is exactly what was intended when the Administration kit was made. Microsoft would want everyone out there(Amazon, eBay, Apple for gods sakes) to be pushing out a customized version of IE7. Dont u get it??
How is this news? The IE has been around for years and years. I remember using it to customize IE 5.5. It may have been around even earlier than that. And as to Microsoft somehow being upset, please look past the knee-jerk reaction and notice that the IE Blog, from Microsoft, actually praises the Google release, and links to their download page. This is what people are SUPPOSED to do with the IEAK. The article is really trying to make a big deal about something that's not...
-James
Yes I can, but I only do so when I have sufficient evidence to believe it happened.
While Yahoo's page may predate Google's page, could it be the case that both came from a template provided by Microsoft in the IE Admin Kit?
If so, then neither is plagiarising, they are simply implementing a tool which they rightfully may.
- RG>
Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
Does no one remember all the branded versions of IE 5.5?
Comcast had one, SBC DSL had one, I'm sure there were hundreds.
I don't see why Microsoft would get upset at this; this is why they released the kit in the first place.
A company is more likely to distribute a browser if they can brand it and what does Microsoft want? You got it, more people using IE7.
Only a select few morons are going to mistake a Google branded IE7 as "Google's internet browser". Everyone else will continue to know that it is Microsoft's Internet Explorer but Google is happy to get its name in all the places it can.
You people missed the point of Google doing this. I am sure Google still fully supports Firefox movement.
Google released a customized IE7 for the sake of brand recognition. And it really doesn't help Microsoft either. It just gives MS bragging rights and no profit. This customized version of IE7 will get people using Google homepage and search engine. Which in return will boost revenue for Google. And with that boost, it will support Google's efforts in the Google Foundation and open source applications with the higher revenue.
In the end, It is a win-win for the open source community. And a loosing situation for Microsoft. No one uses their precious Windows Live or MSN search. A small loss in revenue for Microsoft.
\
My IE7 Program File directory is 2.57MB, but since installing it required two reboots, I imagine that additional files are scattered all over the place.
A couple of months ago, I did some quick testing to see which browser uses the most RAM. I checked the RAM usage right after starting the browser with a blank page, and again after opening a total of 3 tabs (of course, YMMV):
Mozilla Firefox 2.0 (default theme, no extensions)
blank page: 20MB
3 open tabs: 31MB
Mozilla Firefox trunk build (default theme, no extensions)
blank page: 20MB
3 open tabs: 30MB
Mozilla SeaMonkey 1.1A
blank page: 17MB
3 open tabs: 28MB
K-Meleon 1.02
blank page: 15MB
3 open tabs: 24MB
Internet Explorer 6.0SP2
blank page: 11MB
Internet Explorer 7.0
blank page: 17MB
3 open tabs: 35MB
Opera 9.02
blank page: 14MB
3 open tabs: 24MB
Why is it that when this same story came out for Yahoo, everyone declared that Yahoo was "pushing IE7 on Firefox users?" People were even claiming that Yahoo was trying to leverage monopolistic practices. Now that Google has done exactly the same thing, people are claiming that this somehow diminishes Microsoft's original intentions (though I don't understand how having a popular search engine endorse your web browser would be a bad thing). How is Google's decision to use this strategy any different from Yahoo's? I'm just curious to know what sort of BS /. will provide in order to prove how Google's plan is so different and ethically superior to Yahoo's.
"Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
Although I don't usually agree with trying to pressure a monopoly on people, Google is the tweaker behind this customized IE which was created especially for the purpose of using Google services on an IE platform. Nothing wrong with what they did, if someone doesn't want to be forced using Google as a search engine then just use the standard IE that comes with every copy of Windows instead of downloading Google's customized version.
Mute = myoot. As in unable to speak.
Moot = moot. Little practical value or meaning.
It's one of those things like "another words" / "in other words".
~ Leilah
Thats intresting but, it's an apples to oranges comparison with IE compared to other browsers. IE is so fused together with Windows that you can't tell were Windows starts and IE stops. Maybe 10% of IE is tangled up in other Windows processes, maybe 50%, theres no telling how much is being offloaded.
From Microsoft's Page regarding Advantages for Content Providers .
So no, it's EXACTLY what Microsoft intended. And the very fact that it's being offered by Google is actually a boon to Microsoft. They may be competitors in some areas, but this has obvious benefits for both.
"Optimized for Slashdot"
This is an extremely unscientific measurement.
1) The order in which you perform this test could influence which DLLs are loaded in which processes
2) Some applications may allocate memory in chunks or do other funky memory management
3) Which pages were used? Was it the same for each browser?
4) Do these pages include Flash, Java, or similar content which may indicate fault of plug-in rather than browser
5) prob a million more, it's late, I'm tired
http://brandonbloom.name
Ah, it's so much easier for me to speculate blindly and let someone correct me than to actually do the research.
Thanks.
- RG>
Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!