2006 Edge Awards
As Famitsu is to Japan, Edge is to the U.S. and Britain. The much-respected games magazine has released their surprisingly short list of awards, for the 'best of' 2006. The winners are: "Best Game - Final Fantasy XII. Best Innovation - Nintendo Wii. Best Visual Design - Okami. Best Audio Design - Dragon Quest: The Journey Of The Cursed Kin. Best Developer - Nintendo. Best Publisher - Take Two. Best Online Experience - Test Drive Unlimited. Best Hardware - Nintendo DS."
It's a set of awards, specifically for this year (2006). So no, it won't help you pick between a DS Lite or PS2, any moreso than this years Oscar's will tell you whether to rent Lord of the Rings or Forrest Gump.
Now I still think awards like this are mostly crap, but I have to admit their choices aren't too terrible.
I don't think Edge is very popular in the US. It's more of a Brit thing. Not to sound negative or anything.
FFXII is a very good game. It is what happens when someone takes ideas from another genre (in this case, MMORPGs) and applies them to their own game. Most of it is very good...I wish I had more power with the Gambits (sort of if-then statements that you use to control your characters basic functionality) but I think with time we will see that system be more fleshed out.
What really concerns me about this game, though, is that it takes some ideas from MMORPGs too far (or so I thought at first). For example, some treasure chests have a chance to drop really good loot. This sounds really good, but it isn't. Early on in the game you encounter an optional boss. If you choose to defeat this very tough boss, you are rewarded with access to a treasure. The problem with the treasure is that it has something like a 30% chance to drop a really good sword or a 70% chance to drop garbage. This makes getting it a pain as you need to save your game and try a few times before you get it.
I at first thought this was just an MMORPG concept that went too far. But after thinking about this, and finding out some other things about the game (e.g. that to get the best spear you have to not open 4 treasure chests in the game) is that this has nothing to do with MMORPGs. This has to do with selling strategy guides. There is no way you would even know to do a lot of these things without a guide or by going on gamefaqs. And this really bothers me. It's fine if you have some secrets in the game. But there should be some in-game hints that will lead you down that path. Making a game have secrets that you can only find out by forcing a player to buy a guide is wrong.
Other that that, I really don't have any complaints. It is a great game that I am enjoying. It is just slightly diminished because I know I am missing content that there is no way to know unless I rely on external sources.
Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
Except that:
- I've known of Famitsu for years, but have never heard of Edge, and
- According to Wikipedia they're not published in the UK and the US, but the UK and Spain. Some of its content was carried in a US magazine that went defunct four years ago.
Really, the fact that you feel the need to make an analogy to try to show that something is well-known should itself demonstrate that it's not well-known.On a tangent, I can't think of any gaming magazines available in the US worth paying money for.
Umm, Oblivion? its not everybody's cup of tea, but it is very good.
11 was a racehorse
12 was 12
1111 Race
12112
A link for you if you haven't heard of DOSBox (and you thought I was referring to 'a DOS box' rather than 'DOSBox').