Slashdot Mirror


Australia Rules Linking to Copyright Material Also Illegal

An anonymous reader writes "A recent ruling in Federal court upheld the ruling that the operator and ISP that hosted the site 'mp3s4free.net' were guilty of copyright infringement violations because they provided access to the copyright material. From the article: 'Dale Clapperton, vice-chairman of the non-profit organization Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA), explained the ruling as follows: "If you give someone permission to do something that infringes copyright, that in itself is infringement as if you'd done it yourself. Even if you don't do the infringing act yourself, if you more or less condone someone else doing it, that's an infringing act."'"

18 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Google anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Admin knows that most of the illegall stuff I downloaded i found through google...

    1. Re:Google anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Soon the inventors of the Internet will be sued. What will happen to Al Gore?

  2. What next? by junglee_iitk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am going to kill my neighbor. Every one here is guilty of not stopping me. Well, at least all Australians.

    1. Re:What next? by Mike89 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Every one here is guilty of not stopping me. Well, at least all Australians.
      Damn it man, you've got to stop doing that. *Goes to jail*
    2. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You just committed a criminal offence in England, where it is illegal to issue a death threat.

    3. Re:What next? by tomjen · · Score: 2, Funny

      hehe, and in England he would be sent to Australia.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    4. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I am going to kill my neighbor.

      I'll have you know that in several countries, even issuing such a threat can ...

      Hang on a second, there's someone at my door.

  3. A *gasp* COMPUTER Was Involved! by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick, jettison all common sense and everybody do the freakout!!

    Thank you Australia for showing us there is a nation in the "free world" with it's head *just a little" further up it's ass than America when it comes to copyright law. Remember, every inch counts.

    1. Re:A *gasp* COMPUTER Was Involved! by 19061969 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought you spelt it, "Howard"?

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
  4. Re:The really scary part of this ruling.... by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Funny

    As far as you know, you're not an Australian lawyer? Is there a chance you were down there on shore leave, got drunk, kissed an ugly girl, got a tattoo and passed the bar?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  5. A question of intent by tjcrowder · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a question of intent. The judges wrote:

    a principal purpose of the website was to enable infringing copies of the downloaded sound recordings to be made
    The same cannot be said of Google.

    (IANAL)

  6. Nice precedent by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Even if you don't do the infringing act yourself, if you more or less condone someone else doing it, that's an infringing act."

    If you CONDONE someone else doing it, you're an accomplice. You don't even have to explicitly condone it, just "more or less".

    No, no dangerous precedent there at all.

    --
    -Styopa
  7. Re:The really scary part of this ruling.... by pla · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there a chance you were down there on shore leave, got drunk, kissed an ugly girl, got a tattoo and passed the bar?

    Hey, what happens in Surfers Paradise, stays in Surfers Paradise.

    Really, would you admit passing the bar to your friends? Getting drunk and visiting a NZ sheep "farm", sure... But that? <shudder>.

  8. Re:The really scary part of this ruling.... by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny
    How can you not be certain whether you're an Australian lawyer or not? That seems rather like the kind of thing I'd be sure of

    In an effort to inject some integrity into the legal system, the Australian government picks people at random and designates them lawyers. You too could be an Australian lawyer, and the notice just hasn't arrived yet. Before you laugh, many countries choose jurors this way, why not lawyers?

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  9. Re:Oh ye of little faith :-) by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    "businesses don't vote, people do"

    Unless they diebold an election ;).

    --
  10. Re:The really scary part of this ruling.... by Randolpho · · Score: 2, Funny
    Getting drunk and visiting a NZ sheep "farm", sure...
    New Zealand: Australia's Canada.
    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  11. Re:The really scary part of this ruling.... by redcane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Australia: Britains New Zealand.

  12. Re:The really scary part of this ruling.... by John+Whitley · · Score: 2, Funny
    And that is precisely the reason why we have courts.


    Indeed. Though what I really want is sev-1 bug filed on the damned legislature when a horridly written statute segfaults and The Law dumps core. Page their sorry asses out of bed at 2am.

    Followed by The People asking harsh questions as to why the test suite wasn't run before Passing said statue into Production. ;-)