Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

NASA Needs Fake Moon Dust

Posted by Zonk on from the like-to-see-the-requisition-form-for-that dept.

crisco writes "NASA's renewed interest in lunar exploration and 'in situ resource utilization,' or ISRU, is driving the need for tons of carefully faked lunar dust and sand for testing purposes: 'We don't have enough real moondust to go around,' says Larry Taylor, director of Planetary Geosciences Institute at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. To run all the tests, "we need to make a well-qualified lunar simulant.' And not just a few bags will do. 'We need tons of it, mainly for working on technologies for diggers and wheels and machinery on the surface,' adds David S. McKay, chief scientist for astrobiology at the Johnson Space Center (JSC)."

10 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Easy for NASA to do by lecithin · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Well, since they faked the lunar landing - how hard would it be to come up with fake lunar dust?

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
  2. Tinfoil time by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: -1, Redundant

    'We need tons of it, mainly for working on technologies for diggers and wheels and machinery on the surface,'

    Yeah right, they're pulling it off again...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. Of course! by Diordna · · Score: 0, Redundant

    We all know the truth: the fake moon dust from the LAST moon landing went stale, and they need to rebuild the set so they can shoot more "real moon footage." NASA, so naive, they don't know we're onto them.

    1. Re:Of course! by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Actually, it's because the "permanent moonbase" will be a lot larger than the Apollo site so they need a MUCH larger stage.

  4. Where'd it all go? by ayeco · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Don't they have some left over from the fake lunar landing videos?

  5. They faked it all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    They faked it all!

  6. Ask any conspiracy theorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Check Area 51 isn't that where they got it last time they went to the "moon"

  7. hum by gcnaddict · · Score: -1, Redundant

    "NASA Needs Fake Moon Dust"

    Again?

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  8. Re:Fake moon landing site by forkazoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just take it form the Fake moon landing site.


    First off - it has been decades since they used any of it, so it probably all got thrown out back, and blown away, etc.

    Second off, it was only designed to *look* like moon dust. And, on 1960's TV, at that. And, they had to "lose" the high quality slow scan tapes...
  9. Re:Armstrong describes the Lunar soil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant
    'This is very interesting. It is a very soft surface, but here and there where I plug with the contingency sample collector, I run into a very hard surface'


    Sounds like the cement floor of the studio he was in