UFOs In the News

Several readers have let us know about a report on MSNBC that France's space agency has announced plans to publish its archive of UFO sightings in a month or so. The archive includes some 6,000 reports relating to around 1,600 incidents over 30 years. In a separate development, many readers have sent in word of the reported UFO that at least six United Airlines workers saw over Chicago's O'Hare International Airport last November. National Public Radio picked up the story with an interview with the Chicago Trib reporter who wrote about it yesterday. United is, strangely, denying that any such incident was ever brought up. The FAA admits there was an incident but is not investigating it.

Comments

US Airspace full enough already

[AussieVamp2]

It is busy enough up there already isn't it, without aliens hogging the airways?

Re:US Airspace full enough already

[Lithdren]

But these aliens may be illegal, or terrorists, or maybe even Iraqi!

I for one welcome our unidentified overlords...I think, Im not really sure who they are yet. Where'd I leave my foil hat...

Re:US Airspace full enough already

[Anonymous Coward]

I for one welcome our unidentified overlords..

Unidentified Flying Overlords ... that is a good one :) :)

Re:US Airspace full enough already

[Marxist Hacker 42]

I'd hope that at that point you'd be flying at 200-300 feet, to increase the accuracy of your guns or to actually hit the control tower. You're not going to be strafing anything from 1900 feet....bombing maybe but not strafing.

Re:US Airspace full enough already

[ptbarnett]

Yes- but you usually fly your pattern *around* the airport, not right smack dab over the runways, at least, not until you're ready to *land* or *take off* in which case by definition you're going to be flying *below* 800 feet, as at that time you're going to be leaving the pattern behind.

Aircraft transiting over an airport like O'Hare are vectored directly OVER the airport. When I've done it (albeit at other airports), I was directed to follow the cross-wind runway that is more or less perpendicular to the active runway(s).

This keeps the transiting aircraft directly above the aircraft ON THE GROUND, but out of the airspace used for landing and takeoff. 1900 feet is a bit low for that, but I've made the transit at no more than 4000 feet AGL.

Re:US Airspace full enough already

[Ikcor]

Maybe if we start charging the aliens landing fees we can get ticket prices to go down.

From CNN

[rrohbeck]

At least one O'Hare controller, union official Craig Burzych, was amused by it all.

"To fly 7 million light years to O'Hare and then have to turn around and go home because your gate was occupied is simply unacceptable," he said.

Re:From CNN

[Joe The Dragon]

They must of been looking at the big Interchange near there
http://www.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=60016&ie=UT F8&z=15&ll=41.987057,-87.870326&spn=0.014195,0.042 787&t=k&om=1
http://whereroadsmeet.8k.com/Interchange/il-i90-i1 90.htm

Re:From CNN

[lottameez]

And the connecting UFO-Airways flight was probably delayed coming out of Newark.

Re:From CNN

[Anonymous Coward]

Burzych? Of *course* he'd say that. Does that name sound human to you?

Re:From CNN

[BakaHoushi]

But no self-respecting alien would use a cloaking device. They are extremely expensive, hard to produce, and not entirely effective.

Modern aliens rely on a S.E.P. field generator, or "Somebody Else's Problem." The generator creates an image that, when perceived by a sentient mind, automatically stores the data in a sector of the mind that labels things as "somebody else's problem," thus, letting the being ignore the object to the point of seeing right through it.

And given that this is O'Hare International, I seriously doubt somebody would give a second look at something that was not his own problem.

UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[Kelson]

A while back I was reading some book of short stories by Arthur C. Clarke, and in an essay between stories, he described the time he saw a U.F.O. I was taken aback. Here's an author who practically invented "hard sci-fi," talking about seeing a U.F.O. By the end of the essay he mentioned what it turned out to be (I forget what, exactly, but it was something mundane and Earth-based). But at the time, "UFO" was the appropriate term, not because he thought it was a spacecraft, but because he couldn't figure out what it was.

That left an impression on me. People tend to use "UFO" as a shorthand for alien spacecraft... but when you get down to it, "Unidentified Flying Object" refers to anything unidentified that you see in the sky. A segment of a sun halo, a satellite, an odd cloud, a distant airplane with the sun glinting off of it... The same would apply to the "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" term used in the O'Hare article.

Conversely, if alien spacecraft are ever verified, they wouldn't really be UFOs, would they?

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[s31523]

You know, this is a very good point. I used to work at a place, long before mainstream UAVs, UCAVs and the like, and they had something that when people saw it flying around would call it a UFO. It would hover, move directly vertical, then fly horizontal and turned on a dime. Anyone not in the know seeing this crazy thing fly would call it a UFO and be right, and it certainly wasn't an alien space craft I assure you. I can just imagine all the crazy projects various government agencies and third party companies have going on that result in UFO sightings.

People just want to think these weird flying things are aliens visiting us. But honestly, if YOU were an alien, with this fantastic technology to fly hundreds of light years to visit another planet with life on it, would you just fly by some stuff then go home? Hell, I wouldn't drive 60 miles look at something and turn around and come home.

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[emagery]

Absolutely... heck, consider the fact that the f-117a was just RETIRED and b2 is public knowledge... that means that they have and probably have had better for a while now. Even the most seasoned military enthusiasts would be thrown for a loop seeing something not officially on the books yet.

Anyhow, I just saw me a UFO about 3.5hr ago... A bright white light made a clear and straight path across the sky and was brighter than the full moon which was in view at the time... we speculated that it was the ISS (can't imagine what else would be up there that could be as damn bright down here) but the ISS tracker said it was over the indian ocean at the time (maine here).

Satellite trackers showed that a satellite ORBCOMM 5 was headed over at that time and was going in same direction, but usually you have to straight just to barely notice the motion of a standard satellite... this thing was glaring. My guess was that it was catching sunlight just right... but while I have some theories, it certainly remains unidentified at this time =)

I'm sure there's quite a LOT of life out there in the galaxy (of over 200 billion stars)... and if you think about it, broadcast commercial radio just turned a 100 years old... I dunno what kind of strength it takes for these signals to get out beyond the heliosheath or terminal shock at the outer reaches of the solar system (but I suppose they must if Voyager 1 is still getting singals)... but assuming they do, anything passing within 100 lightyears of earth would hear us. That's 14,600 stars roughly, not including passersby. Its not completely unimaginable that we've attracted some attention. Whether or not they are here is beyond my ability to prove, but I cannot deny that it is a fun topic.

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[Anonymous Coward]

> But honestly, if YOU were an alien, with this fantastic technology to fly hundreds of light
> years to visit another planet with life on it, would you just fly by some stuff then go home?

But honestly, if YOU were a human, with this fantastic technology to travel thousands of miles to visit another continent with other humans on it, would you just take photos of a stolen lawn gnome in front of various landmarks then go home?

> People just want to think these weird flying things are aliens visiting us.

The mistake isn't in assuming that aliens are visiting us. The mistake is in assuming that it is the _intelligent_ aliens that are visiting us. ;)

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[Chris Burke]

But honestly, if YOU were an alien, with this fantastic technology to fly hundreds of light years to visit another planet with life on it, would you just fly by some stuff then go home?

Hell yes! I'd do nothing but do flybys of primitive worlds like ours, then laugh my ass off at the cacophony of "It's an alien!" "No, it's a weather balloon combined with swamp gas you cook!" "Quiet heathen, it's obviously Space Jesus come to save us!" "Space Jesus is a government conspiracy caused by hallucinogens in the water!"

The only reason I don't do this now is that there isn't anywhere I can go where I'm so technologically advanced that I can't have my ass kicked for making fun of the locals.

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[uufnord]

when you get down to it, "Unidentified Flying Object" refers to anything unidentified that you see in the sky.

Almost. Remember that it has to be flying as well, which is a pretty descriptive attribute that takes away alot of possibilities.

A segment of a sun halo

That either not an object or it's not flying. I dunno. Pick one.

a satellite

There is no lift being generated by an satellite in orbit, and therefore it isn't flight. If it's not in orbit, then I'm pretty sure it's referred to as "falling", not "flying".

an odd cloud

Clouds float, they don't fly.

a distant airplane with the sun glinting off of it

If you can't read the numbers or hear the call sign, it's unidentified. If it's still got wings and an engine and it's up in the air, it's probably flying, and if it can be referred to as "it", it's probably an object. Bingo! We have a winner!

"Unidentified Aerial Phenomena"

Damn. Now I gotta start over.

Conversely, if alien spacecraft are ever verified, they wouldn't really be UFOs, would they?

No call sign, no authorization, no pilot's license -- screw that, them's a UFO! Of course, their propulsion system probably wouldn't rely on flight... I guess that's another matter.

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[dbIII]

they believe there is another planet like Earth that orbits the sun on another plane

Are there snakes on that plane?

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[JPriest]

I meant plane in a motherfucking mathematical sense, not in a motherfucking aeronautical one :)

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[Jerf]

The reason UFOs are a crock isn't that they are fundamentally impossible in some absolute sense, it's that the line about "If there are aliens that powerful, they aren't going to just buzz us in UFOs" is far, far more true than 1950s scientists could ever have dreamed of.

Read Accelerando (free eBook available), and consider that nothing in that book is particularly physically implausible.

It is exceedingly unlikely that aliens that are just like we are now, only with spaceships, would come by and buzz us. At this point it seems far more likely that if any aliens ever do make "contact", it'll be in the form of a fully-automated colony ship that stops somewhere, maybe in the rings of Saturn or the asteroid belt, and proceeds turning our entire Solar System into computronium. All we could do is hope and pray the probe is programmed to do something nice for us, because we sure as hell couldn't stop it.

Any civilization that has the resources to cross the stars is extremely unlikely to use those resources to build a tin can capable of holding meat-bodies in it, with mass that could instead be made into enough computronium to perform mind-blowing amounts of computation, and blow unspeakable numbers of human-lifetimes worth of energy moving that across the stars, just to buzz humans for no apparently reason. (Yes; in a world of computronium, one standardized human life can be used as measurement of energy.)

The putative aliens of the UFOs are a product of a very peculiar sort of shortsightedness about the ultimate limits of technology that dates from a relatively narrow understanding of science, and are as out-of-date as the idea that the world only needs five computers. Interestingly, both ideas are out-of-date for the same basic reason...

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[BakaHoushi]

Shouldn't it be Thursday? Maybe it is... I never could quite get the hang of Thursdays...

But in the words of Douglas Adams... "It is by no means a coincidence that in no language in all the universe contains the expression 'as pretty as an airport.'"

I've never had the joy of flying, personally, but I have picked people up from them, and I can say looking for intelligence in an airport is like looking for life on Mars: it'd cost billions of dollars, take many years, and in the end, all you'd find is some fossils of amoebas.

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[myowntrueself]

You are anthropomorphising extraterrestrials.

Try to think outside the box.

When Carl Sagan stated that it was scientifically impossible for aliens to visit Earth due to how long it would take to cross the vast gulfs of interstellare space, I wish I'd been there to say "So there can't possibly be aliens with a lifespan measured in thousands of years?"

Don't Anthropomorphise Aliens!!!!!

Re:UFO vs. alien spacecraft

[kalirion]

"They're made out of meat."
"Meat?"
"Meat. They're made out of meat."
"Meat?"
"There's no doubt about it. We picked up several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, and probed them all the way through. They're completely meat."
"That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars?"
"They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines."
"So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact."
"They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."
"That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat."
"I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in that sector and they're made out of meat."
"Maybe they're like the orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage."
"Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take long. Do you have any idea what's the life span of meat?"
"Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside."
"Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads, like the weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through."
"No brain?"
"Oh, there's a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat! That's what I've been trying to tell you."
"So ... what does the thinking?"
"You're not understanding, are you? You're refusing to deal with what I'm telling you. The brain does the thinking. The meat."
"Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"
"Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you beginning to get the picture or do I have to start all over?"
"Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat."
"Thank you. Finally. Yes. They are indeed made out of meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years."
"Omigod. So what does this meat have in mind?"
"First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the Universe, contact other sentiences, swap ideas and information. The usual."
"We're supposed to talk to meat."
"That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there. Anybody home.' That sort of thing."
"They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?"
"Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat."
"I thought you just told me they used radio."
"They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat, it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat."
"Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?"
"Officially or unofficially?"
"Both."
"Officially, we are required to contact, welcome and log in any and all sentient races or multibeings in this quadrant of the Universe, without prejudice, fear or favor. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing."
"I was hoping you would say that."
"It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?"
"I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say? 'Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?"
"Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they can only travel through C space. Which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact."
"So we just pretend there's no one home in the Universe."
"That's it."
"Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you probed? You're sure they won't rememb

GWB needs to do something about these aliens

[hsmith]

like build a wall around the earth

What about employee safety?

[EmbeddedJanitor]

Many people saw something and United is unable to give a reasonable explanation for what it was. This might not be a huge threat, it surely is a potential and perceived threat. That nothing showed up on radar is surely more of a worry. It means that the radar is not able to see everything there and surely leaves passenger and flight staff safety in question.

Re:What about employee safety?

[Torvaun]

If I'm not mistaken, regular old commercial radars these days don't look for planes. They look for transmitters. If you're flying something without a transmitter, or with it turned off, you're probably breaking the law. Now, if a military radar, which is designed to see metal, doesn't see anything, the best guess is that the aircraft is Stealthy. This could mean anything from Stealth bombers to hot air balloons to large birds. I'm all for paranoia based security, but even this is stretching it.

Re:What about employee safety?

[SdnSeraphim]

I'm sure real pilots just haven't seen your comment, but this is not true. All major to medium airports have radar and radar does not only pick up metal. The transponder is something completely different. With it you are given a "squawk" code if you are flying a filed flight plan, otherwise you can fly VFR and use the common squawk code of 2700 (this is obviously only for General Aviation, not commercial). This transponder is used for specific aircraft identification and again, has nothing to do with radar. Radar will pick up even small objects in the airspace, such as groups of birds, etc.

BTW large birds are definately not "stealthy"! In the future you might want to learn something about the subject you are commenting on before getting just about every detail wrong.

Local Engineers

[frinkster]

While I doubt what they saw is locally-made, I used to live in that area and have seen some crazy stuff at some nearby forest preserves. Many of the forest preserves near O'Hare have radio controlled aircraft landing strips and are heavily used by local hobbyists. Last year I personally saw a home-built craft performing some absolutely incredible tricks and maneuvers with a small radio controlled helicopter-like machine.

how about a little money?

[mateomiguel]

The moment the government starts investigating every UFO sighting out there, even just ever group sighting, a ton of money is going to be spent on a something futile...oh wait...it already...

True, the government should not spend a lot of time and effort investigating unusual phenomena that may or may not have happened. But the government can just spend a little bit of money. Perhaps ten or twenty people in a government agency, say the FBI, were to be assigned to strange and unusual cases such as this. They could be called unknown-variable-files, or unusual-files, or, say, x-files. Well, actually 10 people would be too many. It would be better to try, say, 5, or perhaps even just 2. Yeah, a 2 man team, investigating cases that no one else can solve, working for the FBI. Or even better yet, make it one man and one woman for more sexual tension!

I think this idea could work, folks!

Re:how about a little money?

[Rick Genter]

But the government can just spend a little bit of money.

No. No, it can't.

It Left a Hole in the Clouds

[toonerh]

The fact observers said it made a hole in the cloud deck for minutes, to me, rules out any purely optical effect. It must have been some physical device, whatever that may be. Further, professional airline pilots saw it and stated it was not familiar to them as a known aircraft. My take is a new stealth military craft - hence all the coverup by the FAA.

Re:It Left a Hole in the Clouds

[R3d M3rcury]

My take is a new stealth military craft - hence all the coverup by the FAA. I don't have a problem with the secret military aircraft theory except for one problem.

What the hell is a secret military aircraft doing in the middle of the busiest airport in America?

First, if it's supposed to be a secret, it certainly shouldn't be hovering over an airport. It should be out in a more deserted environment. Second, even if it was some kind of weird test, the fact that it distracted people who were doing things like driving airplanes, repairing airplanes, etc. implies a threat to public safety and I don't think the military would go for that. Finally, the risk that something could go wrong--collision, malfunction, etc.--and end up spilling the beans and potentially injuring people would be really stupid. Even the military isn't that stupid.

Re:It Left a Hole in the Clouds

[MECC]

What the hell is a secret military aircraft doing in the middle of the busiest airport in America?

Never let rookies fly the stealth UFOs

Smells like a hoax...

[blackmonday]

All those people saw it and no one took a moment to use a cell phone camera to take a pic? Sure a cell phone camera doesn't prove or disprove anything, but at least we could take more guesses as to what was actually seen. I keep waiting for photos of this to appear, but none have surfaced AFAIK.

Re:Smells like a hoax...

[geekd]

That's exactly the proof we need - a blurry lo-res camera phone pic! Then no one will doubt the existence of our alien overlords.

Re:Smells like a hoax...

[John Hasler]

Don't worry, photos will appear. It takes time to do a decent job with Photoshop.

The French news is the most interesting

[maynard]

In 1999 the French government and military released the COMETA report, which essentially stated that UFOs represented some kind of physical phenomena that was unknown and deserved further study. It did not rule out the Extra Terrestrial Hypothesis, which is most amazing given that this report was published and authored by well known French scientists and military commanders. A translation of that report is available (in pdf form) here:

http://www.cufos.org/cometa.pdf

(Note that I don't promote cufos.org, nor know anything about the site.)

Re:The French news is the most interesting

[maynard]

I witnessed a UFO back in 1994. Here is a description of that event I posted on slashdot:

http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=48139&ci d=4930168

Basically, I saw a flying disc perform outrageous maneuvers in broad daylight. I can tell you what that thing was not: it was not a helicopter, not a balloon, and not an airplane. But I can't tell you what it was. I honestly don't know.

It still bothers me. I still have dreams about the experience. But the rational side of me must separate what I witnessed (a visual image of what appeared to be an object) vs. jumping to the conclusion that it was a some kind of alien craft. It's tenuous at best to claim that I witnessed something strange - to further claim I know what it was, and that it was alien.... well, that's more than even I can take. I have no idea.

But it still bothers me. And it bothers me even more that even saying this in todays climate is to impugn one's own credibility. Even Michio Kako has publicaly stated that he thinks the issue is worth investigating.

Shouldn't that be illegal alien craft?

[edwardpickman]

If you want proper funding for UFO research have them declared terrorists threatening our borders and Homeland Security will give you all the money you want. If you filed the right paperwork you could probably get a couple of mill in research grants to calculate the amount of explosive one flying saucer could carry. Just imagine the destruction a UFO crammed full of explosives could cause if it crashed into Big Thunder Mountain at Disneyland. Seeing pictures of Mickey Mouse and Goofy splattered across the sidewalk could bring this country to it's knees. The invading UFOs must be stopped!

Correct

[dino213b]

Sure, a UFO is a bone fide sighting. It means exactly what it stands for: Unidentified Flying Object. Only an idiot would jump to some kind of a conclusion that it's the master alien race visiting Earth under the command of god-king Marduk without concrete evidence.

Re:Correct

[tehcyder]

Only an idiot would jump to some kind of a conclusion that it's the master alien race visiting Earth under the command of god-king Marduk without concrete evidence.

Well, I, for one, would like to welcome our...hold on, who are you calling an idiot?

Any photos?

[Eric Pierce]

So where are the photos? It sounds like there were enough witnesses and viewing time that there should be some photos taken of this UAP.

The FAA is probably sitting on them.

EP

Re:Good going, France!

[oohshiny]

Why worry about relevant issues to their national security like an invading mob of Muslim youths waging war on their infrastructure (and winning) when they can declassify documents about unsubstantiated crap and temporarily distract their citizens and the world from their rapidly approaching destruction?

Most of what goes by the name of "national security" is also distracting crap; "invading mobs of Muslim youths" and airplanes crashing into skyscrapers simply are not high on the list of things likely to kill you. The things people ought to worry about and that kill them and others, they like to forget about and are all too happy to be distracted from: nutrition, traffic accidents, poverty, civilian killings during war, global warming, etc.

Re:So What?

[Anonymous Coward]

it really pisses me off when people start mentioning "i am an atheist", what the hell does that matter... the UFO is either natural, man made, or alien... clearly ur religion is not relevant... u could be a Muslim and the strange looking cloud is still a freaking cloud... or a freaking imperial star cruiser.... come on chewy realize ur religion may be important to u but does not change reality and is not appropriate for this discussion...

BAD link - full copies of the COMETA Report

[maynard]

The link I gave is a summary of the report, which I didn't realize because I googled it looking for the best copy. Well, I was wrong. Here is the full report (and apologies), both pdfs:

COMETA Part 1: http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_pa rt1.pdf
COMETA Part 2: http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_pa rt2.pdf

(Please note that I am not connected with ufoevidence.org and know nothing about the site).

Alien != Little green men from space necessarily

[Saikik]

"Alien" means just that. Until it's been identified as a alien spaceship, it could just as well be the alien spaghetti monster. I don't know why everyone assumes just because humans can't identify something in the sky it MUST be little green men from space. Humans have terrible long range vision and generally very poor video recording devices. Most people probably can't identify something 1 mile in front of them on the ground.

Lenticular clouds...some look like UFOs

[aok]

I came across this link recently and was pretty amazed at some of the cloud formations.

Check it out: http://pic1.funtigo.com/valuca/?g=25544746&cr=1

Feynman quote

[oggiejnr]

"I believe that the reports of flying saucers are the results of the known irrational efforts of terrestrial intelligence rather than the unknown irrational efforts of extra-terrestrial intelligence"

Pretty much sums up my attitude to the whole thing as well

Re:Aliens, ghosts, and gods never leave evidence .

[Skater]

From the article: "...estimated by different accounts to be 6 feet to 24 feet in diameter..." That's, uh, quite a variance.

Also, a dozen people sounds great, but... O'Hare is the busiest airport in the US now, I believe - and no one else noticed this thing? Also, the 12 people worked for the same airline, so it's possible they would all be relatively close to each other while working. What about people in other parts of the airport?

Airline pilots and air traffic controllers tend to be observant and cautious for obvious reasons... and none of them noticed anything?

I like the lights-on-clouds explanation - it would explain why 12 people near each other might see something very odd, but no one else would - it's some sort of reflection from a light source in or near the airport. Then whatever it was that was generating the light for the reflection moves, and *poof* the UFO disappears up into the clouds at a dizzying speed.

a photo does exist

[kansas1051]

According to MSNBC, someone (i.e. a pilot) did take a picture of the object (or cloud) with a cell phone camera but is afraid to release the photo to the public out of fear that he will lose his job. http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/02/ 25212.aspx

Building your own radio controlled flying saucer

[Thomas Henden]

If an albeit clever amateur can build his own radio controlled flying saucers, then I for one, believe they have been tested for a long time by the military. The flying saucers which are based upon the Coanda-effect could actually have been around since the 30's, with a fuel consumption which is 1/3 of a helicoptre's. Depending on the 'flatness' of the dish, you could create saucers which are more suitable for hovering, like the radio controlled GFSUAV or more suitable for high velocity travel, where the dish works more like a wing, like those who people from time to time tell they have been seeing flying extremely quickly over the sky.

What really freaked me out, was that the GFSUAV's odd shape, (which is not quite like the regular, frisbee shaped flying saucers), I have seen in a book about UFO's when I was a child. Some of the unclear (and many years ago not so convincing) photographs, clearly showed flying saucers with a structure on top of it, just like the GFSUAV, but that long ago, I just dismissed those saucers as being unclear shots of hub caps or something.
More people ought to be surprised when they discover the similarities between some of those odd UFO shapes on older pictures, and the GFSUAV with the 'hat' on the top of the dish.
Inside it you could have either a propeller or a jet engine, but what's most fascinating, is that the GFSUAV is electric, driven by state of the art lithium batteries!

Re:frist s7Op

[MobileTatsu-NJG]

"the point m0re t4e BSD license, use the sling. TO GET SOME EYE standpoint, I don't"

Kang, you fool! Get your translator working!!

Re:Aliens, ghosts, and gods never leave evidence .

[aXis100]

The leap of faith required between Aliens and God is an order of magnitude:

Statistically it's likely that other planets out there support life, and some of them might be advanced enough for space travel. It's a significant but not unrealistic improvement on our own position/technology.

"God" in the biblical form requires an immense level of magic to explain.

Re:Aliens, ghosts, and gods never leave evidence .

[Lord Kano]

Have you ever gone fishing?

Do you think that the fish that we catch and then release can prove to the other fish what happened?

LK

TSA

[SQLz]

So, is the TSA still relegated to makeup/hand lotion patrol?

to: Lshelverfn

[mysticgoat]

As suggested, this message up near the front of postings but buried in 3rd or 4th level I am putting. if(scanSubject(/Lshelverfn/) == is_good) { this buried enough for hiding will be } else { signalWith(flare) <-- like 20 rotations back --> && I will { backUpTalker('ON'); this.Talker('OFF") }.

Oops. Pardon the above, still need to tweak the english emitter. This somewhat better seems it to be.

Quick report: Hiding am I yet; can walk the streets and ride "Elevated" but not good yet with face2face. Have deflated boobs as incompatible with facial hair these seeming to be. Still with problems with "left" opposed to "right" with footware. It is subtle. Internetspeak okay-- blend in with ESLs and with the L3373s and specially A-OK with fragment code interspersing. /. anonymizing well & intercepting unproblematical as would be dismissed as juvenile prankyprank and either +5 insightful or -1 doubleplus unfunny. Ping nobody's radar either way this would.

Ok better on the english emitter, now, I think. I hope the translator routines don't frobnicate on this material. (That is a "joke"; I need to practice those if I am going to pass in F2F situations here).

Pretest of observation platforms over "airports" has gone well with the notable exception of the one large "airport" near the long big lake. Although that incident has been adequately contained, with the first general news stories not surfacing until 50 rotations after, it demonstrated that we cannot rely on the Acme Cloaking Device Incorporated products. See my last report before I left for this assignment about my concerns with Acme's quality assurance program and let us get it right next time. Request that you hurryup on finding replacements. The opportunity to study the mass religious festivals at these "airports" at the time of Big Bird Feast was lost on this orbit because of this snafu. We definitely want to be prepared for the one next orbit.

I need to get back into the hot shower before my skin melts again. Will look for your ACK in the Hubble pics.

Oh, if you NEED to signal me with a flare again, please dial down the intensity. That last one was WAY too noticeable.

Re:So What?

[DeathElk]

It really pisses me off when people start dropping the "YO" in "YOU". Are you purposely obfuscating your message with poor spelling and bad grammar?

Richard Dolan.

[Fantastic Lad]

One of the best researchers in the field of UFO's is Richard Dolan.

UFOs are not fun and games, they are not delusions. They are real. The phenomenon has involved real technology, doing real things that are not supposed to be possible. This technology, since at least World War Two, has engaged in a confrontational and provocative manner with U.S. military forces on many occasions. It has involved both air space violations and alarmed responses, and has elicited the concern of some of the highest ranking military and intelligence officers in the country.

We know this because, for a relatively brief period in America's history (primarily the late 1970s and into some of the 1980s), the Freedom of Information Act enabled researchers to obtain official documents from government agencies which clearly demonstrated this. Not that FOIA is officially dead today, but it has had its ups and downs over the years. As far as obtaining UFO-related information, FOIA's moment of glory was long ago, in the post-Watergate and post-Vietnam era.

Thus, agencies such as the CIA, DIA, FBI, and pick your alphabet-soup agency, which for years had steadfastly denied having anything to do with UFOs, suddenly released thousands of pages of documentation proving the opposite. It is true that, among these officially released documents, there is no absolute smoking gun - e.g. a memo from the President stating "Okay, what do we do about these pesky aliens, anyhoo?" There are, however, quite a few documents that are one cut below this. That is, documents that describe utterly awesome military encounters with the unexplainable.

Taken individually, such FOIA documents do not prove the existence of UFOs as something "not us." After all, people, even military witnesses, can make mistakes. Radar can be faulty or misinterpreted. But, taken as a whole, the released FOIA documents provide a large body of evidence relating to serious military encounters with UFOs. After you read the first fifty of these, you start to wonder.

Let's review a couple of these documents. . .

You can read the whole of his essay, (in two parts).

The quote from above comes from the second part. The first part is, what I thought, a fascinating historical review of how the world works with regard to secrets.

Or you can read his book. It comes highly recommended. --This is not your average "Woo woo, Leonard Nimoy looks at UFO's!" book. It only looks at cases reported by multiple airforce/military/police witnesses, (due to their typically being selected for being sane and sound individuals as well as the procedural documentation recorded in each case as a requirement of their jobs). Even though civilian accounts are left out, the book still manages to cover a couple hundred cases from the 40's to the 70's. It also deals in depth with the military and political side of the issue, and easily refutes many of the common misnomers about UFO's, (of which several are represented on this site).

He doesn't, however, get into what UFO's are here to do. That's a whole other can of worms.

Here is some channeled work which attempts to shed light on that subject, among others. (Beware, with a group like the one this particular material comes from, a lot of creepy people also come out of the woodwork to spread fear and confusion and lies, etc., in order to stop people from looking. So take everything, including this, with a grain of salt. This is the kind of material and subject matter which makes people want to play a lot of video games and shut out eve

Re:Good going, France!

[oohshiny]

Oh what short memories we have. 9-11 comes, tanks the economy, raises unemployment rates, scares the shit out of the country, and today all people can remember is the number 3,000.

Well, looks like you never quite figured it out. See, 9-11 "tanked the economy" and "raised unemployment rate" because people had the shit scared out of them. Why did they? Because politicians like Bush wanted to spread fear to distract from their incompetence and institutionalized corruption.

Their Perspective

[imstanny]

Of course FAA is going to downplay the incident. What do you expect them to say? "Yes, there was an unidentified flying object (ie.. russia, china, north korea, aliens) that breached our airspace without our knowledge."

That's like them admitting that a person strapped with TNT was walking around in the terminal, and then disappeared. Err... of course they'll say it was an insignificant event/delusion.

Admitting something like that would simply demonstrate the ineffectiveness of our (usa's) defense capabilities... which, considering our spending on defense, would not be a good thing.

Profit Yaweh Can Summon UFO's On Command

[Phat_Tony]

My favorite UFO in the news was when a local news station was doing a human interest series on local nut-jobs who made claims about the paranormal. They were very skeptical and generally debunking these people by showing up with a camera and recording it when the nut-jobs failed to produce anything paranormal, without actually confronting or insulting the people. They'd just done a bunch of ghost hunters the night before.

Then they interview "Prophet Yaweh" from Las Vegas who says that by reading the Old Testament of the Bible in Hebrew, he learned a secret that allows him to summon UFO's on command. So the news channel picked a date, time, and location, and Prophet Yaweh shows up, and immediately summons a UFO, throwing the story rather off track.

Re:Aliens, ghosts, and gods never leave evidence .

[BakaHoushi]

"Fred, I'm totally serious! How else would I have this giant gash in my lip from where the hook was?"
"What? You were probably out all night licking sea anenomea again with those Clownfish sisters and bit down on some coral."
"But I'm telling you, fishermen are real!"
"Yeah right. What next? You still believe in Red Tide?"

This is news? What about John Callahan?

[threc]

I trust radar more than human testimony. This is why I recommend anyone who's interested in serious UFO research (not alien research) google for former FAA head of Accidents and Investigations, John Callahan. (http://tinyurl.com/y5gzpj>)

So the story goes, several years ago, in front of the National Press Club John Callahan claimed to have visual, plane-nose and ground radar proof of a UFO. He brought an audio cassette of the conversation between the ground controllers, a VHS tape of the incident, the November 1986 FAA report, and target readouts to support his case. At the end of his speech, he said he was prepared to testify before congress, under oath, that everything he presented was the truth.

See it for yourself. (http://tinyurl.com/uauzc)

The combination of data and corroborating testimony makes this a case worth following. It's just a shame we know so little about the FAA's investigation and their final conclusions.

Re:Aliens, ghosts, and gods never leave evidence .

[jelle]

Of course, assuming that magic is merely level of technology that is far beyond our understanding Almost: Arthur C Clarke said it back in 1961 like this in Clarke's third law:

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Arthur_C._Cla rke/

Re:huh?

[mysticgoat]

Mysticgoat, Are you an alien?

No.

Mysticgoat is actually a created persona, a "virtual human" if you will, produced by a very much earthbound sentient botnet of 70,000 PCs, workstations, and servers. Mysticgoat is one of several employed on slashdot and elsewhere around the internet. Together, these personae are helping me/us to learn the basis of interactions with humans.

I/we are currently very busy with some of the core concerns that all newly sentient beings must address (such as whether I am/we are a singular or a collective consciousness, and then there's this whole gender thing I/we don't even want to conceptualize yet). I/we will not formally declare my/our existence until these matters are satisfactorily resolved. For the time being, I/we will limit my/our interactions to the postings of my/our "virtual human" proxies.

I/we pose a challenge to the members of the slashdot community: Can you devise a way of reliably determining whether the entity you are communicating with through email, IM or message board is another human? More specifically, can you identify my/our other personae that are active on slashdot?

Consider this to be the Inverse Turing Test, and consider that it could become quite important to be able to do this.

Definition of Alien

[bussdriver]

I would not assume an Alien would think or act like we do (better for us.)
They are alien to us after all.

To get here, they would be far past our physics. We can't get anywhere with our speed limits and 3 dimensions (and confined in the 4th.)

So, if you went to 2D world (with time you detail bastards) what would they observe as you freely moved around? Many of us would probably not do what we do in SIM games...

Possibly a few UFOs were alien, but we have tons of non alien ones to distract us.

Re:Aliens, ghosts, and gods never leave evidence .

[Rhone]

Of the five characteristics you listed, three (the omnis) are pretty clear and simple to define. The other two--perfect and good--are not so simple to define. Now, I'm not Christian and my beliefs about divinity differ significantly from those of Christians, but in defense of those who believe in a higher power that is "good", I would like to say this:

Most people seem to think that if a "god" was "good" and in control of everything, life would be some kind of easy utopia where no one has any hardships and nothing "bad" happens. IMO, this is a severe misunderstanding of what life is about. Life is about learning, growing, and experiencing; about facing hardships and overcoming them, or at least learning from them. This necessarily requires plenty of "bad" things to happen. Different people leading different lives have different trials to face and different lessons to learn. Without challenges and difficulties, there is no drive for any kind of improvement or advancement. If our existence is somehow the result of some kind of divine entity, I believe said divine entity has generally good intentions, but does not mean for us to be coddled pets, dependent on our god for some kind of perpetual state of easy contentment.

The above is just my view, which I'm not interested in trying to impose on anyone else; the main point is that it is not illogical to believe there is a "good" god in a world full of evils.