Slashdot Mirror


Sealand Put Up For Sale

antic writes "The Principality of Sealand is up for sale. The 550 square meter steel platform boasts "uninterrupted sea views", complete privacy and has been mentioned on Slashdot in the past for its offers of hosting outside the jurisdiction of (some) traditional laws."

38 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. If only I could afford such a thing by Vengeance · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then I could hunt the most dangerous game of all...

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    1. Re:If only I could afford such a thing by theMerovingian · · Score: 3, Funny


      You're going to hunt women in a jungle?

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  2. Yeah, but... by celardore · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should know that the commute is a bitch.

  3. How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by skurk · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Buy Sealand on credit, you can get a loan anywhere these days.
    2. Apply for your own TLD.
    3. Open up for a new domain rush, demand ridicilous prices for certain domains
    4. Release the loan using the income from domain sales.
    5. You own Sealand, you are king.

    --
    www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
    1. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, I think that's not all that different from what they did... except step 2 is a little more iffy than you might think.

      Last time there was a slashdot story on them, they had the business model of providing a place where folks could store sensitive data without fear of subpeona -- they wanted to be, for data storage, what Switzerland used to be for bank accounts. Guess it didn't work. They don't really have as much independence as they thought... it's tough to hold your ground when your entire country is one "accident" (or torpedo) from oblivion at worst, or a few weeks of blockade away from starvation at best.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    2. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or:

      1) get together with other geeks
      2) make a joint offer for sealand ownership, each one pays a little share.
      3) get sealand
      4) enact legislation which is impossible anywhere else because of WTO, like: no patent on software, only copyright. No stupid patents on anything. There is something that can be done for censorship, to free scientific research hampered by stupid lawsuits, lots of possibilities.
      5) Open embassies wherever a geek need a safe place to develop his ideas without fears of lawsuits. An embassy is territory of sealand too. SSH provides no data sent to sealand and other embassies violates any international law as it's just encrypted blobs there.
      6) Profit for all humanity.

      What do you think?

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    3. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by zlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's an easier way:
      1. Buy Sealand on credit, you can get a loan anywhere these days.
      2. You own Sealand, you are king.
      3. Create a law that forbids the King of Sealand to release loans ;-)

    4. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forgot "4a) Actually get recognised by at least one other country". Best of luck with that.

    5. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by drewzhrodague · · Score: 5, Funny

      5. You own Sealand, you are king.

      It is good to be the king!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    6. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Last time there was a slashdot story on them, they had the business model of providing a place where folks could store sensitive data without fear of subpeona

      Such confidence would be misplaced.

      Either the platform is British Soveriegn territory or it isn't.

      The most likely case is that the British courts consider the platform to be under UK jurisdiction following the expansion of the teritorial limits. International law does not recognize teritorial claims based on man made structures. Contrary to claims made British court has ever recognized sovereignty claims by any other party over the platform.

      Ergo if the UK courts choose to issue a subpoena the subpoena can be served and enforced. Moreover since the Bates family are the directors of HavenCo and they live in the UK they can be arrested and imprisoned on contempt charges if they refuse to comply regardless of the sovereign status of the platform.

      If the British courts did choose to recognize the sovereignty of the platform they or anyone else can declare war on it and blow the thing to smitherines if they make a nuisance of themselves.

      The main reason that this has not happened to date seems to be that HavenCo does not have any customers worth the trouble.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    7. Re:How to buy Sealand for free in just 5 steps by anaesthetica · · Score: 3, Informative
      An embassy is territory of sealand too.

      Nitpick: embassies are not the territory of the foreign country. They are under the jurisdiction of the foreign country. So embassies in the United States are still United States territory, but they are under foreign jurisdiction, not the jurisdiction of the United States.

  4. I should also add by celardore · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not actually for sale, the owners are just offering a tenancy. Which makes it not such a sweet deal.

    1. Re:I should also add by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, but if they're not living there, and you are, you can just declare a coup and that you are now president-for-life, then fight them off when they attempt to come back. I'm sure it would be pretty easy to smuggle weapons onto the platform, considering there's probably not even room for a port authority.

      Considering the traditional way of determining the actual 'government' is 'who is in physical control of the country', you are now the ruler of Sealand. They are the 'government in exile'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:I should also add by Yonzie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which would be pretty incredibly stupid to pay £65mil for, considering what the "Royal Family" did to HavenCo.
      http://havenco.venona.com/

    3. Re:I should also add by bigpat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't be too silly. International Law? No country has ever even officially recognized Sealand, it just puts up with it because it is kinda funny and they don't cause much trouble if they are left alone. To the UK it is just a bunch of local squatters in an abandoned sea platform, you have to believe that they would be thrown out if they discovered oil under it or needed to clear it to make way for a sea lane or something. The only reason you couldn't just show up and start fighting over it would be because the UK would finally move in with force and demolish it. Oh just try to open up a luxury casino or something and see if the UK doesn't step in to collect taxes.

      Theories of international law are all well and good, but the only reason indefensible small island nations remain independent is because they usually aren't worth the trouble of taking them over or the cost of supporting them, and not because of any deeply held convictions over international law.

  5. Territorial Waters by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sealand exists because in 1967, Britian's territorial waters extended only 3 miles out from the shore.

    Therefore, they could legitimately claim the fort as theirs. If they had tried to do that after 1987... it wouldn't have worked, because the 3-mile limit was changed to 12 miles.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  6. Uninterrupted sea views? by Myrrlin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sealand is a bit of a running joke for the people of Harwich. I would contest their "uninterrupted sea views" as I'm fairly sure that the very brightly coloured (luminous yellow!) Hotel Continental situated on the cliffs of Harwich can be seen from it, hell... they can probably see it from Holland! It's also probably quite fire damaged at the moment having suffered a fire http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/5110244.stm last year, and not having its own fire brigade or hospital services had to make use of the British ones.

  7. I'm open to the idea, as long as ... by nastro · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as the new owners don't change the current statutes on Monkey Knife-fighting, I don't see this as a problem.

    I also hope they clear up the inconsistencies in the human-bovine marriage laws.

  8. Headquarters by mulhollandj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like it would make a great superhero headquarters.

    1. Re:Headquarters by carpe_noctem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...or supervillian headquarters.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  9. Sealand is all but destroyed by javaDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to Sealand's official website, the platform sustained heavy damage by fire last summer. From the desperate tone of the account, I gather that Sealand might be very close to uninhabitable by now. That might explain the decision to sell it off, more than the old age of the founder.

    --
    -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
  10. Guns are the assembly code of politics. by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nations are sovereign only because they have enough firepower to keep other nations from claiming them. What does it matter what the laws of Sealand are, if you own it and you have no army? Is the army included, or do you have to put it together yourself?

    --

    Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    1. Re:Guns are the assembly code of politics. by Marcus+Green · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes is it only the 450 strong Luxembourg army and their enormous firepower that stops Belgium, France or Germany from relieving them of their soverignty (pick other examples to suit).

    2. Re:Guns are the assembly code of politics. by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Willful ignorance of international law and diplomacy is frighteningly abundant in the US these days.

      You talk about "international law" as though it exists beyond fictional agreements between the big boys with the most guns.

      As for the counterexample of neutral states, they just happen to benefit from those "let's not kill each other" agreements as a side effect; When wars spread across Europe, they have a long history of making relatively safe corridors through which to move troops to the real action.

      As a simple example, tell Belgium how much better international treaties protected it than guns, when Germany invaded it in 1914 - Sure, the UK had an obligation to respond, but had the UK lost, see the GGP's argument about what actually defines "right" and "wrong" on the international scale.

    3. Re:Guns are the assembly code of politics. by dhaines · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing... After they have exhausted all other possibilities."
      --Winston Churchill

  11. Cheaper to invade. by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe It's empty right now. Sail up there with a paper knife. occupy the terriroty. Kill all zero people who resist. Declare yourself the revolutionary government.

    Of course, the declaration of what makes for statehood is a little arbitrary. So rather than go to the effort, I declare myself King of Antarctica.

    1. Re:Cheaper to invade. by ezzewezza · · Score: 5, Funny

      What the hell?

      I look away for five seconds and someone steals Antarctica from me.

      I'd watch your back if I were you, 91degrees!

    2. Re:Cheaper to invade. by haystor · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'll have a tough time taking it back since it can only be attacked from the north.

      --
      t
  12. Sun? In ENGLAND? by evilandi · · Score: 5, Funny

    bladesjester: the sun do its work

    Off the coast of Essex, England, UK? In the North Sea?

    I'm guessing you've never been to the east coast of England. It is sunny for approximately half an hour in the afternoon only of the third Wednesday after Pentecost.

    A far, far faster method of obtaining fresh water in the North Sea would be to simply open your mouth and tilt your head skywards. It'll fill with fresh rainwater - no desalination required - in about six seconds.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Sun? In ENGLAND? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 3, Informative

      On avarage, London has more days of sunshine than Paris.

  13. "Land" is stretching it by shirizaki · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sealand_fortres s.jpg

    More like "Seaplatform". though it doesn't have that ring to it.


    If anyone is interested in it, move along. Not only is it in the middle of nowhere, you face invasion by several post - industrialized nations. You're better off buying an island in the keys. At least then you're lucky to have something called coconuts and White Sandy beaches.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dots slash you!
  14. Re:Why not by vidarh · · Score: 3, Informative

    The last time they were "invaded" by armed people, they retook the platform with force and held the "invaders" hostage. They've also in the past shot the the British navy... So I do suspect you might need to be armed with a bit more than beer and a hamburger.

  15. Stating the obvious. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For far less than 65m you can build your own damn platform and anchor it in the channel or north sea.

    1. Re:Stating the obvious. by Cauchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is that in 1982, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea changed international law so that no new artificial platform could claim nation status. While no country explicitly recognizes Sealand, since its claims to independence predates 1982, it is exempt from this convention.

  16. Wow by SeePage87 · · Score: 3, Funny

    One of my teachers in high school taught us about Sealand because his son was one of the co-founders. Didn't think I'd see it come up on slashdot. Funny story about the country: after it was founded, many of the world's nations extended their borders into sea from (I think about) 5 miles to 10 miles. Sealand viewed this as an aggressive action by the UK since Sealand was now entirely within UK borders and was considered by the British to be UK soil. Sealands response was to extend their borders to 10 miles as well and claim the respective British coastal areas as Sealand soil.

  17. Coup de Nowhere by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, the Principality Army could stay on site to prevent a coup. What? There is no army? Well then, the citizens can form a militia... You say there are no citizens either? So what does "Prince" Michael rule over?

    This notion that an abandoned radar platform has somehow achieved sovereign nation status just because its squatters say it is has always been a bad joke. They've only gotten away with it because nobody gives a shit. They claim to have a legal decision, but what they really have is a court case the the UK crown won't appeal out of bureaucratic inertia. The very first time they'd done something to really piss people off, a platoon of Scotland Yard bobbies would have landed, sent the "Prince" back to his sheep, and that would have been the end of it.

  18. Re:I remember Sealand from years ago... by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're spending eight digits on your boat, you can afford to spend a couple million bucks to buy some SS-N-25 and P-800 surplus russian anti-ship missiles. Anything that's not an aircraft carrier battlegroup will be toast, and even some of those won't want to engage you without significant air support.

    And the second that a US Navy vessel tells you to stand down and be boarded, and you refuse, and they shoot at you, and you fire back with missiles and try to sink their ship, what the fuck do you think is going to happen? They'll laugh and wander off? You'd be lucky to make off your ship alive.

    And I don't know why 'pirate' would make you laugh. They kill people, you know. Navies are allowed to board anyone they suspect of piracy, and operating without a flag is a pretty strong indicator. And in international waters ships without a flag are subject to the jurisdiction of all nations, and thus any vessel operated by any country can demand they allow themselves to be boarded under suspicion of being a pirate vessel, and fire on them if they refuse.

    That actually isn't just some hypothetical situation. Navies actually do board unflagged ships whenever they find them in international waters or their own waters. (And they alert the host country when they find them suspicious in other people's waters.)

    If you're an innocent person in a boat that wasn't intended for international trips, but drifted, you'll usually be fine, and they'll even tow you back to shore. If you refuse to stand down and be boarded, they will attempt to board by force, period. If you attempt to stop them, they will shoot back. You might be able to hold them off, but they will send their military. And, hell, even if you can defeat their entire military, they'll just alert other navies where you are. Navies board and search suspected pirate ships on general principles, you can't just fire at them and they go 'Well, that seems a bit hard, let's just give up'.

    Plus, have fun finding a port that will take a ship without a flag when you need to get repairs.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?