Slashdot Mirror


Windows Home Server Details

phorest writes "Perhaps Microsoft read the comments from the Slashdot community on Windows Home Server? In any event Microsoft is opening up WHS for users to construct their own system after all; though I'd like to see the price of this OS release before making the jump. From the review: "At the 2007 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this week... Microsoft previewed its long-awaited Windows Home Server product, a Windows Server 2003 R2-based server for consumers that dispenses with the complexities of most Windows Server versions and provides the core storage, sharing, and remote access functionality that digital media and home networking enthusiasts require... Microsoft will make WHS available in two ways: Bundled with new WHS hardware and software-only, the latter so that enthusiasts can install the system on the hardware of their choice... If you're building your own home server, Microsoft requires a 1 GHz processor or better, 512 MB of RAM or more, and as many disks as you think you need. The company will support multiple home servers on the same network, but it's still murky how that will work."

13 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Multiple Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The company will support multiple home servers on the same network, but it's still murky how that will work."

    Easy... Lots of Money.

    1. Re:Multiple Servers by toadlife · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I strongly believe in having people solve their own computer problems, with some guidance, so that they can fix those same problems in the future.

      And I strongly believe in getting laid sometime withing the next month. ;)

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    2. Re:Multiple Servers by toadlife · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hehe. She's holds a degree in English Literature and is working towards her doctorate.

      If I asked her to take the time to learn how computer worked, I'm afraid she'd ask me, in return, to read and analyze some 500 page book written in middle-english from the year 1500.

      I'm not willing to take that chance. ;)

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  2. Re:You have to be crazy to pick WHS by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux, BSD, Windows, all work fine as servers if you aren't an idiot.

    And Macs work great if you are! ; )

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  3. Real Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The company will support multiple home servers on the same network, but it's still murky how that will work."

    1973 called. It wants its system interconnectivity dilemmas back.

  4. Re:Hmm? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    WHS is for media? Are you sure Microsoft didn't mean "VHS" or...is it still Beta? :)

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  5. Re:You have to be crazy to pick WHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Linux box has now run for two years, and no issues.

    I know, your home server has been very stable and reliable and for the most part of these two years, I have tunneled my hacking attacks through it. Keep up the good work!

  6. Re:Back when by hobbesx · · Score: 2, Funny
    Back in my day we had Samba, and we were grateful for it!

    Heh, In the days of real computers we had to beg, just to use Kermit!
    --
    This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
    Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  7. Re:First?! Hmm... by CDarklock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow, I'm not convinced. Ubuntu is still Linux. You can never click a few buttons and be finished with Linux, or indeed with any UNIX derivative. After you spend enough time doing the recurring tweaks, you just stop noticing them, and think it's being finished.

    I could be wrong, but I don't think it's likely enough to investigate.

    --
    Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
  8. Re:First?! Hmm... by tehsoul · · Score: 3, Funny

    what a useless comment.
    if you're a tech geek with server experience, of course this isn't the product for you, just like you won't be using some fully automated linux installation if you've been compiling your own kernels since the age of 12.

    choo choo, it's the obvious train. last stop: you.

    on another note
    i'd probably like it. easy to set up, that's the way i want it

    --
    me and my thinkpad, sittin' in a tree, c-o-d-i-n-g...
  9. Re:IdiotProof-Lockup by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is precisely the reason to have a home server with all your important stuff on it - so if you do something stupid and bork your workstation, all is not lost. Just re-install the OS and hook back up to your server...

    Now we just need to train the unwashed masses about NOT surfing shady porn sites from the server, but to do it from their workstations...

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  10. Re:New Apple Base station by paeanblack · · Score: 2, Funny

    But because it's Apple...the Apple tax is ok, even respectable to pay. Arguably, they're charging more than it's worth to produce.

    With Sony, even with them selling bleeding edge tech at a LOSS, that's not good enough.

    Really, I just don't understand how the average /.er places value on things, none of it makes much sense


    It's all about reputation.

    Apple wants to copulate with you. Sony waits for you to drop the soap.

  11. Re:Shutup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "At the MOST you have to say "Yes, I know it's dangerous to share my pr0n". Click Yes and you're sharing."

    You obviosly have never tried to use windows to share your pr0n. :P