Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 3 Plans and IE8 Speculation

ReadWriteWeb writes "Information about the next versions of Firefox and Internet Explorer suggest that the two biggest browsers are heading in different directions. Mozilla has published a wiki page detailing its plans for the next version of Firefox, codenamed 'Gran Paradiso'. Among the mandatory requirements listed for FF3 are improving the add-on experience, providing an extensible bookmarks back-end platform, adding more support for web services "to act as content handlers" — all of which show that Firefox wants to be an independent information broker rather than a simple HTML renderer in its next version. Also in the works is Microsoft's IE8. According to ActiveWin.com, a Microsoft official at CES told them that work has already begun for IE 8 and it may be released as a final product 'within 18-24 months'. Looking ahead, it's obvious that IE will continue to hook into the advanced functionality that Vista offers."

9 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What's up with the code names, anyway? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative
    I can understand how it could be necessary for things like the original Mac and Windows 95. But why for yet-another-version of an established product?


    For the same reason Windows Vista used to be called by the codename 'Longhorn' or that Ubuntu 6.10 is referred to by the codename 'Edgy Eft'. Because when they start working on the release, they don't know what they will end up calling it. "FF3" could just as easily end up being FF2.5 instead of FF3 if they don't end up with all the features that they wanted.
  2. IE8? by fullphaser · · Score: 5, Funny

    They just got IE7 out, give them 3-4 years, they are working on it.

    --
    Did someone say cake?
  3. Internet Explorer 8 by anss123 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Looking ahead, it's obvious that IE will continue to hook into the advanced functionality that Vista offers."

    Does that include the ability to only run on Vista?

  4. Re:features by chrismcdirty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could have sworn the reason that Firefox came into existence was that the codebase of the Mozilla Suite was bloated, and had too many features that a lot of people didn't want in a web browser. And here they go repeating the past.

    --
    It's like sex, except I'm having it!
  5. Re:That old saying about SMPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Simple Mail Protocol Transport? No, no I don't think they have. It's probably because of the DCMA, you know.

  6. I wonder if... by ProppaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this will be known as FFVI in Japan?

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  7. Re:That old saying about SMPT by PseudoQuant · · Score: 5, Funny

    What does The Society for Mormon Philosophy and Theology have to do with Firefox anyway?

  8. Re:features by Anc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I could have sworn the reason that Firefox came into existence was that the codebase of the Mozilla Suite was bloated, and had too many features that a lot of people didn't want in a web browser. And here they go repeating the past.
    What makes you think so? If you look at it closely, Firefox sticks to its assumptions. The new features are either supplementing or replacing previous ones, like the improved bookmarks system, or are mostly about streamlining the already existing usage paths.

    It's hard to relate to your statement since you provided no concrete arguments or examples. In fact, it sounds as if you were implying that the sheer fact that there's a new release and therefore new stuff coming up means that the application is getting bloated. Perhaps they should halt the development, so not to introduce more bloat, huh?
  9. Re:What's up with the code names, anyway? by Rodness · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's boring to say 'firefox 3' and more fun to say 'gran paradiso'.

    Not even because it's fun. Try reading the Mozilla forums sometime.

    The browsers are given development codenames to SIGNIFICANTLY differentiate the development nightly/alpha/beta releases from the blessed official version releases. They don't want Grandpa Joe Sixpack coming along to download this "FoxFire thingy" he heard his kids talk about and accidently wind up with Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1, (which may or may not work as advertised because, well, it's an alpha) when he's obviously not interested in a development release.

    Another reason is that it's less confusing and ambiguous, especially when you have multiple versions of Firefox. It's easy to get confused about which feature went into which product when you have "Firefox 1.0", "Firefox 1.5", "Firefox 2.0", "Firefox 3.0" and so forth. At least from a developer perspective, there's more uniqueness to "Phoenix", "Deer Park", "Bon Echo", and "Gran Paradiso" releases from the associated mental imagery.

    But keeping them distinct and less noticable from the end user perspective is the most important reason.