Cisco Lost Rights to iPhone Trademark Last Year?
An anonymous reader writes "An investigation into the ongoing trademark dispute between Cisco and Apple over the name "iPhone" appears to show that Cisco does not own the mark as claimed in their recent lawsuit. This is based on publicly available information from the US Patent and Trademark office, as well as public reviews of Cisco products over the past year. The trademark was apparently abandoned in late 2005/early 2006 because Cisco was not using it."
iKnow that
--Steve
Cisco should just rebrand their iPhone product line and call them Apple Phones.
This guy's the limit!
Apple - Sued by Apple records
Unix - Sued by Open Group
iPhone - Sued by Cisco
idiot - sued by you.
Lars T.
To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck
>idiot - sued by you.
iDiot
Err: 1D10T
Can I Make a Beowulf Cluster of those iPhones ?
Would that make it an iBeowulf Cluster, or a Beowulf iCluster? Damn, I'm so confused! Who do we sue next?
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
If this checks out, Youch! Everyone was wondering what was behind Apple so brazenly using the iPhone trademark. Cringely wrote a whole piece on it http://pbs.org/cringely but no one guessed something as simple as this!
Memo to self: Don't play Poker with Steve Jobs.
Y'know, seeing as how it's an Apple product, they can rebrand the whole of their catalog (usher in the new era of Apple Inc). That way you can own aMac and aPhone and aServer with aWirelessLAN. Of course, you could also get aLife...
-BA
1. Unclear, unjustified war in a sovereign nation - Check.
2. National obsession with dance at the expense of expanded consciousness - Check.
3. Horrific fashion - Check.
4. Youth culture co-opted by advertising - Check.
5. Government stomping all over personal liberty - Check.
Sorry, dude, you're too late. The Seventies are back in force.