Slashdot Mirror


Decryption Keys For HD-DVD Found, Confirmed

kad77 writes "It appears that, despite skepticism, 'muslix64' was the real deal. Starting from a riddle posted on pastebin.com, members on the doom9 forum identified the Title key for the HD-DVD release 'Serenity.' Volume Unique Keys and Title keys for other discs followed within hours, confirming that software HD-DVD players, like any common program, store important run-time data in memory. Here's a link to decryption utility and sleuthing info in the original doom9 forum thread. The Fair Use crowd has won Round One; now how will the industry respond?"

11 of 473 comments (clear)

  1. A simple answer by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Fair Use crowd has won Round One; now how will the industry respond?"

    Lawyers. Lots of them.

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
  2. Fantasy Land by gravesb · · Score: 5, Funny

    By admitting DRM is useless and treating customers like clients instead of criminals? Only in my mind, only in my mind....

    --
    http://bgcommonsense.blogspot.com
  3. Re:The fair use crowd? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not every use of a copyrighted work is fair. BackupHDDVD is just as useful to pirates. or to people who have monitors capable of displaying full resolution HD content, but are not permitted to because of a lack of HDCP

    or people who want to watch movies they bought on their mythtv system

    or people who like to buy movies and watch them, but don't run windows
  4. The response will be the dumping of HDDVD. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quite simple. The content industry will simply dump the format, after all, there's an alternative. Now it's high time to show that BluRay is just as "consumer friendly" and break it for good, so there is no alternative left, and if the studios want to get their content to the customer, they have to accept that DRM is useless in their strife to protect their rights.

    The point is to create as much damage as possible, so the industry learns that the only one hurt by DRM are they themselves. Revoked keys mean more work, more expense, more hassle and dissatisfied customers who have to jump the hoops. This will in turn create more awareness for DRM and the problems it creates.

    We have to teach the studios that DRM is a failure. That it only generates hassle and problems for their paying customer and is no barriere or even a deterrent for the pirates. For this, the customer has to be the one hurt, too. Learn the easy or the hard way, learn about DRM by investigating or by having your tools stop working.

    Yes, that's not the usual gentle way of teaching. But appearantly some people don't learn 'fore it starts to hurt.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Again, this is NOT a crack! by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    New disks can be pressed with new keys, and the compromised software player will have it's key revoked. As such, this is not a generally useful solution. AACS remains secure, and at best, we may see individual keys available for certain pressings of certain discs. This approach will never provide general playback as DeCSS does.

    However, it is my understanding that the decryption process can be done by the TPM; once this is supported, the problem will be much more difficult. Make no mistake, the battle has only just begun. Before long, software based attacks may be rendered impossible.

  6. /. paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Porn goes for HD-DVD
    2. HD-DVD encryption is broken
    3. The Pirate Bay will buy a country

    Put them together and you have pirated porn in HD. Note to self: add KY Jelly and a pack of kleenex to the shopping list.

  7. Re:"now how will the industry respond?" by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um, as The Pirate Bay has demonstrated already, there are three wrong with your supposition. First off, ICANN does not and will not revoke domain names at the behest of the government. As long as Doom9 has backbone (and this hasn't been their first time in this type of situation), they're not gonna crumple.

    The second thing is that they might not be located in the USA. The whois dossier shows that the domain was registered by (anonymous) proxy, and it's entirely possible that he's not American. If his servers are physically located outside of the USA, then he can't be legally threatened by civil suits, and he's not subject to DMCA. (However, this is a hypothetical, and since he refuses to host DeCSS, it is my guess that he is somewhere in the USA.)

    The third thing is that the website is http://www.doom9.org/ , not doom9.com.

    --
    ~ C.
  8. Re:"now how will the industry respond?" by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doom9.com: "Hello Microsoft. We are a domain squatter. We have no idea what you are talking about. Besides. We run Linux."

    Microsoft: "Crap. We sued the wrong company. Refile for doom9.NET"

    Doom9.net: "Go fly a kite. We run Linux as well so you have no authorization to do an 'audit'. And go fuck yourself with the DMCA. US laws don't apply in England."

    Microsoft: "Shit. Wait. Why the hell do we care if HD DVD are cracked. That's the MPAA's problem."

  9. youtube demo removed by 1+a+bee · · Score: 5, Interesting
    muslix64's youtube demo linked from the original post has since been removed. Instead the page seems to claim that the content of his video is somehow owned by Warner Bros.:

    This video has been removed at the request of copyright owner Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. because its content was used without permission. Sad, but funny...
  10. Hash information by Ougarou · · Score: 5, Informative

    For when any of these services get killed, let the record state that:
    MD5(BackupHDDVD.zip)= 484a73b61fb795d84e11d72614f77db0
    SHA1(BackupHDDVD .zip)= c9f28f76ff4f1a8bfe74fa963466e8483da95eff
    SHA512(B ackupHDDVD.zip)= 661a12808e64ec516b1eb9e493bf5de4a08223f2ee4258735d aa6a382a1d2e1fbe4b732bebd4133e5af0d968c0904d310f73 40e63edab7b69e1948b08
    3dd2617
    ED2K(BackupHDDVD.z ip)= 4860e9248663d52dc47bfc98d61ec6d7
    GNUNET(BackupHDD VD.zip)= COD1504ECJM52QOUN7I97FQTSIG848VITP15GSQTL9L3GAGT5O FRSIRJ5FLT84PUBBODIQ60I16J23RJ83J3TMLNMQF1II5GGFEI C5O.COTARKV5PLT8MFC6E
    BDF83IMEJI74A3H0QNTGMEGDS6P PO6AEFF75S439R2T731ODI37MP0HM3TQ27266N6FMK4PS8SDLC KNE3UIPD8

  11. Re:Blu-Ray? by grimwell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aye, my MythTV backend with the disk dump has two 320GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drives in a RAID 0 array. The frontend has three HDTV capture cards(two HD-5500 & one HD-3000). A Lowly 100mbps full-duplex network link between the two boxes.

    I'm able to record three HD streams at once via nfs(nfs ver3, ver4 cause kernel panic under that load). Playback of one of the three streams while it is being recorded isn't do-able but recording two and watching an earlier(yet to be transcoded) one all at the same time works.

    An hour of 1080i is a little shy of 8.5GB. The network link is the bottleneck in my setup, the disk array handles the task without a problem.

    --
    If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy