Slashdot Mirror


Seamonkey 1.1 Released

stuuf writes "Version 1.1 of the Seamonkey Internet Application Suite is now available, with quite a few improvements over the 1.0 series. Some of the new features include spell checking in form text areas, a new tagging system to classify email, a better indicator for secure web sites and preview images for browser tabs. This release also includes many of the updates that have gone into the Firefox 2 and Thunderbird 2 branches. Check out the release notes and download page for more."

25 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Competitors by WiseMuse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who are the major players in the web application suite area?

    1. Re:Competitors by free+space · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd say Opera, they have web, email and integrated clients for all sorts of stuff in one package.

      Also, IE+outlook express (yuck!)+msn messenger aren't really a suite, but they come from the same company :)

    2. Re:Competitors by bunratty · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's been some talk of packaging Firefox, Thunderbird, and Sunbird together as a sort of Internet suite.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    3. Re:Competitors by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thats a great idea, they could call it Sea Monkey.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Competitors by Ididerus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, it doesn't use Firefox, it uses the less-than-clean UI of Mozilla. It looks similar to Netscape ver.5 Which is soooo 1995

      I'm sure that it is a great browser, but Mozilla needs to give us the option of which browser to use with the Seamonkey pack. Then I might consider getting rid of my Firefox/Gmail.com/mIRC/Notepad combo, which I can tell you is a lot more compact than Seamonkey.

      --
      I'm fighting The War on Drugs!
    5. Re:Competitors by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, it doesn't use Firefox, it uses the less-than-clean UI of Mozilla. It looks similar to Netscape ver.5 Which is soooo 1995

      It does default to the "Classic" theme, but it also comes with the "Modern" theme, which is much nicer. And you can download many other themes from addons.mozilla.org.

      I'm sure that it is a great browser, but Mozilla needs to give us the option of which browser to use with the Seamonkey pack.

      There is no way to do that and keep the integration, because SeaMonkey is a single executable. You could run Firefox as your browser. and run SeaMonkey for mail, irc and composer, but that would not be any more integrated than Firefox + Thunderbird + Nvu + the Chatzilla extension.

      The other option would be to see if there is a theme for SeaMonkey that looks like Firefox, but a theme could not do things like add a separate search box next to the url field.

      On a side note, it is probably not really correct to say "Mozilla needs to" in reference to SeaMonkey. Mozilla is providing CVS, bug tracking, etc. for SeaMonkey, but since the name change, SeaMonkey is no longer an official Mozilla product. Like Camino, SeaMonkey is produced and maintained by a separate community (although there is a fair amount of membership overlap).

    6. Re:Competitors by evilneko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. It uses the more-complete UI of Mozilla. ;) And it's anything but clunky. Maybe I'm biased as a Netscape fan from back when, but I rather like the UI. Interface aside, Seamonkey uses the same engine as Firefox, and at times uses a newer version. Mozilla/Seamonkey was on Gecko 1.8 long before Firefox got it.

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
  2. Spell Checker by jmagar.com · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's about time that the spell check feature become standard in all browsers. It boggles the mind that this has for a very long time been the main reason to get the Google toolbar, and the browser folks have not responded by including it in their package. With all this web 2.0 hype, and you being the person of the year, why is there no spell checker in the tool we use to create all that damned content?

    Well done Seamonkey!

    1. Re:Spell Checker by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Probably because most of us dont use browsers to create content, only to view it. Creators tend to use tooling with spellcheckers included.
      ... he says as creating "content" from within a browser.
    2. Re:Spell Checker by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      MacOS X DOES provide an inline spell checker, though I believe it only works for Cocoa apps, not Carbon, and I think they leave it up to developers whether to implement it or not (it's an option for certain types of controls, like text fields). There's also a spell checker on the Services menu, though its more for checking the spelling of individual words.

    3. Re:Spell Checker by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm not quite sure why I need a browser, e-mail/news reader, IRC client, and HTML editor together in one package.

      Well then don't download it and STFU. What a waste of bytes. Guess what? I don't need a mammogram. Maybe they should take those breast cancer awareness commercials off the TV!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Spell Checker by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Informative

      MacOS X DOES provide an inline spell checker, though I believe it only works for Cocoa apps, not Carbon, and I think they leave it up to developers whether to implement it or not...

      This is not quite correct. The OS X spellchecking service, like all the other services, works automatically in Cocoa apps without any work on the part of the developer (as I understand) and functions inline. Developers can integrate it in additional ways as well and it can be included in Carbon applications, but the developers have to do it specifically. For example, Firefox3 alpha 1 includes the native OS X spellchecking with the same dictionary as all the other applicatons, despite not being a cocoa application.

      There's also a spell checker on the Services menu, though its more for checking the spelling of individual words.

      This is the same spell checker and uses the same dictionary. It is just a different interface for getting to that function.

    5. Re:Spell Checker by ZOMFF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      write! the spell cheque inn firefox is help full. Know wonder pea poll speak sew hi lee of it. Eye am surprised its knot inn this knew see monkey soft where.

      --
      Launch every sig.
    6. Re:Spell Checker by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just upgraded my SeaMonkey and I didn't like this feature. I am usually a good speller, and I noticed the speed was slower with this real-time feature enabled.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  3. Re:SeaMonkey vs Firefox / Thunderbird by zer0halo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually Thunderbird has built in NewsReader as well. Firefox has a couple of excellent newsreader extensions, and an HTML extension as well.

    I also don't see the advantage of SeaMonkey over Firefox+Thunderbird, though perhaps I'm missing something. I wonder why developers continue to invest work in SeaMonkey rather than just create a meta-package that combines Firefox + Thunderbird + necessary extensions.

    --
    Impossible is nothing.
  4. Re:memory leak fud .. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >Wanna bet someone will post a 'I like Seamonkey
    >except for the memory leak problem ..

    It ain't FUD, bud. Firefox does have memory leak
    problems. It's still my favorite and primary browser,
    but the problems are real.

  5. Re:SeaMonkey vs Firefox / Thunderbird by UnRDJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seamonkey/Mozilla is much more customizable. I particularly like the ability to make key bindings, as well as define scroll ranges. Firefox tries way too hard to be minimal. Look at the preference page, there's barely anything there. Tons of features I found useful before Firefox came about were just cut. I don't want minimal, I like having lots of features.

  6. Theme and extension to enhance Seamonkey UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am writing a theme called SeaGnome for Seamonkey so it blends in nicely with GTK desktops. I have the Mail and Browser section but am still working on the remaining suite applications.
    Try it out here:
    http://markbokil.org/index.php?section=tech&conten t=c_linuxseagnome.php

    I also have written an extension for Seamonkey which allows you to collapse down the toolbars and provides a quick menu to often used features. Great to reclaim screen realestate while browsing.
    http://markbokil.org/index.php?section=tech&conten t=c_linuxmonkeymenu.php

  7. Re:SeaMonkey vs Firefox / Thunderbird by noldrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you are using any combination of Browser, Mail and Composer, Seamonkey is more compact. Also traditionally firefox has lagged behind seamonkey in tab functionality. These days I like it because it tends to filter out some of the craziness of firefox, so by the time Seamonkey gets features they tend to be the best ones with very bugs.

  8. Re:memory leak fud .. by bunratty · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the FUD that the OP was referring to was not that Firefox and SeaMonkey do have some leaks, but that some people try to make "the memory leak" seem like a huge, obvious problem that is going unfixed. I've seen several posts lately saying something to the effect that "the memory leak" is not being addressed. The reality is that the leaks are being fixed. I also don't see any evidence that Firefox or SeaMonkey leak any more than other browsers. So there is FUD, and also you are not just imagining memory leaks.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  9. Re:Numbering System? by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    SeaMonkey 1.5 will be the next release. As per MozillaWiki:

    The current working title for a release from that work is "SeaMonkey 1.5" (subject to change) with a release expected in 2007. (This work takes place on "Mozilla trunk".)

  10. Re:Portable apps version? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you use portable Firefox a lot you might want to look into Google Browser Sync. It keeps all your stuff synced across multiple browsers.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  11. Re:Firefox, Thunderbird, and now Seamonkey? by bunratty · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, Mozilla has almost everything to do with SeaMonkey. They developed Mozilla 1.8, which SeaMonkey is still based upon. They host the source code, bug database, and releases. The core of SeaMonkey is shared with Firefox and Thunderbird so most Mozilla development directly improves SeaMonkey with no extra effort. SeaMonkey remains an official Mozilla project. SeaMonkey simply isn't a Mozilla product, which means that Mozilla doesn't drive SeaMonkey-specific development or provide support.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  12. Re:memory leak fud .. by arunprasannan · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can choose to download/install only the components you desire, in the installer.

  13. I used to use Seamonkey... by coldmist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and now I use FireFox/Thunderbird.

    Why? Extensions. I actually like Seamonkey better for tab options (Ex: Firefox doesn't honor the preference to open a new tab showing the home page.) and the overall integration (icons in the bottom left of the screen, ctrl-[123] to switch between browser/email, etc. Another one: One theme applies to the browser and email.

    However, I run Firefox and Thunderbird now for the extensions.

    But, I wish one theme could be used for both.

    I wish it had all the options (or honored the about:config options that do work, somewhat).

    If/when Seamonkey supports FireFox/Thunderbird extensions, will quickly go back to it.

    --
    Don't steal. The government hates competition.