everyone who uses free software must give back changes they make to the code, because that was the deal in the first place.
That's what my little GPL-firmly-believing voice says. Perhaps I'm not fervorish enough for the masses?
Regardless of how one might define "free," I like these stipulations and would release code under them. Call it derpaderpasource software if you want, I'd still feel the same way about the underlying meaning
I get about 5 of these a day, on a relatively small site. I wrote a small shell script out of sheer boredom that parses hosts.deny and gives me country and hostname info. Here's the output from the past week or so. It seems to confirm that most of these are from public isps overseas.
117.21.249.75 CN, China 121.166.163.142 KR, Korea, Republic of 122.128.36.3 KR, Korea, Republic of 189.19.245.182 BR, Brazil 189-19-245-182.dsl.telesp.net.br. 200.111.157.187 CL, Chile 201.6.124.155 BR, Brazil c9067c9b.static.spo.virtua.com.br. 202.229.120.74 JP, Japan 203.125.51.23 SG, Singapore 207.5.149.188 US, United States 149-188.suscom-maine.net. 211.87.224.190 CN, China 211.99.203.168 CN, China 216.164.162.155 US, United States 216-164-162-155.pa.subnet.cable.rcn.com. 217.219.67.86 IR, Iran, Islamic Republic of 218.241.177.241 CN, China 219.121.10.35 JP, Japan m010035.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp. 221.3.131.110 CN, China 61.184.136.164 CN, China 61.191.53.99 CN, China 99.53.191.61.broad.static.hf.ah.cndata.com. 77.79.88.247 TR, Turkey reverse-77-79-88-247.grid.com.tr. 80.179.149.122 IL, Israel 122.sharatim.co.il. 82.165.27.220 DE, Germany p15173261.pureserver.info. 83.19.20.66 PL, Poland byq66.internetdsl.tpnet.pl. 84.53.78.183 NL, Netherlands 84-53-78-183.wxdsl.nl. 87.197.110.47 SK, Slovakia static-dsl-47.87-197-110.telecom.sk. 99.53.191.61 --, N/A adsl-99-53-191-61.dsl.mtry01.sbcglobal.net. 200.219.194.74 BR, Brazil static.200.219.194.74.datacenter1.com.br. 202.190.177.144 MY, Malaysia 164.77.195.60 CL, Chile 89.119.5.106 IT, Italy 89-119-5-106-static.albacom.net. 221.154.206.233 KR, Korea, Republic of 218.208.91.111 MY, Malaysia 65.120.74.22 US, United States 210.185.64.195 AU, Australia 210-185-64-195.intrapower.net.au. 202.168.58.111 AU, Australia 111.58.168.202.static.comindico.com.au. 85.25.71.36 DE, Germany loft1551.serverloft.de. 193.136.39.26 PT, Portugal genid.dcc.fc.up.pt. 150.146.40.173 IT, Italy mspasiano.cedrc.cnr.it. 221.194.128.66 CN, China 82.135.192.72 LT, Lithuania 82-135-192-72.static.zebra.lt. 80.10.250.17 FR, France 207.28.220.1 US, United States voyager.iavalley.cc.ia.us. 164.77.208.198 CL, Chile 38.107.141.131 US, United States host-38-107-141-131.mtl.net.vexxhost.com. 222.218.156.41 CN, China
It's a shame really, I love SuSE as a distro. Yast is probably the most complete centralized gui based configuration tool for linux. Much better in that sense than ubuntu with gnome which is obsessively minimal and redhat who scatters random tools everywhere that all have varying levels of completeness, stability, and support.
Hide one of these behind a desk somewhere in a computer lab, sneak a cable to the switch or through one of the workstations, and have it connect via rootkit to a remote server somewhere. Then connect to the server and do whatever naughty things you desire. If you were clever you could even disguise it as an AC adapter.
Wouldn't it be more like "Why use swap space in modern systems?" then? Or where you trying to point out the fact that virtual memory references all physical memory and swap space, and therefore the title in that context sounds like "why use physical memory in modern systems?" I can't imagine that he was wondering why modern systems have physical RAM.
'With this kind of device,' Kahn told Wired, 'you're going to see the best and the worst of things.'" Wired then replied:
KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHNNN!!!!!
Eat your heart out mods.
Re:SeaMonkey vs Firefox / Thunderbird
on
Seamonkey 1.1 Released
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Seamonkey/Mozilla is much more customizable. I particularly like the ability to make key bindings, as well as define scroll ranges. Firefox tries way too hard to be minimal. Look at the preference page, there's barely anything there. Tons of features I found useful before Firefox came about were just cut. I don't want minimal, I like having lots of features.
Even if this is invalid, look how much of a fuss SCO and MS have created with BS IP claims. I'm sure if Mr. Cox has paid attention, he can make a few heads turn. Or at least provide us with some amusement.
I agree. I like the ability to customize how far one mousewheel click scrolls. The default is too slow on firefox, and there doesn't seem to be a way to change it.
I just like having those customizability options in general.
I don't see why the firefox team is so obsessed with "simplifying" the browser, as if key binding options make it too difficult to understand or hinder performance.
> Law is an operating system, and those who hack it are called politicians.
Politicians are the OS designers and maintainers.
Lawyers are the ones who try to hack it.
That's how I see the analogy anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
everyone who uses free software must give
back changes they make to the code, because that was the deal in the first place.
That's what my little GPL-firmly-believing voice says. Perhaps I'm not fervorish enough for the masses?
Regardless of how one might define "free," I like these stipulations and would release code under them. Call it derpaderpasource software if you want, I'd still feel the same way about the underlying meaning
Except me. I'm running it on my desktop and laptop. Torrenting it as we speak.
I get about 5 of these a day, on a relatively small site. I wrote a small shell script out of sheer boredom that parses hosts.deny and gives me country and hostname info. Here's the output from the past week or so. It seems to confirm that most of these are from public isps overseas.
117.21.249.75 CN, China
121.166.163.142 KR, Korea, Republic of
122.128.36.3 KR, Korea, Republic of
189.19.245.182 BR, Brazil 189-19-245-182.dsl.telesp.net.br.
200.111.157.187 CL, Chile
201.6.124.155 BR, Brazil c9067c9b.static.spo.virtua.com.br.
202.229.120.74 JP, Japan
203.125.51.23 SG, Singapore
207.5.149.188 US, United States 149-188.suscom-maine.net.
211.87.224.190 CN, China
211.99.203.168 CN, China
216.164.162.155 US, United States 216-164-162-155.pa.subnet.cable.rcn.com.
217.219.67.86 IR, Iran, Islamic Republic of
218.241.177.241 CN, China
219.121.10.35 JP, Japan m010035.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp.
221.3.131.110 CN, China
61.184.136.164 CN, China
61.191.53.99 CN, China 99.53.191.61.broad.static.hf.ah.cndata.com.
77.79.88.247 TR, Turkey reverse-77-79-88-247.grid.com.tr.
80.179.149.122 IL, Israel 122.sharatim.co.il.
82.165.27.220 DE, Germany p15173261.pureserver.info.
83.19.20.66 PL, Poland byq66.internetdsl.tpnet.pl.
84.53.78.183 NL, Netherlands 84-53-78-183.wxdsl.nl.
87.197.110.47 SK, Slovakia static-dsl-47.87-197-110.telecom.sk.
99.53.191.61 --, N/A adsl-99-53-191-61.dsl.mtry01.sbcglobal.net.
200.219.194.74 BR, Brazil static.200.219.194.74.datacenter1.com.br.
202.190.177.144 MY, Malaysia
164.77.195.60 CL, Chile
89.119.5.106 IT, Italy 89-119-5-106-static.albacom.net.
221.154.206.233 KR, Korea, Republic of
218.208.91.111 MY, Malaysia
65.120.74.22 US, United States
210.185.64.195 AU, Australia 210-185-64-195.intrapower.net.au.
202.168.58.111 AU, Australia 111.58.168.202.static.comindico.com.au.
85.25.71.36 DE, Germany loft1551.serverloft.de.
193.136.39.26 PT, Portugal genid.dcc.fc.up.pt.
150.146.40.173 IT, Italy mspasiano.cedrc.cnr.it.
221.194.128.66 CN, China
82.135.192.72 LT, Lithuania 82-135-192-72.static.zebra.lt.
80.10.250.17 FR, France
207.28.220.1 US, United States voyager.iavalley.cc.ia.us.
164.77.208.198 CL, Chile
38.107.141.131 US, United States host-38-107-141-131.mtl.net.vexxhost.com.
222.218.156.41 CN, China
too much karma for your tastes?
Now let's consider how many inexperienced users run everything as administrator/root. Those botnets don't make themselves!
It's a shame really, I love SuSE as a distro. Yast is probably the most complete centralized gui based configuration tool for linux. Much better in that sense than ubuntu with gnome which is obsessively minimal and redhat who scatters random tools everywhere that all have varying levels of completeness, stability, and support.
Hide one of these behind a desk somewhere in a computer lab, sneak a cable to the switch or through one of the workstations, and have it connect via rootkit to a remote server somewhere. Then connect to the server and do whatever naughty things you desire. If you were clever you could even disguise it as an AC adapter.
Wouldn't it be more like "Why use swap space in modern systems?" then? Or where you trying to point out the fact that virtual memory references all physical memory and swap space, and therefore the title in that context sounds like "why use physical memory in modern systems?" I can't imagine that he was wondering why modern systems have physical RAM.
is this theory based solely on the observation that the universe is expanding?
I could theorize that the fsm is stretching the universe with his giant noodley appendages, and I wouldn't be any more right than they are.
And they chose half-life, the most hacked game in existence.
Add to that the fact that the newest hacks are almost impossible to detect unless the player is seriously stupid.
Anyone who takes part in this needs to be slapped up side the head.
Heh, I used printf for the longest time, not out of sheer leetness but only because I was to lazy to figure out the debugger. :)
Sounds kinky.
Percentage of female internet population on myspace.com: 99%
Everywhere else: 1%
Seamonkey/Mozilla is much more customizable. I particularly like the ability to make key bindings, as well as define scroll ranges. Firefox tries way too hard to be minimal. Look at the preference page, there's barely anything there. Tons of features I found useful before Firefox came about were just cut. I don't want minimal, I like having lots of features.
Even if this is invalid, look how much of a fuss SCO and MS have created with BS IP claims. I'm sure if Mr. Cox has paid attention, he can make a few heads turn. Or at least provide us with some amusement.
1. Wait until this becomes somewhat populat 2. DMCA 3. Profit! No question marks needed.
I agree. I like the ability to customize how far one mousewheel click scrolls. The default is too slow on firefox, and there doesn't seem to be a way to change it. I just like having those customizability options in general. I don't see why the firefox team is so obsessed with "simplifying" the browser, as if key binding options make it too difficult to understand or hinder performance.
> Law is an operating system, and those who hack it are called politicians. Politicians are the OS designers and maintainers. Lawyers are the ones who try to hack it. That's how I see the analogy anyway.
Of course he would say yes. The truth would very likely be no.
and one after that showing that 1/2 studies of studies showing studies to be overblown are, in fact, overblown.
WOW!!!1111111111
Here's some information on Online Poker incase anyone isn't familiar with it.
...for online buisinesses to move out of Ohio! wtg!