The Partnership That Could Have Changed Everything
DesertBlade writes "Bloomberg is reporting that, at one point, Microsoft had considered an Apple/iPod partnership before it released its own MP3 player. Microsoft was apparently displeased with MP3 players partnerships they had already made, notably the Creative and Dell models. This information came from court documents introduced in an antitrust lawsuit from Iowa. From the article: 'Microsoft had been working with partners on music devices for at least a year before Apple introduced the iPod in 2001 and catapulted to a dominant position in the market. Microsoft and its partners failed to come up with compelling hardware and had difficulty getting software to properly connect music collections on computers with their devices.' If this Apple/Microsoft partnership was formed how would this have changed the Microsoft and Apple dynamics?"
Yeah - show me a company that really REALY pushes the bounds of monopolistic behavior worse than apple. Just a matter of Steve Jobs couldn't beat little BillyG at the software game and insisted on selling hardware.
I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
if Apple and M$ had teemed up, wouldn't that just loose the lawyers en mass?
Try learning English before using foreign phrases.
this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
That's unfair, Linux is a fragile kernel as well.
Any other UNIX should only panic when flaky hardware is involved
Bill Gates owns a majority stake of Apple shares. If that's not a partnership, I don't know what is!