Slashdot Mirror


One In Five Windows Installs Is Non-Genuine

snib writes "Microsoft disclosed Monday that, according to reports collected by the notorious Windows Genuine Advantage tool on millions of users' PCs, 22% of all Windows installs do not pass its validation tests and have therefore been deemed non-genuine. Quoting: 'Since WGA launched in July 2005, over 512 million users have attempted to validate their copy of Windows, Microsoft said. Of those, the non-genuine rate was 22.3 percent... [T]he Business Software Alliance... reports that 35 percent of the world's software is pirated (22 percent in North America)...'"

85 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. 100% of Linux 2.6 installs contain stolen code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    from SCO.

    1. Re:100% of Linux 2.6 installs contain stolen code by CapitalT · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure whether mod you troll or funny, but that's OK since I don't have mod points.

    2. Re:100% of Linux 2.6 installs contain stolen code by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be fair... 100% of Windows Installs has stolen code from BSD.

      Oh wait...

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:100% of Linux 2.6 installs contain stolen code by x2A · · Score: 5, Funny

      even the name, Windows, is a word stolen from the dictionary, made purely with letters stolen from the alphabet!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  2. Re:A la Bash.org by Teresita · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's the false positive rate?

  3. Well... by TheComputerMutt.ca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pff, that's obviously because geeks/pirates have so many more installations than the average person.

    I'd probably count for four, but if it counts as a new installation each time you format, than more than double that. (No more now though, I've got a Mac. 3) I'd assume it's the same for many users here.

    1. Re:Well... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't be surprised if every user whose "validation" fails tries at least a couple more times after that, inflating the failure rate.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Well... by morleron · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One has to wonder how they count non-authorized systems. For instance, I added a gig of RAM and a different video card to my parent's computer a little over a year ago. The system told me that the Windows XP installation was no longer valid when I re-booted the system and put me through the re-certification rigamarole. That failed: it kept refusing the key that the system itself had generated. I eventually found a registry hack out on the 'Net that let me get around all of this and kept my folks PC usable. However, I'm sure that MS would consider this to be a pirated installation, even though the original Certificate of Authority is still glued on the machine. This all happened over a year ago so some of the technical details may be wrong, but the jist of the tale is correct. It all makes me glad that I don't use any MS slaveare at home.

      Just my $.02,
      Ron

      --
      Impeach Barack Obama for violating the Constitutional requirement to be a "natural born" citizen to hold the office of P
    3. Re:Well... by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your story is telling...mostly telling lies. Added RAM? that alone wont cause it to need a new key.

      Presuming you mean that seriously, rather than just to troll the guy...

      He said, and I quote, "I added a gig of RAM and a different video card" (bolding mine). Two changes, depending on which ones, can trigger reactivation.

      Really quite annoying, actually. I find it much easier to just pirate VLK versions. That way, no messy activation (or cracks thereof) to bother with.



      To which I will reply: Fine, Why didn't you just call Microsoft?

      Have you ever called a company to tell them they've made a mistake? Hmm?

      Trust me, it takes far less time to just download a "third-party patch" to correct the problem, than trying to do things the "right" way.

    4. Re:Well... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yeah, but those same geeky pirates probably know enough to sidestep validation.

      Excellent point. That was the first thing I thought of...of all the people who pirate Windows, how many ever subject themselves to WGA? I suspect it is a relative small fraction of them. And then there is the reciprocal question, of the 22% that report as non-genuine, how many are really valid installs that raise a false positive? If it's even 10%, that puts the false positive rate at around 2%, which would be unacceptably high in my opinion.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    5. Re:Well... by rsmoody · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. Let's not forget all of the false hits. My favorite thing is when you have to reinstall an OEM (Dell, HP, Compaq, etc) and you don't have the exact fracking CD to use and naturally the completely LEGAL key won't work or if it does if fails to validate, drives me up the fracking wall! What fracking difference does it make if the CD is not the exact one? NONE! It's still fracking legal! God I hate M$'s bull$h|t! All I am doing is LEGALLY installing a LEGAL copy of Windows using a LEGAL key! The last time, I was told by the recording to contact the manufacturer of the system, no option whatsoever to talk to someone in India. What fracking good is that going to do other than delay me and my customer further and cost my customer more by being forced to order a restore CD that refuses to allow me to do a repair install. Gee, thanks for the help. At least with linux, you can just keep the home folder and save all of your info and settings. That's a big no-go with anything from M$ because clearly they know that when you buy a system from a vendor and it comes with Windows, you can't possibly have the need to do a repair install, the ONLY thing you will EVER need to do is format and start over. Ugh.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:Well... by catwh0re · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think it's important that Microsoft doesn't correlate WGA failures with actual pirate installations. Firstly for the reason you've listed above, but also because we all know that WGA doesn't even work very well. I for one know of many systems that have passed WGA despite having an illegitimate serial number. I also know of a few where they haven't passed, despite being bonafide installations from dell. I believe MS hasn't well-tracked the serials which are being pirated out there 'in the wild' and WGA is their future on clamping down on serial number duplicity.

      I also believe Microsoft should 'suck it up' because if they have an 80% non-piracy rate for a monopolised operating system that is still very good returns, and the "20%" of pirated software merely helps to maintain that monopoly.

      I'm certain Microsoft would prefer to keep those 20% on windows rather than have them on linux for example.

    7. Re:Well... by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Trust me, it takes far less time to just download a "third-party patch" to correct the problem, than trying to do things the "right" way.

      Used to work at a computer store & a big part of my job was reinstalling Windows from viruses & such. Over 90% of the time...I had to call Microsoft to reactivate their copy of XP. Used to sit on hold at least 5 minutes & outside of US business hours...didn't even try. With that time I lost sitting on the phone waiting on Microsoft to get their stuff together meant that time I could've spent generating quite a bit of revenue waiting on their BS.

      I totally agree with you about the patch...especially when Microsoft decides to end their XP activation service in 5 years or less.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    8. Re:Well... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That was the first thing I thought of...of all the people who pirate Windows, how many ever subject themselves to WGA?

      Not to mention, how many don't bother with XP at all and just use 2000 instead?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Well... by mrbcs · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can order one and wait 3 weeks for delivery. I'm sure you customer would love waiting that long to get their computer back.

      OEM's have been leaning to putting the install files on a second partition. Some actually ask you to make restore disks. I personally can't believe that they can't afford the 50 cents for the damn cd.

      You also USED to be able to just use any xp cd and the key on the box and it would work. It would freak out after the first boot, but if you changed the key to what it actually was, then you could activate over the web. You can't do this anymore. Now if you do this routine, you have to call Microsoft and they usually will give you about a 60 digit code to make the machine work again.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  4. WGA by brain1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or does WGA fail 22% of the time? Hmmm?

    1. Re:WGA by oheso · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a sysadmin responsible for about 200 Windows machines of varying pedigree. We have a site license for Windows XP and most of the machines have that installed and give us no trouble. When new machines come in the door they get a fresh install from the site licensed disks.

      I've had trouble in the case of older machines (installed by my predecessor), and particularly with OEM installs. In the latter case, I've seen the failure rate of WGA approach 100%.

      So, overall, of the 22%, I'd attribute most of it to failure. Particularly given that Windows and IE appear to use multiple different bits of code to accomplish the same thing (one of the first steps of an IE7 installation is validation). This means multiple avenues of failure, but only one chance to get it right.

      No mention in the article of any attempt to account for failures.

    2. Re:WGA by MEGAMAID · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why was that modded funny?

      I recently had to fix a HP laptop with a reinstall of XP they'd done only 1 month ago (from the supplied CDs and the XP key stuck to it) and yes WGA failed because it couldn't update itself with the latest version. It wouldn't login without a 5 second timer on the WGA warning and many, many popups.
      It looked like spyware and other nasties were preventing some .dlls registering and this was stopping WGA from running. But the stupid thing is that because of this, XP couldn't download windows updates. Had to start again with a re-format and re-install. I can't imagine that this would be an isolated case.

      --

      Waking Up - There must be a better way to start the day.
    3. Re:WGA by Bri3D · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article also doesn't realize that the majority of serious (aka real) pirated Windows installations use MuBlinder or another memory-patching or DLL replacement application to bypass WGA.
      I think that nearly 100% of the failures reported were false positives, and that the number is probably highly inflated by legit users frantically trying to get their critical security updates after WGA has randomly failed them.
      The real pirates are dodging WGA and aren't trackable with these stats.

    4. Re:WGA by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The purpose of WGA is ultimately to provide some statistical support to high piracy numbers. Thus, WGA hasn't failed as you assert. It's working perfectly.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  5. Bad numbers by Anon-Admin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can count 5 that fail it's validation and every one of them is a legal copy on a legal system.

    I would look at there program first, then accuse everyone of steeling second.

    It really does not surprise me that there are a lot of pirated copies out there.

  6. Re:A la Bash.org by ForestGrump · · Score: 3, Interesting

    or false negative rate?

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  7. What a load of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's no way it's that low

  8. A thought.... by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One in five... of people who actually attempted to run the WGA. I'd imagine there's a sizable group of people who already know they won't pass it, so they never even try.

    I anticipate that some folks will say 'lolz if WGA doesn't false positive!!11!!eleventy!' (translated: Assuming that WGA doesn't falsely label a machine as pirated). The number of these seems to be reeeeeally low, I'm guessing it's not a big part of the final numbers.

    1. Re:A thought.... by misleb · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, personally, I have reinstalled the same copy of windows on the same machine more times than the activation allows (~20?). So, no, I don't try to activate either.


      Now that's persistence! If at first you can't make it stable, try, try again.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  9. The number is high by adamstew · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know for a fact that my install is 100% genuine...Although WGA has flagged it as non-genuine.

    I obtained my copy of XP from a university site license that was given to all the students at the university of Pittsburgh. They just recently invalidated that site license...so you are looking at tens of thousands (if not a couple hundred thousand) students, faculty and staff that were all using that key that is now non-genuine.

    1. Re:The number is high by mandelbr0t · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh. I bet you didn't read your license agreement very carefully. If you received Microsoft software at your institution through the Academic Alliance, then you did not receive a full Windows XP license. Rather, you were given a license which allowed you to borrow their copy to install on your machine at home and a license key that allowed installation. However, you don't have any rights whatsoever to the software beyond what your classroom needs are. So, they can revoke your license without warning, or otherwise change the terms of what "genuine" means. At any rate, the expected lifespan of the software you received in school is exactly the length of the course you are taking that uses the software (and it wasn't even that long for me, not that I cared since I devoted myself to Linux anyway).

      Disclaimer: this applies to Microsoft software obtained through the Academic Alliance program only. The actual words of the license agreement and my actual experience may disagree; however I'm going with my experience on this one, since it's similar to all other Microsoft licenses I've had to deal with.

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    2. Re:The number is high by eli+pabst · · Score: 4, Informative
      I had the same issue happen at the University of Pittsburgh and it wasn't just limited to student software. The volume license key I was given as a student was identical to the one that my department IT administrators had, so this wasn't just an issue of "loaning" it to students. The "real" reason they decided to invalidate the license key was that Microsoft wanted them to start giving out XP disks that had *individual* license keys rather than a volume license so that they could track who was distributing software.

      From the U of Pittsburgh's own software distribution site:
      "Students are permitted to keep, for their personal use, copies of Microsoft software received under this license upon leaving the University."

      Plus I just read the official Products Use Rights statement and their isn't anything about loaning or revoking the license at any time.
  10. Most likely an undercount by Dobeln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actual piracy numbers are likely to be even larger.

    Why? Two main reasons.

    One: Pirates are probably far less likely to attempt to run a WGA certification compared to a legitimate licence holder. For obvious reasons.

    Two: "Borrowed" corporate editions, etc. will validate despite being, well, "borrowed".

    1. Re:Most likely an undercount by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wrong.

      Pirates have the WGA crack installed and it passes with flying colors downloading all apps and patches without problem.

      Pirates have it way easier and better than the legit users. Hell there are even slipstreamed iso's out there with this crack installed already.

      Btw: Yes some release groups can be trusted to not have it full of spyware and trojans. The bigger release groups pride themselves of releasing pristine packages...

      not that I know anything about that stuff or am a member of any groups..... really.... it's true....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. i dont think that word means what they think it me by User+956 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft disclosed Monday that, according to reports collected by the notorious Windows Genuine Advantage tool on millions of users' PCs, 22% of all Windows installs do not pass its validation tests and have therefore been deemed non-genuine.

    genuine /dnyun/ -adjective

    1. possessing the claimed or attributed character 2. descended from the original stock; pure in breed:

    Even pirated software is genuine.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  12. WGA only catches 99% of the XP installs... by vistic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My free copy of WindowsXP that I've installed on my Mac Mini is valid (msdn academic alliance), but I've intentionally avoided installing anything with WGA because I have problems with that kind of tactic.

    I managed to find a crack so I could download IE7 without WGA (I never use IE, I use Mozilla products, but it's the kind of thing you install just because you figure something Microsoft is probably going to require it sooner or later). And some other WGA-only updates are available in places as WGA-less downloads. You can also use Microsoft's Orca to disable the WGA check in some .msi packages.

    Maybe someone will reply and complain about how I'm not using an official super-approved install of IE7, but WGA was created to stop people from illegally using stolen software (the stuff they charge actual money for, and you didn't pay for), and IE7 is a free download. I just preferred to get around their #$*!@% WGA stuff.

  13. Probably much higher than that by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet that 22% is probably very wrong.

    They say that that's 22% of those who attempted to be authenticated- anyone who knows they are using a pirated copy sure as hell isn't going to try to authenticate it. Those who failed either didn't know they had a pirated copy (installed by teenage son or shady computer store) or are really dumb pirates.

    Or the third option, that WGA fails a fifth of the time. I can think of at least one instance where I have tried to authenticate a legitamite copy (which I had just unpacked from HP, and was doing updates on) and WGA said it didn't pass.

  14. Invalid... or just no CD for the license key? by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My experience in reinstalling several completely fried windows boxes (virus or trojans) is that the biggest issue is that the OEM CD has been lost and then the key that they have, for a perfectly valid version of Windows, doesn't work for the "full" Windows CD that I (legally) have. So what is the solution? Phone MS Support? Hell they say its an OEM problem. Phone the OEM and they want to charge to ship a new replacement CD, or just don't care.

    So I'd say that a decent proportion of those "invalid" windows installs are actually perfectly valid but just suffering because a reinstall had to be done due to the MS security issues and couldn't be done from a CD that matched the key. You can actually get MS support (nice high cost phone number) to sort this out but it really isn't worth the pain, no doubt these days they'll be pushing a "Vista upgrade" as the solution.

    So WGA failure doesn't mean it isn't legal, just that the key you have doesn't match the CD that had to do the re-install.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  15. Re:Really? by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny
    Give me time.

    Oh, I think that's a little excessive. Confiscation of your computer and a public whipping would satisfy me.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  16. My policy is... by gillbates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those who insist on using proprietary operating systems get to pay for them. Yes, even when that means they pay with their time.

    If your copy of Windows won't validate, that's between you and Microsoft, my friend:

    • If you were using OSS, you wouldn't have this problem in the first place, and,
    • As much as I pity you, I can't help you. No, I'm not going to Google for an MS Keygen for you.
    • No, you can't "borrow" a Windows key from me. I don't have one.
    • No, I *really* can't help you. If your OS doesn't validate, there's nothing I can do. It's not just a matter of won't, but I can't.
    • If you think commercial software is so great, follow the commercial model of paying someone for support.

    Oh, and there's a Linux installfest this Thursday. If things between you and Bill don't work out, why don't you stop by and install a real 64 bit OS on your machine?

    But I do hate it for the gamers, man. What are they going to do?

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:My policy is... by toadlife · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Those who insist on using open source operating systems get to pay for them. Yes, that means they pay with their time.

      If your copy of Ubuntu won't play DVDs, that's between you and Google, my friend:

              * If you were using Windows Vista, you wouldn't have this problem in the first place, and,
              * As much as I pity you, I can't help you. No, I'm not going to Google for 'Ogle crashing' for you.
              * No, you can't "borrow" a Windows key from me. Go and buy your own.
              * No, I *really* can't help you. If your OS doesn't work, there's nothing I can do. It's not just a matter of won't, but I can't.
              * If you think open source software is so great, follow the open source model of RTFM and Googling.

      Oh, and there's a Windows UG meeting this Thursday. If things between you and Tux don't work out, why don't you stop by and install an OS with ISV and OEM support on your machine?

      But I do hate it for the gamers, man. What are they going to do?

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    2. Re:My policy is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes he does! Linux itself is a computer game. A very long text adventure game full of twisty passages, all alike. Want to know your score? >uptime

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    3. Re:My policy is... by molarmass192 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If your copy of Ubuntu won't play DVDs, that's between you and Google, my friend

      I know you're being funny, but last time I checked, Windows didn't play DVDs "out of the box" either. Try laying down a fresh XP or Vista install and playing a DVD. On that note, there is 1 "legal" way I know of to play DVDs on Linux, and (sadly) it's via the CNR ... as for no-so-legal ways ... umm ... Google!

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  17. Who are the 4 saps who are paying? by dwalsh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I kid. Really, I kid.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  18. Re:i dont think that word means what they think it by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Funny

    But virus-infected software is not. Maybe that's what this number is referring to.

  19. Re:A la Bash.org by Chapter80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know I tried to validate my VALID windows copy five times and failed each time. So I guess I'm one of the one-in-five. One valid copy that was unable to validate; five invalid attempts.

  20. Sucks to be in the 80% by dfay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if they plan to apologize to the 80% of their customers who got this system foisted on them without recourse (you have to enable WGA to get security fixes).

    Not to mention, the 20% must be either really stupid (I wonder if my Haxxored Windows copy will validate? Gee, let's try!) or, more likely, have misconfigured Windows systems or bugs in WGA that report them as invalid when they probably own a legitimate license.

    Great marketing strategy though: punish your legit user-base as the pirates work around your system. Can't wait to see how Vista improves things. I'm excited to see what "advantage" I'm "genuinely" going to get.

    Disclosure: I only allow WGA on my work machine, where I have little choice and didn't pay the license fee personally.

  21. 80% of Windows Installs are Genuine??? by WaZiX · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a lot...

  22. This is a statistic? by Gulik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Already (and, at the time I'm posting this, there are only around 25 comments), there are people talking about how copies of XP that they know they obtained legally fail to authenticate (so the reported piracy rate might be inflated), people pointing out, correctly, that even a modestly bright pirate will be smart enough not to try to authenticate when he knows it will fail (and so the estimated piracy rate might be too low), and people coming up with a smattering of other ways in which WGA could give false positives or negatives.

    It seems safe to say that Microsoft has no frelling clue how many pirated copies of XP are out there, and that WGA is approximately useless as a tool for trying to count them. Not that it will matter at all in the media -- "One In Five Windows Installs Is Non-Genuine" is too good a headline to pass up.

  23. Piracy by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    put 50 billion dollars into the man's pockets. What exactly is his complaint again? Piracy has also insured that Apple only gets 5 percent of the market. Why? Because it's rather difficult to bootleg the giant "Macintosh" dongle that apple attached to its software. Draw your own conclusions about the subject of piracy. For me, the numbers speak for themselves, quite loudly. Just adding to the chorus of voices in my head.

    --
    What?
  24. Re:Really? by x2A · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Oh, and apart from Windows: I don't pirate anything else"

    That's not pirated, that's plain old 100% classic stolen.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  25. Not hardly by davmoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    [AOL] Me too! [/AOL]

    If that's the only basis for Microsoft's estimate, they are *way* off, and I bet actually piracy isn't even half that.

    I have 5 different machines running XP. 3 of them insist they are pirated...even though I have receipts and valid license certificates bought from OfficeMax for two copies, and the third copy came installed with the machine when I bought it new out of the box. When I contacted Microsoft about this, their tech's response was words to the effect of "You'll have to buy valid copies again." My response was, and I quote, "Fuck you, I'll just crack WGA on my validly purchased copies that I already own, and I dare you assholes to try and prosecute."

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  26. Yes, but by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. How many installs are erroneously flagged as genuine?

    2. How many installs are erroneously flagged as not genuine?

    3. How many installs are not seen by WGA?

    4. How many of those are genuine/not genuine?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Yes, but by Alex_WGA+MSFT · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I work on the WGA team and I wanted to take a moment to answer a couple of these questions. Btw, I think these are great questions.

      1. How many installs are erroneously flagged as genuine?

      > We don't have specific numbers on that but the system has been designed to give the benefit of the doubt in many cases. We are also in the process of designing a 'yellow light' scenario where instead of simply giving the benefit of the doubt we will be able to offer specific information to the user about whatever didn't seem right with the system. We can then offer tools to help them to figure out whether their copy is properly licensed and genuine and fix the cases where the system appears non-genuine when it really is genuine.

      2. How many installs are erroneously flagged as not genuine?

      > Not very many, there's an article now on Information Week that indicates the number is in the millions. This number was calculated by taking a previously disclosed 'half of one percent' estimate of false positives against into the total number of validations (512 million). Calculating the false positive isn't quite that easy, the rate of false positives climbs and falls when issues are discovered then fixed. Given that the false positive scenarios are time bound in this way it's not right to just use that number as a lifetime average.

      3. How many installs are not seen by WGA?

      > As has been pointed out in numerous places probably many of those that are aware that their copy isn't licensed or genuine won't visit one of our sites that require validation or attempt to install an application (IE7, WMP11 etc.) that have validation built into their setup. How many systems don't we see? Hard to say but it's a point worth making.

      4. How many of those are genuine/not genuine?

      > Again, I don't know but it's still a good question.

      For more on this issue and others related to WGA visit my blog. http://blogs.msdn.com/wga/

  27. oh come on by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like SCO have managed to wangle some mod points on slashdot... anyone with a sense of humour and mod points like to mod that the way it should be?

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  28. Being legit is a pain by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Informative

    I currently have 4 machines running windows presently. Two desktops, two laptops. The laptops are quite legit, both came shipped with windows, Media center edition, and Pen edition. The desktops were not shipped with windows but have legit copies of XP pro on them.

    The laptops, i've only had issue with one, the Toshiba pen edition. I "wanted" to do a fresh install on a fresh drive, but didn't have the tablet edition, nor was downloading possible as no copy would take my legit key.

    Desktops, I've had NOTHING but issues. Motherboard upgrades, pre WGA systems would fail to authentiate. Post WGA systems in all fairness the warning was a tad more tolerant. I could browse the net, and get a resolution, well, except for the fact that on my via based board you needed to download the USB drivers, so alot of hassle to backup a system who's motherboard failed, who due to Nortons wouldn't mount under XP, just to get the same glitch when trying to transfer the old install to a new system.

    I understand what microsoft is doing. They are trying to prevent casual piracy, those casual pirates who would otherwise buy one copy and use on many machines are likely to just buy another copy. But what they are actually doing is encouraging people like my self to download a cracked version of xp pro corp.

    It would be "nice" if you could tell freaking windows "I bought new hardware, transfer this license". They can be control freaks till their hearts explode, so long as they continue to permit me to
    1) Backup my existing install of windows
    2) in the event of hardware failure, restore a backup, and have it work, or transfer the hard disk to another machine without assuming i've gone rogue.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  29. RE: Repeat Failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had three that failed, all of them HPs that I bought at Wal-Mart. Two of them failed multiple times, so they are now Linux-powered. The third one only fails if I download updates and try to run them instead of using Microsoft Update and automatic installation.

  30. Two invalid from major OEMs 50% of WGA fails valid by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do on-site computer repair. In the last 6 years, I have only seen the WGA notifier notify of two truly invalid copies of Windows. (In both cases, the user knew/acknowledged that their copy was likely not properly licensed.) In the same time, I've seen hardware from HP and Dell both come with a key that the MS program cites as invalid, and declares non-genuine. Both with their original OEM installs.

    So of WGA-flagged installs I have seen in the past few years, HALF were, in fact, valid installs that were flagged improperly. What was REALLY goofy is that one succeeded in re-activation, and even after re-activation, WGA still insisted it wasn't valid! (The other didn't need reactivation.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  31. Even if you own M$ it's easier to pirate it by justfred · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our company has Dell machines with the reg code right on the side. Since Windows gets garbaged up on a regular basis, it's necessary to reinstall. Who knows where our original discs went, but I've got Windows 2000 discs (don't dare to use XP, especially since it's of no benefit) - but they don't recognize the Dell serial number. So I log on to the net, find a pirate serial number, and the rest of the install goes fine. We freaking own these machines, and licences for them. And by the way, the cd rom drives had been updated to cdrw but the machine didn't know how to boot off those. And some brilliant engineer had the idea to reformat the machines by sticking working hard drives from other (same exact model) machines, of course that didn't work either.

    Meanwhile, on my Macs, I'm continuing to be productive. No serial numbers necessary. Hard drive swap works. Any cd I plug in just works, no drivers. And no looking up install/driver/whatever procedures on arcane Linux/BSD sites either.

  32. Re:Really? by dlim · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's also theft. Did you miss the part where he lifted it from his employer?

  33. idiots by lewis2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've bought/built about 20 PCs for personal use over the years. I bought retail or retail upgrades for each machine (I have 3 concurrent licenses in total). Recently I got a SMART warning and swapped a data drive. I had to talk to a Microsoft support person to get a new license key as the one that came with my install CD didn't work. I since then had to swap the system drive and submitted a support request b/c it won't run windows update and they assigned me a case # a month ago and haven't called back. Fortunately for the community I know Microsoft's machines - even when patched - are a risk so I don't allow them on the public network without a firewall (openbsd in my case). However they should know better than to prevent a paying customer from applying their patches.

  34. Re:A la Bash.org by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Feh. I don't bother with WGA. Check out http://www.windizupdate.com

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  35. False.. by a16 · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you're saying is simply not true.

    It's true that MSDN AA licenses are "restricted" in that you can't use them for commercial use, and you can't use new licenses/new installs after you leave an institution that is part of an MSDN AA program.

    However they specifically state that you may continue using already installed software for as long as you wish after you leave your program, as long as you keep to the original non commercial rules - ie. follow the original license requirements. Therefore if they're marking an install as non-genuine, they aren't keeping to their own agreement. What I suspect happened here is that an institution has been giving out the shared media with a shared key, which isn't how it works (or at least not how it works wherever I've seen this) - students can share installation media but should still be granted individual keys by the MSDN AA administrator.

    1. Re:False.. by mandelbr0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Therefore if they're marking an install as non-genuine, they aren't keeping to their own agreement Yes, that was exactly the point I was making. Please read my disclaimer more carefully; I am referring to the fact that Microsoft has some very cleverly worded license agreements that appear from experience to suggest that Microsoft doesn't keep to their own agreement. I agree that the spirit of the AA license agreement claims to allow you to keep the software after you finish school. However, you do not receive installation media in case your OS installation fails which mine did after 4 months. Therefore, their license agreement effectively allowed them to terminate my license agreement after 4 months by disabling my software. Of course, if I'd cared I could have borrowed the disks and installed again. However, a deliberate error in the burned CD that I borrowed made copying effectively impossible to even a reasonably competent user. I didn't really feel like following up in a courtroom since I don't have years of my life or millions of dollars to waste on an OS I don't care about.
      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    2. Re:False.. by a16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, you do not receive installation media in case your OS installation fails which mine did after 4 months.
      You might not have, but I certainly did - and I'm fairly certain most MSDN AA members should be able to. I've got a standard issue MS printed XP CD in a wallet with my own unique license in front of me, which cost me £7 in postage. I've also got an MS supplied Vista business DVD .iso and a copy burned to DVD in front of me, along with a unique Vista Business license key. Infact, I've got two - for some reason they let me order both the CD and DVD download, and have given me two license keys.

      Most european establishments that I've encountered seem to give their users access to the MSDN AA e-academy site to manage licenses etc, whereas I've noticed that for some reason most US establishments go for the "lend a CD out to everyone" approach, and often with the same license key. This is where I'm presuming some of the problems might be starting - I'm not entirely sure these places should have been sharing a key for all machines, even if their license agreement with MS allows their students to install copies - they are probably still supposed to have a unique key per student. But I suppose in the pre-genuine advantage crap days, this was less of an issue.
  36. Re:A la Bash.org by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    False positives? Lots. I changed my mobo, video card, dvd twice in the course of repairing and upgrading the same beige box (hey, I like that case!) and ran out of "genuine advantage" brownie points somewhere. I really, really did not appreciate having to replace XP.

    Yes, I should know better. Wish SoE would provide a decent Vanguard SOH port to Linux...

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  37. Define Genuine by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is similar to my situation. I upgrade often but only had one working desktop at a time. Now I use the Windows "Flea Market" distro, but my pirate status isn't so clear cut. I have one computer and I've purchased one XP license.

    I have to wonder how many people fall into my category. If anything, this 1-in-5 statistic is an indictment WGA and it's reliability in determining whether or not you are "Genuine".

  38. Re:Sampling? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I doubt many geeks have non-genuine Windows installs. My Thinkpad has a small Windows XP partition on it for playing a few old games (although WINE is rapidly making even the obsolete). It is 100% legal, however, even though I didn't pay a penny for it. It's not like Microsoft makes it hard to get a free copy of Windows if you look a bit like you might be writing code on it and strengthening their vendor lock-in...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  39. Re:A la Bash.org by Jjeff1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    False positive rate?
    Not sure, but we do work for schools. I walked in to a computer lab one day, and saw perhaps 5 out of 30 machines with a stupid WGA error message. Mind you, all of these machines were the identical model PC, purchased at the same time, imaged at the same time, with the exact same WinXP disk image and the exact same internet access.
    Based on that, I'd say their 22% rate is just about accurate, though not for the reasons they think.

  40. Re:Couldn't msft have stopped pirating long ago? by Shados · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The vast, vast majority of piracy, from my experience, doesn't come from blackhats using hexeditors in their spare times wanting a free ride: It comes from moms and pops who don't know any better. If microsoft just stops THOSE, the leftovers "hardcores" (the ones that will spend all night on shady web sites and IRC looking for cracks and anonymous FTPs, or making the cracks themselves, etc) are most likely negligeable in numbers.

    Its the 80/20 rule. If Microsoft can stop 80 percents of the piracy, with 20 percent of the effort, its worth it. Stopping the last 20% would cost more than the money they'd make otherwise, especialy if you consider, like you said, that a lot of those wouldn't even use it otherwise. And Microsoft (I actualy think it was Bill Gates) did publicly say before: "If they're going to pirate softwares, we'd rather they pirate ours". It makes sense: Mindshare is worth more than customers, in a way.

  41. Re:A la Bash.org by Schemat1c · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really, really did not appreciate having to replace XP. All you had to do was call Microsoft and they would have validated you over the phone. I know it's a pain but it's better than paying them twice for the same piece of software.
    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  42. Re:A la Bash.org by basscomm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a similar thing happen to me, upgraded one too many times in X number of days. However, I called Microsoft's telephone activation (per the dialog box that popped up), gave them the code that Windows gave me, assured the guy on the other end that I only had XP installed on one machine, and they gave me a code to activate.

    --
    http://crummysocks.com
  43. Re:A la Bash.org by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why did you replace XP? I've upgraded plenty and invalidated my copy of windows. It took an annoying 30 minute phone call to convince M$ that I was legit, but in the end they've always validated me. I even have the same copy running on two different machines, and i've never had a problem with them validating them over the phone. It seems that if you have any kind of semi-reasonable explanation they don't ask too many questions.

    --
    I got nothin'
  44. Re:A la Bash.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Search google...

    "wga crack" ext:bittorrent

    Solves the problem, and puts the WGA numbers back where they should be.

    I distribute a miniCD to friends that fix that WGA problems with windows XP.

  45. Re:Really? by mollymoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never bothered with XP at all, precisely because of this product activation crap. But I too did the right thing, and legally bought a Mac. Curiously, I then started paying for all my (commercial) software - perhaps because I am older and richer than I was, but I think not having an adversarial relationship with my computer and not feeling like I was being fucked over by an abusive monopolist helped too.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  46. Re:A la Bash.org by binarybum · · Score: 5, Funny

    "All you had to do was call Microsoft and they would have validated you over the phone"

        That's such a creepy statement. You are not valid without microsoft's consent... fortunately, for your convenience, you may be validated by telephone.
      For an additional $199, Bill Gates will baptize you over the phone.

    --
    ôó
  47. Re:A la Bash.org by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Funny

    For an additional $199, Bill Gates will baptize you over the phone. That's cheaper than the church charges.
    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  48. Re:A la Bash.org by McGiraf · · Score: 2, Funny

    me too!

  49. Identical copies of virtual machine installs fail. by OgGreeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm using Parallels Desktop on my Mac Pro with a bought XP full license, and
    every once in a while the OS in the VM will require reactivation when booted.
    The first time I did this I went through the online activation, the second
    time it wouldn't reactivate and I had to go through the Microsoft phone operator.

    Now when it happens I just restore from a copy of the VM file and keep going. The
    virtual machine environment should present the same hardward configuration and system ID
    to the OS, shouldn't it?

    --
    -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
  50. Re:Sampling? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny
    I doubt many geeks have non-genuine Windows installs.

    Oh you've got to be kidding. This is the hight of Slashdot delusional thinking. You know as well as I do that the primary source of cracked XP is geeks. Same with cracked Photoshop and all the rest. Next thing, you'll be telling me that no one here has any pirated music.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  51. No need for Automatic Updates or WGA by Darthmalt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just use Auto Patcher

  52. Re:Really? by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, I think that's a little excessive. Confiscation of your computer and a public whipping would satisfy me. For stealing windows or for using it in the first place?
  53. how could so many pirate windows? by philipgar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least in this country, I find these numbers extremely hard to believe. Mostly because the vast majority of machines sold come with windows preinstalled on them. How do people then pirate it? I guess some people illegally upgrade their version to a newer one, but most people who have computers don't seem to know enough to be capable of doing this. There are the friends who might do this for them, but that doesn't seem too likely, as most people are content with their computer. . . As long as everything still works.

    There's the key I guess. Most people don't care for their computer, and it shows, over time the install goes to hell, getting viruses spyware, etc. Then they may get a friend to come over and help them, and the friend may install a pirated version of windows, maybe a fancier one, maybe the same type (but not the same copy), or maybe even the same copy.

    This is illegal . . . technically, but hard to really say it is, as the people do have the right to use windows on their computer, and that's often the only way they can.

    With windows XP at least, I wouldn't doubt if more copies of it have been sold than their are copies currently in use! It seems like a crazy statement, but considering how many companies buy machines with windows preinstalled, and then install their site licensed copy on the machine. Plus how many people have had machines get outdated, or crippled, or break on them, and bought a new computer to replace it. How many copies of windows were thrown out because of that?

    I can't speak for other countries, as I'm sure there are places where piracy runs rampant, and you can easily buy computers without windows preinstalled, or with an illegitimate copy installed, but in the US this generally isn't the case. Maybe MS should take these figures into account and say something like "-30% of windows copies in the US are pirated", after taking into account the anti-pirated cases of double licenses etc. Of course, things don't really work that way.

    Now other software I imagine the number is much higher. What percentage of copies of office are less than legitimate? I imagine those are much higher, and a 20-30% install base being illegal wouldn't be too far off. of course, even here with so many copies sold to businesses, it dillutes the home market that's far more likely to pirate software than corporate ones (people can get in far less trouble generally).

    Phil

  54. Offtopic but a reply to your post... by adisakp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I clicked on the link in your sig and I have some constructive criticism to offer your company.

    > Photoshop has 20+ layer modes. We offer 70+ at 10% the cost. [blackbeltsystems.com]

    Wow is that web-page UGLY. You'd think that a company offering image manipulation software would know enough about imaging to not have such an ugly webpage. Especially annoying shit like

    * blue text on two slightly different blue backgrounds for the navigation links
    * metalled embossed hard to read fonts as headers
    * "link-heavy" text with more links than text (put it into a list of feature links)
    * multi-column text that goes off-page requiring "back-scrolling" to read
    * juvenile snipes at vague competitors rather than professional and objective feature comparisons
    * overuse of exclamation points! Especially in testimonials! No Really!
    * prominent google ads for a site trying to sell commercial software

    For punishment, I suggest you make your web-page designer navigate this site for an hour or two: http://corson.tv/main/buttugly.htm

    1. Re:Offtopic but a reply to your post... by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      Programmers should be artists if they are making a art program.

      Duh.

    2. Re:Offtopic but a reply to your post... by jackbird · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I do understand the product (full-time 3D artist/compositor/TD), and I agree with the GP.

      I even considered taking your product for a spin, but if you can't be arsed to hire a web designer to sell image manipulation software, I can't be arsed to take you seriously.

      I hereby deduct one point from your diatribe's validity score for presuming that programmers are artists. Then hire an artist. If OSS applications can get volunteers to make great icons, and sometimes even a useable UI, your commercial software company has no excuse. In addition to the webpage, those Windows 3.1-esque giant icon buttons in the UI have got to go. Oh, and the shitty fractal terrain example images, too (it's 2007, and terragen 2 is coming. Hell, Terragen 1 from years ago looks loads better, and it's free/cheap.) You claim big clients, show big results.

      I deduct another point for not addressing product issues. Production artists have to ramp up on lots of applications quickly. Showing off a cluttered mess of a UI on an unreadable webpage with horrible dayglo fractal sample images in the screenshots does not give me confidence in the production-worthiness or ease of use of your tool. If you want to reach people, consider explaining why your morpher is a better option than Combustion, Fusion, Shake, or even an ancient copy of Elastic Reality from the top shelf in the closet, for example. Another example is that when examining your 70+ layer modes, fully half of the first ten should really be composed of multiple operators, both to increase flexibility and to reduce clutter (why should I have to memorize, and pick from, a list of 70, if half of them are "inverted foo"? Why layers instead of nodes, for that matter, if you're touting a powerful procedural compositor with a robust scripting language?)
      Perhaps the most glaring red flag is the lack of a user-to-user forum. That suggests either that nobody is using the software, or that you don't want people talking to each other about it.

      I deduct another point for characterizing your criticism as "constructive" when it was simply an opportunity to bluster about web pages. I just suggested some positive steps you can take. So did the GP, for that matter. Harsh criticism is a day-to-day reality of the industry you're serving, and people who take it personally wdon't tend to last long. Don't get mad, you're getting valuable feedback from your target market.

      Finally, I deduct another point for being offtopic. Since I'm replying to your reply, it's on-topic now.

      HAND.

      Make a case that your software will make artists lives easier and more productive, with great sample images and clear feature examples, and you just might have a hit.

  55. Re:A la Bash.org by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's the false positive rate? I don't know any exact figures. But I do work in a PC repair shop, and here's what I've seen personally. Out of dozens of PC's we've worked on that came up as not having "genuine" Windows XP, we've had about one or two that actually had illegal copies installed. The rest were all false positives. Even worse, I've personally tested an illegal copy and it passed the WGA with flying colors. Didn't even have to pull any special tricks or use hacks.

    So personally, I would have to say any figures Microsoft gives on this aren't even close to accurate.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  56. Re:A la Bash.org by lukas84 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you sure they were really false positives?

    Most problems with XP i've seen so far are machines that do have a valid Pro OEM Key to be installed with a (well known pirate) VLP Pro Key.

    This problem was mostly caused by lazy pc repair shops and neighboorhood kids.

  57. Re:A la Bash.org by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This problem was mostly caused by lazy pc repair shops and neighboorhood kids.
    I can well belive that,

    Its going to be so much less effort to stick in a slipstreamed pirate CD and enter your standard pirate VLK than to try and find the correct big brand oem recovery CD and try to convince it to work in a way that didn't wipe the entire system and leave it loaded with shitware or to use a generic oem CD and try to convince MS to activate the result.

    At the end of the day time is money and doing it the legit way is so much more effort!

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register