Slashdot Mirror


British Police Identify Killer in Radiation Case

reporter writes "According to a front-page story by The Guardian, British authorities have identified Andrei Lugovoi to be the murderer who used radioactive pollonium-210 to kill Andrei Litvinenko. The British government will ask Moscow to extradite Lugovoi. The Guardian states: 'Associates of the dead man have repeatedly accused President Vladimir Putin's government of being behind his murder, a claim the Kremlin rejects. While it is known that detectives believe they have uncovered evidence pointing to Mr Lugovoi's involvement, it is not clear whether they have established a motive for the murder'"

26 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. We should be defending the Plutonium killer by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 4, Funny

    because not only is he interested in high tech assassination, he's also in favor of Open Sores.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  2. Tracked by his radioactive trail by spun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Haha! Busted. He left a radioactive trail all over London, even in an airplane he travelled on. He's the only person who can be tied to all the locations they've found traces of radioactive polonium. Of course, he's claiming someone set him up by following him around and dropping the stuff wherever he went. We'll see if the Russians will hand him over. If they don't, it's gonna look mighty suspicious. If they do, he's gonna say Putin put him up to it, whether he did or not.

    The UK may have to hand over a scummy billionaire who profited immensely off of the rush to privatize Russia, which would be cool: two scumbags busted for the price of one.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Tracked by his radioactive trail by residue · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Berezovsky is actually not a scumbag -- he never did anything outrageously illegal, just the usual machinations necessary in a lawless nation like Russia to make any money. Contrast this with the Stalin-esque purgings of dissenting voices that are rampant in Russia these days.

      At the same time, he has stood for the liberalization of the media and government structures, for which he was ordered exterminated by Litvinenko. In a tyrannical atmosphere that is Russia right now, that deserves a lot of credit.

    2. Re:Tracked by his radioactive trail by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Could we trade Darl McBride to the Russians in exchange for... well ...let's give him to them for free.

    3. Re:Tracked by his radioactive trail by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      What??

      He openly provided funds to Chechen terrorists. He openly declared his plans to violently overthrow Russian government. If both of these are legal, then I'm Santa Claus.

    4. Re:Tracked by his radioactive trail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can I have a pony?

  3. Implications for British Power by TigerTim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is a real test case of whether the notion of the UK as a nation holds any actual power in the World. The Russian constitution, as I understand it, obliges the Russian government NOT to render Russian citizens for extradition, despite the fact that in Britain the defendent will assuredly recieve a fair trial (either in the UK or by analogy to the Lockerbie case, in a third country).

    If the Russian government DID sponsor an assassination within British territory, it is an affront to our sovereignty and should be exposed. If on the other hand it was NOT, then it is equally desirable that the Russian government be cleared of that.

    If the UK does not take a strong, principled stand on this issue, then I feel that our identity of "British" is very probably meaningless.

    1. Re:Implications for British Power by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

      To the people with the power on display here, the terms "British" and "Russian", you name it, don't exist. They don't see it that way. They have a target, location, and a date and time and that's the only thing that matters. They are not distracted by such ubsurdities as "sovereignty" and "identity". And we shouldn't be either when going after them. Bah, What am I talking about? The CIA and other allied intelligence agencies already operate that way. As a matter of fact, isn't this a case of the pot calling...? You know...like are there no British agents operating outside their borders in a clandestine manner? Taking part in "targeted" assasinations?

      --
      What?
  4. ya right by mastershake_phd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    10:1 this guy dies mysteriously or disappears.

    1. Re:ya right by mastershake_phd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually I was trying to suggest the Russians would kill him.

  5. He ASKED for this... by Karganeth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was absolutely no need for the James Bond style assasination. Why not just shoot the bugger using a silencer? Advantages of using a gun:

    1. Weapon doesn't decay.
    2. Don't need to visit a nuclear reactor (which will have very restricted access on) to get one.
    3. Doesn't leave a HUGE trail of everywhere you have been with it.
    4. Less chance of target surving long enough to give full description of you.

    This assasination was far too elaborate...

    1. Re:He ASKED for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There were many less obvious and easier ways to do it.

      It seems apparent that it was the assassin's intension to show that it was an assassination by a well connected person, and to get a lot of media attention. They also wanted him to die slowly and make his accusations.

      It seems likely the assassination is associated with Putin, committed by either a supporter or an opponent. A supporter might make others more fearful of dissidence. It would also end his speaking out against the administration, but his assassination probably raised more attention than what he did while he was alive, especially internationally. An opponent would have the obvious advantage of making his enemy look like a murderer.

  6. Can we fix the headline? by Stonent1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could we change the Slashdot headline to say they have charged someone. Legally a representative of the police or any legal branch of a government, would not say "We've identified the killer". It is up to the courts to decide if he killed someone, not the police. The police can only supply evidence to the prosecutor and a jury will decide if he did it or not.

  7. It's just politics and diplomacy by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect the Russian government knows full well that the British Government can't hand over Boris Berezovsky. That's why they're likely to make the request. It's not, on the face of it, unreasonable. Just legally impossible. But Britain's "refusal" to hand him over will mean that Russia has a better bargaining position. They can push Britain into offering an alternative of greater value.

    1. Re:It's just politics and diplomacy by ParraCida · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No way in hell is the UK going to give something to Russia in this particular case. I mean, just imagine the situation if the UK now pulls of some sort of exchange with Russia for this guy: he's going to continue denying that he did it, even if found guilty Russia will deny all allegations and accuse the brittish government for orchestrating these false charges, they get to have Litvinenko dead AND they get something else in return for someone they don't really care about anyway.

      Fact of the matter is, Russia trounced on the UK's sovereignty and did it with a lot of noise. The UK essentially got humiliated and they are going to have to apply negative leverage over Russia in order to get that guy in order to save face. Since the UK actually is a lot more powerful economically speaking and have a lot more say in organizations such as the WTO and EU they are in a position to put a lot of hurt on Russia for this, if they would really want too.

  8. A better question by thule · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Should it even be a homicide investigation or a smuggling investigation? Why would anyone poison someone with many more times the amount required to kill them with a material that is so expensive and easy to trace? There are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay easier ways to kill someone. Ways that would garner much less attention.

    Why poison the person multiple times when one time would be enough? We know it's multiple times because the police believe it to be multiple exposures. How would they know this unless the decay or signatures were different between exposures?

    The amount is very puzzling. The amount is a huge amount of the material. It was so much that it left a blemish in the tea cup. Something on orders of 100 watts of heat from the Po-210.

    I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but it seems to me there has to be much more to this story. What were these guys really up to?

    1. Re:A better question by ptbarnett · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why would anyone poison someone with many more times the amount required to kill them with a material that is so expensive and easy to trace? There are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay easier ways to kill someone. Ways that would garner much less attention.

      And that's exactly why I believe this method was used.

      No individual or even group would have been able to get that much polonium, without at least the tacit approval of a government with a sufficiently advanced nuclear program. The list of potential suppliers is very short.

      This was a message, which is very clear to dissenters and critics: you can't hide. We can get to you, or at least those that are close to you, no matter where you are.

    2. Re:A better question by thule · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why multiple exposures? Why so sloppy? Why use so much? They could have used a *much*, *much*, *much* smaller amount and still have made the same statement. Why was there so much of the stuff all around, but only a small amount (by a large measure) made it into the target of the assassination? It just doesn't add up. It seems like these guys were up to something else.

  9. Actually, it was perfect assissination by blantonl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, it was a perfect assassination. Did you see how the guy perished? All his hair fell out. He sat in a hospital bed for a tremendous amount of time. He suffered. He bled internally.

    Why was it a perfect assassination? Because it involved radiation which inherently causes anyone to shiver, and it caused a slow, painful, agonizing death, which sends about as big of a message as publicly drawing and quartering the guy.

    --
    Lindsay Blanton
    RadioReference.com
  10. Andrei's reply by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

    You arrest me, and I will irradiate you all! Muhahahaha... enjoy your sushi, judge!(disappears in a cloud of green phosphorescent smoke)

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. Mod Parent Up by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Already, the Russians are claiming that it's against their Constitution to allow extraditions. (Read the last paragraph in the article.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  12. Billionaire by Morosoph · · Score: 3, Informative

    The UK may have to hand over a scummy billionaire who profited immensely off of the rush to privatize Russia, which would be cool: two scumbags busted for the price of one. This billionaire might indeed be scummy, but he wouldn't receive a fair trial, according to English Courts, so extradition is off. As the article says, the Russians will, most likely, not accept this as an excuse.

    In fact, this is the whole problem: to Russia, the concept of an independent judiciary is not credible.

  13. Re:Uh, postage costs for radioactive items? by tbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disclaimer: IAAP (I Am A Physicist)

    Just think - if you could buy as much polonium 210 as what was used against Litvinenko, do you really think that any postage service would want to deliver a radioactive package?

    Actually, Polonium 210 is an alpha emitter, which means it's quite safe unless you ingest or inhale it (at which point even small amounts become deadly). Just putting it in a paper bag would shield you from much of the radiation. As long as it was securely packaged, I don't think it would be unsafe to mail.

  14. Re:Summary From A Former Soviet Citizen by ezh · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here are the poll results of exUSSR citizens that live abroad (mostly in Ireland). Lots of them think it was FSB that killed Litvinenko, but majority actually think it was an accident (Lugovoi and Litvinenko were smuggling radioactive materials from Russia). Poll options one by one:
    1. Federal Security Bureau
    2. Russian Mafia that Litvinenko tried to blackmail
    3. Suicide to blame Putin
    4. Americans or other enemies of Russia
    5. Accident when smuggling radioactive materials
    Option #5 seems to be the most popular one. I know this poll is not very representative, but it certainly beats your coworker's opinion... Tschuss...
  15. Re:YRO? by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the hey does this have to do with Your Rights Online?
    Online is a code word for electricity, and electricity is produced by nuclear power plants, and where there's nuclear power plants, there's plutonium, and plutonium was used to poison the Russian guy, and killing Russians is not allowed in Britain, and things that aren't allowed are written down in the Law, and the Law sets out your Rights, for values of your which are compatible with whichever Law applies, so that's why Your is capitalized.

    But Britain is an industrialized society, so I don't think it's got anything to do with hay or hey as it's sometimes written.

  16. Litvinenko's Book by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As detailed in Litvinenko's book (with Yuri Felshtinsky) published right after he was poisoned to death _Blowing Up Russia_, Russia's KGB (by whatever new name disguises it) has been working against the conversion to democracy, especially since KGB exec Putin replaced Yeltsin the drunken reformer. According to Litvinenko before he died (reported in the book), he was being chased and then killed for reporting on the faked 1999 "apartment bombings" in Moscow and elsewhere in Russia which the KGB staged to get Yeltsin to invade Chechnya on the pretext of "Islamic terrorism". The book is banned (and was confiscated) in Russia.

    "Think. It ain't illegal yet." - George Clinton with Funkadelic

    --

    --
    make install -not war