Slashdot Mirror


Water From Wind

ghostcorps recommends a writeup in The Australian by columnist Phillip Adams about a new windmill design that extracts water from air. The article gives few details of how it works, because patent protection is not yet in place, but what is revealed sounds promising. "[Max] Whisson's design has many blades, each as aerodynamic as an aircraft wing, and each employing 'lift' to get the device spinning... They don't face into the wind like a conventional windmill; they're arranged vertically, within an elegant column, and take the wind from any direction... The secret of Max's design is how his windmills, whirring away in the merest hint of a wind, cool the air as it passes by... With three or four of Max's magical machines on hills at our farm we could fill the tanks and troughs, and weather the drought. One small Whisson windmill on the roof of a suburban house could keep your taps flowing. Biggies on office buildings, whoppers on skyscrapers, could give independence from the city's water supply. And plonk a few hundred in marginal outback land — specifically to water tree-lots — and you could start to improve local rainfall."

23 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Interested.... by SQLGuru · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Things I would like to know:

    1. Does this design perform better than other windmill designs (for generation).
    2. What will this do to the atmospheric conditions?
    3. If everyone has one....will it no longer rain?

    Layne

    1. Re:Interested.... by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, and if you put the windmill high enough, can you also generate considerable electricity with the water as gravity brings it down to the ground?

      Layne

    2. Re:Interested.... by misleb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm guessing that it is more of a constant trickle. Doubt it would generate much electricity. Might as well try to build a dam at the curb of your street to generate electricity from teh water flowing into the sewers :P

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    3. Re:Interested.... by danpat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another post already mentioned this, but it's all to do with pressure. See this:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airfoil

      when air moves over something like an airfoil, a low pressure area is created.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_gas_law

      Generally, when you drop the pressure, the temperature will also drop. A drop in temperature will likely lead to condensation, which this device puports to gather.

    4. Re:Interested.... by belligerent0001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Might as well try to build a dam at the curb of your street to generate electricity from teh water flowing into the sewers :P"

      That idea stinks....but it's crazy enough that it just might work. There is always water flowing in the sewars, hook up a few thousand paddle wheels attached to a generator and you could probably power a few streetlights. Or, maybe a heating coil under the street surface to melt snow and ice.

      --
      "...a civilian some of the time, a soldier part of the time and a patriot all of the time." -Brig. Gen. James Drain
    5. Re:Interested.... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stick with the first one. If the blades are vertical (not all that new in itself), then the condensate can simply run down into a collector. Also note that this condensation will warm the air ever so slightly, contributing to global warming :-)

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Interested.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I do not believe this is a scam - roughly 15 years ago or so a bunch of guys and me built a couple of scale models of vertical mills with aerofoil blades generating lift, the mill both faced windward in whatever direction the wind decided to come from as well as spun faster than a bat out of hell to put it mildly, quite a lot faster than the windspeed if built correctly is quite possible - These mills will basically blaze away!!!

      Unfortunately we never got around to putting any form of electricity generation equipment or water/warmpumps rotor concept onto them as we planned (maelstroems/turbolence in the water to extract the potential energy)

        - We have for years been putting off finishing the half built full size mill parked in the basement, maybe it's time to find the right bearings that can take the correct angle of pressure etc. and slam that hunk of junk together and start generating some $$$ from the savings as well as doing something right for the environment.

      And the neat thing is that we have independent witnesses from several countries who can back us up regarding what we built and the principles involved so there will be no patent BS to stop us from doing whatever we'd like with our concept.

      So No - I do not for one second believe this might be a scam, but I hope the guy simply decides to share his idea freely as his earnings will be far higher than mere money when the chips fall. Heck he could surely make quite some cash if he spoke to the right people - no need for patents - just get production started - If the concept is as revulutionizing as the article mentions then the need will far exceed production capabilities anyway - plenty to take from.

      He could in life as well as later be remembered as a pioneer - And if the concept is realized as a stroke of genious - people might just listen to the next thing he might hatch.

      Just my two cents...

    7. Re:Interested.... by BoRegardless · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whisson; Maxwell Edmund has at least 15 U.S. patents issued over 20 years.

      Easy to check for yourself. Unfortunately that does not give info on air-water systems, and there is no info in searching the Patent Applications yet.

      If you want to get water out of air, you need to cool a surface to condense out water or reduce the air pressure to cause RH to go to 100% to condense out @ ambient temperature, or you can use hygroscopic materials to absorb water directly out of the air, but then you have to extract the water from that material.

      I think it was the Chilean military that figured out how to set up a "spiderweb" at night in the Atacama desert & water would condense out on the fibers and drain into a can, to support military in the field.

      We will have to wait on Max's details it sounds like.

    8. Re:Interested.... by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The process of separating the hydrogen could be powered by the wind-generated electricity it would seem."

      The energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells is roughly 50%. That means that if you put 100W into splitting the output water into hydrogen and oxygen, the resulting fuel cell would produce 50W. Seeing as generator efficiency can be as low as 80% due to heat losses, that means you would get about 40% of the wind energy in the form of electricity when you go to use the fuel cell.

      Now, if you're talking about using it as a charger for your fuel cells (like a Niven's CARM), you could probably buffet it with solar paint (low efficiency, but no engineering cost) and have a working charger in light or wind, and it would be kinda useful. Still, you'd do better to save the water for something else and pump the electricity directly into an ultracapacitor or other type of high-power battery.

      "imagine giving a portable version of this to sailors. If you could create drinking water and electricity from this while floating on the ocean that would be a real life saver."

      First off, I'm going to guess that a 'portable' version would be problematic; make a windmill too small, and it doesn't generate enough power to run a vibrator. Second, there are many, less cumbersome ways to power a portable distiller, including an old-school type evaporative distiller.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  2. Free Dry Land! by nbannerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Excellent, so now anyone living near, but not in a city can enjoy a barren landscape when the rain no longer falls.

    Alright, sarcasm aside, surely there are bound to be some less-than-good effects on the surrounding enviroment if large amounts of water are 'sucked' out of the atmosphere prematurely?

    1. Re:Free Dry Land! by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was originally inclined to agree with you, until I thought about the fact that populated areas already interfere with the environment to a noticable degree. You have air conditioners making the outdoor air warmer and removing humidity. You have concrete and pavement that artificially hold heat way after sundown and much longer than normal soil would, and on and on.

      I can't see how a few hundred of these things, placed strategically would have any more of a negative impact than these factors. In fact, they could potentially be a sort of a civilization mitigator in a way. Someone please correct me if my thinking is wrong here.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Free Dry Land! by CodeShark · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, this is most likely not true.

      Here's why: Assume for the sake of argument that you can remove 20% of the water vapor over the 2-1/2 or so Meters above your house in a given day. And that all the houses in the big city do the same thing. Most of the water will go where? down the toilet or sink eventually, or perhaps be put into a garden, etc. where much of the moisture will re-evaporate. Now then, a reasonable assumption is that what goes down the toilet or sink gets put through the local sewage treatment plant or into a local septic field -- where, guess what -- it re-evaporates.

      Secondarily, that 2-1-/2 meters of 20% more-dehumidified air is only maybe 1/100th of what is available under the weather, but even so, as the moisture re-distributes from the other 99%, assume it generates a little wind. Ultimately pulls say 1% more moist air in from the sea, soaks up some heat in the atmosphere, but if there is a constant drain that moisture will keep coming toward your city. Providing more wind energy to produce power and rain, etc. Not dry areas.

      Let me know what you think.

      --
      ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  3. Wow. by foxtrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We can now turn the Australian Outback into Tattooine. We now have vaporators!

  4. Bad idea by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One small Whisson windmill on the roof of a suburban house could keep your taps flowing. Biggies on office buildings, whoppers on skyscrapers, could give independence from the city's water supply.

    And enough of them and the humidity of the air will drop, reducing all of these miracle machines to a trickle. Probably not good for the local plant and wildlife, too. Rain is important.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  5. Re:Something doesn't add up... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, condensing water from the air to water trees, from which some of the water will transpire back to the atmosphere, might improve local rainfall? Is that like the "lose money on every sale, but we make it up in volume" line? :)

    No, it's more that this windmill does what trees in a rainforest are already doing. Israel noticed this some time ago, and spent most of the 1960s and 1970s on something similar, though theirs was based on water pumped out of salinated lakes and the Medditeranian, and placed in desalination tanks. The fresh water was used for tree farms, that created more rainfall by cooling the air.

    Therefore, the windmill in this situation is just a placeholder for what the trees will do anyway once they're mature enough.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  6. sum zero gain by jsepeta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the article states that with these windmills, water will be replenished into the air from the oceans. how do we know this? how was this proven?

    and if the water content of oceans diminishes, the salt content increases proportionately. that would threaten to bring dramatic change to the fragile balance of the environment for marine life.

    when man plays with mother nature, we almost inevitably come out on the losing end.
    * drain the swamps in new orleans, then lose 60% of the land's ability to absorb water.
    * introduce pest-killing amphibians to the everglades, then they procreate without preditors and wipe out existing species.
    * water the deserts of nevada to make lush golf courses, then people in colorado go thirsty and firemen can't put out historically large forest fires covering hundreds of thousands of acres.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:sum zero gain by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Okay, just a few counterpoints here..

      water will be replenished into the air from the oceans. how do we know this? how was this proven?

      Air can only hold a certain amount of water, known as the saturation point. Saturation is the reason water stops evaporating, not the speed of the evaporation process. That is to say, if the air is drier, evaporation will easily keep up to bring it back to the saturation point. The humidity will be replenished, unless the sun stops shining.

      if the water content of oceans diminishes, the salt content increases proportionately.

      Ok, this might be a topic best saved for a more advanced lesson, but water does not disappear once you drink it and/or bathe with it. All water eventually flows back to the sea. This was covered in such educational films as "Finding Nemo."

  7. Venturi Effect by reyalpdemannu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some reason, the technology described just reminds me of a venturi nozzle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venturi

  8. So no one understands climates? by DrChuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Understand that moisture content in the air is established by temperature and pressure. There is water in Australia, its just not dropping out of the sky. If you extract moisture from the air, then when that air is in the presence of liquid water it will induce some evaporation. That being said, this system could work either by using the reduced pressure from the airfoil surface or more likely by actually creating some compression and then having a decompression path for the air that goes through a condenser. All that being said, I was in Australia a couple of months ago and speaking as someone from California I'd say that if they put flow restrictors on their faucets it would do them a world of good. Sure taking a shower in a 6gpm shower is luxurious but really, do you really care about conserving water if you let your water run free like that? Low flow toilets? Nope. Granted I was mostly in the cities (Sydney, Canberra, etc) but still it seemed there wasn't a lot of "internalizing" what it means to live in a drought. --C

  9. Many side effects by Zanix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I see there will be many side effects of such a system. First, as many have mentioned, it will pull moisture out of the air. This means that there will be less moisture downwind and with enough of these windmills, a dry region. That said, though, taking moisture out of the air increase the amount of room in the air for more moisture and thereby would allow evaporation downwind to be more efficient. On the other hand, if there is no rain replenishing the water, it would eventually all dry out. Second, since it has a cooling effect, this also means the air temperature would drop downwind. In fact, with enough of them, you may cause a significant drop in temperature. Not only is it dry at that point, but its also cold. Since colder air cannot hold moisture as well as warmer air, this cancels out any increased efficiency in evaporation. Third, if you drop the temperature enough, you might hit your dewpoint. You also might not considering you are removing moisture from the air and thereby lowering the dewpoint. Lets say for now you do hit your dewpoint because the removal of moisture isn't as effective as the decrease in temperature. Anyone who knows anything about weather knows if the temperature reaches the dewpoint, it start to rain. This means there is more moisture in the air than the air can hold. Now its raining removing even more of the moisture from the air, though putting it on our dry cold region we were talking about. At that point, its just a cold region though dropping water out of the air may cause a region further away to now become our dry cold region. Last, as people have also noted, there will be a low pressure area in our cold region. Storms tend to develop between high and low pressure regions under some circumstances and at the very least, high winds. If our cold region isn't a stormy cold region and that point, its a windy cold region. But then again, the air of the high pressure area will probably be warmer than our windy cold region which then makes it warmer. So now we just have a windy region. If the windmills slow down the air at all, then everything may just equal out in the end. I think it would take a meteorologist of some experience and perhaps someone of the more physical science persuasion to work out all the effects and if it will have any overall effect.

  10. Re:Sounds familiar. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a good way to extract atmospheric moisture. And drifting pesticides, emmision fumes, particulate pollution blowing from every industrial site in the area... its like a pollutent-concentrator!

    If you have enough room you can use solar distillers to purify the water. The water goes through a bend with a pinhole in the top and VOCs are removed, and everything else is left behind.

    If not, you can use a particulate filter, a carbon filter, and then a reverse osmosis filter, but this requires using a pump to develop at least 40 psi, at least in models I've seen (and the one I own.) Then again, you could use another windmill to drive the pump.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Are you thinking of Crimea? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are some ancient dew collectors. Check this one.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  12. Re:Where's the need come from? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Deserts exist mainly because there is no moisture in the air to be extracted, not because of a lack of extraction.

    Depends on the desert. Some exist where mankind imported goats, which ate all of the vegetation down to nothing. The first usually has drought-resistant plants still around, like cactus and the like, and shouldn't be messed with. The second, like what exists in Australia, Northern Africa, and the Middle East, usually has no vegetation to speak of and high humidity. These deserts can be rehabilitated with planting and air moisture extraction (though this is the first large scale version I've seen- earlier ones I've been aware of use desalinated sea water pumped many miles to kick off the vegetation first). The second type is usually very rocky and sandy as well, the soil having been eroded away by the wind once the vegetation was gone. For this reason, many environmentalists in those areas consider goats to be weapons of mass destruction.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.