Slashdot Mirror


Freeing the Good Stuff From University Labs

netbuzz writes "University research labs are not supposed to be like Vegas: What happens in them is not supposed to stay there. A nonprofit from the Kauffman Innovation Network launching yesterday at DEMO 07 aims to free the fruits of academic research that would otherwise sit trapped on university shelves. Bonus: the site translates academic-speak into English.

6 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Stealing! by nuxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    At first I thought this article was going to be pointers on "freeing the good stuff" chemistry-wise from the lab stores.

    Darn.

  2. Already happening by cfulmer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a lawyer who (among other things) advises startups who want to license discoveries from universities. There is already a thriving market in such research, thanks in large part to the Bayh-Dole act, which allows universities to exploit inventions funded by the US government. The gov't gets a non-exclusive right to practice the invention (or have it practiced for the government) and there are a few other relatively minor restrictions. Because of this, Universities have been mining their research for years. Especially in the biochem and biotech industries, the vegas-like attitude does not exist. Quite the opposite -- researchers typically now conduct their research with an eye toward its commercial practicability. Before Bayh-Dole, this rarely happened.

    1. Re:Already happening by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      researchers typically now conduct their research with an eye toward its commercial practicability.
      And you think this is an entirely good thing? Sure it has some good points. The universities get more money quicker. However, the general state of things previously was that academics did pie in the sky research, much of which never winds up being "useful" (although I would argue that increasing our general knowledge is useful...), and then industry would take what it could use from there and develop it for commercial practicability. Notice, however, that industry doing research with an eye toward commercial practicability rarely comes up with the new, ground-breaking, really great stuff. Its all kind of humdrum usage of established knowledge. The great advances (which later enable commercial applications) come from way out there pie in the sky research with no view to commercial practicability.

      Of course, there is not a bright line, for instance, Bell Labs back in the day did a lot of research without view to practicability. Bell Labs is famed for being the source of an awful lot of really awesome stuff, too.

      I think that Bayh-Dole may very well cause university research to fall into the same boat as industrial research. You won't be able to start a project until you can prove that it will have some commercial application. That's not a good state to be in.

      BTW, this "vegas-like attitude" doesn't exist. Nobody in universities actively tries to keep their research to themselves, because that would harm them more than anyone else. Academia runs on reputations, and you can't build up a reputation (and thus get grant money) unless you release your research. The reason that a lot of university research stays in the universities is that nobody comes asking for it. Nearly all research professors are delighted to talk the ear off anyone who shows an interest in their research. So, if you want to know what they are doing, just ask!
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  3. I want to see some patent protection by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No private corporation should ever be able to patent anything developed with my tax money. Why is THAT allowed to continue? I'm tired of paying for companies' research for them. In fact I'd say that this state of affairs is why more public companies don't bother to do major research. They know they can get the same stuff done for free (or for much cheaper anyway) by a University someplace, using our tax dollars.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:I want to see some patent protection by PriceIke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US Constitution, Article I, Section 8: To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;

      Patent law is DRM for researchers.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  4. Bayh-Dole Act is the first door/barrier by Fysiks+Wurks · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Bayh-Dole Act ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh-Dole_Act ) confers univeristies the IP rights to their discoveries.

    --
    P226