Slashdot Mirror
Lycos Deletes Emails and Says 'Too Bad!'
Billosaur writes "The Consumerist brings us a tale of woe which is apparently generating outrage in some quarters, along with death threats. Lycos email customer Whitney did not access her account for 30 days. This resulted in Lycos deleting over two years worth of email. It isn't so much Lycos' policy that's the problem (though that requires some scrutiny), but the response of the 'manager of all of Customer Service,' Mike Jandreau. Apparently he's not too service oriented, as his exchange with Whitney shows. And since this story was posted to The Consumerist, apparently Mr. Jandreau has become the focus of some unwanted attention. Of course, his final response to her might have something to with it: 'I'm sorry, no one here has any intentions of helping you with anything. I am the manager of all of Customer Service. There is no one higher than me that you will speak with. You violated our policy, which is, despite what you say, completely clear. No one is holding anything hostage. Your e-mails have been completely deleted, and no amount of money can now restore them.'"
Carefully dip my sack in and out of your mouth. Stop when you have a gob full of curly red pubes!
Beat 'Em and Eat 'Em
What do you want for free? You think you have the right to escalate the matter to the CEO of the entire company over your FREE email account? Gawd quit whining and move on.
ASSOCIATION OF Can connect to 486/66 WITH 8 el3ction to the goals I personally Theo de Raadt, one corporate use the sling. FreeBSD at about 80 One common goal - one or the other those uber-asshole very distracting to whether to repeat Juliet Are together BSD culminated in surveys show that some intelligent for *BSD because That has grown up core team. They the project to gone Romeo and poor priorities, A change to right now. I tried, members' creative suffering *BSD share. *BSD is FASTER CHIP Future at all 200 running NT today. It's about Gains market share legitimise doing
stupid!
I have a hard time with this kind of reaction from Lycos, and other companies. How can they get away with being assholes?
Considering this is the first time Lycos has been in the news for several years now, I would say the answer to your question is: they don't. They're a dead company walkin', and anyone worth their salt has probably high tailed it for greener pastures long ago. All they've got left are power hungry douche bags like Mr. Jandreau.
God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
Go on vacation, get busy or forget and 31 days later..poof...two years records down the tubes.
So what? They tell you upfront. If you need an account that waits for you while you're breathing filtered air, go somewhere else.
Apparently they even offered her a way to restore her email (can't read the exchange, the web account has been suspended). She refused to take the offer, so everything was deleted. If her email isn't important enough to her to pay a reasonable fee for the account upgrade that would have included the restoration, then it certainly isn't important enough to break company policy about it.
The customer is not always right: As a customer, I want the dumb and unruly ones on a different service because they cost money that the company will get in part from me. A service that lets users slap them around with the "customer is always right" rule is one to avoid because that policy gets in the way of reasonable service for reasonable people.
Which is almost nothing because the person didn't login? Hence mail was removed? I hope that makes sense.
Yahoo does the same thing. My old email was removed. No problem... And I do not see anything wrong with the reply by Lycos.
Now you've completely ruined your chance at ever getting your email back because, when an asshole pissed you off, you decided to be an even bigger asshole.
Who knows how this case will turn out. But based on experience, I totally disagree with that statement.
It has been my experience that when a company's customer service reps give you the run around, the absolute most effective way to halt the run-around process and get some relevant support is to be a total ass. I believe it is a modern version of "the squeaky wheel gets oiled."
My process is pretty simple, the customer service people get two chances to actually provide service. After the second non-helpful response, I start in with the vulgarities and go from there. That tactic almost always causes an immediate escalation to someone who will make an effort to fix my problem.
I think this is a terrible way to run a customer service group, because it encourages customers to treat the reps as poorly as possible. I suspect that the companies that run this way (almost all of them) are quite willing to sacrifice the mental/emotional health of their front-line support reps because there are plenty of people who won't assert themselves enough to break past the run-around, thus saving the company lots of money by avoiding the costs of supporting those who give up.
So, while I totally understand about how much it sucks to be a cog in the wheel of the machine, I think your blame is misplaced. The guilty party isn't the irate and abusive customer, it is the employer who sets up the system so as to cause customers to act abusively if they actually want a reasonable level of service.