Slashdot Mirror


Alternative Registrars to GoDaddy?

Futurepower(R) wrote in to ask for your suggestions about reliable domain name registrars. With GoDaddy, the one-time favorite registrar, suspending domains based on the wishes of the Irish High Court, and 'requests' from MySpace, is it any wonder that people are starting to lose faith in it? A word of warning from the last article linked in the last sentence: "(GoDaddy) reserves the right to terminate your access to the services at any time, without notice, for any reason whatsoever." Chilling words from a domain name registrar. So what registrars would you recommend for people looking to replace GoDaddy, and how would you suggest they go about transferring their domains in a hassle-free manner?

218 comments

  1. Daddy's bad touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://gomommy.com/

    Daddy abducted Mommy.

    1. Re:Daddy's bad touch by DesertBlade · · Score: 2, Funny

      The world is coming to an end. Mommy is now daddy. Maybe I have two daddies? Anyways I use Bluehost.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    2. Re:Daddy's bad touch by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Haven't you just figured out what it really is? Daddy. Mommy. They're both the same. Don't you remember:

      The Corps is Mother. The Corps is Father.

      You gotta keep a sharp eye out -- but then again, the teeps already know you've got a sharp eye out, don't they? And Bester is on his way.

    3. Re:Daddy's bad touch by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Be quiet, Bester, and go back to playing Checkov! :-)

      ttyl

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    4. Re:Daddy's bad touch by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Hey, my teek can beat up your teek!

  2. RegistryRocket.com by dosius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, there's a small annoyance, that if you get a domain, they default-direct it to one of those generic squat pages until the first change perks down, and it has an expire time of about a week. So rotate your dns servers in that case.

    Any rate, I bought from them through a reseller, who a friend of mine was using (I covered his domain renewal, then bought a domain of my own), other than this, seems to be not bad, not much trickier than the dyndns way and a lot cheaper than buying a domain through them or through my ISP, the $9.96 I paid was prolly comparable to GoDaddy...or not much more...

    -uso.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    1. Re:RegistryRocket.com by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used pagesgarden.com (hosting and registration). They are awesome. After receiving complaints from the corporate hoards about my gripe site (sig) they politely informed the lawyers that they are a "common carrier" and would be happy to shut down my domain, after they are properly served with court orders, in person, by a law enforcement or court official. They also provided my contact e-mail to the lawyers and slapped my hand about the bogus whois and suggested a privacy service if I was concerned. At no time was my domain suspended or locked, and at no time did I lose connectivity to the internet.

      Add to that the one time I had issues with e-mail account setups in C-panel and the tech team had it resolved in under 30 minutes. I'm a loyal customer ;-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  3. I'm very happy with dyndns.com by MysticOne · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was having some issues with GoDaddy and have been slowly migrating my domains to DynDNS.com. I'd used them in the past for dynamic DNS stuff (heck, what Linux user didn't at some point?), but didn't realize until recently that they were a full blown registrar. Their website is easy to use, their technical staff are knowledgeable, helpful and polite, and I've had an excellent experience with them so far. They're more expensive than GoDaddy ($15/year for most domains), but I think the extra service and attention to detail is worth it. I'd rather pay a little extra and support a good company.

    1. Re:I'm very happy with dyndns.com by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And how's their record on dealing with legal threats?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:I'm very happy with dyndns.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And how's their record on dealing with legal threats?

      Several years back, dyndns.org cut my account for providing a copy of DeCSS. How's that for sticking up for their customers?

    3. Re:I'm very happy with dyndns.com by UtucXul · · Score: 1

      I also use dyndns.com for domains (after switching from network solutions). I've used their free dynamic dns service for years and was thrilled when I saw I could use them to register domains. They are a lot cheaper than network solutions and while they aren't the very cheapest, I think of the (very small amount) of extra price as giving a little back for their really great free services. Very rare that there is an internet service that I have nothing but good things to say about.

    4. Re:I'm very happy with dyndns.com by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Precisely my point. Don't expect any better from any of the so-called alternatives. Do any of them have any history of telling the government, or anybody flashing the DMCA card, to go to hell? It's up to us, the customer, to make protecting OUR interests more lucrative, and to make sure failure carries a high price. Nobody is going to do it for us. Try before you buy. Put up "offensive" material and see if it withstands the pressure.

      --
      What?
  4. 1and1 by theripper · · Score: 1

    http://www.1and1.com/ And their hosting plans aren't bad either

    1. Re:1and1 by MysticOne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd steer clear of 1and1. While I don't know if this is indicative of a pattern in dealing with problems, they cut off Spocko's Brain, a weblog, due to a nastygram from ABC regarding an interesting radio show controversy. Since the purpose of avoiding GoDaddy is to get away from these knee-jerk responses, I'd not recommend 1and1 based on these recent actions. You can check the blog for information on what happened in more detail.

    2. Re:1and1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have my domains with 1and1. After the GoDaddy-story came on slashdot I reread my contract - they have the same fineprint (we'll take your stuff offline if we feel like it) and I think I saw a story a while ago (although I can't find the link) where they took some supposedly offensive blog offline. Same story, no surprise. There hosting is good and reliable, though. Just don't expect them to stand up for you.

    3. Re:1and1 by linkedlinked · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't have a lot of dirt myself on 1and1, but I used to work for a good-sized hosting company, and whenever a customer asked about buying a domain from 1and1, my boss would crap out a community of small woodland animals. He didn't necessarily hate them, but he was pretty convinced that they were a load of bad news, and it was corporate policy to do whatever we could to keep the customer away from that registrar.

      Also, we'd get lots of testimonials from old 1and1 hosting customers who had venerable horror-stories, complete with "site offline for 5 days+", "wont answer my emails" and "took my money and ran" situations.

    4. Re:1and1 by FunnyLookinHat · · Score: 1

      I tried 1and1 as well. Bad news. The service I found to be pretty bad, slow responses to emails and difficult to cancel an account. Granted, nothing can be as difficult as transferring a domain out of go-daddy's hosting, but it was still hard none-the-less.

    5. Re:1and1 by lbft · · Score: 1

      I'd have already tried 1&1 - if they'd let me be a customer. Between all their sites, 1&1 will only sell to the US and Canada, the UK, Germany and Austria. The rest of the world can go jump, apparently.

    6. Re:1and1 by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 1

      I've had a fairly good experience with 1&1. Although, be careful about obtaining domains with their hosting packages. They slap you with a registration fee if you want to dissociate the domain with that hosting package.

      --
      1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
    7. Re:1and1 by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      I've used 1&1 for the past couple of years, registering domains and hosting a few sites. I've not been pleased. Their administrative interfaces are clunky, convoluted and slow. Customer service was below par -- but not abysmal -- in my experience.

      The worst part, though, is that transferring a domain away from them is about as easy as learning a new distro & installing it on unfamiliar hardware. It can be done once you climb the mountain and pass the great tests that await you there, though; just prepare yourself for some extra effort.

      FWIW, I recommend Namecheap (http://www.namecheap.com). Good interface, reliability, and price. Haven't needed customer service much; the one time I did, the response time was *really* long (days). Overall though, I get everything I need from them to DIY at a bargain price. 'nuff fer me.

  5. Vs. NetSol by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm still paying the unbelievable price of $35/year with NetSol, and was just about to effect a mass transfer to GoDaddy last week; certain events have gotten me to stop and think: NetSol is highway-robbery, but they're stable as hell.

    1. Re:Vs. NetSol by Talian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Threaten to leave. I get my netsol domains renewed for 7.95 a year. Stable, and affordable.

    2. Re:Vs. NetSol by gtoomey · · Score: 1

      How do you do it for that price?

    3. Re:Vs. NetSol by StarHeart · · Score: 2, Informative

      NetSol isn't stable in all cases. Don't let them host your domain on their dns servers, unless you like like regular problems.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    4. Re:Vs. NetSol by Talian · · Score: 1

      Right, use my dns servers, just netsol registrar. Was about to leave (and go to GoDaddy actually), when they offered to price match, and have let me renew at that same price since.

    5. Re:Vs. NetSol by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I'll have to agree here. My boss solely used GoDaddy before this last reregistration, and so NetSol's price threw him. The fact that GD didn't email him before or after his domain expired convinced him. I no longer have to wait 15 between changes to the email; we host our own now. While Network Solutions IS more expensive, I've NEVER had any real trouble with their services. The piece of mind is worth it.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    6. Re:Vs. NetSol by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      but they're stable as hell.

      ...in the Debian sense of "updates roll out every few years". God help you if you need to update your DNS entries in less than a month. That's the reason I left them: their stability was more than I could stand.

      Oh, and I still use Domainmonger. Their terms of service were good at the time, and while their prices aren't great (I really need to take another look at that), I've had nothing but good experiences with them. Once I accidentally renewed one domain for three years instead of three domains for one year, and one phone call to a live person later, my mistake was fixed. I never, ever, not once, resolved a problem with Network Solutions with a single phone call.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Vs. NetSol by kchrist · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is call their customer service and tell them you're going to transfer all your domains away. They offered me this deal too (I transferred anyway).

    8. Re:Vs. NetSol by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

      I moved from netsol to dotster couple years ago. They have a great price $14.95, with better responsiveness than I recall having before. They also email out registration discount offers a few times a year, they often send one a week before the domain expires too btw. You have to put up with occasional email discounts about a new virtual or hosting plan, but the renewal discount offers I've seen are from $1.99-9.99 so they make up for it. I have never had any service issues with either netsol or dotster. After signing up a domain with dotster to try their service I ended up moving registrations to them as they expired for the lower cost. A friend of mine uses GoDaddy exclusively, and has received legal notices from large companies before without a loss in connectivity with them however.

  6. I've heard of this new startup... by AEton · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...something about networks. Hm. Network Solutions, I think. Check it out, netsol.com.

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:I've heard of this new startup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey mods: This is supposed to be funny.

    2. Re:I've heard of this new startup... by Leto-II · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you have to tell people it's funny, then it's not funny... Sorry.

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
  7. Who needs a domain name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just use your ip address! It's like a phone number, and people memorize those all the time.

    1. Re:Who needs a domain name? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      You're gonna need a pretty big napkin to write down that number

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Who needs a domain name? by value_added · · Score: 1
      Just use your ip address! It's like a phone number, and people memorize those all the time.

      Pfft. Real men do it in binary.

      http://1000010011001100000011101100011/
      Or for the lazy:

      http://1113982819/
    3. Re:Who needs a domain name? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can specify IP addresses in binary. Decimal, yes. Hexidecimal, yes. Dotted-quad, yes. Binary and octal, no.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    4. Re:Who needs a domain name? by value_added · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can specify IP addresses in binary. Decimal, yes. Hexidecimal, yes. Dotted-quad, yes. Binary and octal, no.

      A quick copy/paste would settle the matter, doncha think? If it helps, the address resolves to Google. Firefox will take you there, so no guarantees if you're using IE.

    5. Re:Who needs a domain name? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      It's not firefox, it's your system resolver -- you can even ping 1113982819 if you want. The decimal address works on linux, the binary one doesn't. If the binary address works on windows, its resolver is even more insane than I had imagined.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Who needs a domain name? by mdecarle · · Score: 1

      "... Could not find host ..."

      So, no, Windows XP can't resolve the binary address.

    7. Re:Who needs a domain name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need a domain name if you want to receive emails

    8. Re:Who needs a domain name? by amazon10x · · Score: 1

      No, you do not.

    9. Re:Who needs a domain name? by generica1 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, neither of those resolve on my Mac OS X 10.4.8 PPC + Camino web browser combination.

      Works great on my LAN's gateway box though... (the decimal address)

      Steve

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
  8. Absolutely by XanC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used their free dynamic services, and now they've earned my business long-term. Great registrar, no gimmicks, no games. Even if it's a few dollars a year above some of the other places, it's absolutely worth it.

  9. Joker by emag · · Score: 1

    I've been extremely happy with joker.com. They're not the cheapest (if/when the US dollar makes gains on the Euro it might work out better), but they're reliable. I don't know what else to say, as I've been using them so long, and been so happy, that I haven't bothered to look elsewhere.

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    1. Re:Joker by samjam · · Score: 1

      I prefer joker.

      I wish they'd do .uk domains too, I keep pushing them, but no luck yet.

      Sam

  10. enom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am affiliated with enom... because I have had good experiences with them, you might too

    1. Re:enom by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree with the AC here. They're incredibly reliable and very fast when it comes to any updates. They also give you incredible tools for managing multiple domains.

      Disclaimer: I am a registered eNom reseller, but there's a reason why. They really do handle things very well.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
  11. GoDaddy stable too... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It depends on what you are doing. If you don't own any domains someone might accuse you of squatting on, GoDaddy is quite stable. I have a number of domains registered through them and have never had any issues. Even if that might be an issue I'm not sure GoDaddy is quite so complacent as is made out.

    They make it a little more cumbersome to order a domain than you might like, but once you have the domain I think the managemnet tools are OK - though I've never used other registrars very heavily before I moved to GoDaddy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:GoDaddy stable too... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      The mods are on crack. Offtopic? If I stretch my mind, I can make this be offtopic because we're talking about not-GoDaddy. But just because someone sticks up for them does not make it offtopic.

      Not that I agree, I just think censorship is not only bad, but pointless and potentially dangerous.

      Also, don't mistake apathy for customer service. Just because they never did anything about one of your potential domain-squats doesn't mean that they even answer emails from people about them, or that they even received an email about it at all.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  12. one more to avoid by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2, Informative

    For what it's worth, a group of us on Web Hosting Talk were chatting about the Godaddy problems, and someone from Dynadot came by to support Godaddy and state that they do the same. You can see the start of that here:

    http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=569 379#post4265087

    So if you're leaving Godaddy for their interference with domain names, then you surely want to also avoid Dynadot.

    1. Re:one more to avoid by zyzko · · Score: 1

      I've had some serious problems with joker.com when trying to transfer domains from Network Solutions. New domains are ok, the service is fast and ok, but constantly failing transfers (be it joker or NSI) have kept me from using them as the only registrar. godaddy.com is working flawlessly for me also on transfers.

  13. WoW! That's some marketing! by Skal+Tura · · Score: 4, Informative

    You REALLY have to ask alternatives for GoDaddy? That's some hell of a marketing.

    Hell, personally, i wouldn't touch GoDaddy with a long pole even! And always thought that way.
    Reason is obvious: They don't convey trust and technological excellency.

    But what they have apparently got right is marketing, wouldn't have thought one would need to EVEN ask for alternatives to
    GoDaddy and yet know what registrar stands for.

    And no, i am not trolling or trying to be flamebait.
    As for alternative places to register domains, some are:

    - Enom
    - Joker
    - Mydomain
    - DirectI
    - RegisterFly

    and huge amount of big players i can't remember right now

    1. Re:WoW! That's some marketing! by Mike1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You REALLY have to ask alternatives for GoDaddy? That's some hell of a marketing.

      The poster could probably have found other registrars easily - google would have happily given him thousands. I think what he really wanted is "alternative registrars to GoDaddy, which don't suck".

      Clearly, if you're moving away from one company because of bad service, you don't want to move to a company that's worse. And the domain name business is full of dodgy "free domain parking", companies who register domains if you check their availability, companies who will refuse to let you move your domain to another supplier, and so on. Resultantly, the results google would give wouldn't be that useful - because you don't just want to find a company, you want to find a company that doesn't suck.

      And that's an ideal use for 'ask slashdot' - learning from others' experiences.

      Just my $0.02

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    2. Re:WoW! That's some marketing! by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ever heard of PageRank?
      Ever heard of search engine spamming? Even the best page ranking algorithm cannot guarantee that the policies and practises of the company being linked to are compatible with yours.

      Ever heard of contextual advertising?
      Ever heard of a company using the money they get from ripping off their customers to attract more customers to rip off?

      Just choose one of the bigger names and you are safe, if you want a smaller, there are many other things to check their reputability.
      Like posting an Ask Slashdot.
      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:WoW! That's some marketing! by ddillman · · Score: 1

      - Contextual advertising: highest paying advertiser most probably have a really successfull business and has to be atleast to some degree reputable.

      By your reasoning, Microsoft (a very successful business by all accounts) is to some degree reputable. Wanna try again?

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
    4. Re:WoW! That's some marketing! by Skal+Tura · · Score: 0, Troll

      And they are quite reputable, it's not the ideology what matters, dude.

      Nothing for you to Troll here, move along!

    5. Re:WoW! That's some marketing! by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Informative

      That isn't trolling, just pointing out that your reasoning is fundamentally flawed. Some very non-reputable companies spend a lot of money on advertising... quite often because they have bad reputations.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  14. Stargate has worked for me... by sid+crimson · · Score: 1

    ...cheap enough, stable enough.
    www.stargateinc.com (I don't work for them...)

    -sid

  15. Support userfriendly.org by satherto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have so far had good luck with register4less, http://uf.r4l.com/. I mainly started using them as a way to support User Friendly.

    I had an interesting problem with GoDaddy. I had a number of domains registered with Domain Direct, and had good luck with them, though I started to find them expensive, so I started registering domains through GoDaddy. I had a domain expire that was originally on GoDaddy, but didn't really care about it, then about 8 months later I wanted a domain to do some testing, and figured I'd re-new my old domain. When I tried to renew through GoDaddy, they said that it was on hold, and it would cost $$$ extra to release it, tried some other domain registers, and they said GoDaddy had locked the name. A month later, I checked on it using register4less.com, and it was available, so I renewed through them. I then checked a different old domain name on Register4less, and Domain Direct, both showed the domain available. Went to GoDaddy, and it was held, due to it being expired, and would need extra $$$ to purchase it.

    I will never use GoDaddy to register another domain again.

    --
    ----
    1. Re:Support userfriendly.org by Cattywampus · · Score: 1

      Yep. I've used uf.register4less.com for years, and never had a complaint or problem. ('Course, I haven't been hosting anything controversial, either.)

      I'm really surprised that more Slashdot readers didn't chime in to mention these guys. *ahem* Why, back in my day, everybody who read Slashdot read UserFriendly, too ...

    2. Re:Support userfriendly.org by mrcaseyj · · Score: 1
      satherto wrote:

      I had a domain expire that was originally on GoDaddy...about 8 months later...When I tried to renew through GoDaddy, they said that it was on hold, and it would cost $$$ extra to release it...

      I think this is actually a feature rather than a bad thing. If your registrar lets your domain go then it will be picked up by a squatter. Then if you want it back the squatter will put it up for auction and/or extort you for as much as they think they can. Just a couple weeks ago I forgot about an old domain that wasn't very important to me and I accidentally let it expire for about two weeks. When I realized it Godaddy let me reregister it for no extra charge above the usual registration fee. After a certain period Godaddy has to pay out of their own pocket to hold onto your domain. They have to recover their costs from the few people who want their domain back since they can't get anything from the people who don't want them anymore.

      If your domain has any value to anyone else though you'll probably be out of luck anyway, because I think Godaddy puts your domain up for auction after it's been expired for more than 75days. This sounds nasty but if Godaddy didn't do it it would be immediately snatched up by other even nastier auction places anyhow, so Godaddy might as well make the profits themselves.

    3. Re:Support userfriendly.org by satherto · · Score: 1

      I would have had no problem if the held it and let me re-register, but what it appears they did was wait for me to check on the registration, hold it, then charge me extra to register it.

      I doubt they would have held it for 8 months, then a month after I inquired, release it. Also the other domain I checked first on with other companies, and it wasn't until I checked with goDaddy that it became held.

      --
      ----
    4. Re:Support userfriendly.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in your day, UserFriendly was fresh and funny. I used to read it too. Nowadays it's Slashdot the Comic Strip.

  16. GKG by StarHeart · · Score: 1

    gkg.net

    I have been using them for years. They are cheap, their website is good enough, and never had a problem with them. In the beginning when I talked to their tech support for something they were very friendly and helpful.

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    1. Re:GKG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea I've been using them for about 7 years, never had a problem. I've had people threaten me w/ the DMCA and stuff too (not sure if they said anything to gkg though).

  17. registrar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use http://ipower.com/ Haven't had any hassles or anything with them. So far so good.

    1. Re:registrar by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      From iPower's domain registration ToS:

      20. REVOCATION. We, in our sole discretion, reserve the right to deny, cancel, suspend, transfer or modify any domain name registration to correct a mistake, protect the integrity and stability of the company and any applicable registry, to comply with any applicable laws, government rules, or requirements, requests of law enforcement, in compliance with any dispute resolution process, or to avoid any liability, civil or criminal. You agree that we shall not be liable to you for loss or damages that may result from our refusal to register or cancel, suspend, transfer or modify your domain name registration. (emphasis mine)

      I just thought I'd point that out, as it sounds to me like they're reserving the right to drop you even if they think they might get sued over something you did. On the positive side, the word "maintain" isn't in the list in the last sentence.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:registrar by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Their hosting... Dear God. How incompetent.
      They claim daily backups, but every time they fuck something up and have to restore it on my end, they restore a backup from March of this year. I have recordings of their techs stating that they don't actually do daily backups and if I had a bit more time I'd put up all that stuff on a website, but I don't feel like wasting more time at this point on them.

      They don't "backup" emails either (at all) - something which isn't clear at all on their website.
      They gave me a few months free as a "sorry, we fucked up" but I had to call in and spent like 45 minutes trying to get them to give the 3 promised months to me.

      They also pulled my entire site one day and said it was "due to copyright infringement". When I tried to find out more info, I couldn't get an explanation out of them and almost a year later, I still don't know fucking why.
      Or what.
      I'm guessing they just deleted the server by accident or something and needed an excuse.
      Just a lot of *sigh* dealing with this company.

      And before the apologists chime in, yeah, ok, I have a local backup so why should this be an issue? Because I don't look forward to upload 5 fucking gigs over my capped connection. Thanks for your future smart ass comments though.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  18. Directnic by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

    I've had great luck with Directnic. They also offer cheap hosting if all you need for a while is a placeholder or brochure-ware sites. I don't think they do anything with CGI or databases or anything dynamic, though.

    1. Re:Directnic by wickedsteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One great thing about directnic is that if your paid for hosting gets used up from too much traffic (say you get slashdotted) they just switch it to free hosting with a banner. They are affordable and great for small sites if you do not need CGI, ASP, JSP, PHP, MySQL, ColdFusion or FrontPage extensions.

    2. Re:Directnic by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention they are also the company that got all the notice after Katrina. They're in New Orleans and they kept going through the entire hurricane and aftermath. The guy handling the emergency became well known for his blog, which I think was even mentioned in a story here.

    3. Re:Directnic by secolactico · · Score: 1

      I'll second the DirectNIC recommendation. I have 3 personal domains with them, one of them using their DirectDNS service. No problems at all. Cheap as well.

      Does anybody remember ever paying $100+ for a domain in Network Solutions (InterNIC)? And you had to buy 2 years contracts? God, I feel old...

      --
      No sig
    4. Re:Directnic by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Does anybody remember ever paying $100+ for a domain in Network Solutions (InterNIC)? And you had to buy 2 years contracts? God, I feel old..."

      No, old is when you remember emailing templates off to the SRI nic.

      Ironically, netsol is - other that price - one of the better registrars. A lot of the unpredictable weirdnesses with small registrars don't happen at nesol. But they are expensive.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  19. Melbourne IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Melbourne IT, where our slogan is, "All your Panix belong to us".

    Disclaimer: I work for Melbourne IT, so have to post Anonymously.

    1. Re:Melbourne IT by dokebi · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could answer this poster's horrible experience with Melbourne IT? Since you are posting anonymously and all...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  20. Registrar for adding root nameservers by gtoomey · · Score: 1
    All my domains have DNS servers NS1.domain.com NS2.domain.com that are registered with the root nameservers. Godaddy supports this online, but for other registrars its a manual process (hello Melbourne IT).

    Does others have this issue, and what registrar would you recommend?

    1. Re:Registrar for adding root nameservers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. GoDaddy controls the whois record and can pull the glue from the root servers. So even if you run your own name servers, you're gonna be out of service. (Typically within 12-24 hours, which gives you some time to get issues resolved).

  21. enames by nnet · · Score: 1

    www.enameco.com, they even have a "register nameserver" button, cool.

  22. Network Solutions are the good guys now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm slowly moving new domains that reach renewal to Network Solutions. Go Daddy was great for a number of years and then became questionable. But after a domain expired w/o notice, I paid redemption fee they wanted, and after the waiting period had to petition them to refund the redemtion fees because some mystery registrar in Lebanon grabbed it "too soon" and they didn't know it, I gave up on their games. Network Solutions is more expensive but has great phone service, doesn't spam me for the Marine Corps and other odd causes, and is very solid all around.

  23. GANDI by iriefrank · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gandi at www.gandi.net is a French registrar that is fantastic, and has the best contract of any registrar. No bullshit suspensions or any of that nonsense.

    1. Re:GANDI by hords · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of my friends had well over 50 domains with Gandi. There was a dispute with one of his domains and they shut them ALL down. He did get them to turn them back on, but after some hassle. My biggest complaint with Gandi when I was using them was that they took forever to implement domain locking when pretty much every other registrar offered it, and their control panel was a bit lacking. Other than those experiences, I enjoyed their service. You just can't beat GoDaddy's price, especially with bulk discount.

  24. Gandi by illuminatedwax · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gandi is an excellent place to go. They aren't as cheap as GoDaddy, but they are a heck of a lot friendlier to deal with, and they allow you a lot of flexibility. They have a new XML API, and they support a lot of causes, including Debian.

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  25. Just look for controversial websites by lorcha · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just use whois to see where controversial websites are registered. For instance:
    • godhatesfags.com is registered through Network Solutions
    • nambla.org is registered through Tucows
    You get the idea.
    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    1. Re:Just look for controversial websites by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Tucows, I use DomainMonger, who is a reseller for Tucows. (Found that out afterwards.)

      They are a bit expensive ($13/mo minimum) and their DNS stuff is lame (only certain records, can't write the bind stuff yourself) but they've been pretty stable for me. I keep thinking about moving to another one, but then I hear the horror stories like in these posts and I decide that $13/yr isn't that bad after all. That's like 2 months hosting costs.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Just look for controversial websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My own personal check shows that Network Solutions and ENOM are registrars for sites that would attract PC-attacks.

  26. Nearlyfreespeech.net by CliffSpradlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/ -- these guys are the best. Check out their site, you'll understand.

    1. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 1

      It looks like they offer a service to proxy your registration address. Having my home address/phone/email in the NIC registry has always been somewhat of an annoyance.

      Does anyone else do this? Is there a good reason not to?

    2. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by CliffSpradlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Others do it, but not quite as well as nearlyfreespeech.net. Not only does NFSN forward domain email to wherever you want, but they also receive faxes and letter mail, and let you know when nonspam mail comes in for your domain.

    3. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NearlyFreeSpeech.NET reserves the right at any time and for any reason, including but not limited to your violation of these TACOS, to limit, suspend, or terminate your use of the Services and to discard any of your Content.

      Nice.

    4. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by Leto-II · · Score: 1

      Isn't it pretty standard for a company to have that in its terms of service?

      The real question is how often, and for what reasons, they will exercise this right.

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
    5. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by CliffSpradlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This has been discussed several times in the past in an open forum with the people who run NFSN...understand that they are more open about free speech than basically everyone else. The only time they've run into an issue where they've needed to exercise that ability is when credit cards have been used fraudulently to purchase domains and/or web hosting, in order to seize those assets. Since you don't usually find out about a fraudulent transaction until much later, they is unable to get any kind of refund on the domain fees or hosting. The clause is there to protect them financially/legally from these and similar situations.

      If you guys have any concerns about this beyond that, I'm sure they'd be happy to discuss it. They are quite simply more responsive to customer concerns, and especially support requests, than anyone else out there.

      (and just to be clear, I make no money off of whether or not you guys choose to use them..I don't work for them and they have a philosophical hatred of affiliate programs)

    6. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. nfs.net are great for basic domain reg, dns, hosting and email forwarding. For more advanced stuff I'd use Dreamhost.

    7. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      I heartily agree with NearlyFreeSpeech.net. They're simply amazing. I've been using them for all my hosting, and for as much of my domain registration as I can (they don't do *.us yet). Customer service is GREAT (I once tossed a bunch of emails back and forth with this guy named Jeff who worked there, ALL DAY LONG, turned out to be a problem with the shmucks I got to register my *.us domain). Prices for registration are fair to middling, but you ASSUREDLY get quality for your cash.

      Like some others have said, I don't work for them, they don't have affiliate programs, I'm just a super happy customer.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
  27. Gandi.net by Arker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last I checked Gandi.net offered by far the best terms. Not in terms of money (close, though!) but in terms of recognising the customers rights.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    1. Re:Gandi.net by _iris · · Score: 1

      I've used joker.com since 1998 and I have never had any problems with them. They charge $12 per year, but the service is definitely worth it to me.

    2. Re:Gandi.net by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used gandi for a while for a couple of domains. The big problem I had with them was that they always seemed to overload their servers. Any time I needed to do anything, like update my contact info or something, it seemed like there was a 50/50 chance that I'd actually be able to do it that day. One domain was expiring, so I switched to a different registrar; unresponsive server, finally got it done after a lot of hassles. The other domain expired this year, and again it required a lot of waiting and retrying and wondering whether I would ever be able to get a response from their server.

    3. Re:Gandi.net by musicmaster · · Score: 1

      I was at Joker a few years ago and it was a complete disaster. At some point I could do nothing with my domains: not even setting the DNS servers. The help desk never answered a question and on the discussion forum I encountered only people with similar experiences.

      I was glad that the domain transfering still worked...

  28. Registars by SocialWorm · · Score: 1

    There's a list of registars at http://www.internic.net/alpha.html if you'd really like to compare. Myself, I tranferred a domain away from GoDaddy, and didn't have any particular problems (I transferred partly because I could get a better deal elsewhere, and partly because I don't want my domains all over the place). I currently use DreamHost and 000Domains, both of which seem decent enough.

    --
    My Blog: http://nic.dreamhost.com/
    1. Re:Registars by briosky · · Score: 1

      ICANN-Accredited Registrars list is at
      http://www.icann.org/registrars/accredited-list.ht ml
      I personally use Melbourne IT. Which I got when I bought the TLD through those yahoo jerks (cheap though: $4.95/y)
      They are so smart they attached a yahoo banner at the bottom of all my pages.
      Workaround was to change the name servers; now using the free service at http://freedns.afraid.org/, rock-solid and free company.
      Hope this can help

      --
      BS at South Texas Free University, STFU. CEO at Ontario Mega Finance Group, OMFG. And just Last Mad ABCA Obdurate, LMAO
  29. I wound up at register.com almost by default by Artifex · · Score: 1

    I used to be with NetSol, until they started having really bad security issues allowing for domain hijacking a few years ago. I looked around and wound up with Register, because at the time they had one of the most secure systems for changing information, not to mention they had a great coupon at the time :) I ended up buying multiple years for each of 9 domains. Since then, I suspect a few other registrars have started up that are good, but I haven't bothered to look around, yet, since I don't need to renew until 2011. I personally would like to stay with Register, but $35/year/domain is too much for me, especially since I have a list of more domains I want to add. I'll want a bulk rate from my next registrar.

    Be sure you find one with a commitment to security first and foremost, and that will let you sign for the transfer and then do the work of contacting GoDaddy for you. Oh, and GD probably has something set up to block transfer requests for your domain; you will need to log in and turn that off, before you launch with the new registrar.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  30. Avoid Yahoo Domains! by amaupin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whatever you do, no matter how good a deal they offer, NEVER register a domain through Yahoo.

    I had problems with my Yahoo Domains account's email (web service was fine) - basically 1 out of every 5 emails sent from my Yahoo purchased domain's account would not be delivered to Yahoo or Hotmail addresses. I'd get a message 2 days later saying hotmail.com couldn't be found, or yahoo.com couldn't be found. I went back and forth with Yahoo support. Eventually they told me the addresses of my friends (the Yahoo ones, at least) didn't exist or weren't valid Yahoo accounts. These were people who regularly send me mail. So I made a test free Yahoo account of my own and got the same result - sometimes mail I sent to the account didn't go through and I didn't get any clue that something was wrong until a nondelivery message came 2 days later. Again customer support told me the address didn't exist, so I sent them email FROM that address, and then they completely stopped responding to all customer support mails I sent from that point on. I was amazed.

    So I decided to switch my domain to Godaddy, the registrar I have been using recently. I made a transfer purchase order through Godaddy's site and all I needed was the authorization code for my domain from Yahoo.

    And thus began the hell that is trying to transfer a domain away from Yahoo.

    Buried deep down in Yahoo's Website Services help pages were the directions to contact Melbourne IT, the registrar Yahoo uses to purchase domains. (Yes, Yahoo is not a registrar.) I emailed Melbourne IT asking for my code. They said to contact the reseller. Yahoo sent me email that I should contact Melbourne IT. Another person at Yahoo said I should cancel my Yahoo Domains account and they'd send me the information I needed to login to Melbourne IT's site and get my code. This sounded dubious.

    But searching online revealed that's what other people had ended up doing. So I tried to change my domain's contact email address to a temp gmail address, so that when Yahoo canceled my account they wouldn't send email to the just-canceled email service. Yahoo's contact address change form returned, "Unable to modify contact information at this time. Please try again later," no matter when I tried using it. Finally I got someone at Yahoo to change the address for me. I cancelled my Yahoo account.

    True to their word, Yahoo sent the login information for Melbourne IT to my domain's contact address after closing my website services account. I logged into Melbourne IT's site and there was no way to request the authorization code other than entering a basic help ticket. I did, and got no response. After a few days I sent another request. Again, no response.

    One day I was reading complaints on message boards about Melbourne IT and saw a link to a login URL I hadn't seen before. I logged in there and had access to to my domain's code! Apparently Melbourne IT's support pages are partitioned with no links between each other... I sent the auth code to Godaddy and they began the transfer. Four days later, Melbourne IT responded to my original request for the authorization codes.

    (I have omitted the dozens of useless exchanges with tech support people asking me for information I had already given to one of their coworkers. There is nothing more frustrating - and Yahoo was really bad at this - of starting over in a process because the person who responds to your message today doesn't understand what their coworker began two days previous.)

    Total time to transfer a domain from Yahoo Domains: 1 1/2 months

    1. Re:Avoid Yahoo Domains! by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      I had a remarkably similar experience moving domains away from yahoo-- at one point I called Melbourne IT on the phone and they answered pretty quickly (no time on hold) and gave me accurate and useful information about how to get it done.

      I had another domain that I registered with yahoo years ago when they used NetSol. When yahoo switched to Melbourne, they basically abandoned the users signed up through NetSol, except for collecting their money (which was higher than through Melbourne). NetSol was also pretty straightforward for getting control back over my domain (fax them a copy of an ID or something, and a single form).

      After those experiences I'll never register a domain through a reseller-- it just creates too much hassle.

    2. Re:Avoid Yahoo Domains! by prestonmichaelh · · Score: 1

      I would agree as well. I registered a domain name through Yahoo when they were doing one of their domain name for $3 promotions. Most of my domains were at GoDaddy. I did not do any hosting at Yahoo, just domain registration and pointed it at my name servers to be hosted elsewhere. After I had the domain through Yahoo for about 8 months, I decided to transfer it go GoDaddy to get all of my domains in one place. GoDaddy would give me the rest of the year I had already paid for plus another year for the normal one year fee, so I figured I wouldn't be losing anything, so there wouldn't be a problem. I transferred the domain to GoDaddy with very little problem. The domain name in question was the only one I had with Yahoo and the 1 year registration for the 1 domain name was the only thing I had ever bought from Yahoo.

      The fun started when the 1 year from my original registration date was up. I was looking over my credit card statement and there was a $9.95 charge from Yahoo for domain registration. I checked my Yahoo account and sure enough, they had charged me for the domain that had been at GoDaddy for 4 months. I called them up and after 5 or 6 phone calls speaking with different reps over a couple of days, they finally told me that although they would refund my money, that I should have canceled my account and it was really my fault. I was amazed at the fact that they would charge me even just $9.95 for absolutely nothing and wondered how many times they did it to others and got away with it because they didn't check their credit card statements.

  31. VoxDomains.com by ninjaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had been using GKG.Net, as it was a Slashdot darling in this kind of story 5 or 6 years ago. Things turned bad when I let one of my names go a couple days past the expiration date. I had never had that be a big deal before (I had that happen using DomainMonger and paying a few days late was never a big issue, but their prices had become double that of the competition). GKG, however, demanded $60 in addition to the cost of the domain renewal fee, saying that 3 different people in their organization had to work on the request. They would only take the $60 as a money order, too, which struck me as incredibly shady. Since I had taken a year and a half off to study, I didn't have money to frivolously throw away on domain extortion, so I let it go and thought I'd just register it when it dropped off. No such luck, and for the past 2 years some squatters in Vancouver have had it.

    Since then, I have been using VoxDomains and it has been a good experience. $6.95 domains, and when I forgot the password to my account and wanted to make sure a payment got through, it was no problem to contact a representative and get the payment posted. When one of my domains expired with VoxDomains, they had the domain redirect to a "please pay us" page, and when I paid them the regular domain registration fee, everything turned out fine.

    1. Re:VoxDomains.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you sign up as "Futurepower(R)" because "Kharmawhore(R)" was taken? Shut up already.

  32. You might look here... by Pinkfud · · Score: 1

    I hesitate to "advertise" on here, but I am a registrar. Please check http://www.netwithus.net/ and see what I can do for you. My prices are competitive with Godaddy.

    --
    The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    1. Re:You might look here... by moresheth · · Score: 1

      What are the policies of Wild West Domains (your momma registrar) regarding shutting down people's sites?

      This discussion has made me consider switching all my domains to something other than GoDaddy. Price is one thing, but reliability in the face of legal troubles is something else. Does your domain provider hold up?

    2. Re:You might look here... by Pinkfud · · Score: 1
      I honestly don't know. The issue has never come up for my little company. But I would point out that no one but ICANN can actually "kill" a registered domain. All they can do is set their nameservers so the domain doesn't resolve. So if you still have access to your control panel (as I think you would have with me), you can set your NS somewhere else and get around the problem.

      Now, if you HOST with me, then of course you have to follow the TOS. My hosting is third-party and I have no control over that. But frankly, I would recommend hosting elsewhere anyway. I only offer hosting at all because all other registrars do and I have to compete.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    3. Re:You might look here... by Blackbrain · · Score: 1

      Wild West Domains is owned GoDaddy as is any registrar with SECURESERVER.NET as a name server. ...knowing is half the battle...

      --
      Where would we be if Wheel had hid her round rock in a cave instead of showing everyone how it rolls?
  33. aitdomains.com by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

    I've been using aitdomains.com for over a year now. $8 per usual domain IIRC, barely any trouble at all, and their customer support actually replies and solves problems. No DNS servers however, but I get those at dnsmadeeasy.com for $0.75 each plus goodies, and they have yet to fail me once. Total: less than $9 per domain and no hassle.

    1. Re:aitdomains.com by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 1

      If you're using AITDomains for registrations, and AIT for web hosting, be certain you don't run afoul of their restrictive service terms. If they deem you to be in default, they WILL jerk your domain.

    2. Re:aitdomains.com by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

      Neh, just for domains, I have my own webhosting.

  34. I suggest Enom.com by RancidPickle · · Score: 1

    Enom has been suggested, I'd like to say why.

    I have over 50 domains, and when I teach HTML classes, I buy each student a web domain. Enom is not for the casual web domain user. You have to deposit funds starting at $100US, but the domains are only $8.10US. The website is very thourough, and includes custom MX records, DNS entries, and a free web generator for those who don't know HTML or hate parking spam pages.

    It's easy to transfer domains, and they have excellent customer service. I've been with them for years, and have been completely satisfied with their services.

    --
    "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
    - Doctor Who
  35. Alternatives to go for and to avoid by KitsuneSoftware · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Main topic: I've not had any problem with HostIreland, though as you may be able to guess from the name they like to combine domain registration with hosting. One (host) to avoid at all costs is NetPivotal: they reverted my site to a week-old backup without telling me, then randomly merged the front page with my first page, a placeholder that had only been up for a few days. Oh, and to upload pages securely, the only option is* a bloated geocities-style file manager. Aside: I can understand being upset by the MySpace issue, but seriosuly, a High Court order? They have to simultaneously obey all laws of every country in which they operate. *or was, at the time.

  36. one more to add to the list by wfberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A quick google turns up a lot of registrars.

    I had a domain name registered at godaddy for a while, but I left, exactly because of the horror stories from their (alleged?) "we'll pull any site that generates complaints without investigating one bit" policy. I don't host anything controversial (in fact, I use my domainnames almost exclusively for e-mail), but all it takes is someone deciding to (fake) some spam advertising your domainname, and you can kiss it goodbye.

    Something godaddy pulled on me was that when it came time to renew, the registration rates offered to me were higher than for new customers - and no discount for 10 year registrations.

    So, after some forum reading, and weeding out suspiciously cheap registrars, I decided on namecheap. As the name implies, they're cheap, $8.88 per domain per year. At the time they were slightly more expensive than godaddy, now they're slightly cheaper.

    They're an eNom reseller, so they probably offer the exact same services as any other eNom reseller, but they're cheap.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:one more to add to the list by aymanh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm another happy NameCheap customer; I have been using their services for around 3 years. Their prices are cheap, and they offer a clean and very usable control panel. In addition, customer support was quick and helpful in the few times I needed it.

      --
      python>>> q="'";s='q="%c";s=%c%s%c;print s%%(q,q,s,q)';print s%(q,q,s,q)
    2. Re:one more to add to the list by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm another happy namecheap user. I registered my private domain there, but at work I manage several domains in other registrars and namecheap has by far the best control panel, thus give you by far the best control of your domain.

      Sure, it might be that the other registrars I work with just plain suck, but I'm really enjoying namecheap.

    3. Re:one more to add to the list by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      Ditto what the parent said on Namecheap (my one customer service experience was anything but quick, but I need them so rarely that, really, I don't much care.)

      (PS - I usually consider "Me too" posts unnecessary and redundant, but in this case, I think it'd be informative to see the number of readers voting for or against a particular host, seconding a particular opinion, etc.)

  37. joker.com by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    I've had excellent service from joker.com over the years.

    It Just Works. No BS, no loud advertising, just working registry service.

    The only complaint I have about them is that their DNS service doesn't allow wildcards. I'm not losing any sleep over that, though.

    1. Re:joker.com by rueger · · Score: 2, Informative

      I too used joker.com for years, but have had problems in recent times. Specifically we had an autoforwarded address which suddenly started having long delays in mail delivery.

      Turns out according to our ISP (who I do have a lot of faith in) that a significant amount of what comes out of the joker.com mailservers is spam, and joker seems disinclined to do anything about it. Consequently our ISP had been throttling back mail from joker.

      I've also found in the last year or so that mail to joker support simply goes unanswered.

      I'm moving our domains, and client domains away from joker.

    2. Re:joker.com by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that.

      Since I've never had a need for service, I had no idea. The spam news is bad enough. Looks like I'll be switching to Gandi.

      A pity. Joker's "utilitarian" site design filled me with an ironic confidence, like having security in some one who runs csh for a default shell. And it turns out they just don't care.

    3. Re:joker.com by Megane · · Score: 1

      I've been using joker.com since I first got a domain back in 2000. It's been fine for me.

      But I should mention that I've always done my own DNS, and people seem to be having problems with using them for DNS and other services.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:joker.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. No BS and just works - Joker.com has worked very well for me.

  38. DirectI by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    I've been using DirectI for years. The web interface is heavy and slow, but the domains are cheap and the customer service is good and friendly. The thing to do, though, is not to buy your domains from DirectI as a customer, but to sign up as a reseller. This is easy and gives you lower prices. Last I checked, prices were something like 6 to 7 US dollars per year, depending on volume.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  39. GoDaddy Alternatives -- Try NoDaddy.Com by fv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just a few days ago, I launched a noncommercial site dedicated to this exact purpose -- encouraging and helping people move away from GoDaddy. The site is at NoDaddy.Com (I'm sure Bob Parsons loves the domain name ;).

    I launched the site after GoDaddy shut down my domain SecLists.Org, as noted in this /. article summary. The site includes a list of alternative registrars that readers have recommended. It is rather sparse on details right now, but I'm working on that. I'll go through all your comments in this article tomorrow to fish out good ideas for the registrar section of the site. I'm trying to fill up the site as much as possible before GoDaddy's big SuperBowl ads air on Sunday. We are currently seeking a volunteer to set up and run the NoDaddy forums -- write me if you're interested. We're also looking for "NoDaddy girl" models, but perhaps Slashdot isn't the best place to recruit for that :).

    Just today, CNET News.Com posted an article where they interviewed many registrars about there takedown policies. Unfortunately, many registrars refused or didn't bother to respond. Of those who did, the authors "found that the French registrar Gandi.net and New Orleans-based DirectNIC offered the most extensive guarantees against unnecessary domain name suspension."

    -Fyodor
    Insecure.Org

  40. Gandi.net by borfast · · Score: 1

    I definitely recommend Gandi.net. They're friendly, their terms of service are fair and honest and they don't offer as much options as Godaddy - yes, this is good, because I'm talking about all the sh$t that Godaddy tries to push down clients' throats when they buy one simple domain name.

    I started to think of moving away from Godaddy when they made the huge change to MS-based servers and that's when I started to notice all the news about them shutting down domain names without notice, their tricky way of pushing unneeded stuff onto their customers and also their draconian terms of service.

    There's just one thing that Godaddy offers and Gandi.net doesn't which I think could be usefull for some - anonymous information for the domains. But then again, if Godaddy is willing to release the ownership information just because of one single legal threat, as the article says, then it's not worth that much, wither.

    There's also the price tag thing - Gandi.net is not as cheap as Godaddy but I think the advantages of working with an honest company who treats their clients fairly and doesn't try to sell them 5 tonnes of unneeded crap, largely compensate the extra money I pay for the domains I have there.

  41. EasyDNS by Tridus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Been using them for a while now, I'm very happy with them. If you're looking for other services you may be out of luck, they really don't do much OTHER then registrar and DNS service, but then thats what attracted me to them in the first place. (I like it when a company does one thing well, rather then doing 500 things badly.)

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  42. 1and1 can pound sand by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MysticOne is absolutely right. 1and1 will never get my business because of the way they caved to the cryptofascists at Disney/ABC. I don't care if Disney is the 800lb gorilla, you look out for your customers and you don't pull a registration just because you got one letter from a lawyer. I doubt they spent 5 minutes looking into the matter. As soon as they saw "Disney/ABC" on the letterhead, they were reaching for the plug.

    And thanks, MysticOne,for telling me about this Spocko's Brain thing. Living in the cold Midwest, I forget there are also people on the coasts that are trying to stand up. I sent Spocko a few bucks just for being a stone in the shoe of those who would threaten liberty.

    Oh, and I am happy with dynDNS, they surprised me with their service and strong policies.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  43. RegistryRocket.com gives an error message. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the suggestion. Does Registry Rocket register domains?

    This Registry Rocket?

    "RegistryRocket is a customizable e-commerce web page. It is designed as a tool for you to sell domain names. You give your site a name, upload a logo (or not), and set the pricing. We take care of the website hosting, merchant processing and other eNom services. Track sales and watch your account balance grow in your eNom reseller account.Whether this is your permanent e-commerce solution fordomain name sales, or an interim option until you have your own merchant account established, RegistryRocket works."

    RegistryRocket.com gives an error message.

    Registry Rocket - Free Domain Reselling?

    1. Re:RegistryRocket.com gives an error message. by dosius · · Score: 1

      I did say through a reseller, right? RegistryRocket.com was part of the url while registering; ppnhosting.info was the actual site I registered from.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  44. Domain expiration alignment? by NuclearKangaroo · · Score: 1

    Of your recommendations for alternatives to GoDaddy.com, which ones allow for the alignment of multiple domain expiry dates?

    I have several domains with different expiration dates I'd just as soon only have to deal with ONCE a year. :]P

  45. Become an eNom Reseller for as little as $195??? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Enom is not a direct seller of domain names?

    Enom has "Pricing", rather than "prices": enom.com. "Become an eNom Reseller for as little as $195".

  46. PagesGarden.com is not a domain registrar? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    PagesGarden.com apparently is not a domain registrar, unless you buy hosting through them.

    1. Re:PagesGarden.com is not a domain registrar? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      They're not a registrar even then. A WHOIS lookup on farmersreallysucks.com shows that it's registered through enom.com. Pagesgarden.com is probably just a reseller.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  47. Gandi.net: $15.63 by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Gandi.net costs "12,00 Tax Excl. ie. 14,35 incl. tax". That is $15.63 today (2007-02-03), almost twice as expensive as the minimum.

    1. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's still less than $0.05 a day. I guess if you have more than a couple domains it would be a consideration, but for one or two...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twice as expensive? That means it's almost $8 more expensive that the minimum. I don't live in the USA, but I think that amounts to about two or three beers *a year*. A perfectly good trade, IMHO, as they indeed provide good service.

    3. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Funny

      But Sally Struthers says that I can use that 5 cents a day to solve world hunger.....ethics? or business? Tough call.

      Layne

    4. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you want to be knife wieldingly insane, the price difference is less than $0.02 a day.

      Regarding your nearly troll, some people have the terrible notion that taking care of yourself and staying out of the way of others is ethical.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Dude....I'm not sure if you could tell or not, but I was going for FUNNY. Not TROLL.

      Layne

    6. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by maxume · · Score: 1

      Well, somewhere between my tending to take myself too seriously, my sense of humor and your joke, I wasn't amused. Oh well.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Gandi.net: $15.63 by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've used Gandi for years, since back when it was the best deal or nearly so. They're pretty hassle-free. Of course, if you want the best deal, you can register for nine years at $5 per year with one of those cheap registrars, wait 60 days until you can transfer it, then transfer it to Gandi for one year's registration ($15-ish) and you basically get a domain for $6 per year, but the advantages of a registrar that isn't evil.

      Note: do not register for ten years, then attempt to transfer the domain. IIRC, registrations are only allowed up to 10 years ahead, and your transfer adds a year, so you'd probably have problems if you registered for ten years and then tried to transfer it.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  48. DynDNS has "pricing". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    DynDNS has pricing rather than "prices". When I see that word, I think "pricey". Why should a domain name registrar be so expensive? What do they do with the money ($15 per year)?

    1. Re:DynDNS has "pricing". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think US$15 a year is bad? A typical domain registrar in Australia charges AU$70 (~US$55) per year, and essentially all they do is stick your details in a database, send you occasional spam, and completely ignore you if you have any problems with them.

    2. Re:DynDNS has "pricing". by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Apparently, by giving them a little more than other registrars, they provide good customer service, free dynamic DNS things, other free services, and don't squat every fucking domain someone searches for on their site if you don't register it in 24 hours. I think that would be worth it...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  49. NameCheap.com features? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Here are NameCheap.com's features. Anything missing from Enom.com's features? Is NameCheap.com really an Enom.com reseller?

    1. Re:NameCheap.com features? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      They're a resellers as in: they are not themselves an ICANN accredited registrar.
      (There are a lot of eNom resellers; back in the day, eNom was handing out reseller contracts like candy, with massive discounts on volume.)
      Stuff like hosting etc. is bound not to happen through eNom, but perhaps some subset is shared amongst resellers (like the private registrations; these are part of the eNom XML API interface. Something called 'Name-My-Phone' is too, but namecheap doesn't seem to bother with it).

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:NameCheap.com features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes they are affiliated with eNom. I have used namecheap for quite a few years and have had only one big issue. When a domain that was no longer under my account had expired (by a long time), the only recourse to contact them is via email (took 24 hours to get a reply) or call the number in their whois (leave a voicemail). Essentially, if you keep your account straight, up to date, and rarely ever have support needs, namecheap is a good fit.

  50. StargateInc.com asks you to pay extra... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    StargateInc.com asks you to pay extra for "URL Forwarding, Email Forwarding, and Advanced DNS Zone Control Panel", apparently.

    1. Re:StargateInc.com asks you to pay extra... by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you want to do these things separately anyway?

  51. Register4Less.com has "pricing structure". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Parent comment is very interesting.

    But Register4Less.com has "pricing structure" instead of "prices". You know what that means. "Registering one domain name for one year will cost $14.95, already saving you $20 or more as compared to some other registrars." Paying almost twice as much saves you $20 per year? They mean "some other [very expensive] registrars".

  52. GKG.net by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    GKG.net does not seem to list the features. Do they provide email forwarding, for example?

  53. List of prices. Survey of 12 registrars. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT UP!!! Excellent links: NamePros.com provides a list of registrars and prices. CNet's article is must reading: Survey: Are domain registrars free-speech friendly?

  54. A vote for RegisterFly.com by jbarr · · Score: 1

    I've been using RegisterFly.com for years, and have had excellent results. There may be better ones out there, but RegisterFly.com has been very, very reliable for me.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  55. eNameCo.com is $16.99 per year. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    eNameCo.com is $16.99 per year. Here are eNameCo.com's free services.

  56. See the above comment about Gandi.net. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    But see the above comment about Gandi.net: "There was a dispute with one of his [Gandi.net] domains and they shut them ALL down."

    Gandi.net is also a bit spendy: 12,00 = 15,6276 U.S. dollars (on 2007-02-03).

    1. Re:See the above comment about Gandi.net. by kchrist · · Score: 1

      $15/year is only expensive when you compare them to the bottom-of-the-barrel crowd, who you probably don't want to do business with anyway. Whatever happened to paying more for quality service?

      PairNIC is $13 - $19/year and I have no problem with this for the seven domains I have there. Their support is prompt and efficient and they were one of two registrars I found that don't have horror story after horror story written about them. The other one was Gandi (I went with Pair over Gandi because Gandi doesn't do .us domains and I wanted to keep all my domains together).

  57. Nearlyfreespeech.net domain registration features. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Nearlyfreespeech.net costs $7.30/year for email forwarding? Apparently you cannot discover the features offered unless you are already a customer: "Visit the Domains tab in our user interface for more information."

  58. DreamHost.com domain features? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    DreamHost.com domain names are $9.95/year. However, apparently it is not possible to see the domain features unless you are a customer.

    Thanks for the link to the InterNIC list of all domain registrars.

    000domains.com domains are $13.50 per year, with a list of no-extra-cost features.

  59. VoxDomains.com by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Funny

    VoxDomains.com has a list of free services for $6.95/year.

  60. Not neccesarily by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

    Please note that the company offering Yahoo domains' service differs from country to country.

    Their scheme works this way (as you already found out): Yahoo! interconnects its users via an obscure login algorithm involving a shared secret and some header redirects to a company which functions as a domain registrar. Yahoo! never shares any account information with said company, so you (as customer) have to register twice: Once for Yahoo! and the second time for the registrar.

    The fact that they converted you to a native user of themselves to transfer your domain is sound. I once worked for a company which provided the same service (different country) for Yahoo!. We did exactly the same because Yahoo! messed with the logins of our users (lost them, etc.) and generally were totally incompetent and unhelpful to its contractors (us). The additional work overhead when dealing with Yahoo! is enormous.

    --
    Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
  61. See the comment below about GKG.net by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative
  62. Private domain registrations by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    I am currently with GoDaddy because it offers private domain registrations - my email and address are replaced by GoDaddy's email and address in whois lookups, and therefore it keeps spammers away from my inbox. What other registrars offer this private registration service?

    1. Re:Private domain registrations by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the same "service" that makes it so much harder to track down spammers and other low-lifes?

  63. NearlyFreeSpeech.NET by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use NearlyFreeSpeech.NET for my domain registration. They're a web host, but they offer great domain name prices ($7.50 for .com/.net/.org). If you plan on using all of the crappy bells and whistles that come with most registrars (like email forwarding and WHOIS privacy), it'll cost a little more -- $0.01/day for WHOIS privacy, and $0.02/day for email. So that's $3.65 a year and $7.30 a year. But the email forwarding is nice; they let you create unlimited addresses that can 1) forward to any address 2) POST the message to a CGI script (!) 3) bounce messages or 4) discard messages, and you can select any of those options as a catchall.

    Their hosting is also wonderful for personal sites that don't get a ton of traffic. (It's probably good for larger sites, but I only host my personal website on it right now.) They charge a flat $1.00/GB for transfer and $0.01/MB/month for storage. Bandwidth is available in discounted "buckets" that contain a certain amount and expire after a certain date. Storage might be available in a similar way soon. MySQL is $0.01/day for the first process, $0.02/day for each extra (normally you only need one), $0.01/day/process for InnoDB, and $0.01/day/process if you're in the top 10% of activity (not likely). They have every CGI language known to man, but of course they don't support things like FastCGI and mod_perl, since FastCGI would require a ton of persistent processes, and mod_perl allows one user to crash the whole server. And their control panel is really simple and intuitive (although they're scrambling to create better reporting/statistics tools).

  64. DNSMadeEasy.com. AITDomains.com is spendy? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Please provide links! DNSMadeEasy.com.

    AITDomains.com sells URL forwarding for "only" $5.99 per year. I don't see a list of other features.

  65. Joker.com is $12/year. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Joker.com is $12/year with a list of free features.

    I feel uncomfortable with the name. When someone chooses a poor name for a business, doesn't that indicate a low amount of business sophistication?

    1. Re:Joker.com is $12/year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still host some sites with a web host called 'Amen' ... which I hesitated to try at first, as it sounded like customers should be praying for things to work.

  66. And fuse-conning, too. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost to be a DirectI.com reseller?

    Investigating the features of every suggested registrar is beginning to be bind moggling.

    1. Re:And fuse-conning, too. by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Being a DirectI reseller doesn't cost anything, as far as I know.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  67. EasyDNS is spendy. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    EasyDNS is $25 per year.

  68. MyDomain.com - $8.50 domains by mdd4696 · · Score: 1

    I've used MyDomain for 3 years and I am happy with them. I've never had a problem with my domain, and it only costs $8.50 a year.

    Aside from offering many services for little or no cost, I have stayed with them because they have frequent promotions (right now I have free WHOIS privacy protection for a year) and their forums have a lot of common questions and answers you might have about your domain.

    Granted, I've never tried out other registrars, but I've never felt the need to!

  69. NAMESECURE.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Domains for $7.95 / year, will full control over your DNS zone file.

  70. regtek.com or joker.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Registration Technologies http://www.regtek.com/ are excellent. Inexpensive, excellent online service, excellent customer service. As someone else mentioned, Joker is also pretty good, though I've moved most of my domains away from them as they came up for renewal.

  71. You could go with what Google and Yahoo use. by jZnat · · Score: 1

    MarkMonitor. They also seem to include services to register your domain (i.e. trademark, company name) across basically all the TLDs and ccTLDs as well as protection from phishing (so that would probably including registering all the typo.com et al. domains as well). Be warned, however, that it appears they also set the clientTransferProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited, and clientUpdateProhibited flags (according to GNU whois using VeriSign's whois database), so of course that would help from domain squatters and other spammers and phishers from acquiring your domain name if you forgot to renew (which I'd assume they allow for automatic renewal), but it may or may not be a hassle to transfer your domain in the future. I'd assume they're nice about allowing you (or your company) and only you to transfer the domain name to another service, but I don't have experience with them, so I can't say for sure.

    With the service they provide and the target customer (businesses), you can probably be sure they're not going to touch your domain name without the police getting involved. What they're selling is also a guarantee that your domain name (and therefore, your company brand and image) is protected.

    So, based on that, I'd recommend looking into it and seeing if it's in your price range.

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  72. Re:Nearlyfreespeech.net domain registration featur by CliffSpradlin · · Score: 1

    "Apparently you cannot discover the features offered unless you are already a customer"

    If by already a customer, you mean signed up for a free (+ $0.02 bonus added) account, then yes. Everything is a la carte in their system, so while you're required to have at least a single site or domain setup for the account to stay active for more than say 60 days, you certainly are under no obligations to buy anything, or even to provide credit card information.

    That being said, their non-member site gives a pretty comprehensive overview of their services, especially in the FAQ.

  73. Moniker.com by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

    After hearing about the GoDaddy/MySpace fiasco, I looked around for a new registrar. Moniker seemed to have really good marks for customer service and the price is just a little more expensive than GoDaddy at about $10/year for each domain. Everything online says they change $18/year, but not according to their website, they must have recently lowered their rates.

  74. DomainSite.com by ErnieD · · Score: 1

    I've been using DomainSite.com for a few years now and have been very happy. Transfers have all gone very smoothly, they have a good un-cluttered management interface, and best of all...NO ADS! I even moved all of the domains for the company I work for to them last year.

    I used to use GoDaddy as well but got tired of their cluttered interface and constant ads for their add-on services. I'm glad I left them before all this suspension BS started.

  75. nearlyfreespeech.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    duh

  76. One small issue by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only issue I would have with them is a requirement that the Whois information be accurate and that they'll suspend you if it's not. I wouldn't care to put my real name, address & email up there for everyone to harvest, personally.

    1. Re:One small issue by Kalriath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a requirement of ICANN, not theirs. WHOIS information must be Valid, and YOURS (or someone who represents you, privacy services do meet this requirement). So if you don't put your name, address and email, or at least a valid representative of yourself, you can EXPECT your domain to be flushed down the drain.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  77. RegisterFly by dtrmp4 · · Score: 1

    I used RegisterFly. I transfered my domain from another registrar to them and it was really easy. They also have a lot of good deals. When you transfer, they give you the time left on your domain before you have to renew it plus another year. They had a special a few days ago for $4.95 transfers if you enter the code 'CLIENTREWARDS'. Not sure if it still works though.

    1. Re:RegisterFly by sunset · · Score: 1

      My experience with RegisterFly has been very poor. Parts of their web site do not work with Mozilla/Firefox, and I've had things like renewals and transfers fail randomly and mysteriously with useless error messages and no reponse from tech support. I wouldn't use them for any new domains even if it was free.

  78. YI.ORG rocks. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I like YI.ORG because they don't do any of that spamming crap, they have a direct itnerface that lets you do anything you want (even if you have to know what you want to do - ie it's for geeks), and the guy that runs it is good about fixing any problems you have if you IM him. I use YI for most of my long-term domains whereas I use 1&1 for short-term domains that I'm going to throw away in a year. 1&1 is cheap but don't allow much flexibility and have bad customer service.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  79. I prefer a small, yet very good company by Mopar93 · · Score: 0
    I like using VCSWEB.com. Why? Because it's a small company run by a husband and wife (Rod and Gaelyne Gasson) and in the rare case where I need a little help or assistance, they are personally available through email.

    Even though their prices are a little higher than some of the big discount places, their $15 (Australian) charge for a domain name registration which works out to somewhere around $11.50 for me in the US is still very, very reasonable.

    Plus, they have a free DNS service which is very handy. And if you get to know them and they get to know and trust you, they can fix you up with an SSL certificate which is also a free service.

    As an added bonus, they like Linux and they also like Commodore computers.

    -Maurice

    --
    FixingTheWeb.com Helping to keep the bad guys out...
  80. Gem3 by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    They use the exact same web interface as GoDaddy, once you get into managing your site, and charge about the same. I don't know about the terms...

    To be honest, the only reason I went with them was the fact that you can do a manual PayPal transaction. That is, I can just send them $9 and a note saying what I want them to do with it, rather than with GoDaddy, where I'm required to sign a contract giving them unrestricted access to my PayPal account until I cancel.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  81. DomainDiscover by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Since my only websites are personal, I appreciate that Nearlyfreespeech.net will shut down public access to my website if it is slashdotted or otherwise DoSed, rather than charging me extra for bandwidth, like most other hosting providers, and will immediately restore access once I have put more money in the "bank".
    I also like that there is no monthly fee, so I pay only for what I use.
    (I put in $40 about a year ago or so, and still have over $30 left.)

    However, I think that it is a bad idea to have one's web site host and one's domain registrar be the same entity, so I have my domains registered at domaindiscover.com ($9.95/yr for .org).
    DomainDiscover also allows subdomains (which I haven't used yet, but plan to in the near future), and allows more-or-less direct access to the DB, so one can add, say, AAAA records (for IPv6) and so forth.
    It also offers free email forwarding.
    Finally, nothing on the site (of which I know) requires JavaScript (which I have disabled for security reasons), another big plus.
    I have no complaints so far.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    1. Re:DomainDiscover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NFSN will keep on chugging as long as you got money in the account. In the FAQ, it states that a slasdotting costs around $10 and happens once a week on their network. The slashdot effect isn't as debilitating as it once was--a few members on their forum posted their costs for recent slashdottings which did not amount to anything over 10 cents.

      I've heard the "keep your registrar and host separate" advice too. My site was hosted with them, and a different company maintained the domain. however, I switched to NFSN for all my domain and DNS needs after being impressed with their service. They clearly state who owns what in their FAQ.

  82. Why even pick goDaddy? by rblancarte · · Score: 1

    IMHO, they have really shown nothing as a reputable registrar, EVER. Their commercials were pure shock value and nothing more. IMHO, I think that picking someone like Network Solutions etc is a better way to go.

    GoDaddy hit fast and hard, but IMHO, were always a 2 bit company. I would have never used them to register a domain.

    RonB

    --
    It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  83. MyDomain.com by KWTm · · Score: 1

    US$9/yr, autorenewing if you want. That includes email redirection and web site forwarding. I've used them a happy 2.5 years for made-up-on-the-spot disposable email addresses, as well as structuring my web site. What first attracted me to them was their Q&A/Tech Support forums which anyone can browse. Admittedly, they could have been deleting all the posts about unsatisfactory service etc. and I wouldn't have known, but it looked like they're pretty open about solving problems and letting anyone and everyone read about their problems, which aren't too many.

    Haven't checked the forums at all since I signed up --never needed to.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  84. Not Dotster by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

    I've used Yahoo domains and have been happy with them. I also have used Dotster and have been continuously spammed by them ever since.

    I've avoided GoDaddy just because I choose not to support advertisers I feel are trashy.

    --
    Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  85. DirectNIC are alleged squatters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had an experience with DirectNIC squatting on one of my domains. I will not support DirectNIC in any way shape or form. Here's a few links with information on their activities.

    Check the wikipedia article on Sigmund Solares, the CEO.
    www.kenyatechwatch.com Forum for discussion of kenyatech, the front company for their squatting activities.
    www.rederon.net got taken as well, he has articles up and is fighting them.
    www.rootfest.net/squatters.html explains how they're able to do it.

    There are others as well, a quick google search will bring up more information.

  86. Anger problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anger problem?

  87. GANDI.NET by obi · · Score: 1

    I had good experiences with Gandi. Last I checked, they had the best Terms of Service, and while they weren't exactly the cheapest, they weren't expensive either.

    They're quite straight forward, no ad-bombardement or spamming; they just do what they say they would do. The few times I had a problem (not because of them), they were always quite helpful. I reserve the right to change my mind, but up till now, I've been nothing but happy (based on my experience with them for many years)

  88. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for pointing that out! I was just about to register a couple of domains with dynadot. Then I read what you posted.

    So that little tidbit just cost them a couple of domains. Plus the referrals that I give.

  89. Gandi by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    I have used Gandi on and off since 2002 really only one complaint, the price has gone up. Depending on currency fluctuation it can cost $18 USD, if you are still on the US dollar. I tried Joker last year, but was not pleased with either their interface or their customer service. It took a few weeks to get the domain to kick in even after coughing up the money. It was rather smooth, though not fast, to transfer some domains away from Joker. That took about a week.

    One of the other posts mentioned an idea about registering five or six years at a discount place and then transfefring to Gandi. It's worth investigating, but does involve some delay and some risk. The delay is from minimum time before transfer that many registrars

    It'd be interesting to hear a few months down the road what you decided on and how it turned out.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  90. Sitelutions.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like sitelutions.com
    I happened upon them by accident but they are reasonably priced, have excellent customer service. They also have scripts for windows and linux (which would work fine in OSX) to autoupdate domain name ip addresses (DNS A records). They have some hosting services which I've not taken advantage of but which seem fine. They also donate a significant percentage of their profits to a charity of your choosing. I give them 5/5 penguins!

    Dave

  91. DynDNS has "real people" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    What do they do with the money ($15 per year)?

    Others have mentioned some of the good things they do but for me the primary driver is that they use it to hire polite, competent, knowledgeable local folks to work at their company. When you send in a request you get a fast response from a helpful person who isn't trying to just close your ticket.

    This has been more of a help to some of my clients than to me, so I can say they're very good to those folks our there who aren't BSD admins themselves.

    They also put resources into supporting the local business community.

    In summary, they run a good "old-fashioned" business, that is "offer a good service at a fair price and take care of your customers" . If the extra $9/yr over the most craptacular service you can find isn't worth it to you, fine, enjoy GoDaddy.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  92. Good registrar and host by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had a lot of luck with cominsys. It's pretty fast, they answer my questions, and I never have any problems with my domains or hosting. It's not perfect, but for what I can afford it's pretty good... http://www.cominsys.com/. I've got two domains through them, and am thinking about adding a new one for a blog.

  93. nearlyfreespeech.net by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen it here yet, but I use NearlyFreeSpeech.net. They now offer their own domain registration service. From their ideals listed on the page. I can't imagine them caving to any bogus threats. Their prices and support are also great!

    satisfied customer

  94. Re: Restoring using a flux capacitor by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    every time they fuck something up and have to restore it on my end, they restore a backup from March of this year.
    This is February.
    Are you saying that they restore from one month into the future?
    That's some neat trick!
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  95. Domain registrar, or other services? by timftbf · · Score: 1

    The question of the OP isn't clear, or at least a lot of the responses are mixing up a great many things.

    - Domain registration, that is to say putting NS records into the appropriate gTLD / ccTLD / ccSLD (.co.uk etc)zone and registrant / contact info into whois
    - DNS hosting
    - Web hosting / redirection
    - Mail hosting / redirection

    Now, a lot of companies will sell you any combination of the above, but without knowing what the OP wants, it's difficult to make a recommendation. Personally, I'm very happy with Joker - but only for the first item. I've never had cause to pay someone to do the other three, I have my own servers for that, so I can't comment on whether Joker's offerings are better or worse than anyone else's.

  96. GoDaddy has become rich. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Most of those services are done by a computer. Most of the services done by a person are done once, but the domain registration fee is paid every year.

    Notice that GoDaddy has become so rich that it can buy a Superbowl commercial. It seems that most of that money comes from tricking first-time buyers into buying things they don't need, but why should a mostly online clerical company become fabulously wealthy?

    Maybe the domain registration business should be re-organized. Was it ever intended to help the registrars build vast fortunes?

    1. Re:GoDaddy has become rich. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of those services are done by a computer. Most of the services done by a person are done once, but the domain registration fee is paid every year.

      True.

      Notice that GoDaddy has become so rich that it can buy a Superbowl commercial.

      And, man, was that the worst commercial of the night, or what? Apparently successful recipe: "talk about domain names, pretend they cost $2, show boobs, profit". They did this a couple years ago, and it seems to be what brought them out of obscurity. It would appear "show boobs" is the elusive Phase 2.

      It seems that most of that money comes from tricking first-time buyers into buying things they don't need, but why should a mostly online clerical company become fabulously wealthy?

      See above. There's an old saying, "any successful business plan will involve taking money from dumb people."

      Maybe the domain registration business should be re-organized. Was it ever intended to help the registrars build vast fortunes?

      If they can do it for less money, the market should correct for that. IIRC, the .TLD registry is taking on the order of $6-8 for the registration, so if they're selling it for $2, they're taking a loss to get customers in for the other high-profit services they offer.

      With a company like DynDNS then, if they keep $9 a year, figure it costs them $1 to handle the transaction maybe, so they have $8 a year to play with. If I call them once and an American answers the phone, they've lost the $8 a year for that domain. So, it's a gamble on their part that their service is good enough you never need to call. What I like about them is I never wind up talking to a guy in Mumbai in an effort to keep $2 of that $8.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  97. namecheap.com by lewp · · Score: 1

    I've used namecheap.com for the last couple domains I registered. They seem to be good enough I used to use GoDaddy, but some of the things in their ToS annoyed me. Anyway, namecheap.com has been perfectly suitable, has a sane control panel, costs just south of $9/year, and they don't charge you extra to keep your WHOIS data masked if that's what you want.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  98. I've already switched by Larry_Dillon · · Score: 1

    I switched after GoDaddy started taking bribes from Microsoft.

    GoDaddy's site is so full of advertising for "add-on" services that it's hard to manage your domain for all of the junk.

    It's so dumbed down that it's actually difficult to use. For instance: One cannot designate a DNS server before it's up. If I want to point by domain's DNS to a server that's not up yet, that's my business. I could see giving a warning or whatever, but it's my decision.

    If you've read some of the writing of Bob Parsons, the founder, you get the impression that he's something of a lunatic.

    Sorry for ranting. The bottom line is that any company that is too focused on making money will alienate it's customer-base.

    --
    Competition Good, Monopoly Bad.
  99. Where to register your new spamming domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the large amount of spam I receive from domains that are registered through godaddy.com, I suspect you are looking for a new registrar to register your domains to sell v!@gr/\ and other such wonderful things through.
    Well, I have found the perfect spammer-friendly registrar - pacnames.com. They have even launched a new anonymizer service to obfuscate your information - sheildedwhois.com - so that the people you spam will never succeed in contacting you. They've registered dozens of different domains for selling pirated software and illegal drugs, so you know they must be good!
    Oh and did I mention, they even have a physical address that doesn't correspond to a business location, and a name that is not recognized as a business in the city (and country!) where they claim to operate? Clearly, you can trust all your spamming needs to a company who themselves is able to internationally obfuscate their own registration data!

  100. Domainmonger by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    Haven't had a problem with Domainmonger, been with them for a while (actually before they were DomainMonger, I think). I hear people dismiss it as being too pricey (just under half of NS), but it's been reliable and stable, which is better than I can say for cripplingly slow gandi, which always seems to be the reg behind any domain I have trouble looking up. It helps that they were offering single-year pricing well before most.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  101. gkg.net by zsadecki · · Score: 1

    When I was looking around a few years back for a cheap registrar I found both godaddy and gkg.net were about the same price... I'm glad I went with gkg.net.

  102. moniker.com ??? by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

    Any comments on http://moniker.com/ ?

  103. eNom resellers by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

    Being an eNom reseller isn't necessarily a bad thing; I've had very good experiences using Namecheap.com, who resells for eNom at $8.88 for most TLDs.

    Haven't experienced nor seen any reports of heavy-handed censoring by them, but I can't say it hasn't happened.

    Cheers...

  104. NameCheap.com by x-caiver · · Score: 1

    I've got a whole handful of names registered at NameCheap.com. I've recommended them to several people.
    I've never had any trouble with them, and they have all the features I need to manage a combination of domains with DNS run by them, a domain with DNS run by someone else, and domain urls that are just forwarders to other urls.

  105. 1and1 - my story by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    1and1, just never use them. Let me tell you a little story

    Five years ago now myself and two school mates registered a domain with 1and1 hosting, we went with 1and1 because they offered a bandwidth cap, were the cheapest and we found a domain that was very cool. After about a year we lost interest in the website but kept the account because it was usefull to have webspace, apart form the occasional reminder to pay to continue the service (came yearly) there was no other notification of change in status. I've actually been through the previous emails to confirm this and the original signed terms and conditions included the bandwidth cap in them.

    Several years went by and I started with a group of online friends a website, we used my existing account because 1and1 offered a free service. A few months go by and the podcast becomes popular but I notice that their billing me extra each month. So I phone them (and have the woman on record (I love PPC's)) telling me that the bandwidth cap must be broken and I wouldn't be charged. Then assuming things were ok I carried on and recieved a bill for £650. After dozens of phone calls I put measures in place to stop any more downloading and they agreed they had screwed up, this time a man (on a saved MP3) said they were wrong and he would look into it.

    So I guess you would be surprised when a £700 bill landed on my door mat with threats of calling in people to take my stuff three weeks later. At the time I was in contact with a solicitor for other reasons and related this story to here complete with the agreed terms and conditions, the difference in service without notification and all the recorded phone calls. Her response was legally I was completly correct however the cost of fighting the bill would be pretty much the cost of the bill plus alot of time off university I couldn't afford. After some time with her I sent a letter to the head of the accounting department starting the process of a legal challenge(the idea was to get them to drop the bill) he agreed that after a certain date that things had gone wrong at their end and knocked the bill down to £400. I'm a poor student the people I ran the podcast with had coffed up £350 and my legal advice was that challenging the bill would cost more than £400. I was already going without sleep to keep up with university so I swallowed my principles.

    In short they changed my service without notification (against their Terms and Conditions) they deactivated features after I'd activated them without notice (in this case a bandwidth warning notifier, due to 'site maintanence' the guy on the phone told me) they lied to me on the phone over technical matters, they lied about the service plan so many times I've lost count, they used the fact that the legal costs would be greater than the bill to force their customer to pay, even though they repeatedly agreed they were wrong.

    I hate 1and1, I want them to die. I'd actually put them as worse than the RIAA in their tactics, their fine if all you want to use your site is to transfer the occasional large file, so you don't use email.

  106. A very quick competency test... by mi · · Score: 1

    When registering an account — with anyone, but especially registrars and web-hosters, since they are supposed to know — try giving an e-mail address with a plus-tag (like mine here <mi+slashdot@aldan.algebra.com>).

    If a site rejects such an address is "invalid", stay away — their techs are incompetent...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  107. Bizarre limitations from Enom.com by mi · · Score: 1

    I am a bulkregister.com customer (bulkregister was recently acquired by enom). This past December a few of my domains were expiring and I wanted to renew them while on business trip in Ukraine. Bizarrely, Enom refused to accept my credit card, because I was connecting from Kyiv... They never responded to my e-mail on the subject either, of course (bulkregister used to respond to e-mails back 6 or so years ago, when I had some DNS issues).

    I note, that you quote $8.10 per year — bulkregister still wants $12 even though they are part of enom now. I'll look into that.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.