Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Netscape 9 to Undo Netscape 8 Mistakes?

Posted by Zonk on from the goin-back-in-time dept.

An anonymous reader writes "MozillaZine reports that Netscape 9 has been announced. The most interesting thing is how they seem to be re-evaluating many of the decisions they made with Netscape 8. Netscape 9 will be developed in-house (Netscape 8 was outsourced) and it will be available for Windows, OSX, and Linux (Netscape 8 was Windows only). Although Netscape 9 will be a standalone browser, the company is also considering resuming support for Netscape 7.2, the last suite version with an email client and Web page editor. It remains to be seen whether Netscape will reverse the disastrous decision to include the Internet Explorer rendering engine as an alternative to Gecko but given that there's no IE for OS X or Linux, here's hoping. After a series of substandard releases, could Netscape be on the verge of making of a version of their browser that enhances the awesomeness of Firefox, rather than distracts from it?"

8 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Is Netscape still taken serious? by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative
    First couple days of the month for one of my sites...

    Windows 202 72.4 %
            Linux 37 13.2 %
            Unknown 35 12.5 %
            Macintosh 4 1.4 %
            GNU 1 0.3 %

    Browsers (Top 10) - Full list/Versions - Unknown
              Browsers Grabber Hits Percent
            Firefox No 127 45.5 %
            MS Internet Explorer No 91 32.6 %
            Unknown ? 34 12.1 %
            Konqueror No 10 3.5 %
            Opera No 8 2.8 %
            Mozilla No 6 2.1 %
            Safari No 2 0.7 %
            Wget Looks like it's likely to be firefox on windows for the most common...
    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  2. Re:Is Netscape still taken serious? by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Informative

    He didn't say Firefox was the most used browser, he said it was "more used" than Netscape.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  3. Re:3 was the last worthwhile version. by limecat4eva · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.pimpmysafari.com

    --
    comma
  4. Re:3 was the last worthwhile version. by Maian · · Score: 3, Informative
    You got 2 things wrong:
    1. Netscape 4 didn't use Gecko. At all. It was built on top of Netscape 3. The first Netscape to use Gecko was Netscape 6 (they skipped version 5 as a marketing ploy).
    2. Gecko supports CSS. Netscape 3 doesn't. Want to try viewing /. in Netscape 3? Be my guest. Now the old /. - that's a different story :)
  5. Re:3 was the last worthwhile version. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I want a sodding web browser.

    Well, if it's a sodding web browser you want, I can highly recommend IE7. It definitely ups the sod factor significantly.

    I wonder if someone could come up with a Navigator 3 theme for Firefox that would configure the interface to the (vastly superior) Navigator 3 interface. That'd be nice. I'd keep CSS though, if I were you (although I'd make sure minimum font size and override web author colours was turned on).

    As far as speed goes, I think most people would be SHOCKED at how much faster the Web experience is if you have a caching name server running on your machine. Seriously - the biggest speedup you'll probably ever see.

  6. Re:There's a Netscape 9? And 8? 7? 6? by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 2, Informative


    Um, there's still a big market for Fortran compilers... and F2003 has lots of "modern" features, so it's not really living in the past.

  7. Re:Is Netscape still taken serious? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personally, I'm happy with Firefox 1.5.something. Tried 2.0, it screwed my bookmarks, various other things.
    You must be doing something screwy with your bookmarks. I've got hundreds of bookmarks organized into folders and had zero problems going from 1.5 to 2.0. It disabled a couple of oddball extensions I had but fired right up.
  8. Re:What is the point? by christopherfinke · · Score: 3, Informative

    What will NS9 that Firefox, maybe with one or two extensions installed, cannot do?
    For starters, improvements to the core of the browser. If we only wanted Netscape to be Firefox with a few extensions, we would have already released it as Firefox with a few extensions. I'm not at liberty to discuss here what else there will be, but I do blog a progress update/feature teaser every Tuesday at the Netscape blog.

    One thing I can guarantee: Netscape 9 will not force you to supply a zipcode when you install it. That's one Netscape 8 mistake it will definitely undo.

    Christopher Finke
    Dev lead for Netscape 9