Slashdot Mirror


Google Apps to Become Paid Service

FredDC writes "Business Week reports Google Apps is becoming a paid service soon for companies who wish to use it for their domain. Disney and Pixar are reportedly thinking about switching to Google Apps instead of using Microsoft Office. Could this be the end of a monopoly? Or the start of a new one?"

24 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. Pixar's considering Google Apps? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WTF? Why is Pixar considering Google Apps? Isn't Apple's .mac service up to scratch?

    Anyway, I've been using Apps for my personal domain for quite a while. It's pretty great for a freebie - just point your mx records at google, create an admin account and google takes care of everything else. Setup catch all accounts, gmail accounts for different users, calender, gtalk, etc are all there.

    But I won't continue to use it if it costs anything. Like I said, its great for a freebie.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Pixar's considering Google Apps? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      .mac isn't an application suite - it's basically a shared disk (the 'iDisk'), a webmail interface (although 'Mail' is much better), and a place to put your website. Oh, you can sync your address book through it as well... It has peripheral advantages, if you use other mac apps ... the "casting" abilities of the iApps, for example, where I can publish/subscribe to various document-formats (eg: iPhoto does 'photocasts'); it's only really being used as a network-shared disk in this instance though.

      It's actually one of the few things I think must have slipped under Steve's radar - I don't think .Mac is worth the money.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Pixar's considering Google Apps? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe because Microsoft Office won't be a Universal binary until later this year?

      I don't expect people to read the article, but at least read the comment you're replying to.

      Google Apps for your domain is not an online office suite, but a gmail, gtalk, gcalender, etc for your domain.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    3. Re:Pixar's considering Google Apps? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it's the killer widget instead of the killer office suite? Maybe Apple should be scared then. :P

      It's an exchange killer, not an office killer.

      Apple and Google don't compete. Apple has no need to be afraid of Google.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Pixar's considering Google Apps? by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Informative

      That statement was pulled out of their asses. The Google Apps page has always said it would be free for beta, and then after beta, new signups will be charged. I know, because the company I work for has made the switch. We were looking for new email hosting at the time anyhow, and that came up as a recommendation. After weighing the alternatives, and treating GMail as if it was costing the same as the others (so as not to give it unfair advantage in our minds, as it has to be GOOD for our company) we still chose GMail.

      There has been a few snags. No IMAP, POP3 implementation sucks, SMTP and POP3 both require use of secure ports, no folders (tags instead, useless to a pop3 client), and some (minor, temporary) hassles now and then with adding email lists, names to email lists, new accounts, and setting forwards.

      If I had my vote again, I might choose to have the company pay for a managed email solution... But were on it, and weve worked out most of the kinks. And I love GMails interface. Ive given up on Thunderbird and just use the web interface now.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:Pixar's considering Google Apps? by uhlume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever hear of Writely? Google Spreadsheets? Presently? Why on earth would you assume that the current (beta) incarnation of Google Apps for Your Domain is anything more than an initial offering?

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    6. Re:Pixar's considering Google Apps? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably because it would seem weird for all *Pixar* employees to have "@mac.com" email addresses. .Mac is really an excellent service for the home user. For the enterprise, not so much (nor is it intended to be).

      Pixar and Disney going with Google Apps would have significant implications (all good, I think) for .Mac.

  2. Gamma by Skadet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, does this mean a Google product is out of beta? Stop the presses!!!

    1. Re:Gamma by aaronl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know it isn't the point, but take a look at the keyboard in these pictures:

      http://www.activewin.com/screenshots/officexpkeybo ard/images/officekeyboard.JPG
      http://home.uchicago.edu/~iyjung/bigpictures/48.jp g

      That is the way MS is pushing for layouts. Do you notice that the Insert key isn't there? It's now a control key off of some other random key. Which key that is will change between just about every keyboard model.

      Sure, we can keep the Caps Lock key in the wrong place, hell, even on dedicated key at all, but we get rid of the Insert key. Go figure.

  3. Start of a new one by Colourspace · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sorry but it's been a long while since I have felt comfortable with Google's 'do no evil' mantra. They are a billion dollar company with shareholders to report to. I wouldn't be suprised if in 5-10 years we see the same sort of slashback here we see now for MS applied to Google. I particularly don't like the way the toolbar trawls my PC for information to report back to the Googel servers. It was at that point I stopped seeing them as saviours and more like the circling vultures they may well turn out to be.

  4. Google server in a box? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I cant imagine a real company allowing its data to be housed outside its control. But if google sells a server in a box that houses all the apps needed to meet most of the documents needed, it could make sense. IT takes care of maintaining this big server. And all the other people use stripped down pc with no USB dongle, no print screen, no copy-paste that runs a simple browser to create the documents and with a full audit trail for all printed copies, it makes sense. Really. Companies are paranoid about security. Currently any document in the intranet server can be saved to usb thumb drive, cut/paste into emails, or forwarded via emails ... If Google or any company can promise a full information lock-down to the management, they will get a sympathetic ear.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Google server in a box? by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I cant imagine a real company allowing its data to be housed outside its control.

      Guess what: a lot of real companies can't imagine trusting their most important data to only their in-house IT guys. Otherwise there wouldn't be successful companies that handle the outsourcing of hosted apps, backups, e-commerce, and so on. And there are. There are also plenty of companies that thought they had it all under control internally, and totally blew it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Leads to open formats by vijayiyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The use of Google Apps will not create a monopoly. Rather, it will precede a shift to real open formats (i.e., not Microsoft's XML implementations) which are application agnostic. Interfaces, rather than applications, are what must be open to truly benefit consumers.

  6. Uh oh by Excelcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google is doing what Microsoft has dreamed about forever - turn computer platforms into monthly revenue generators. This has been the source of erotic dreams for Microsoft executives forever. I don't care how cool a web application is, there is just something fundamentally wrong with having my productivity depend on someone else's servers.

    In some measure, this is already the case - how many people at work haven't searched online for solutions to problems encountered at work. This being one form of online dependence. This is a far cry from depending on an outside server. Think about the exposure to DoS attacks that this makes your company? Corporate war is just around the corner. Get a botnet to bring down your competitor's internet and their entire workforce productivity drops to zero.

    Additionally, just wait until some security hole opens up and a lawyer's documents are hacked into because they are being edited online.

    This is just a bad, bad idea on its face.

  7. Re:Let's see... by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Contrary to the title, it's not MS-Office that google is going after, it is Exchange.

    Every Exchange admin I have ever spoken with claims that it is a nightmare to set up and maintain. There is a trend now to outsource that functionality. Google is targeting that market.

  8. Tinfoil hat time by TinBromide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Simply because a tiger hasn't eaten your face yet doesn't mean it won't in the future. We should be as suspicious of google as we are of any other big software company. Just because they have a catchy bumper sticker slogan doesn't inoculate them to the temptations of corporate culture.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:Tinfoil hat time by ezratrumpet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Should we be suspicious of every large business that started out small? At what point does a small, presumably non-corporate business become "big" and full of the "temptations of corporate culture"?

      Google's shareholders have virtually no voice in the operation of the company, remember? How can a company be answerable to people that never had a real voice in the company in the first place?

      Cautious? Sure. Suspicious? I'm not sure.

    2. Re:Tinfoil hat time by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Should we be suspicious of every large business that started out small?

      Yes. (Then again, I tend to be very cynical about companies in general.)

      At what point does a small, presumably non-corporate business become "big" and full of the "temptations of corporate culture"?

      Hard to say, but if you can influence back door sessions of state legislatures I think that's a good indication you've crossed the boundary.

  9. And when I'm not connected? by ReallyEvilCanine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's pretend $MegaCorp dumps MS Office and implements Google apps. What the fuck am I supposed to use to write my documents, spreadsheets and now presentations if I'm in a car, plane, train, backwards country -- wherever I can't jack into the Net? Notepad?

  10. Exchange a big obstacle to Linux Adoption by Phrogman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have read many times that its the lack of MS Exchange on *nix desktops that is the major stumbling block for a lot of businesses that have considered switching. If so, its fine by me if Google can offer an alternative to Exchange functionality for business users. Its much more likely that any google solution will be *nix compatible than anything MS will offer in the future.

    Now, if there was only some way Google could wrest control over the games industry from Microsoft and let game developers develop for alternative platforms a bit easier. My gaming habits are the only thing keeping me from leaving XP completely. I am not likely to stop gaming, I can't/won't play consoles, and the future looks pretty MS monopolistic to me unless something changes. I think there are a lot of people like me out there too.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  11. What, no spelling Nazis? by hereschenes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where are the pedants decrying the spelling of the word "innstead"? Shame on you all!

    Hang on a second... I think I just poured mockery on myself.
    --
    More like... nerdular nerdence!
  12. Since when is Google Apps an office suite? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 4, Informative

    A replacement for Outlook and Exchange, maybe. But "Google Apps for Your Domain", the service in question, isn't an office suite.

    It is:

    1. Domain registration
    2. Website hosting
    3. Email hosting (with POP and webmail)
    4. Calendar hosting (with CalDav and web-based calendaring)
    5. Chat (Jabber-based, can tie-in with Google Talk)


    It is *NOT* a replacement for Word, Excel, or PowerPoint. That is 'Google Docs & Spreadsheet' (minus the presentation software, which is rumored to be coming soon.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  13. google apps at universities by gsn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They aren't trying to replace Office (though if they include the Google Docs and Spreadsheet and PPT thing I'd be happy) - they are trying to replace corporate mail systems. Harvard
    http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=516036 has been looking into it and I'd be thrilled if they do use a GMail like interface because the current FAS webmail system is a piece of tripe. (I logged into it once and then went back to SSH and pine - some departments don't even have a webmail interface because the damn thing is so bad).

    The added storage space and some savings you'd get from moving to Google Apps is nice but a lot of students (well in Physics,astronomy anyway) still need to be able to SSH in and start a remote X session, which I don't see happening soon, so they are still going to have to spend money on their own servers. As the article points out Google isn't without competition - Windows has Live @edu (run away) and there is .mac (which needs to allow something.edu before its going anywhere and it'd be nice to have a Windows/*nix port of Backup). Personally I think the best solution for Harvard at least is to shut up and spend money and buy additional space, and redesign the webmail client (just keep pine around).

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  14. Google Apps is not going to replace Office by corecaptain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google Apps are not going to replace Office any time soon.

      1) A web based interface does not stack up to a native gui app.
      2) Google Apps are not full featured.
      3) Security. Shopping list on google servers - sure, why not.
            My personal financial information - not a chance.
            Corporate Data - You are kidding me, right?
      4) Availability - no internet connection. no Google Apps.