Slashdot Mirror


New Universes Will be Born from Ours

David Shiga writes "What gruesome fate awaits our universe? Some physicists have argued that it is doomed to be ripped apart by runaway dark energy, while others think it is bouncing through an endless series of big bangs and big crunches. Now, scientists have combined these two ideas to create another option, in which our universe ultimately shatters into billions of pieces. Each shard would then subsequently grow into a whole new universe. The model could solve the mystery of why our early universe was surprisingly well ordered."

5 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Well-ordered? by g_adams27 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > The model could solve the mystery of why our early universe was surprisingly well ordered.

    Not really - you've just pushed the problem back one level. Where did the well-ordered universe shards that made this universe come from? It can't be "turtles all the way down"

  2. Re:Please... by Sneftel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds fine, as long as it's coupled with a plausible explanation for god.

    --
    The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
  3. Re:Please... by Ambitwistor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One single, three-letter word is all we need to answer this question, no models necessary: "GOD."

    I don't understand why we need to make up so many other ideas. Yeah, why have science at all?

    "Why is there lightning?" "God did it."
    "How did mountains form?" "God did it."
    "Why do massive bodies attract each other?" "God did it."
    "How do cells reproduce?" "God did it."
    "Why is there disease?" "God did it."

    Who needs those complicated science models. Three words, no models necessary: "God"
  4. Re:Please... by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why, as a scientist at heart, would you think there there is a "meaning of life" to be "proven?" _v/d++

  5. Re:Please... by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, do we really expect science to explain everything? Is there a scientific method that provides proof for the meaning of life?

    Who says there's a meaning to life? We want there to be one. Doesn't mean there is one. The fundamental purpose in life can be summed up thusly: "Successfully reproduce before something eats you". Do that and you've done what you are here for. Now, we as human beings can add more to that. We can, because of our intelligence, give our lives a "greater" purpose. What that purpose is is up to each of us as individuals. If you want your life to be spent helping those less fortunate than yourself do it. If you want your life to be spent eating as many donuts as you can go for it. It's your life to fritter away im whatever way suits you best.

    To me, the chances of everything being as they are now by cosmic chance seems just as plausible as a God in heaven. So in the meantime I am currently undecided, a fact for which my Christian friends tell me I am undoubtedly going to hell for.

    The chances are better for random chance than for God. We have proof the universe exists. We can see it, smell it, measure it, predict its behavior, etc... We can do none of these things for God. Add to this the fact that all previous religions and gods in history are mere myths and the chances of God being real drops even lower. Why is the current myth any more real than the previous ones? Other than you were raised to believe in this one?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.