Slashdot Mirror


Web Censorship Proposed For Norway

Aqwis writes "A Norwegian Web filtering system (link in Norwegian), comparable to the Great Firewall of China, has been proposed to the Norwegian legislature. It would, if enacted, block all Web sites and servers that contain hate material (racial hate, pro-Nazi sites, hate towards the government, etc.), most kinds of pornography (not only child pornography), foreign gambling sites, and sites that share copyrighted or other material that it is not legal to share (such as most BitTorrent sites and services such as LimeWire). Reactions have been mixed; however they are mostly negative."

6 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Womb to Tomb, baby! by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Troll

    Remember, all property is theft.

    You will mark this as a troll, but what are you admitting in doing so?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  2. The Guard of Freedom by WED+Fan · · Score: 1, Troll

    Ah, Norway, that progressive place of freedom. Nope. Don't buy it. Who's in charge there? Liberals? Let's not say anything that would offend anyone. We have to be tolerant of the offended.

    Crap, another country I thought was on the right track, until now.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  3. Stuff like this... by MikeRT · · Score: 0, Troll

    Shows the different meanings of "enlightenment" as defined in politics. In America, you get trouble for boobies. In Europe, you get thrown in prison for merely saying things that sound racist or bigoted. Puritans versus anti-free speech fascists. All I can say, after seeing this sort of effort to block minority points of view is that America really is freer than these countries.

    We can sneak porn without getting in any real trouble in general. Europeans have to hide anonymously to express views that are not liked by the bulk of the population. That's what it comes down to.

  4. Minority by chrislas · · Score: 0, Troll

    As a fellow Norwegian, can I just be allowed to mention that this whole idea does in no way represent the majority opinion of Norwegians :)

    It is just a bunch of naive politicians who would like child-pornography to "go away", just like that.

    Personally, I think the death-penalty is the only cure against such material.

    We could actually make a nice combo out of this, to get rid of the sickos and politicians at the same time! Introduce the death-penalty for spreading the filth, and for every 2 sickos terminated like this, we terminate 1 politician as well. (And for every 2 politicians, we COULD add a lawyer too, and Voila, hey presto, a working society again!)

    --
    - Here's to everyone with no signature!
  5. Re:Things That Offend and You Aren't Allowed to Sa by bogjobber · · Score: 1, Troll
    How's that PATRIOT act working out for y'all?

    It's working just fine, thank you. The PATRIOT Act has nothing to do with free speech. Absolutely nothing whatsoever. The objections to certain articles of the PATRIOT Act have to do with invasion of privacy and a perceived lack of judicial oversight for certain provisions.

    When you say that Norway is at the top of the list, the United States is not far back. And this is a completely unscientific, opinion-based, qualitative ranking that you are citing. The survey is wildly erratic and, with the US at least, . The US fell over 20 places in Reporters Without Borders for, according to them, the decisions made in the Judith Miller case. That had absolutely nothing to do with her being censored or deprived of the right to speak or publish her opinion in any way, shape, or form. She was arrested for contempt of court. If she has facts that are related to a specific trial, she has a legal obligation to give up those facts. Whether you are a journalist or a private citizen, you simply can't ignore a grand jury summons. By refusing to testify when she had valuable information, she undermined the integrity of the court case. You do not, and should not, have the right to withhold information from a jury.

    For an example, El Salvador was ranked ahead of the United States last year. Can you honestly tell me that you would feel safer criticizing the government in El Salvador? That El Salvador has more societal and governmental assurance of a free press?

    I know US-bashing is in fashion and the OP was wrong, but please shut the fuck up. We've had asshole presidents, moronic legislatures, and stupid, pointless wars before and we'll have them again. That doesn't change the fact that we have a long and proud history of freedom of the press.

  6. Re:Things That Offend and You Aren't Allowed to Sa by bogjobber · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well that's certainly not the response I expected :) Sorry for the strong language, I just get a bit angry by people acting like the US is turning into some backward country where we don't even respect basic human rights. Stuff like the PATRIOT Act, Guantanamo and the like are horrible and should be gotten rid of, but speaking in relative terms they really aren't that bad. We're still an extraordinarily free society, even if we're constantly having to fight idiot laws and policies to keep that freedom.