70% of Sites Hackable? $1,000 Says "No Way"
netbuzz writes "Security vendor Acunetix is flogging a survey that claims 7 out 10 Web sites it checked have vulnerabilities posing a medium- to high-level risk of a breach of personal data. Network World's go-to security guy, Joel Snyder, says that percentage is 'sensationalist nonsense' — and he's willing to back that judgment with $1,000 of his own money. In fact Snyder will pay up if Acunetix can get personal data out of 3 of 10 sites chosen at random from their survey list."
Reminds me of: "Three statisticians went out hunting, and came across a large deer. The first statistician fired, but missed, by a meter to the left. The second statistician fired, but also missed, by a meter to the right. The third statistician didn't fire, but shouted in triumph, "On the average we got it!"
"I've got a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel"
Acunetix have just HACKED into Snyder's bank account and helped themselves to the $1000.
Ok then..."70% of Girls cannot reach orgasm!". I can prove it to you free of charge!
Kudos to Joel for putting it to them!
Why this particular comment? What's so special about it? This is incredibly self-centered of you, to assume that your comment will be a major target for the trolls.
There's lots of good comments out there that would make better targets. This comment, for instance, is much more interesting. Not only is it longer, it's also a lot wittier and better thought out altogether. Oh, and did I mention that it's also self-referencing? Beat that!
I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
Professional Hitman Mr Smith is flogging a survey that claims 7 out 10 people he has checked have a lack of police protection posing a medium- to high-level risk of getting them murdered. The police's go-to security guy, Mr Doe, says that percentage is 'sensationalist nonsense' -- and he's willing to back that judgment with $1,000 of his own money. In fact Mr Doe will pay up if Mr Smith can whack 3 of 10 people chosen at random from his survey list."
GOD. There should be some code in chmod that activates when the user does that. The code should punch the user in the face.
I'm pretty sure that I'd end up in lots of trouble if I said "$10,000 says you can't rob that guys house" and the person accepted the challenge then was caught.
Probably right. Best to stick with the "triple dog dare ya"
Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
You mean there is another way?
Yes, it's known as 'Amish-style' computing. Here, a computer may be used as a boat anchor or paperweight.
I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.