Slashdot Mirror


FCC Report - TV Violence Should be Regulated

tanman writes "CNN reports that a draft FCC report circulating on Capitol Hill 'suggests Congress could craft a law that would let the agency regulate violent programming much like it regulates sexual content and profanity — by barring it from being aired during hours when children may be watching' The article goes on to quote from studies showing a link between violent imagery and violence in life, and discusses the 'huge grey areas' that could result from ill-defined concepts of excessive violence." Government as Nanny, or cracking down on an excessive entertainment culture? Which side of this do you find yourself on?

9 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Choices choices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which side of this do you find yourself on?

    I think I'd prefer the gratuitous sexuality. That's way more fun than violence.
    1. Re:Choices choices... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with that. I'd rather have some hardcore deep dicking than some pair of conjoined twins joined at the head on TLC. (The learning channel my fucking ass)

  2. Remember, kids... by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gratuitous, horrific violence is OK, just as long as you don't say any naughty words!

    1. Re:Remember, kids... by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gratuitous, horrific violence is OK, just as long as you don't say any naughty words!

      Senator, is that you?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  3. Re:So watching porn stops rape? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, since I started playing Natural Selection I sometimes find myself fighting the urge to drop from the ceiling and parasite, chomp, chomp someone.

  4. Re:Limit or Ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've always found it strange that the U.S. has such conflicted a conflicted attitude towards sex, with numerous "morals" laws and restrictions, yet a massive hard- and soft-porn industry. Porn industry and hookers need you to supress sex. Otherwise why watch porn when you could get the real thing for free?
  5. This just in... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    Government agency announces it should have exanded role, increased powers. Experts reportly shocked at this development.

    Chris Mattern

  6. So you're going to regulate Jack Bauer? by kentrel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good luck!

  7. I support an alternate solution: Tag the children! by Behrooz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rather than requiring content filtering at the broadcaster or on the cable box, I support filtering on a per-child level. Parents should be able to purchase individually-tailored shock collars for their children which automatically activate whenever the child is exposed to non-parental-approved content or situations. By harnessing the power of the shock-averse 'natural intelligence' already guiding children, parents can sleep soundly knowing that their children are making every possible effort to avoid corrupting and immoral influences.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin