Slashdot Mirror


Raymond Knocks Fedora, Switches to Ubuntu

narramissic writes "After 13 years as a loyal Red Hat user, Eric Raymond, co-founder of the Open Source Initiative, is switching to the Ubuntu distribution. In a message distributed to Linux mailing lists and news organizations, Raymond cited technical issues with Red Hat, such as the way repositories are maintained, the submission process and 'stagnant' development of Red Hat's packaging technology, as well as governance problems, the failure to gain desktop market share and the failure to include proprietary media formats. 'Over the last five years, I've watched Red Hat/Fedora throw away what was at one time a near-unassailable lead in technical prowess, market share and community prestige,' Raymond wrote. 'The blunders have been legion on both technical and political levels.'"

7 of 608 comments (clear)

  1. Fedora Responds by spacemky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fedora-devel-list has already responded to this, as well as Alan Cox himself.

    Personally, I'd like to see ESR's response to these rebuffs.

    --
    640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
    1. Re:Fedora Responds by otis+wildflower · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, at least he has the rocks to put up a cogent flame about it.

      Nonconfrontational folks like me just get fed up with the puritanical bullshit about MP3 playback and NVidia drivers, buy a Macbook, and have done with it.

      I'd have said go Gentoo, which I did for awhile (abandoned about 1yr ago), but I find OS X just a whole lot less stressful than dealing with Yet Another Buggy App or Yet Another Goddamn Artsd Collision or Yet Another Flash Thing That Doesn't Work Well With Linux or Yet Another Codec That Isn't Available On Linux Without Getting The Stinkeye From RMS or Yet Another Ban From WoW For Cedega Use or or or or...

      And I may roll with CentOS at work, but I have no illusions of any 'normals' being happy with it. Even with my pymp'd Baghira themes!

      Crap, gotta kill artsd again...

  2. Good for him by finkployd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did the same thing around the time the colossal mess that was Fedora Core 3 was out. Most of the Linux users I know (which amounts to around 40 or so people I work with and know socially) have switched from Redhat to Ubuntu (or OSX) for desktops and laptops. And a lot of us have switched to Solaris 10/Express for servers. Naturally the Debian users I know still use Debian :)

    Looking back, I should have left Redhat around 7.3, which was the last good and consistently stable RH release.

    Finkployd

  3. Re:He should.. by esconsult1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmmm... that's just a load of bull.

    3 Months ago I installed Ubuntu.. in a virgin installation I could do nothing. After searching for and installing Automatix, I could do stuff.

    2 days ago I replaced that Ununtu desktop with Fedora 6... in a virgin installation I could do nothing. After searching for and finding the excellent HowoToForge doc on spiffing up Fedora,:
    http://www.howtoforge.com/the_perfect_desktop_fedo ra_core6

    I could do everything I wanted with just slightly more effort. (My reasons for switching has nothing to do with not liking Ubuntu. Its just that my hard drive crashed and I wanted to try Fedora 6 upon re-installing a new desktop).

    Out of the box, both Distros offer the same capabilities, and lack of proprietary drivers, codecs, etc. The user has to do it for themselves by going to third part websites for these.

  4. Re:Why make a stink? by mrcparker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He chose to make it public to show what he's fighting for. He wants Linux to get real, not to be totally out of touch with reality. We need proprietary software, and very often, they need Linux. It's not about fighting with them - it's about cooperating. Haha. Sure he did.

    He also just happened to join the Freespire board. Freespire is Linspire, a company which just signed a deal with Ubuntu. hrmm

    His argument was a bit valid, but it is not Red Hat's fault - it is the people who own all of the little Fedora repositories that have not really worked well together. Fedora is about software freedom, and Eric cares about getting Linux everywhere no matter what. I am not really sure where ESR stands on the whole freedom argument, or if he only cares about challenging Microsoft.
  5. Beat the stuffing out of that straw man! by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The win is, add one or two lines to your yum.conf, or if you prefer to your apt-sources list, and the problem disappears entirely under Redhat or Fedora, easily, cleanly, and without sending you into dependency hell. This RPM bashing is a real straw man. The end user package management systems used on Redhat and Fedora are yum and apt, *not* rpm. Sure you can dive into low level package management and use RPM directly - and you can even screw up your system. You can go one better and use tar or rm directly - and screw up your system even faster (if you don't know what you're doing).

    If yum can't install a package for an end-user, the *package* is broken, not the packaging system. BTW, someone mentioned false auto-dependencies on Perl script examples in the %doc directory. I haven't run into this, but there is "Autoreq: 0" and "Requires: ...". A pain for the package builder, but not for the end-user.

    The only "dependency hell" I've ever had with yum is when building source RPMs - and of course that doesn't use yum. I would like yum to (optionally) auto-install build dependencies (but sometimes you have to build the build dependencies from source). In my dreams, building from source would be as smooth as gentoo. I've heard a rumor that this is coming.

    After building a package from source, I'll try a direct rpm. But if that is missing stuff, I just copy my new package to my own repository and let yum do all the dependency chasing!

  6. Re:Disappointed by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Did it bug you that they have ESR do his angry intro to Revolution OS right before your interview is shown? (IIRC, that's how it went...)

    Nah, I'm pretty thick-skinned by now. It didn't even bug me when Richard Stallman and I were presenting at the U.N. World Summit on the Information Society, and I said something about how the Open Source folks were standing on Richard's shoulders, and Richard covered his shoulders! It's in this video. That one was damn funny, classic Richard.

    What bothers me is that this eminently trivial story about Eric quitting Fedora gets on Slashdot, and when I need you folks to help with something really important, for example, by voting for the only Secretary of State candidate in California who supports Open Voting, that gets killed. Slashdot used to be an important site in the Open Source world. They took the readers and made it a "geek culture" site. And that's a shame. The "firehose" hasn't helped, it seems. An editor's job is to uplift the content, marking schemes seem to cater to the lowest common denominator.

    * 2007-02-05 15:54:23 Open Hardware License - Call for Public Review (Features,Hardware Hacking) (rejected)
    * 2006-11-03 00:53:13 Novell-Microsoft: It's About Software Patenting (Linux,Patents) (rejected)
    * 2006-06-30 01:06:08 Software Patent Lawsuits Against Open Source (Politics,Patents) (accepted)
    * 2006-04-14 21:31:56 California to consider Open Source Voting Bill (Index,Software) (rejected)